2024-04-26T06:40:30+03:00[Europe/Moscow] en true <p>Neurorights</p>, <p>Farahany - The Battle For Your Brain (2023)</p>, <p>Bublitz &amp; Merkel - Crimes Against Minds: MEntal Manipulations, Harms, Rights to Mental Self-Determination</p>, <p>Lever - Neuro v Privacy (2012) Democratoc perspective</p>, <p>Farah et al. (2014) functional MRI-based Lie detection; scientific and sociaetal challenges</p>, <p>Jabari (2013) Brain MAchine Interface and Human Enhancement</p>, <p>President's Council (2003)</p>, <p>Kolbert (2011) Give Memory altering drugs a chance</p>, <p>Clark &amp; Chakmers (1998) the extended mind</p>, <p>Aas (2019) prosthetic embodiment</p>, <p>Greene &amp; Cohen (2004) neuroethics changes nothing and everything</p>, <p>Hardcastle (2017) my brain made me do it?</p>, <p>What is cognitive liberty?</p>, <p>Lie Detection in Neuroethics</p>, <p>Reasons for Punishment</p>, <p>TMS</p>, <p>dbs</p>, <p>what are some examples of self determination violations from bublitz and merkel</p>, <p>bublitx merkel: why do we need and not have neurorights</p>, <p>Negative and Posiitve Neurorights</p>, <p>Normal interaction vs Violation (bublitz merkel)</p>, <p>What is an invasion of mental privacy?</p>, <p>Faranahay Tech Worries</p>, <p>FArahany "Last Fortress" </p>, <p>how is farahany's approach apolitical?</p>, <p>Lever on the link between privacy and societies</p>, <p>Lie detection</p>, <p>Functional MRI (fMRI)- lie detection</p>, <p>Hurdles for fMRI lie detecion</p>, <p>Lever's main claim</p>, <p>No Lie MRI</p>, <p>terms for implants/ tech connecting to nervous system (via electrodes to machine.) communication between brain and machine</p>, <p>Extracting info from brain</p>, <p>how do you send sisgnals into a brain</p>, <p>applications for BCI</p>, <p>Jebari on autonomy</p>, <p>Low/MEdium tech memory modification</p>, <p>LTP </p>, <p>low/medium memory modification</p>, <p>propanolol</p>, <p>Prez council bioethcis worries about memory mod. (beyond therapy: pursuit of happiness)</p>, <p>Discuss in pairs which of the PCB’s worries seem the most reasonable or serious.</p>, <p>Life Should have pain? memory modification worries</p>, <p>What sorts of emotional pain seem like important parts of a full life, and which don’t? (What makes the difference?)</p>, <p>Kolber thinks the worries raised by the PCB are:</p><p></p><p>not concerned enough</p><p>important/reasonable</p><p>overblown</p>, <p>Value of Self Knowledge</p>, <p>ZIP</p>, <p>Hypothetical ZIP uses</p>, <p>arm-matic 3000</p>, <p>Individual &amp; Social Knowledge</p>, <p>where is the mind</p>, <p>functionalism</p>, <p>parity principles</p>, <p>inga and otto</p>, <p>clark and chalmers four key functional featuures of otto's notebook</p>, <p>Your mind and body both seems like constituents of you ➔ </p>, <p>coupled system</p>, <p>what defines the body?</p>, <p>Aas body vs Levy treatment/enhancement</p>, <p>body moral def</p>, <p>Justifications for Punishment</p>, <p>types of justice</p>, <p>consequentalists</p>, <p>retributivism</p>, <p>mens rea vs actus reus</p>, <p>mr puppet, boys from brazil</p>, <p>hard determinism, soft determinism, libertarianism</p>, <p>what if we do not have free will?</p>, <p>roels neuroscientific data could play </p>, <p>bub and merkel 3 key factors differentiating violation from social interaction</p>, <p>authors and main points</p>, <p>EEG</p>, <p>emg</p>, <p>fMRI</p>, <p>ECoG</p>, <p>a(DBS)</p>, <p>Single Neuron Recording</p>, <p>neuralink array</p>, <p>negative neurorights</p>, <p>what distinguishes a violation of your mind from normal social interraction according to bublitz and merkel?</p>, <p>five factors from bublitz and merkel specifying negative neurorights</p>, <p>bublitz and merkel define negative mental consequences:</p>, <p>what is an invasion of privacy?</p>, <p>for your private information: what protects it?</p><p>do you rely on expectation people who know it will not shre it?</p><p>do you conceal it so snoopers must use intrusove methods?</p><p>do you hope?</p>, <p>how do tech companies violate privacy</p>, <p>why are we uneasy at the idea of tech companies using our data in ways we consent to?</p>, <p>Is internet data harvesting:</p><p>unethical by companies</p><p>social problem but no companies fault</p><p>fair price for free internet?</p>, <p>faranahay worries about two main sorts of tech:</p>, <p>why is brain data uniwye? is it uniquely sensitive? just because it is new?</p>, <p>does farahany want to restrict research into neurotech for fear of pribacy info?</p>, <p>what sort of privacy supports a democratic society?</p>, <p>what sort of privacy are humans entitled to</p>, <p>if we're so worried about brain data. what do we do?</p>, <p>in waht ways does faranahay consider privacy apolitical</p>, <p>lever feels that definitions of privacy reflect</p>, <p>example of different privacy forms in voting</p>, <p>how can overexpansive privacy make oppression? how can limited privacy create oppression?</p>, <p>mackinnon on feminism</p>, <p>child controls as indicator of value judgement in privacy</p>, <p>what sort of privacy we prioritize is a _</p> flashcards
Neuroethics: Altering Other People's Brains

Neuroethics: Altering Other People's Brains

  • Neurorights

    h

  • Farahany - The Battle For Your Brain (2023)

    Main Point: our brains need special protections.

    Points:

    restricting the flow of information is impossible and harmful

    cognitive liberty

    mental privacy: rights over info abour your mind

    freexom of thousht:

    pos: right to change mental state

    neg: right not to have something happen or be protected (unwarranted search/seizure)

    self determination

    pos: rights to change your mental state as you wish

    neg: right to not be denied determination?

    neurotech could oppress or protect us we must choose

    Concerns/Rebuttals:

    "we should restrict" impossible

    Summary:

  • Bublitz & Merkel - Crimes Against Minds: MEntal Manipulations, Harms, Rights to Mental Self-Determination

    current legal does not acknowledge mental crimes. the law should introduce inner sphere protections.

    Not covered bodily rights

    Not just harm to brain

    Involves brain but in diff way concussion/disease

    Not a new idea

    Implicit in ideas about human dignity; always assumed/intuitive

    direct: on brain physically dbs

    indirect: mediated.

    Concerns/Rebuttals:

    we alter eachothers minds all the time/free speech: how ban intervention?

    consent

    some interventions informed consent and can eval legally

    neg mental

    impair cog, alter prefs, injure, undermine self deter

    what makes change negative?how do we know emotion inappropriate?

  • Lever - Neuro v Privacy (2012) Democratoc perspective

    Main Point: new neuro tech will create new ways to harm privacy. must first address the mundane ethics as things become more advanced

    Points:

    we already have exposes on celebrities in biographic depictions. forefit privacy in deatht

    torture violate a victim's privacy

    privacy vs liberty

    invasions of privacy=intrusion, disclosure

    Concerns/Rebuttals:

    Summary:

  • Farah et al. (2014) functional MRI-based Lie detection; scientific and sociaetal challenges

    Main Point:

    Points:

    detection of deception. not always high tech. can fmri discriminate lies from truth in individual subjects with sufficient accuracy?

    lying is not homogenous behavior

    low accuracy

    criminals vs subjects and undergrads

    first: different policies considered for different fmri lie detection. not banning despite shortcoming. different restrictions different scenarios

    second: publically funded research.

    removal of experimental ocnfounds.

    more realistic experiment conditions

    third: scientists vital neuroscience law. raise questions about accuracy and provide answers

    Concerns/Rebuttals:

    Summary:

  • Jabari (2013) Brain MAchine Interface and Human Enhancement

    Main Point:

    Points:

    Concerns/Rebuttals:

    Summary:

  • President's Council (2003)

    Main Point:

    Points:

    Concerns/Rebuttals:

    Summary:

  • Kolbert (2011) Give Memory altering drugs a chance

    Main Point:

    Points:

    Concerns/Rebuttals:

    Summary:

  • Clark & Chakmers (1998) the extended mind

    Main Point:

    Points:

    Concerns/Rebuttals:

    Summary:

  • Aas (2019) prosthetic embodiment

    Main Point:

    Points:

    Concerns/Rebuttals:

    Summary:

  • Greene & Cohen (2004) neuroethics changes nothing and everything

    Main Point:

    Points:

    Concerns/Rebuttals:

    Summary:

  • Hardcastle (2017) my brain made me do it?

    Main Point:

    Points:

    Concerns/Rebuttals:

    Summary:

  • What is cognitive liberty?

    j

  • Lie Detection in Neuroethics

    h

  • Reasons for Punishment

    retribution

    deterrence

    containment

    rehabilitation

  • TMS

    transcranial magnetic stimulation

    (bbublitz and merkel propose stimulating areas of the brain during testimony to make deceit harder therefore easier to detect)

  • dbs

    deep brain stimulation. the scientists change and monitor a patients brain activity

    Deep brain stimulation (DBS) involves implanting electrodes within areas of the brain. The electrodes produce electrical impulses that affect brain activity to treat certain medical conditions. The electrical impulses also can affect cells and chemicals within the brain that cause medical conditions.

    Parkinson's disease.

    Epilepsy.

    Tourette syndrome.

    Obsessive-compulsive disorder.

  • what are some examples of self determination violations from bublitz and merkel

    Investigating corruption through TMS to make lying harder

    DBS for journal paper. patient altered to create mood swings

    ghrelin (chemicals to cause hunger) to sell more restaurant food appetite

    oxytocin to win at poker (manipulate intuation of situationa nd raise trust)

    memory blockers to conceal crime (SA victims forcced to forget)

    stimulants for financial trading (concstantly alert financial broker to always be ready to make quick bet

    SOME WE DO NOT NEED TECH FOR:

    interrogators leading witnesses to certain beliefs

    stores designed for subtl purhasing

    snack chemisty

    subliminal web dessign cause purchase

    brainwashsing: mk ultra, communism thought reform

    ALL ARE: INTUITIVELY WRONG in the SAME WAY

  • bublitx merkel: why do we need and not have neurorights

    different from bodily harm (mwntal harm not same concussion)

    implicit. we take for granted. we assumed

  • Negative and Posiitve Neurorights

    Negative: defense from unwanted intrustions

    posiitv: freedome to determine one's niner realm

  • Normal interaction vs Violation (bublitz merkel)

    consented?

    negative mental effects?

    ● reduce or impair cognitive capacities (e.g. memory, concentration, will

    ● alter preferences, beliefs dispositions (e.g. implanting false memories, creating addictions),

    ● elicit inappropriate emotions (e.g. artificially induced appetite)

    ● orclinically identifiable mental injuries.”

    directly or indirectly?

    (I) stimuli that operate directly on the brain… bypassing mental control capacities of the addressee, causing serious negative mental consequences shall be punishable …unless consent

    (II)through stimuli purposefully designed to bypass mental control capacities causing severe negative mental consequences punishable unless such stimuli are exercises of permissible conduct such as free speech….[unless consented to]

  • What is an invasion of mental privacy?

    Tort for privacy violation: intrusion into soething pricate defined by METHOD reasonably expect privacy, disclosure public defined by CONTENT would offend reasonable person (truth is not defense but public interest is)

    what if we consent? is internet data harvesting unethical?

  • Faranahay Tech Worries

    Consumer EEG (devices (meditation aides, sleep trackers, migraine predictors, etc.) (electroencephalogram) (records the electrical activity of brain via electroedes fix to scalp. record conditions)

    Neural Interfaces to connect to tech

  • FArahany "Last Fortress"

    brain the ONE PLACE of solace.

    why is brain data uuniwue?

    important? not really

    control? not always

    WHAT TO DO?

    doesn't want to restrict flow of information; impossible and limits progress. doesn't want to stop use and records

    put into place clear rules and regulations

    WHAT REGULATIONS?

    transparent corporations

    limited processing

    user-based controls

    (power on and off without worrying what actiity)

    local process

    continuous overwrite

    standards against discrim use

  • how is farahany's approach apolitical?

    Focuses on individuals (not social structures or relationships)

    Treats individuals as all having the same interests (not opposed interests)

    Assumes that the value of privacy is shared (opposition is just from greed etc.

  • Lever on the link between privacy and societies

    concentrate valye of privacy compatible and implicit in democratic government. current pricacy does not always mirror democratic values

    eg:

    secret ballot

    open voting

    reinforce the entitlement to vote: “while democratic legislators may be more vulnerable to intimidation than citizens [...] it is the former, not the latter, who must vote openly, not secretly"

    (reinforcing different ppls rights!)

    privacy can create domination (shielded domestic violence because "private")

    parents controlling what children see online? is critixizing them an invasion of their privacy? is discussing parenting protecting the child's privact?

    value judgement!

  • Lie detection

    OLD:

    dry mouth (rice in mouth. after questions if dry then called liar)

    polygraph "lie detectors"

    sodium pentothal (truth serum)

    now untrustworthy. false confessions. anxiety, impairm compel

  • Functional MRI (fMRI)- lie detection

    Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is a class of imaging methods developed in order to demonstrate regional, time-varying changes in brain metabolism. mri using magnets creates magnetic fieldPLAN:use fmri to scan when lying and telling trusthidentifying areas different active when lying (FIRST HURDLE)CLEARED we  know brain areas active in deceptionwrite program to detect those areasuse fmri to detect activity during interrogation

    Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) is a class of imaging methods developed in order to demonstrate regional, time-varying changes in brain metabolism. mri using magnets creates magnetic field

    PLAN:

    use fmri to scan when lying and telling trusth

    identifying areas different active when lying (FIRST HURDLE)

    CLEARED we know brain areas active in deception

    write program to detect those areas

    use fmri to detect activity during interrogation

  • Hurdles for fMRI lie detecion

    confounds (picking up lying or something else?)

    base rates (if lying rate, then even accurate etest may give false results) (false positives. 67% in studies)

    individual variation (everyone different)

    task variation (what different sorts lies have different neural signatures)

    countermeasures (tech widely used, way to trick?)

  • Lever's main claim

    how we codify privacy reflects what kind of society we want to make

    “Truth” is a good goal when everyone’s interests line up; when people’s interests are in conflict, truth helps some people and hurts others.

    E.g. In war, both sides want their information about the enemy to be true, and want their enemy’s information about them to be false.

    COOPERATIVE vs ANTAGONISTIC when interests align

  • No Lie MRI

    introduce lie detection to courts.

    rules out epxplicit coercion. but doesnt guaruntee implicit coercian.

  • terms for implants/ tech connecting to nervous system (via electrodes to machine.) communication between brain and machine

    Brain Machine Interface (BMI)

    Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)

    neural interface

  • Extracting info from brain

    methodsElectrocorticography (ECoG), a type of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG), is a type of electrophysiological monitoring that uses electrodes placed

    methods

    Electrocorticography (ECoG), a type of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG), is a type of electrophysiological monitoring that uses electrodes placed

  • how do you send sisgnals into a brain

    sending in

    sending in

  • applications for BCI

    sensory prostheses (link camera to cortical stim. sub sense), motor prostheses (robo limb), Brain to Brain (silent talk, eeg user to user communication on battlefield)

  • Jebari on autonomy

    as DBS becomes more widespread, as this paper has concluded is to be expected, costs and risks will plunge and in a longer perspective, productivity-enhancing DBS seems like a real prospect.

    An Autonomy Comparison

    A cashier could be made happier and more friendly, a police officer could have his aggressions blocked, a doctor could be made more caring and empathetic, and a soldier could be transformed into a callous and detached person.”

    (addicted police officer?) (arm-matic 3000)

  • Low/MEdium tech memory modification

    TYPES OF MEMMORY:

    Short-term memory

    Long-term memory

    Implicit memory

    ■ Procedural memory

    ■ Associative memory

    ○ Explicit memory

    ■ Semantic memory

    ■ Episodic memor

    LTP long term potentiation

    Rehearsal (to solidify the memory) ● Mnemonics (to make something easier to remember) ● Revisiting with a different mood (to moderate emotional tone) ● Suggestive prompting (to implant false memories) ● ‘Externalizing’ memories in the form of notes, writing diaries, photographs, stories, etc. We also have familiar drugs that can interrupt long-term potentiation by disrupting brain activity generally (e.g. ‘getting blackout drunk’). This stops any memory being formed at all, and has severe side-effects.

  • LTP

    long term potentiation, processing long term memory.

    move from short to long term.

    neuron connections strengthened (one fire will usually acivate others)

    relies on hippocampus and strengthened by amygdala aka emotional arousal area

  • low/medium memory modification

    rehearsal (solidify)

    mnemonics

    revisitng

    suggestive prompting

    exterbalizineg (writing diaries, notes, photos, stories)

    alcohol/intoxication

    propanolol

  • propanolol

    heart nedication

    interfere with emotion effects and LTP

    doesnt affect recall but affects emotion response

    emotive intensity can improve recall

    USE:

    PTSD

    dampen flashbacks

    cptsd (complex ptsd without single focal event long term)

  • Prez council bioethcis worries about memory mod. (beyond therapy: pursuit of happiness)

    (no proposals, just worries)

    clinical use: make prospective judgement that event is sufficiently terrible to warrant in-the-moment blunting?

    non-clinical: (could also apply to research)

    prepare soldier to kill,

    dull sting of shame,

    criminal numb victims memory

    societal: obligation to remember

    obligation on those who experience directly

    victims/witnesses numb themselves and protect perpetrators? testimony?

    (value of emotional pain? psychic pain unnecessary.....become inhuman....remove difficult)

  • Discuss in pairs which of the PCB’s worries seem the most reasonable or serious.

    Judging when to administer propranolol clinically

    ● Making soldiers callous and unfeeling ●

    Blocking guilt from wrongdoing ●

    Numbing victims and witness’s memories of wrongdoing ●

    Victims and witnesses numbing their own memories

  • Life Should have pain? memory modification worries

    human life should incorporate pain:

    plausible: life without pain sounds weird

    paradoxical: when we feel pain we try to reduce it

    what sorts of pain?

    failure: life without failure impoverished?

    torture: good life without this?

    loss/lovehurt:unclear??? love entails pain but we may never feel pain in love

  • What sorts of emotional pain seem like important parts of a full life, and which don’t? (What makes the difference?)

    value of emotional pain. contemplate answer

  • Kolber thinks the worries raised by the PCB are:

    not concerned enough

    important/reasonable

    overblown

    overblown

    (but recent discoverries more radical ways. overblown concerns in 2001 could be reasonable in 31)

  • Value of Self Knowledge

    kolber: pcb overblown fears. unjustified aversion to pharmaceutical managing trauma

    Self-knowledge is valuable

    (maybe also: “personal growth”?)

    Direct methods work independently of self-knowledge.

    Indirect methods change our minds by means of giving us self-knowledge.

    ➔ Therefore We should prefer indirect methods when possible

    “some bioethicists argue that instead of seeking a solution in a pill bottle, we should do the difficult but rewarding emotional work"

    levy accepts first two and says third is true in SOME cases. some indirect methods work through self knowledge. but direct methods may still facilitate self knowledge. self knowledge is just one good among many not an obligation.

  • ZIP

    Zera-inhibitory Peptide

    blocks PKC-Zeta, protein involved in LTP

    (rat taught where to get cocaine, ZIP injected, rat lost behavior related to finding the cocaine, but no brain damage)

    (BUT: rat memory diff from human, not clear how selective or how to make it selective,)

  • Hypothetical ZIP uses

    ERASE

    1

    find neurons with certain memory.

    injext ZIP to block those neurons and erase that memory

    hopefully does not erase all memories associated with those neurons

    2

    actibating memory to re-encode with LTP

    ZIP blocks LTP

    activating memory and injecting ZIP = erasure

    CREATE

    3

    what does opposite of ZIP? (PKC-Zeta?)

    patient imagines event

    inject anti-Zip

    imagined event feels real

    would be COMPLEX

    Lacuna-eternal sunshine. removes emotional charge AND factual knowledge (would anyone choose to remove instead of just "numbing". is it ethically diff?)

  • arm-matic 3000

    define

  • Individual & Social Knowledge

    most of what we know we learn from others. removing info from your mind might make it less available to others

    Honesty andDemocracy

    do others have a right to know info

    are you making democratic society worse

    is removing a factual memory lying to yourself?

    is lying to self as bad, or worse than to others

    SELF DECEPTION:

    exceptions for honesty:

    deceive enemies in conflict

    trivial matters

    private matters when others have no right to know

  • where is the mind

    where is my mind? why do we think it is there?

    immediate experiene- eyes and ears in front brain (contingent

    soul is? cannot detect?

    biology? nothing special about brain-tissue

    philosophers think key is function. mind is in brain because of what it does

  • functionalism

    : Mentality is a matter of performing certain information-processing functions.

    The mind is software, the brain is hardware

    You can run the same software on any sufficiently complex hardware ● Hence microchips, if they can perform the same function, are just as good as neurons. ● Hence aliens or robots might have minds just like ours, but implemented in a different sort of materia

  • parity principles

    If an internal process and an external process perform the exact same function, they’re on a par for being part of the mind. But obviously

    There are some functional differences between a notebook and biological memory.

    (E.g. A notebook requires light: it stops functioning in darkness, where biological memory continues to function.) So we have to spell out which aspects of what something does matter.

    specifically thinking about STORAGE

  • inga and otto

    can otto's notebook be part o his mind

    “playing the same role.”

  • clark and chalmers four key functional featuures of otto's notebook

    constant presence. rarely take action if re;evant

    available without difficulty

    autpmatically endorses

    consciously endorse some point in the past

    (but notebook not always, still interface, doubt or distrust (what if someone else write) perfectly track)

    what biological brain functions which also fail to meet features

  • Your mind and body both seems like constituents of you ➔

    Whatever is part of your mind is also part of you)

  • coupled system

    ..

  • what defines the body?

    should crimes against a person include intimate inorganic items? artificial limb stolen is theft or battery?bodily wrongs like assault are simply wrongs that involve the body where what counts as the body is a question for scienceAas:body is all things and only things whichPSYCHOLOGICAL ACCOUNT:feel like part of my body when using skillfullyfeel part of my body alll the time (ownership?)are part of my extended mindBIOLOGICAL ACCOUNT:work like body part (organic/functional integration?)grew from same zygore v(ontogenetic?)(biology of being)evolved in tandem with other parts (evolutionary)accepted by my immune system (immunology?)critical to our functioning as equals

    should crimes against a person include intimate inorganic items? artificial limb stolen is theft or battery?

    bodily wrongs like assault are simply wrongs that involve the body where what counts as the body is a question for science

    Aas:

    body is all things and only things which

    PSYCHOLOGICAL ACCOUNT:

    feel like part of my body when using skillfully

    feel part of my body alll the time (ownership?)

    are part of my extended mind

    BIOLOGICAL ACCOUNT:

    work like body part (organic/functional integration?)

    grew from same zygore v(ontogenetic?)(biology of being)

    evolved in tandem with other parts (evolutionary)

    accepted by my immune system (immunology?)

    critical to our functioning as equals

  • Aas body vs Levy treatment/enhancement

    Aas body vs Levy treatment/enhancement

    levy/aas

  • body moral def

    “to the extent that a kind of inorganic item meets the following conditions, it is hard to imagine how any institutions that treat disabled people as equals could resist affording items of this kind bodily protection [...]

    (1) Functionally replace a ‘missing’ organic item (whether, in terms of relevant phenomenology or matching self-representation; or in terms of maintaining the integrated functioning of a system needed to support action and experience); and

    (2) Are themselves not significantly easier to replace than the organic item they replace

  • Justifications for Punishment

    If P kills someone. should they b punished? why

  • types of justice

    retribution: only fair for guilty people to suffer in proportion to their guilt (backward) (free will)

    deterrence: seeing an act punished will deter people from further in the future (free will)

    rehabilitation: make them better in future (because not in control)

    restitution: some punishments rectify harm doneto victims (regardless free will)

    containment: some punishments make an offender physically less able to offend again (because not in control)

  • consequentalists

    right thiung to do is whatever will bring about the best overall consequencces (utilitarianism is form of consequentialism)

  • retributivism

    punishment should be given "As deserved"

  • mens rea vs actus reus

    guilty mind vs guilty act

    (criminal punishment presupposes free will )

    acting intentionally or negligently not autoamtic

    understand what you are doing

    understand moral status

    being in control and able to do otherwise

  • mr puppet, boys from brazil

    Greene and Cohen argue as follows:

    Premise 1: The planned external causes of Mr. Puppet’s actions mean that he doesn’t have free will. (Responsibility for Mr. Puppet’s actions lies with the scientists, not him: he’s just “a pawn”.)

    Premise 2: If Mr. Puppet is unfree, then someone whose actions are equally determined by unplanned external influences also doesn’t have free will.

    Premise 3: Our actions are determined by unplanned external influences, just as much as Mr. Puppet’s are determined by planned ones.

    Conclusion: We don’t have free will. (“what is the difference between Mr Puppet and anyone else accused of a crime?”)

  • hard determinism, soft determinism, libertarianism

    hard determinism: everything we do product of prior, no free will

    soft determinism: even tho everything we do is a product of prior casual influences. free will

    libertarianism: free will because actions NOT product casual actions

  • what if we do not have free will?

    since the law presupposes free will can we never punish? greene and cohen say we can punish just it will not be based on deserts

  • roels neuroscientific data could play

    Absolve of guilt altogether (NGRI)

    not guilty reason of insanity

    not know nature, not know what doing wrong, could not appreciate criminality, could not conform, act product of degect (dont deserve then shorter cant control then longer double edge)x

    get someone lighter sentence (mitigation)

    shift how we think about justifications

    (diversion courts for ngri defenders?) neuroscience?)

  • bub and merkel 3 key factors differentiating violation from social interaction

    does the affected conset

    does it bring negative mental effects

    is it direct or indirect?

  • <p>authors and main points</p>
    <p>lever: privacy and democracy</p>
  • EEG

    electroencephalogramless invasice-no surgeryextract signals from braina test that measures electrical activity in the brain using small, metal discs (electrodes) attached to the scalp. Brain cells communicate via electrical impulses and are active all the time, even during asleep. This activity shows up as wavy lines on an EEG recording.

    electroencephalogram

    less invasice-no surgery

    extract signals from brain

    a test that measures electrical activity in the brain using small, metal discs (electrodes) attached to the scalp. Brain cells communicate via electrical impulses and are active all the time, even during asleep. This activity shows up as wavy lines on an EEG recording.

  • emg

    electromyogramless invasive- no surgeryextract signals from brainmeasures muscle response or electrical activity in response to a nerve's stimulation of the muscle. The test is used to help detect neuromuscular abnormalities. During the test, one or more small needles (also called electrodes) are inserted through the skin into the muscle.

    electromyogram

    less invasive- no surgery

    extract signals from brain

    measures muscle response or electrical activity in response to a nerve's stimulation of the muscle. The test is used to help detect neuromuscular abnormalities. During the test, one or more small needles (also called electrodes) are inserted through the skin into the muscle.

  • fMRI

    functional magnetic resonance imagingsignals from brainless invasive-no surgerymeasures the small changes in blood flow that occur with brain activity. It may be used to examine which parts of the brain are handling critical functions, evaluate the effects of stroke or other disease, or to guide brain treatment.

    functional magnetic resonance imaging

    signals from brain

    less invasive-no surgery

    measures the small changes in blood flow that occur with brain activity. It may be used to examine which parts of the brain are handling critical functions, evaluate the effects of stroke or other disease, or to guide brain treatment.

  • ECoG

    electrocorticogramsignals from brainmoderately invasive- skull surgeryAn electrocorticogram (ECOG) is the tracing of the brain waves made by an apparatus used for detecting and recording brain waves made with the electrodes in direct contact with the brain.

    electrocorticogram

    signals from brain

    moderately invasive- skull surgery

    An electrocorticogram (ECOG) is the tracing of the brain waves made by an apparatus used for detecting and recording brain waves made with the electrodes in direct contact with the brain.

  • a(DBS)

    adaptive Deep Brain Stimulationmore invasivesignals to the brain/from the brainThe procedure involves implanting electrodes in the brain to deliver electrical stimulation using an implanted battery source called an impulse generator. It uses feedback from the brain itself to fine-tune its signaling.

    adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation

    more invasive

    signals to the brain/from the brain

    The procedure involves implanting electrodes in the brain to deliver electrical stimulation using an implanted battery source called an impulse generator. It uses feedback from the brain itself to fine-tune its signaling.

  • Single Neuron Recording

    more invasive-brain surgeryextract signals from brain/send into brainIn neuroscience, single-unit recordings (also, single-neuron recordings) provide a method of measuring the electro-physiological responses of a single neuron using a microelectrode system. When a neuron generates an action potential, the signal propagates down the neuron as a current which flows in and out of the cell through excitable membrane regions in the soma and axon. A microelectrode is inserted into the brain, where it can record the rate of change in voltage with respect to time. These microelectrodes must be fine-tipped, impedance matching;[1] they are primarily glass micro-pipettes, metal microelectrodes made of platinum, tungsten, iridium or even iridium oxide.[2][3][4] Microelectrodes can be carefully placed close to the cell membrane, allowing the ability to record extracellularly.

    more invasive-brain surgery

    extract signals from brain/send into brain

    In neuroscience, single-unit recordings (also, single-neuron recordings) provide a method of measuring the electro-physiological responses of a single neuron using a microelectrode system. When a neuron generates an action potential, the signal propagates down the neuron as a current which flows in and out of the cell through excitable membrane regions in the soma and axon. A microelectrode is inserted into the brain, where it can record the rate of change in voltage with respect to time. These microelectrodes must be fine-tipped, impedance matching;[1] they are primarily glass micro-pipettes, metal microelectrodes made of platinum, tungsten, iridium or even iridium oxide.[2][3][4] Microelectrodes can be carefully placed close to the cell membrane, allowing the ability to record extracellularly.

  • neuralink array

    more invasice-brain surgeryextract signals from brain/send to brainNeuralink device contains a chip and electrode arrays of more than 1,000 superthin, flexible conductors that a surgical robot threads into the cerebral cortex. There the electrodes are designed to register thoughts related to moti

    more invasice-brain surgery

    extract signals from brain/send to brain

    Neuralink device contains a chip and electrode arrays of more than 1,000 superthin, flexible conductors that a surgical robot threads into the cerebral cortex. There the electrodes are designed to register thoughts related to moti

  • negative neurorights

    degensive wall against unwanted intrusions (faranahay calls them mental selfdetermination. zuk calls them mental integrity)

  • what distinguishes a violation of your mind from normal social interraction according to bublitz and merkel?

    consent -how much understanding? when tacit consent asumed? what are default expectations? what if interventioin makes future consent more likely??

    negative mental effects-where is

    boundary between changing or impairing? what makes change negative? how do we determine when emotuon is innappropriate? what if intervenor thinks its appropriate?

    direct or indirect/-why are direct impermissible (prima facie, against levy's idea that effects matter over form) direct violate demands of dignity.

  • five factors from bublitz and merkel specifying negative neurorights

    (in)direct?

    negative mental consequences?

    consent?

    designed to bypass control?

    oritected by other rights?

  • bublitz and merkel define negative mental consequences:

    reduce or impair cog capabilities

    alter preferences, beliegs, behavioral dispositions, erasing memories, creating addictions

    elicit inappropriate emotions

    elicit clinicially identifiable mental injury

  • what is an invasion of privacy?

    intrusion (form)

    disclosure (content)

    truth not defense but public interest is

    (based on jurisprudence's evaluation of reasonable)

  • for your private information: what protects it?

    do you rely on expectation people who know it will not shre it?

    do you conceal it so snoopers must use intrusove methods?

    do you hope?

    answer

  • how do tech companies violate privacy

    INTRUSIVE: hack phone, computer, email

    DISCLOSE: share location, purchase, personal data etc

    why can we not sue? because we conseneted (if we consented why do we still feel uneasy?)

  • why are we uneasy at the idea of tech companies using our data in ways we consent to?

    we dont understand agreements

    would we choose diff?

    we dont have control over details of data use?

    what would we choose if we did?

    internet use non optional

    whose fualt?

  • Is internet data harvesting:

    unethical by companies

    social problem but no companies fault

    fair price for free internet?

    answawer

  • faranahay worries about two main sorts of tech:

    consumer EEG

    neural interfaces

  • why is brain data uniwye? is it uniquely sensitive? just because it is new?

    control

    important

  • does farahany want to restrict research into neurotech for fear of pribacy info?

    NO! She wants regulations, not restrictive bans

    "impossible and limits insights to end suffering"

    transparency

    limit further processing

    user-based controls

    data processed locally

    data continuously overwritten

    standards against discriminatory use

  • what sort of privacy supports a democratic society?

    lever

  • what sort of privacy are humans entitled to

    s

  • if we're so worried about brain data. what do we do?

    ?

  • in waht ways does faranahay consider privacy apolitical

    individuals, not structures/relationships

    treats individuals as having the same interests

    assumes value of privacy is shared (opposition is just greed)

  • lever feels that definitions of privacy reflect

    different forms of society

    “we have to concentrate on the value of privacy that is implicit in, or compatible with, democratic rather than undemocratic forms of government, and cannot assume that current forms of privacy adequately reflect the former.”

  • example of different privacy forms in voting

    secret ballot

    open voting

  • how can overexpansive privacy make oppression? how can limited privacy create oppression?

    -rape, assault,

  • mackinnon on feminism

    MacKinnon thus argues that fighting sexism requires willingness to openly discuss or intrude into “private” matters like sex, domestic violence or who does the dishes.

  • child controls as indicator of value judgement in privacy

    private matter: parents authority. otherwise invading.

    publis: in

  • what sort of privacy we prioritize is a _

    value judgement