The degree to which a society achieves public order depends in part on the price society is willing to pay to obtain it. Resources committed to crime suppressions, detection, and prevention. The extent to which people are willing to accept a reduction in civil liberties. In a free society there is a constant tension between its government’s legitimate police function and its citizens’ liberty interests. It has and will be with us and it will never go away. It is a source of conflict that must be understood by both the police and the population in order for it to be controlled. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 18,000 different agencies ( UK with ¼ of US population has 43 agencies). Fragmented (UK all agencies administered by the Home Office). Federal agencies. State agencies. County sheriffs. Local police agencies. Special police. Nationally, sworn officers account for 69.5 percent of PD personnel. Nationally, police to population ratio rural and city is: 2.4 per 1000. Indiana has 146 local PDs. In the U.S. in 2005, the average number of full-time law enforcement employees in cities (both sworn officers and civilian) was 3.0 per 1,000 inhabitants. Within cities in the Northeast, the rate of full-time law enforcement employees per 1,000 inhabitants was 3.5. Within cities in the South, the rate of full-time law enforcement employees per 1,000 inhabitants was 3.4. Within cities in the Midwest, the rate of full-time law enforcement employees per 1,000 inhabitants was 2.7. Within cities in the West, the rate of full-time law enforcement employees per 1,000 inhabitants was 2.4. Police cannot control: 1. The time it takes from when the crime occurs to when it is discovered; 2. The time it takes from when it is discovered to when it is reported to police Crime Prevention Crime Deterrence Likelihood Desire Ability Desire of being caught Opportunity Gravity of harm if caught Scanning Analysis Response Assessment Each problem likely not only involves crime, but a wider community social issue. Outputs are work product like the number of traffic tickets issued, crashes investigated, or the number of criminals arrested. Outcomes are the results of outputs. Crime and accident rates for example. Crime Specific Analysis-pattern of reported crime. Link analysis-Associations among people. Telephone Toll Analysis. Visual Investigative Analysis (VIA) charting key criminal events in chronological order. Case Analysis and Management Systemcomputerized to clarify relationships & calculate probability of associations. 1. 2. 3. 4. Geographical Information Systems-mapping. Global Positioning Systems-locating. Artificial Intelligence Systems. Natural language applications. Robotic applications. Computer science applications (brains). Cognitive science applications (decisionmaking). Politics Economy Competing agencies Community groups Governments: federal, state, & local Unions and associations Review boards Judicial review Prior to the 60’s the Bill of Rights restricted and regulated only the federal government. Through a series of cases in the 60’s, the Warren Court began incorporating USC protections to the states through the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Procedural Due Process can be boiled down to notice of the charges and an opportunity to be heard. Substantive Due Process means the procedures must be in content and conducted “fairly.” Constitutions 1. Federal 2. States Legislated 1. Federal 2. State 3. Local Common law (Case law) 1. Federal 2. State Administrative law Judicial – interprete laws Executive – execute and enforce laws Legislative – create and pass laws Congress or legislature delegates authority to the administrative agency through an enabling statute. Laws must be tailored to the mission of the agency. Must be properly promulaged. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized . Any search conducted without a warrant is per se illegal unless an exception exists. Search incident to a lawful, custodial arrest Voluntary consent and waiver Search of a vehicle with probable cause Inventory after lawful impoundment of a vehicle Stop and frisk searches (Investigatory Detention) Plain view, smell & touch Open fields Exigent circumstances - hot pursuit Abandoned property Protective sweep No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Custodial Interrogation. The person in custody must, prior to interrogation, be clearly informed that he or she has the right to remain silent, and that anything the person says may be used against that person in court; the person must be clearly informed that he or she has the right to consult with an attorney and to have that attorney present during questioning, and that, if he or she is indigent, an attorney will be provided at no cost to represent him or her. Additionally, the officer must ask whether the person understands their right and will consent to questioning. Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914). First used in federal case. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) Made applicable to the states. Rationale 1. Dirty Hands 2. Deterrence 3. Way to enforce constitution 8th Amendment: Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. 1. Guarantee defendant’s appearance. 2. Public safety. Presumed innocent means that the defendant is not judged guilty of a crime and punished unless convicted BRD or he pleads guilty to it in the criminal courts. Beyond a reasonable doubt. Clear and convincing evidence. Preponderance of the evidence. Probable cause. Articulable suspicion. Good faith belief. There are four traditional types of evidence: real evidence (tangible things like a weapon), demonstrative (a model or photograph), documentary (a writing or other document), and testimonial (testimony by witnesses). Circumstantial Evidence - Testimony not based on actual personal knowledge or observation of the facts in controversy, but of other facts from which deductions are drawn, showing indirectly the facts to be proved. Police Ethical Models 1. Law. 2. Code of conduct. 3. Rules, regulations, & standard operating procedures. Police have a property interest in their jobs. Cannot be terminated or disciplined without due process. Internal Investigation 1. Founded 2. Unfounded 3. Exonerated 4. Not determined. The First Amendment of the federal constitution provides the news media and all citizens certain rights of free speech and press. The media, however, does not have an unlimited right to engage in the collection of news material. “Newsmen have no constitutional right of special access to the scenes of crime or disaster when the general public is excluded . . .” Brandzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665, 684-685 (1972). However, once the news media has acquired information from a critical incident or other source, it will be difficult to prevent its publication. Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58 (1963). Federal: US Attorney may bring a charge only through a GJ Indictment. State: Prosecutor may bring a charge either by filing an Information or by GJ Indictment. Prosecutor has absolute discretion on whether to bring a charge, but must have PC if he decides to bring a charge. Role diffusion occurs when people spread themselves too thin, experience personal uncertainty, and place themselves at the mercy of people who promise to give them a sense of identity they cannot develop for themselves. Example: Gangs. For a discussion on what factors increase the chances of gang activity among juveniles got to: http://www.lao.ca.gov/1995/050195_juv_crime/kkpart3.aspx Young people extremely vulnerable t the negative consequences of school failure, substance abuse, and early sexuality. By the time they reach 18, most young people have spent more time in front of the TV than in the classroom. They see thousands of depictions of rape, assault, murder, theft, and other anti-social behaviors. They also listen to hours of music with violent and sexual content. Research indicates that kids who listen to music with sexual content are more likely to engage in precocious sex than those who don’t. 2 mothers die in childbirth 4 children are killed by abuse or neglect 5 children or teens commit suicide 9 children or teens are killed by firearms 32 die from accidents 202 arrested for violent crimes 377 arrested for drug crimes 964 babies are born at low birthrate 1,210 babies are born to teen mothers Siegel, L. J., & Welsh, B. C. (2012). Juvenile delinquency: Theory, practice, and law (11th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 1,240 public school students corporally punished 2,060 babies born without health insurance 2,175 children are confirmed as abused or neglected 2,222 drop out of high school 2,692 babies are born into poverty 4,435 children are arrested 4,498 babies are born to unwed mothers 18,493 public school students are suspended from school Siegel, L. J., & Welsh, B. C. (2012). Juvenile delinquency: Theory, practice, and law (11th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth About 70% of all 4th graders cannot read at level About 90% of blacks About 80% of Latino About 80% of American Indian Black children are about 50% more likely to drop out of school than white children; in part caused by poor reading ability that leads to stress Siegel, L. J., & Welsh, B. C. (2012). Juvenile delinquency: Theory, practice, and law (11th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Conduct is only illegal because the offender is under age. Smoking and drinking Skipping school Runaway Participating in sex Curfew Profanity Disobeying parents Truantcy Serious crimes against property and people Murder Rape Burglary Arson Motor vehicle theft Theft Aggravated assult All other crimes that are not Part I crimes Public intoxication Driving under the influence Littering Disorderly conduct, et cetera Drug use More than 13.6 million arrests each year 2.3 million are Part I crimes 11 million are less serious Part II crimes Juveniles are arrested for approximately 15% of Part I violent crimes and 24% Part I property crimes Kids 14-17 account for only 6% of population, but are arrested for a disproportionate amount of crime. 1.1 million juvenile arrests in 2009 for Part II offenses 74,000 status offenses arrests in 2009 Socioeconomic Status Theory Cognitive Behavior Theory Rational Choice Theory Trait Theory Biosocial Theory Psychological Theory Capable Guardians Motivated Offenders Suitable Targets Interpersonal interactions: family, peers, schools, jobs Community conditions: inner-city, poverty, decay Exposure to violence Social change: politics, mistrust, economic stress Low socioeconomic status: poverty creates incentive Racial disparity: poverty among minorities is higher than that of whites Social Structure: crime (“C”) is function of place in economic structure. Social Process: C as result of interaction with socialization elements. Stratified Society: Grouping society into classes based on the unequal distribution of resources. Culture of Poverty: View that poor people form their own values which sometimes clash with conventional society. Underclass: Group of poor whose members have little chance of upward mobility. Social Structure: Crime is result of socioeconomic conditions and cultural values. Enculturated: The process learning what is accepted in a culture. Social Disorganization: Links crime to being locked out of economic mainstream which cause anger. Cultural Deviance: Lower class culture develops in disorganized areas whose beliefs are in conflict with conventional norms Social Transmission: Norms and values passed down from each generation. Social Control: Ability of institutions to influence social behavior. Social Ecology: Law abiding behavior is result of social rather than individual forces. Transitional Neighborhood: Transition of population & structure from middle class to poorer (White flight). Siege Mentality: Residents become suspicious of authority and consider outside world as the enemy. We see this when communities refuse to cooperate with police even when the crimes are outrageous and heinous. Collective Efficacy: The ability of communities to regulate behavior through influences of school and family. Street Efficacy: Using one’s wit to avoid violence and feel safe. Strain Theory: Suggests that most people share similar values and goals. When people feel shutout they feel frustrated and angry, a condition called strain. General Strain Theory (GST): Multiple sources of strain interact with a person’s traits and responses to produce crime. Anomie: Normlessness produced by rapidly shifting moral values. Personal goals cannot be achieved using available means. Failure to achieve positively valued goals. Disjunction between expectations and achievements. Removal of positively valued stimuli (loss of friends). Presentation of negative stimuli (child abuse). People who think they have been treated unfairly report high levels of anger & high levels of theft. People who live in strain producing conditions are more likely to commit anti-social acts. People who believe that path to success is blocked are more likely to engage in criminal activities. Similar results in foreign countries (indicating not cultural based outcomes). Unique value system that defines lower-class culture. Conformance to these focal concerns dominates life. Promotes illegal or violent behavior. The need for being seen as tough or the need for excitement, trouble, smartness (streetwise & savvy), fate, and personal autonomy (independent of authority figures). Status Frustration: Culture conflict experienced by lower-class youths because social conditions prevent them from achieving success as defined by society. Middle-class Measuring Rods: Standards used by teachers & others to evaluate behavior-when poorer kids do not meet standards they are subject to failure, which brings about anger and frustration. Reaction Formation: ψ Reaction that occurs when a person does or says something that is the opposite of what he really wants or is socially appropriate. View that poorer youths, which have limited opportunities, join gangs and pursue criminal careers as an alternative means to achieving success. Criminal gangs: Criminal goals. Conflict gangs: Protect their own. Retreatist gangs: Retreat and create fringe society; often getting high, sex, and music is goal. 1. 2. 3. 4. Socialization: People learn to adopt the behaviors of the community in which they live. Family influence School Peers Religion Crime is learned through close relationships with others; asserts that children are born good and learn bad from others. Differential Association: Asserts that crime is learned within interpersonal groups and youths will become crime if violating the law is favorable to obeying the law. Crime behavior is learned. Learning is a by-product of interaction. Learning occurs within intimate groups. Criminal techniques are learned. Perceptions of legal code influence motives. Crime participation may vary in duration, frequency, priority, & intensity. Crime is an expression of needs & values, but not an excuse. Subterranean values: The ability of people to repress social norms. People can drift back and force between conventional and crime norms. A set of attitudes that allow people to negate moral apprehension so that they may freely engage in crime behavior without regret. 1. Deny responsibility. 2. Deny injury (no one hurt, so not wrong). 3. Deny the victim (he had it coming). 4. Condemn the condemners (world, school, society is corrupt). 5. Appeal to higher loyalties (Caught between being loyal to peers and rules of society). All people have the potential to violate the law and that society presents many opportunities for illegal activity. Drugs, illicit sex, even theft offer exciting pastimes. Is it fear of punishment that prevents offending behavior (choice theory)? Obeying law is a function of success, so we don’t disobey (structural theory)? Obedience is because of contact with law-abiding parents and peers (learning theory)? SCT argues that internal and external forces control desire and passion. Proper socialization renders us incapable of committing D acts. Pygmalion effect. Tell someone they are bad, injudicious, lazy, or unqualified (and they and those around them) and the resulting reinforcement can actually cause the outcome. People communicate via gestures, signals, symbols, and words that stand for something else. Ring on fourth finger of left hand indicates that the person is married for example. Possession, rank, or activity that indicates one’s social prestige. Mark someone with disgrace or reproach; to characterize or brand someone as disgraceful or disreputable. Law is differentially applied; white collar criminals ordinarily get lighter sentences than common burglars for example. This is due to discretionary decision making. Damaged identity-stigmatized. Primary deviance-norm violations that little influence on the actor and can be quickly forgotten. Minor crimes that go unnoticed and therefore have little influence on the person’s life. Secondary deviance-deviant acts that define the actor and create a new identity. Crimes that come to the attention of others who apply a negative label. Pure deviants-engage in illegal acts and get caught. Conformists-do not engage in delinquent acts. Falsely accused-blamed for something they did not do. Secret deviants-engage in illegal acts, but do not get caught. Restorative justice- humanistic, non-punitive strategies. Shame-personal feelings we have when we fail to meet personal standard or those of significant others. Reintegrative shaming-allowing offenders to understand their wrongdoing and shame themselves. Restoration-using the system to heal the offender. Developmental theory Life-course theory Latent trait Propensity Trajectory theory Integrates social control theory with biosocial, psychological, routine activities, and rational choice theories. Authority conflicts-early age defiance and authority avoidance Covert pathway-begins with minor underhanded behaviors and then leads to more serious theft and fraud crimes Overt pathway- begins with minor aggression and leads to fighting and violent crimes Suites begin with the filing of a Complaint. The person who files is the Plaintiff. The person to whom the complaint is filed against is the Defendant. The defendant is notified by a Summons. After being notified the defendant will file an Answer. 73 Suites begin with the filing of a Complaint. The person who files is the Plaintiff. The person to whom the complaint is filed against is the Defendant. The defendant is notified by a Summons. After being notified the defendant will file an Answer. 74 The plaintiff's lawyer must decide where to file the case. A court has no authority to decide a case unless it has jurisdiction over the person or property involved. To have jurisdiction, a court must have authority over the subject matter of the case and the court must be able to exercise control over the defendant, or the property involved must be located in the area under the court's control. 75 Subject matter jurisdiction. The authority of a court to hear a particular dispute. Personal jurisdiction. The authority of a court to hear a dispute involving the particular parties. Original jurisdiction. The authority of a court decide the dispute in the first instance. Appellate Jurisdiction. The authority of a court to review a prior decision by a previous court. 76 Courts of Limited jurisdiction are generally specialized courts and courts of appeals. The Supreme Court is a court of special limited jurisdiction. Courts of General jurisdiction are commonly the trial courts such as Circuit or Superior courts. 77 1. 2. Federal Question arises if a case involves an alleged violation of the USC, federal regulation, or treaty. Diversity Jurisdiction arises if: Amount in controversy exceeds $75K Lawsuit is between people of different states or a state and a foreign country. 78 Venue refers to the county or district within a state or the U.S. where the lawsuit is to be tried. The venue of a lawsuit is set by statute, but it can sometimes be changed to another county or district. For example, if a case has received widespread pre-trial publicity, one of the parties may make a motion (request to the judge) for change of venue in an effort to secure jurors who haven’t already formed an opinion about the case. Venue also may be changed for the convenience of witnesses. 79 1. 2. 3. Standing to sue. An individual or entity must have a sufficient stake in the controversy before he or she may bring a suit. Factors include: Real controversy not hypothetical. Whether the person was injured. Whether the person might be injured. 80 A lawsuit begins when the person bringing the suit files a complaint. This first step begins what is known as the pleadings stage of the suit. Pleadings are certain formal documents filed with the court that state the parties' basic positions. Common pre-trial pleadings include: 81 Complaint (or petition or bill). Probably the most important pleading in a civil case, since by setting out the plaintiff's version of the facts and specifying the damages, it frames the issues of the case. It includes various counts - that is, distinct statements of the plaintiff’s cause of action - highlighting the factual and legal basis of the suit. Answer. This statement by the defendant usually explains why the plaintiff should not prevail. It may also offer additional facts, or plead an excuse. Reply. Any party in the case may have to file a reply, which is an answer to new allegations raised in pleadings. Counterclaim. The defendant may file a counterclaim, which asserts that the plaintiff has injured the defendant in some way, and should pay damages. ("You're suing me? Well then, I'm suing you.") It may be filed separately or as part of the answer. If a counterclaim is filed, the plaintiff must be given the opportunity to respond by filing a reply. 82 Motions are not pleadings but are requests for the judge to make a legal ruling. Some of the most common pre-trial motions include: Motion to Discover. A motion by which one party seeks to gain information from the adverse party. Motion to Dismiss. This motion asks the court to dismiss the suit because the suit doesn’t have a legally sound basis, even if all the facts alleged are proven true. Motion for Summary Judgment (sometimes called motion for summary disposition). This motion asks the court for a judgment on the merits of the case before the trial. It is properly made where there is no dispute about the facts and only a question of law needs to be decided. 83 To begin preparing for trial, both sides engage in discovery. This is the formal process of exchanging information between the parties about the witnesses and evidence they’ll present at trial. Discovery enables the parties to know before the trial begins what evidence may be presented. It’s designed to prevent "trial by ambush," where one side doesn’t learn of the other side’s evidence or witnesses until the trial, when there’s no time to obtain answering evidence. 84 One of the most common methods of discovery is to take depositions. A deposition is an out-ofcourt statement given under oath by any person involved in the case. It is to be used at trial or in preparation for trial. It may be in the form of a written transcript, a videotape, or both. In most states, either of the parties may take the deposition of the other party, or of any other witness. Both sides have the right to be present during oral depositions. 85 In addition to taking depositions, either party may submit written questions, called interrogatories, to the other party and require that they be answered in writing under oath. If one party chooses to use an interrogatory, written questions are sent to the lawyer representing the other side, and that party has a period of time in which to answer. 86 Other methods of discovery include: subpoenaing or requiring the other side to produce books, records or other documents for inspection (a subpoena is a written order issued by a court compelling a person to testify or produce certain physical evidence such as records); having the other side submit to a physical examination; or asking that a document be submitted for examination to determine if it is genuine. 87 Judges use pre-trial conferences with lawyers for many purposes. One type of conference gaining popularity is the status conference (sometimes called the early conference). This conference—held after all initial pleadings have been filed—helps the judge manage the case. Judges use it to establish a time frame for concluding all pre-trial activities and may set a tentative trial date at this time. 88 Juries of six to twelve persons are selected from the jury pool. The size of jury varies from state to state and depends to some extent on the type of case at trial. In civil cases, especially in courts of limited jurisdiction, the standard size in many jurisdictions is becoming six, which can be increased by stipulation of both parties. In misdemeanor cases there are sometimes fewer than twelve jurors, though in serious criminal cases twelve jurors are generally required. The old requirement that juries be unanimous is also changing. In misdemeanor and civil cases particularly, states often provide for verdicts based on the agreement of three-fourths or five-sixths of the jurors. 89 IC 35-37-1-1 If a defendant is charged with: (1) murder, a Class A felony, a Class B felony or a Class C felony, the jury shall consist of twelve (12) qualified jurors unless the defendant and prosecuting attorney agree to a lesser number; or (2) any other crime, the jury shall consist of six (6) qualified jurors. 90 In prosecutions for murder where the death penalty is sought, the attorneys may challenge, peremptorily, 20 jurors. In prosecutions for murder, where the death penalty is not sought, and Class A, Class B, or Class C felonies, the defendant may challenge, peremptorily,10 jurors. In prosecutions for all other crimes, the defendant may challenge, peremptorily, 5 jurors. When several defendants are tried together, they must join in their challenges. Good causes for challenge; opinion on guilt or innocence. 91 IC 34-36-3-1 Number of jurors; stipulations Sec. 1. (a) In a civil case, the jury consists of six (6) members. (b) At any time before the verdict is announced, the parties may stipulate that a verdict or finding of a stated majority of the jurors shall be taken as the verdict or finding of the jury. 92 In all civil cases, the jury shall consist of 6 members. Alternate Jurors. The Court may direct that no more than 3 jurors in addition to the regular jury be called. Peremptory Challenges. Each side shall have 3 peremptory challenges. In addition, each side is entitled to: 1 peremptory challenge if the court directs that 1 or 2 alternate jurors are to be impaneled; or 2 peremptory challenges if the court directs that 3 alternate jurors are to be impaneled. The additional peremptory challenges may be used only against alternate jurors.. Examination of jurors. The court shall permit the parties or their attorneys to conduct the examination of prospective jurors, and may conduct examination itself. 93 1. 2. 3. 4. You will not automatically get a jury trial, you must timely ask for one. Not all trials can be heard in front of a jury: Divorce cases. Bankruptcy. Tax court. Probate court. 94 Voir Dire. Strike for Cause. Preemptory Challenge. 95 The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements must be confined to facts that will be proved by the evidence, and cannot be argumentative. 96 The heart of the case is the presentation of evidence. There are two types of evidence -direct and circumstantial. Direct evidence usually is that which speaks for itself: eyewitness accounts, a confession, or a weapon. Circumstantial evidence usually is that which suggests a fact by implication or inference: the appearance of the scene of a crime, testimony that suggests a connection or link with a crime, physical evidence that suggests criminal activity. 97 Lawyers for the plaintiff or the government begin the presentation of evidence by calling witnesses. The questions they ask of the witnesses are direct examination. Direct examination may elicit both direct and circumstantial evidence. Witnesses may testify to matters of fact, and in some instances provide opinions. They also may be called to identify documents, pictures or other items introduced into evidence. 98 When the lawyer for the plaintiff or the government has finished questioning a witness, the lawyer for the defendant may then crossexamine the witness. Cross-examination is generally limited to questioning only on matters that were raised during direct examination. Leading questions may be asked during cross-examination, since the purpose of cross-examination is to test the credibility of statements made during direct examination. 99 At the conclusion of the plaintiff's or government's evidence, the lawyer will announce that the plaintiff or government rests. Then, when the jury leaves the courtroom, the defendant's lawyer in a civil case has the option of making a motion for a directed verdict, arguing that his or her client's liability has not been proven by a preponderance of the evidence. In a criminal trial, the defendant's lawyer can ask for a motion to dismiss the charges, arguing that the government has failed to prove its case. 100 The defense presents evidence in the same manner as the plaintiff or state, and the plaintiff or government in return has the right to cross-examine the defense's witnesses. Redirect and re-cross examination also are permitted. 101 At the conclusion of the defendant's case, the plaintiff or government can present rebuttal witnesses or evidence to refute evidence presented by the defendant. This may include only evidence not presented in the case initially, or a new witness who contradicts the defendant's witnesses. 102 The lawyers’ closing arguments or summations discuss the evidence and properly drawn inferences. The lawyers cannot talk about issues outside the case or about evidence that was not presented. The judge usually indicates to the lawyers before closing arguments begin which instructions he or she intends to give the jury. In their closing arguments the lawyers can comment on the jury instructions and relate them to the evidence. The lawyer for the plaintiff or government usually goes first. The lawyer sums up and comments on the evidence in the most favorable light for his or her side, showing how it proved what he or she had to prove to prevail in the case. 103 The judge will advise the jury that they are the sole judge of the facts and of the credibility (believability) of witnesses. He or she will note that the jurors are to base their conclusions on the evidence as presented in the trial, and that the opening and closing arguments of the lawyers are not evidence. Sometimes judges will explain what basic facts are in dispute, and what facts do not matter to the case. 104 Mistrials are trials that are not successfully completed. Mistrials can occur for many reasons: death of a juror or attorney. an impropriety in the drawing of the jury discovered during the trial. a fundamental error prejudicial (unfair) to the defendant that cannot be cured by appropriate instructions to the jury (such as the inclusion of highly improper remarks in the prosecutor's summation). juror misconduct the jury's inability to reach a verdict because it is hopelessly deadlocked. 105 After reaching a decision, the jury notifies the bailiff, who notifies the judge. All of the participants reconvene in the courtroom and the decision is announced. The announcement may be made by either the foreperson or the court clerk. 106 In a civil case, either party may appeal to a higher court. In a criminal case, only the defendant has a right to an appeal in most states. (Some states give the prosecution a limited right to appeal to determine certain points of law. These appeals usually occur before the actual trial begins. Appeals by the prosecution after a verdict are not normally allowed because of the prohibition in the U. S. Constitution against double jeopardy, or being tried twice for the same crime). 107 Affirm. Reverse and remand. Reverse and render a new judgment. 108 Burden of Proof. Complaint v. Information or Grand Jury. Trial brought in the name of Plaintiff v. the name of the State. Civil damages v. Criminal incarceration. Double Jeopardy v. Res Judicata. Some criminal convictions receive automatic appeal to Indiana Supreme Court. 109 Criminal: Beyond a reasonable doubt. Commitment: Clear and convincing evidence. Civil: Preponderance of the evidence. Arrest: Probable Cause. Civil Infraction Notice to appear: Good faith belief. Investigatory detention: Articulatible suspicion. 110 1. 2. Applies to criminal proceedings. One cannot be convicted of a crime unless: Pleads guilty-admitting the truth of the allegation. Convicted at trial (guilt proved beyond a reasonable doubt). 111 1. 2. Bail is allowed so long as not excessive (8th Amendment to USC). If presumed innocent, why bail required at all? Guarantee presence at trial. Public safety. 112 A private employer X has a “Public Conduct” clause in his employee contracts that state that behavior by employees that brings discredit to the employer or that is inappropriate as measured by community standards whether or not on-duty is cause for discipline up to and including dismissal. Employee X is arrested, but not convicted of cruelty to animals and promoting illegal dog fighting. Must employer X wait to see if employee X is convicted in order to discipline the employee? 113