Lecture 1: Why Econ of Ed? Econ 325, Winter 2016 1 1/9/2016 Syllabus Contact Prereqs Assignments 2 in-class exams, no final “Low-stakes” writing: HW, free writing, practice paper summaries, peer feedback sessions, instructor meeting Formal writing: the drafts of the constituent parts of your term paper (including the final product) Readings Powerpoint notes as the central repository of expected knowledge (see “notes” to each page) Schedule 2 1/9/2016 Why ULWR? The Econ of Ed is very empirical, and very policyrelevant. A good policy economist needs to be able to understand the literature, and to translate the literature into words (and possibly thereafter, action) Clear communication of quantitative results is critical in “analyst” or “consultant” type jobs. Many of the “formal writing” drafts are themselves practical exercises: grant writing, research summary, “executive memo” styles 3 1/9/2016 Why Econ of Ed? An entire class on one industry! Imagine “Economics of software”, “Economics of retail groceries”, or “Economics of cement” courses What makes education so special that it deserves its own class? Virtually everyone in the developed world spends at least 10 years (1/8th of their life) as students The average American spends around 14 years in school Recently, around 40% of Americans earn at least bachelor’s degrees:16 years or more An industry that effects us all 4 1/9/2016 Why Econ of Ed? “An industry that effects us all” Let’s not beat around the bush: education is an industry and can be studied as such In 2011, education spending represented around $1.1 trillion, or about 8% of GDP. In 2012, 86 million people were enrolled in school In 2012, 11 million people were employed by the field of education (4.7 million are teachers) Education is the third-biggest government expenditure (state and federal), after health care and social income support (Soc Sec, medicaid, etc). Greater than national defense, for example. 5 1/9/2016 Why Econ of Ed? A hugely influential part of the economy! Virtually every well-paying job requires some sort of formal education On-the-job-training (OTJT) is something that we won’t really discuss in this class, but easily falls under the area of “education”, and every job takes some degree of OTJT To understand labor markets, you must understand education Labor is an input into all goods. Therefore, the production of all goods involves education 6 1/9/2016 But why Economics? Lots of disciplines study education, most for as long or longer than economists have Psychology, sociology, history, anthropology, poli sci (and, of course, education folk) How is economics particularly useful in exploring educational issues? Standard definition of economics: the study of allocation of scare resources among competing ends How to best use resources - i.e., efficiency How do we get the most gain at least cost? Most output with the least input? 7 1/9/2016 But why Economics? Efficiency What are inputs in education? What’s the output? Is there more than one output? The answers to these question alone are very important Economists stress rationality and optimization Rationality: people know that they want, and use the best possible means to achieve their goals. That is, a rational person optimizes, given what they know, and given their various constraints 8 1/9/2016 But why Economics? Rationality / optimization a responsiveness to incentives. People who behave this way will respond in predictable ways to policy changes (taxes, subsidies, etc) Economists have useful insight into the design of educational policy, so as to increase social welfare. A fundamental building block in the “modern” movement of the economic analysis of education: Human Capital (from Becker, 1964) Human Capital: Any characteristic that makes a unit of labor more productive Education, health, training, experience, strength, intelligence, etc. 9 1/9/2016 But why Economics? Human capital is like labor-augmenting technology. We will cover the sub-field of labor economics The input-output framework suggests that we are interested in how the industry organizes inputs and achieves efficiency (if at all). We will cover the sub-field of industrial organization Education is governmentally funded via taxation. We will cover the sub-field of public finance 10 1/9/2016 Course goals I have four-and-a-half main objectives in the class 1. Use the economic theory to explain how and why the educational system works. How is education produced? Why do people “get an education”? How does education relate to economic outcomes like unemployment or income inequality? 2. Understand the structure of the educational system – the facts of “how things are done” What are the practices, constraints and incentives currently faced by educators? Is this structure beneficial? How might we change this structure? 11 1/9/2016 Course goals I have four-and-a-half main objectives in the class 3. Use the analytical tools of economics/statistics to evaluate policy proposals in the field of education What are the effects of No Child Left Behind and other “accountability” measures? Do vouchers and charter schools “work”? What is the best thing to spend more money on, in order to improve education? Can we spend more money and improve education? 12 1/9/2016 Course goals I have four-and-a-half main objectives in the class 3.5.Increase your comfort level in reading technical evaluations of education If you want to understand the educational system and educational policy evaluation beyond sheer punditry, you’ve got to be able to understand the studies of the system Involves data, statistics, experiments, surveys, etc. There are other classes that teach these things in detail – I want to take away the “fear” of jumping into the data. We’ve got to be reality-based! 13 1/9/2016 Course goals I have four-and-a-half main objectives in the class 4. How does the mechanism of markets interact with, and potentially improve, the educational system? The market for teachers School choice: the market for schools The market for college quality 14 1/9/2016 Next: Human capital theory of education 15 1/9/2016