The Foundations of the Knowledge Economy: Global Evidence Carl Dahlman Georgetown University Ukraine Knowledge Economy Training Initiative January 22, 2008 Structure of Presentation 1. 2. 3. 4. What is the Knowledge Economy and Why is it Relevant Foundations of the Knowledge Economy Benchmarking Countries in the Knowledge Economy Recent Transformation of Key Developed and Developing Countries 5. What is at Stake? 6. Key Strategic Areas for Ukraine 7. What is to be Done? ©cd 1. What is the Knowledge Economy? It is an economy that increasingly bases its economic activity on value enhancing knowledge rather than limited natural resources Knowledge has always been important It is becoming more important now because there has been an acceleration in the creation and dissemination of knowledge Why is it Relevant? There are many possibilities to leverage growth by making effective use of knowledge that already exists as well as by generating new knowledge Most new knowledge creation is being led by developed countries There is risk that developing countries will be falling behind But to make effective use of knowledge as well as to create relevant knowledge it is necessary to develop appropriate policies, institutions, and capabilities 2. Foundations of the Knowledge Economy Technological Trends Increasing Importance of Knowledge Growing Technology Intensity of Trade Increasing Globalization and Competition Changing Education Paradigm Major Global Restructuring Changing Nature of Competitiveness Technological Trends There has been speed up in the generation and dissemination of knowledge The ICT revolution is becoming an increasingly important element of the current techno economic structure It is spawning changes in management and organization of production and distribution Production and Trade are becoming more knowledge intensive Innovation and high level human capital are becoming critical elements of competitiveness The knowledge and innovation markets are global and have big implications for successful participation in the global economy Investments in Knowledge* now as high % of GDP as Investments in Machinery and Equipment in Advanced Countries (2002) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Investments in Knowledge US Sweden Finland OECD Investments in Machinery & Equipment *Investments in Knowledge = R&D, Software, and Higher Education; Source OECD 2005 ©Knowledge for Development, WBI Knowledge Intensive Services* Greater % of Gross GDP than Technology Intensive Manufactures in Advanced Countries (2002) 25 20 15 10 US EU Japan 5 0 High and Medium Technology Manufactures Knowledge Intensive Services *Knowledge Intensive Market Services exclude government and include following services: posts and telecommunications, finance & insurance, business services: Source OECD 2005 ©Knowledge for Development, WBI Changing Structure of World Merchandise Export 1985 vs. 2004: Primary vs. Manuf. by Tech. Intensity Annual Growth Rate 1985 2004 % % Products 1985 2004 All Products 1,689 7,350 7.6 100.0 391 1,018 4.9 23.2 14.7 1,244 6,063 8.2 76.8 85.3 Resource based 327 1,148 6.5 19.4 15.6 Low technology 239 1,962 7.9 14.2 15.0 Medium technology 480 2,169 7.8 28.5 29.5 High technology 196 1,643 11.2 11.6 22.4 Primary products Manufactured products 100.0 An Increasingly Globalized and Competitive World Economy Increasing Globalization Increasing Competition Rapid reduction of transportation and communications costs. Increasing global information (political, cultural, socio economic) Strong trends towards regional integration (NAFTA, EU, ASEAN+3) Significant trade liberalization is creating larger global market and increased competition Share of exports and imports to GDP has increased from 40% in 1990 to 58% in 2005 MNCs are becoming the most important agent in global economic activity MNCs account for more than 50% of global R&D They are responsible for about 2/3 of trade, and organize and control global supply and distribution ©cjd Changing Education & Training Paradigm Traditional Model Information based Rote learning Teacher directed Just in case Formal education only Directive based Learn at a given age Terminal education Knowledge Economy Model Knowledge creation/application Analysis and synthesis Collaborative learning Just in time Variety of learning modes Initiative based Incentives, motivation to ©Knowledge for Development, WBI Changes in Job Task-Skill Demands USA: 1960–98 16 14 Expert Thinking 12 Percentile Change 10 8 Complex Communication 6 4 2 Routine Manual 0 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1998 -2 Routine Cognitive -4 -6 Non-Routine Manual -8 -10 Source: Autor, Levy, and Murnane (2003) “The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration,” Quarterly Journal of Economics. © K4D program Major Global Restructuring Three major components Unbundling of production of goods to emerging countries facilitated by reduction of transportation costs Unbundling of tasks to emerging countries facilitated by ICT revolution Roughly doubling of global labor force participating in export markets with entry of China, India, and former Soviet republics Implications Returns to labor in developed countries are decreasing because of doubling of global labor force with entrance of newly emerging countries Returns to capital are increasing because of expansion of labor force and ability to operate globally Job security is decreasing Increasing tension between objectives of MNCs and national interests Changing Nature of Competitiveness Competitiveness traditionally based on Capital and labor costs Costs of inputs and infrastructure services General business environment and ease of doing business (including macro stability, taxes, x rate, etc) Superiority in technology or management But it is increasingly being based on Ability to redeploy resources to take advantage of those changing opportunities Quality, skills and flexibility of labor force (and management) Ability to constantly keep up with rapidly changing technological and organizational advances Ability to make effective use of information technologies to reduce transactions costs and improve capacity to respond quickly to changing opportunities©cjd and threats Changing Nature of Competitiveness (cont) Greater value added now comes from knowledge and information As a result there is increased attention across countries on Improving their overall business environment and the flexibility and speed of their economies to respond to rapidly changing circumstances Improving education and skills systems Improving their innovation systems Improving their information infrastructure ©cjd 3. The Four Pillars of the Knowledge Economy EIR provides incentives for the efficient creation, dissemination, and use of existing knowledge To facilitate the effective communication, dissemination, and processing of information. Economic and Institutional Regime Information Infrastructure An educated and skilled population that can use knowledge effectively Education Innovation consisting of organizations that can tap into the stock of global knowledge, assimilate and adapt it and create local knowledge Innovation ©cjd Benchmarking Countries in the Knowledge Economy: The Knowledge Assessment Methodology KAM: 83 structural/qualitative variables to benchmark performance on 4 pillars Variables normalized from 0 (worst) to 10 (best) for 140 countries and 9 regions www.worldbank.org/kam Basic scorecard for 14 variables for two points in time, 1995 and most recent Knowledge economy index (KEI) which includes 3 variables for each of the four pillars: Economic and institutional regime: tariff and non-tariff barriers, rule of law, regulatory quality Education: literacy, secondary and tertiary enrollment rates Innovation: researchers in R&D, scientific and technical scientific publications, and patents in the US ©cjd ICTs: fixed and mobile phone lines per 1000 people, computer per 1000, internet users per 10,000 Basic Scorecard Knowledge Economy Index Economic and Institutional Regime Sub-Index Education Sub-Index Information & Communication Technologies Sub-Index Innovation Sub-Index (Unweighted) Innovation in Context of Developing Countries Innovation should not be considered narrowly just as R&D to move the global frontier It should be understood as new to the country, new to the sector, even new to the firm Developing countries, like Ukraine, will get a much higher return from effectively tapping into global knowledge through trade, foreign direct investment, technology licensing, foreign education, etc than just from own R&D Broad Innovation Scorecard 4. Recent Transformation of Key Developed and Developing Economies Developed Triad: US, Europe, Japan Exemplary European Examples: Finland and Ireland The Four East Asian Newly Industrialized economies Developing Country Giants: China and India United States: technological leader building on large market, flexible institutions, and entrepreneurship The US is the dominant Knowledge Economy in the World The US show tremendous ability to restructure Is the largest single country market Spends the most on education (especially higher education and continuous training) Spends the most on research and development Largest home to multinationals Reaps tremendous gains from scale economies and first mover advantage Thanks to great flexibility of capital and labor markets Tremendous ability for technical, institutional and organizational innovation Strong entrepreneurial and risk taking culture But other countries/regions are catching up EU is now larger economic market Other countries are catching up in tertiary education and R&D Even US multinationals are now becoming more global than American companies Is beginning to suffer from over reach in Iraq fiasco and lose hearts and minds of many parts of world European Community: building large internal market to compete with US Part of the rational for creation of EU was to create large market to get economies of scale to compete with US EU launched ambitious Lisbon Plan in 2001 to make EU the “most knowledge intensive” region in the world by 2010 First was progressive trade integration Then common currency area now covering most EU countries Now working on integration in services and in regulatory mechanisms, but has proved more difficult-note failure of EU constitution in 2006 Also expanded from EU 15 to EU 25 countries in 2004 Included creation of European Research Area and many framework programs to promote joint R&D across countries and increase innovation efforts Also included European Education Area with many programs to integrate education and training programs across countries In spite of many advances plan is falling short of goals Productivity increases and use of information technology in Europe have not kept up with advances in US Few countries that were not already meeting R&D goals are significantly expanding spending to plan levels Japan: producer oriented economy leveraging re-engineering and manufacturing capability Japan was leading world in competitiveness in 1970s and 1980s Japan had major financial crisis in 1991 and unlike Finland (financial crisis in 1991) and Korea (financial 1997) still has not fully recovered growth momentum Initially absorbed foreign knowledge Then developed superior production system with just in time, multi-skilling, multitasking and flexible specialization, and life-long employment This was an autonomously led development, with little foreign direct investment. Rapidly expanded share in global economy, with rapid advances in auto and electronics industry Failed to tackle necessary structural reforms in finance , education, and distribution systems Failure from excessive focus on growth of market share w/o sufficient emphasis on profitability and sustainability Was not sufficiently innovative in basic science Nevertheless Japan still very technologically strong country Second largest R&D spender Strong technological innovator-growing leadership in autos, capital goods, energy efficiency Home to many successful multinationals Exemplary European Examples Finland (from natural resource to knowledge based country) Major financial and exchange crisis in 1990/91 with collapse of Soviet Union Crisis lead to creation of national vision based on investment in telecommunication technologies Government lead increase in R&D investment & ICT engineers Private sector followed and deepened ICT and forestry clusters Became one of most globally competitive economies Ireland (from poorest of Europe to one of richest based on FDI, software and ICT Was poor agricultural economy until 1970s Developed national vision with respect to entry into EC Invested heavily in higher education and attracted European oriented FDI Also developed knowledge based service sector as well as tourism East Asian NIES: Different entry points and leveraging strategies Korea and Taiwan (more technologically autonomous a la Japan) Korea: resource poor economy becomes global competitor by investing in education and skills and technologically strong domestic conglomerates Taiwan: plugs into global production networks and moves up global value chains, with help of Chinese Diaspora Hong Kong and Singapore (FDI dependent) Hong Kong: leverages its human resources as free trade entrepot service economy for trade with China and node of global production system in East Asia Singapore: leverages its human resources by strategically attracting FDI with value increasing activities by investing in human resources and trade infrastructure China: Becoming the World’s Manufacturing Hub Speed, scale and scope of China’s entry into global system unprecedented in history Initially based high investment rate and tapping into global knowledge through Trade FDI Technology licensing Early start in basic and secondary education But moving rapidly up technology ladder through massive investments Second largest economy in ppp terms since 1994 when passed Japan Third largest merchandise exporter since 2005 when passed Japan Will pass US in merchandise exports by end 2007 Tertiary education (now largest # of tertiary students in world) R&D (now second largest in PPP terms-surpassed Japan end 2006) Physical infrastructure Strong global competitor advantage not just low cost labor but also Skills, knowledge, logistics Being plugged into global production system through FDI and Diaspora India: Becoming the World’s Off shoring Service Center India increased rate of growth Post 2000 increase due to From 2-3% Hindu rate of growth of 1950-1980s To 6% in 1990s To 8% last three years Great success in post Y2K ICT service exports Having made early investments in elite English speaking engineering schools Growth of business and financial services India is becoming a knowledge intensive service economy with services, pharmaceuticals, and auto parts as main drivers Has offset constraints of poor infrastructure and bureaucratic constraints on physical trade through possibilities opened up by ICT enabled services 5 .What is at Stake for Ukraine? Given present trends, where will Ukraine be 10, 20, 30 years from now? Will it have increased the income and welfare of its inhabitants, and its role in the world? Will there be many world class knowledge driven companies who can open new opportunities Or will Ukrainian companies be left behind and become marginalized? Weakness in all the fundamental elements of growth and competitiveness Relatively weak government and institutions Low savings and investment Weak human capital particularly new skills and life long learning Weak ICT infrastructure and use Weak innovation in terms to tapping global knowledge 6. Key Strategic Areas for Ukraine Ukraine needs to develop more explicit strategies to improve competitiveness and to benefit more from participation in global economy These strategies need to pay more attention to: Economies of scale in regional markets Quality of institutions and market Education and high level skills Innovation, not just R&D, but tapping global knowledge Effective use of information and communication technologies Trade logistics ©cjd 7. What is to be done? The objective of this training seminar is to Provide an overview of some of the key global trends of the knowledge economy Give an initial assessment of where Ukraine stands in this new very competitive, demanding and dynamic international environment Give some examples of strategies of different countries are using to deal with the challenges Stimulate thinking about some of the key strategic issues Ukraine needs to focus on to improve its competitiveness in this context Successful strategies depend on leadership and on good coordination between private sector, civil society and government That requires developing a common vision, and strong implementation and monitoring capability End Carl J. Dahlman Luce Professor of International Affairs and Information Technology Georgetown University Email: cjd42@georgetown.edu Telephone: 202 687 8045 ©cjd Ukraine’s Knowledge Economy Index Compared to other Regions Ukraine: Current vs 1995 Ukraine and Russia