Compact City Planning Instruments Glafkos Constantinides May 2015 EUKN Policy Lab & DTP&H The issue we discuss has two main aspects (1) Why compact development matters in planning? Which planning objectives need to guide us? What is society gaining (2) How do we deliver compact development Which instruments ? What planning process ? What is the big deal with Compact Development? THE THEORY: A historic objective in planning, almost the reason why planning exists / to achieve outcomes • • • • Reduce uncertainty Work within a predictable timeline Bring needed changes Deliver positive benefits to society, such as: • SOCIAL • ECONOMIC • ENVIRONMENTAL Social cohesion (What the market cannot offer, lower cost housing, etc. ) Economic efficiency and Infrastructure utilization Integrated solutions Avoidance of waste, Shorter trips and reduction of car dependency energy requirement NEW TOWNS WERE PLANNED TO ORGANIZE AND MANAGE POPULATION OVERSPIL FROM LONDON, LIVERPOOL, MANCHESTER AND SCOTLAND TO DO THE JOB DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONS WITH APPROPRIATE POWERS WERE ESTABLISHED REALITY To achieve the benefits of compactness we need to invest in the quality of planning process • Planning needs to be proactive • Planning needs to have resources • Planning needs to have the necessary legal powers • Planning needs to have legitimacy from society and Government In other words Society needs to give to planning all the instruments for pursuing positive actions / compact development Planning needs to be central to public policy on development Consistent with Democracy and the Rule of Law, planning process needs to have: • Powers to control the location of development and the land market • Powers to restrict / regulate the exercise of development rights • Powers to raise revenues from land development • Powers to assemble land for integrated and organized development • Powers to engage all the stakeholders in development • Powers to enter into PPP PLANNER’S (ideal) PERSPECTIVE Planners need legal, financial and technical powers, skills and tools to achieve this IS THIS ‘COMPACT DEVELOPMENT’ ? IF NOT WHAT IS IT? Different cities grow in different ways….. For different reasons • • • • • Transport Income Access to land Policies Social values THIS IS SPRAWL THIS IS SPRAWL Where are the services? How is it accessible? Who pays for the infrastructure? COMPACT DEVELOPMENT IS DESIRABLE IT LEADS TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT DO WE HAVE THE TOOLS TO ACHIEVE COMPACT DEVELOPMENT? TWO SERIOUS CONCERNS (1) DO WE HAVE WHAT IT TAKES? Preconditions for compact development: • • • • • SOCIAL Powerful planning system Robust planning tools Financial resources for actions Political support Social commitment to planning (2) IS IT ALL POSITIVE? Cohesion / limited choices of life style Economies / diseconomies Higher densities / congestion / green space, diversity ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTAL Land area (in sqKm) Density (people per sqKm) Rank City / Urban area Country Population 1 Mumbai India 14,350,000 484 29,650 10 Shanghai China 10,000,000 746 13,400 21 Cairo Egypt 12,200,000 1,295 9,400 32 Istanbul Turkey 9,000,000 1,166 7,700 40 Athens Greece 3,685,000 684 5,400 41 Ankara Turkey 3,100,000 583 5,300 42 Madrid Spain 4,900,000 945 5,200 43 London UK 8,278,000 1,623 5,100 44 Tel Aviv Israel 2,300,000 453 5,050 47 Moscow Russia 10,500,000 2,150 4,900 48 Barcelona Spain 3,900,000 803 4,850 114 New York USA 17,800,000 8,683 2,050 116 New Orleans USA 1,009,000 512 1,950 117 Copenhagen Denmark 1,525,000 816 1,850 120 Las Vegas USA 1,314,000 741 1,750 124 Antwerp Belgium 915,000 596 1,550 125 Denver USA 1,985,000 1,292 1,550 Source: http://www.citymayors.com/statistics/largest-cities-density-125.html City Population Area km2 Pop / km2 Population to cover urbanizatio n costs / KM2 Nicosia 225,000 225 1,000 1,000 Tel Aviv 2,300,000 453 5,400 5,400 London 8,278,000 1,623 5,100 5,100 Barcelona 3,900,000 803 4,850 4,800 URBANIZATION EXPANSION COSTS ARE IMPORTANT WHO BEARS THE COSTS IS EVEN MORE IMPORTANT Nicosia has a costly urban growth pattern NICOSIA URBAN REGION NICOSIA LOCAL PLAN AREA Compact development is about how cities grow Two parameters: • Growth and location • Growth and how development is organized COMPACT DEVELOPMENT IS NOT ONLY A MATTER OF LOCATION WHAT MATTERS IS THE ORGANIZATION OF DEVELOPMENT • • • • • • • • • Mixed uses Density Mobility Accessibility Services Amenity Open Space Design quality Unity AND diversity Working with an overall vision Change from piecemeal to a positive outcome • • • • • • • • • PPP / Land for Investment Intensification of development TDR / Green Corridor Land Assembly / Exchange EU Grant Funds /Planning vision Betterment / Infrastructure Accessibility P Transport / Bicycles Governance/Implementation Team Higher priority for intervention Organized development in an area where the rest of development Is open ended Tools for ‘quality’ Planning Process Spatial instruments Non-spatial instruments Tackling fragmentation: Land pooling / readjustment / assembly Governance: Upgrading of role of planning Tackling piecemeal development: Planned Unit Development Development Companies Legitimacy / Acceptance: Planning at the centre of government policy Tackling financial dependency: Betterment / compensation Community Infrastructure Levy Tackling mismatch between spatial and wider policy objectives: Fiscal Policy / Tax policy Tackling ownership issues: Transferable Development Rights Tackling isolation: Framework for working with the private sector for win-win results Tackling the need to deliver outcomes: Tackling the need to deliver outcomes: Public Private Partnership (PPP) Public Private Partnership (PPP) Tackling dependency on details: More facilitation and strategic control Tackling the need to ‘cost / benefit’ development: Going for growth with benefits To sum up • Compact development remains a key objective • There are challenges in delivering it • To achieve it we need to empower the Planning Process • Planning needs closer interaction with wider social and economic policy, Planning at the centre of Government’s policy on development • What is important is to achieve Organized Development (what does ‘compact development’ mean beyond Organized Development) • In Cyprus achievements could be greater if Society offered Planning all it needs to work (legal powers, resources, priority and support)