Cost Accounting:
Foundations and Evolutions, 9e
Kinney ● Raiborn
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
How are the outputs of a joint process classified?
What management decisions must be made before beginning a joint process?
How is the joint cost of production allocated to joint products?
How are by-product and scrap accounted for?
How should retail and not-for-profit organizations account for the cost of a joint activity?
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Joint process —single process in which one product cannot be manufactured without producing others
Extractive industries
Agriculture industries
Food industries
Chemical industries
Industries that produce both first-quality and factory seconds merchandise in a single operation
When the process is unstable and is unable to maintain output at a uniform quality level or
The output quality varies
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Joint costs —material, labor, and overhead incurred during a joint process
Allocate to primary products of a joint process using
Physical measures
Monetary measures
Interpret costs allocated to joint products carefully
Product profitability is determined largely by the allocation method
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
A joint process produces
Joint products —primary outputs of a joint process; substantial revenue-generating ability
By-products —incidental output of a joint process with a higher sales value than scrap but less than joint products
Scrap —incidental output of a joint process with a low sales value
Waste —residual output with no sales value
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Separate cost —incurred in later states of production; assignable to specific primary products
Split-off point —when joint products are first identifiable as individual products
At split-off, joint costs are allocated to joint products
Joint costs are sunk costs once the split-off point is reached
Joint costs may be reduced by the sales value of byproducts and/or scrap
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
D’s Chicken Soup Company
Chicken Noodle
Chicken & Dumplings
Chicken Rice
Chicken
Water
Spices
Prepare vegetables, discard waste
Cook vegetables and chicken in water
Chicken, water, spices and vegetables are joint inputs
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
split off point add
Cooked, canned, and into FG inventory
Chicken
Noodle Noodles
Basic chicken soup Rice
Chicken
Rice
Dumplings
Chicken
&
Dumplings
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Decide before the joint-process is started
Will revenues exceed total costs?
Revenue from sale of joint process outputs
Costs
Joint costs
Processing costs after split-off
Selling costs
What is the opportunity cost?
Is income from the joint process greater than income from other uses?
Is the joint production process the best use of capacity?
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Decide at the split-off point
How to classify outputs
Primary
By-product
Scrap
Waste
Joint costs, reduced by the value of by-products and scrap, are assigned to primary products only
Sell at split-off or process further?
If primary products are marketable at split-off, process further only if value added to the product (incremental revenue exceeds incremental cost)
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Physical measure
Common physical characteristic
Monetary measure
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Physical Measures
Treats each unit as equally desirable
Assigns same cost to each unit
Provides an unchanging yardstick of output over time
Use for products with unstable selling prices
Use in rate-regulated industries
Ignores revenue-generating ability of joint product
Joint Cost
Pounds =
$150
300 lbs
Examples of Physical
Measures
Tons of meat, bone, and hide in meat packing and chicken processing
Tons of ore in mining
Linear board feet in lumber milling
Barrels of oil in petroleum refining
Number of computer chips in semiconductors
= $0.50 per lb
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Monetary Measure
Recognizes the revenue —generating ability of joint products
The base is not constant — unchanging
Choices
Sales value at split-off
Net realizable value (NRV) at split-off
Approximated NRV at split-off
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Choose a monetary allocation base
List values that comprise the base for each joint product
Sum the values
Divide each individual value by the total value; this is the numerical proportion for each value
Multiply joint costs by each proportion; this is the amount to allocate to each product
Divide allocated joint cost for each product by the number of equivalent units to obtain a cost per equivalent unit
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
(slide 1 of 3)
Choose a monetary allocation base
Sales value at split-off
List values that comprise the base for each joint product
Product Revenue (at split-off)
A
B
C
$ 1,000
$ 4,000
$ 5,000
Sum the values
$1,000 + $4,000 + $5,000 = $10,000
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
(slide 2 of 3)
Divide each individual value by the total value; this is the numerical proportion for each value
Product Revenue
A
B
C
$ 1,000 1,000/10,000 = 10%
$ 4,000 4,000/10,000 = 40%
$ 5,000 5,000/10,000 = 50%
$10,000 100%
Multiply joint costs ($3,000) by each proportion; this is the amount to allocate to each product
Joint Cost
Product Joint Costs Proportion Per Product
A
B
C
$3,000 *
$3,000 *
$3,000 *
10%
40%
50%
$ 300
$1,200
$1,500
$3,000
$3,000 of joint costs are allocated to Products A, B and C
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
(slide 2 of 3)
Divide allocated joint cost for each product by the number of equivalent units to obtain a cost per EUP
Joint Cost
Product Per Product
A $ 300 /
B
C
$1,200
$1,500 /
$3,000
/
Equivalent
Units
100
600
300
Cost
Per EU
$3.00
$2.00
$5.00
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Uses relative sales value at split-off point
All joint products must be marketable at splitoff
Uses a weighting technique based on both
Quantity produced
Selling price of production
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Sales revenue at split-off less product disposal costs equals NRV
NRV at split-off
Assigns joint costs based on the proportional NRVs of the joint products at the split-off point
All joint products must be marketable at split-off
Approximated NRV at split-off
Some or all joint products are not marketable at split-off
Uses simulated NRV at split-off in place of actual NRV at split-off
Incremental separate cost equals all processing and disposal costs incurred between split-of point and point of sale
Assumes that incremental revenue from further processing is equal to or greater than the incremental costs of further processing and selling
Final sales price less incremental separate costs equals simulated NRV at split-off
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Which monetary measure method to use?
Sales value at split-off
NRV at split-off
Approximated NRV at split-off
Superior method of measuring benefits
Matches costs of joint processing with its benefits
Provides expected contribution of each product line to the coverage of joint costs
More complex due to required estimates
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
(slide 1 of 3)
By-products, scrap, and waste may provide substantial revenue
Companies are devoting time, attention, and creativity to developing innovative revenue sources from by-products, scrap, and waste
Sales value of by-products/scrap is recorded using
NRV Method or
Choose method based on
Realized Value Method
Magnitude of NRV
Need for additional processing after split-off
Decide before joint costs are allocated to the joint products
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
(slide 2 of 3)
Selling Price
Less Process, Storage, Disposal Costs equals NRV of By-Product/Scrap NRV
Use this method when NRV is significant
Scrap or by-product recorded at NRV
NRV reduces joint cost of main products
Any loss is added to cost of the main products
Indirect method
NRV reduces cost of goods sold for joint products
Conservative; joint cost is reduced when the product/scrap is sold
Direct method
NRV reduces work in process for joint products
Joint cost is reduced when by-product/scrap is produced
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
(slide 3 of 3)
NRV is the traditional method, not necessarily best method
By-products have either no assignable costs or costs equal to their net sales value
Difficult for management to
Monitor production and further processing of byproducts
Make effective decisions for by-products
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
(slide 1 of 2)
First option
Proceeds recorded as
Other Revenue
Costs of additional processing or disposal added to costs of primary products
Provides little information to management as it does not match revenues and expenses
By-product/scrap value is recognized when items sold
Second option
Proceeds less related costs shown as Other Income
Matches revenues and related expenses for storage, further processing, transportation, and disposal costs
Highlights the revenue enhancement provided by managing the costs and revenues related to byproducts/scrap
Allows for better control and improved performance
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
(slide 2 of 2)
Other clerically efficient options
Proceeds added to gross margin
Proceeds reduce cost of goods manufactured
Proceeds reduce cost of goods sold
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
If most jobs create byproducts or scrap
Proceeds reduce the manufacturing overhead account
The journal entry using the realized value approach is:
If only specific jobs create by-products or scrap
Proceeds reduce work in process for the specific job
The journal entries using the NRV approach are:
Cash
Manufacturing Overhead
Scrap Inventory
Work in Process
Cash
Scrap Inventory
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Joint costs include
Advertising for multiple products
Printing for multipurpose documents
Events held for multiple purposes
Not required to allocate joint costs
Allocation base
Physical (number of locations)
Monetary (sales volume)
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Joint costs related to
Fund-raising
Organizational programs (program activities)
Conducting an administrative function
Joint costs must be allocated for NPFs and state and local government entities
Method must be rational and systematic
Clearly show the amount spent for various activities
Three tests for allocation — purpose , audience , and content
If tests not met, the costs are fund-raising
Compensation tied to contributions is automatically fund-raising
Purpose is to ensure that users of financial statements can identify fund-raising costs
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
What is a joint product?
How are costs allocated to joint products?
What accounting methods are used to record the proceeds from the sale of by-products?
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Product decisions based on sum of joint and separate processing costs
Misclassifying a joint product as by-product or scrap
Misclassifying products as waste and selling “off the books”
Manipulating joint costs in ending inventory
Using sales values of by-products and scrap to manipulate overhead allocation rates
Disposing of hazardous waste in a harmful way
Misallocating costs to programs or management activities to reduce fund-raising costs reported by a not-for-profit organization
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.