Simplification Study for the EU

Commission

Jean-Marc Cambien

Senior Manager

ITU Conference, 5 and 6 June 2003, Geneva

PwC

© 2003 PricewaterhouseCoopers. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers

International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. All rights reserved.

pwc

© 2003 PricewaterhouseCoopers. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers

International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. All rights reserved.

Aim

PricewaterhouseCoopers

EU Simplification study

Aim of the study

• To make concrete recommendations on the means of simplifying and modernising VAT obligations in the field of:

– VAT registration

– Submission of VAT returns (including summary VAT returns)

– Payment and refund of VAT

– Submission of recapitulative statements

4

© 2003 PricewaterhouseCoopers. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers

International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. All rights reserved.

5

1.

Phase 1: data gathering

Current VAT obligations in the four fields concerned in the 15

Member States (questionnaire of 226 questions !)

2.

Phase 2: data analysis

Interviews with the 15 VAT authorities and 33 international and national professional organisations (e.g. EeTG, Unice, CBI, …)

3.

Phase 3: recommendations

To recommend ways to:

– simplify these obligations (e.g. by harmonisation) and

– modernise these obligations in view of new technologies

The 10 accession countries were not part of the study!

Key findings

PricewaterhouseCoopers

EU Simplification study

Key findings

 15 different VAT rules

 15 different administrative practices

 Big diversity in links with other taxes

 Language barriers

 Variety in required forms and evidence

(e.g. proof of activity, copies of the trade register)

 Too general anti-fraud measures imposing a burden to each company

 Non-harmonized and non-user friendly e-compliance systems

Complex Burdensome Expensive

Need for simplification

7

© 2003 PricewaterhouseCoopers. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers

International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. All rights reserved.

8

EU Simplification study

VAT registrations

Is it possible to register for VAT by electronic means?

Yes

Yes/No

No

Depends on the required information.

Project phase

Must be allowed by the Member States as from 1 July 2003

EU Simplification study

VAT returns

Where is it possible to file VAT returns electronically?

9

Allowed

Allowed only for established companies

Not allowed

Sometimes obligatory

AT:

As of 17 February 2003

NL:

« EDITAX »: outdated and not widely used. The Dutch authorities are considering modernising and implementing internet-filing. The use of an accredited service provider is required.

IT:

Obligatory a.o. for all companies

© 2003 PricewaterhouseCoopers. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers

International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. All rights reserved.

EU Simplification study

VAT returns

Is it possible to file electronic VAT returns via the Internet?

Allowed

Allowed only for established companies

Not allowed

10

© 2003 PricewaterhouseCoopers. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers

International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. All rights reserved.

EU Simplification study

VAT returns

Internet filing: use of digital signature with qualified certificate required?

No

Yes

Non applicable

FI:

Use of accredited 3 rd service provider required.

11

© 2003 PricewaterhouseCoopers. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers

International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. All rights reserved.

EU Simplification study

Recapitulative statements

Is it possible to file recapitulative statements electronically?

Allowed

Allowed only on data carrier

Not allowed

12

Must be allowed by the Member States as from 1 July 2003

© 2003 PricewaterhouseCoopers. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers

International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. All rights reserved.

EU Simplification study

Businesses on E-compliance

13

• Most businesses are of the opinion that e-compliance must be possible

• A majority thinks that e-compliance should remain optional

• A minority of the businesses thinks that e-compliance necessarily implies a security risk

• The use of a digital signature based on a qualified certificate is experienced as too burdensome

• Authorities should accept widely used commercial standards in order to allow automatic input from the in-house accounting system

• Some businesses are afraid that now the VAT returns can be filed electronically, the authorities would make filling out of the VAT return as such more complicated (i.e. more info, more data,…)

• Most businesses are of the opinion that the authorities benefit most in terms of cost from e-compliance

14

EU Simplification study

Authorities on E-compliance

Advantages according to the authorities

• More efficiency in collecting, processing the information received from taxpayers or in transmitting information

• First validation of data to be transmitted to the tax authorities

• Better access for the taxpayers

Disadvantages according to the authorities

• The use of a digital signature based on a qualified certificate hampers the success of e-compliance

• Technical problems

Recommendations

PricewaterhouseCoopers

EU Simplification study

E-compliance

Opportunities

Internet provides the opportunity to provide easy accessible, understandable and structured information to the public;

• E-compliance allows easier exchange of information between tax authorities;

• Communication between the tax authorities and the economic operators could be speed up by using electronic means.

Recommendations o Reasonable mix of security and flexibility. Technology neutral. Harmonised use of PIN-codes and no e-signatures.

o Optional in a first stage.

Warning

 Difficult link with in-house systems due to technology choice of the authorities

16

© 2003 PricewaterhouseCoopers. PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the network of member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers

International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity. All rights reserved.

pwc