1 A Self Harm Conference Presentation March 2015

advertisement

Prevention of Self-Harm and Suicidal

Ideation Conference

26 th March 2015

Welcome

Emma Grinham

Young Person Chair of the Mental Health Anti

Stigma Programme

David Loyd-Hearn

Commissioning Manager Children and Young People

Emotional Health and Wellbeing

Prevention of Self-Harm and Suicidal Ideation

Conference

• Setting the Scene

• Self Harm and serious Case Reviews – lessons learnt

• Acute self harm

• Break

• Northamptonshire Community & Toolkit

• The real story in school

• TaMHS – Mental Health in Schools - setting up an

Emotional Health and Wellbeing Team

• Action planning

• Closing summary

Setting the Scene

Self-Harm = Symptoms

Self-harm across the spectrum

Why is Emotional Well Being and Mental Health for Children important?

Emotional wellbeing underpins being successful at school, making and keeping friendships and making the most of life.

Approximately 50% of lifetime mental illness

starts before the age of 14 and it is estimated that potentially half these problems are preventable.

Self Harm can sometimes be a coping mechanism or fashion, but it can also lead to significant harm and occasionally suicide. It is not the act that matters, but the intent.

Around 1 in 10 children and young people may

have a mental health problem at any one time.

Referrals have increased by 27% in

Northamptonshire over the last 3 years with 6.5% of all children getting support

Self-harming admissions are higher in

Northamptonshire than the national average.

Research suggests self-harming behaviours are average.

Recent Northamptonshire Public Health assessment suggests local wider costs £1347 million due to mental illness

In adulthood half of all women, and a quarter of men will be affected by depression at some stage in their life.

When it comes to children and young people, 1 in

10 children self-harm, with suicide accounting for

20% of deaths in young people between the ages of 15-24.

Key Findings from CYP Survey

(775 Responses)

Unmet needs continue to feature which do not fit in defined Specialist CAMHS criteria e.g. challenging behaviour, self harm as a coping mechanism. We are working together to resolve.

73% of a significant sample of young people have body image concerns, this increases to 90% of the sample of

CAMHS users. Young people suggest this is sometimes a cause for self-harm.

Behaviour Issues account for 52% of

paediatric referrals and a significant number of CAMHS referrals. If untreated, sometimes these cases may lead to selfharm.

We are a national outlier for self harm due to the adherence of NICE guidance, though we are about average in presentation numbers by NHS estimates.

Anxiety and Depression is the number 1

reason for referral (and can lead to eating issues or self harm as a coping mechanism). Young People increasingly find self harm is an acceptable coping

Mechanism.

There is a significant lack of knowledge

of services, what is available and how to access. If in doubt, visit www.asknormen.co.uk

What is self-harm?

• Self-mutilation

• Self-destructive behaviours (compulsively pursued acts that causes self-harm e.g. head banging)

• Self-harm without suicidal intent

• Attempted suicide

• Minority who self-harm attend A&E departments or specialist services

• Most are supported in the community

• Most young people who self-harm do not continue with this into their 20’s

How many young people self-harm?

• Rarer in pre-teens (but locally this is growing)

• 10% of adolescents in the UK self-harm

• At 14yrs; 25% Females & 14% Males experience suicidal ideation

• Only 2-3% present to medical services

• Huge number remain unknown (behaviour self harm has been anecdotally estimated at 50%)

Self Harm is not the issue, it is the cause and intent that matter most. Less than 4% of self harmers go on to have enduring mental health needs.

National and Local Statistics

• 72% of people who seek help for depression are female

• 75% of people who take their own lives are men.

• National rates of self-reported self-harm are 7% for 11-16 year olds but several times higher in those with:

• emotional disorder (28%)

• conduct disorder (21%)

• ADHD (18%).

• Applying national rates to Northamptonshire would mean that 2940 11-16 year olds would report self-harm. Our actual figure is lower, though in schools anecdotal evidence suggests the rates could be as many as 50%.

Northamptonshire A&E Admission Rates for Self Harm

Locality

Western Northampton

Kettering

East/Southern Northampton

Central Northampton

East Northants

Daventry North

Corby

Wellingborough

Daventry South

Oundle & Wansford

Not coded

Total

Inpatient

Admissions of 0-19's in

2009-10

Inpatient

Admissions of 0-19's in

2010-11

Inpatient

Admissions of 0-19's in

2011-12

Inpatient

Admissions of 0-19's in

2012-13

51

35

60

51

64

40

55

49

30

44

15

28

48

43

19

30

55

55

20

23

40

28

26

23

29

15

14

1

28

21

17

0

24

14

18

1

25

20

17

4

19

281

15

332

23

337

12

299

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

All

Inpatient

All

Inpatient

Admissions Admissions

All

Inpatient

All

Inpatient

Admissions Admissions in 2009-10 in 2010-11 in 2011-12 in 2012-13

Years 0-4

Years 5-11

Years 12-16

Years 17-18

Hospital Admissions (Approx)

Under 10 yrs Low figures

East Midlands 2010

10-14 yrs 350

15-19 yrs 1500

20-24 yrs 1300

• 25-29 yrs 1000

• 30-34 yrs 800

• 30-39 yrs 1100

• 40-44 yrs 1200

• 45-49 yrs 700

• 50-54 yrs 550

• 55-59 yrs 300

• 60-64 yrs 170

• 65-85+ yrs figures reduce

Under 18’s Hospital Admissions by PCT

East Midlands 2010

• Derbyshire 210 12.4

• Derby City 104 17.4

• Nottinghamshire 164 9.2

• Nottingham City 118 17.3

• Northamptonshire 220 12.8

Per 10,000 area population

• Leicestershire 199 12.2

• Leicester City 91 11.2

• Lincolnshire 155 9.8

• East Midlands Total 1261 12.0

What are we doing about self-harm? Short

Term

• The conference highlights the new self- harm toolkits for Northamptonshire on www.asknormen.co.uk

• Web resources for young people by young people available on http://www.talkoutloud.info/how-do-youfeel/self-harm.aspx

• We have redefined the acute self harm and suicidal ideation pathway

• We are actively working with Northampton and Kettering Locality Forums to embed action plans with excellent examples of best practice at schools such as Northampton Academy & Kettering Buccleuch

Academy.

• Auditing Urgent Care Admissions

• Developing questionnaires for acute self-harmers

What are we doing to reduce self-harm?

Long Term

• The 2014-17 Children and Young People Emotional Wellbeing and Mental Health Strategy looks at improving emotional resilience

• The Partnership are working to improve outcomes relating to challenging sexualised behaviours, drug and alcohol misuse, parental mental health and interpersonal violence

• Initiatives to improve family relationships, resilience and coping strategies o Five to Thrive o Targeted Mental Health in Schools (TaMHS) o Talk Out Loud Anti Stigma Programme o Working with School Nursing as a part of the National Call to Action

• Support of adults with mental health concerns or harmful behaviours

• Developing the Children’s Community Health Services

Priorities for the 2013-17

Emotional Wellbeing and Mental

Health Strategy

• The promotion of positive emotional wellbeing and early intervention

• Improved integration in targeted and specialist services including a single point of access

• Better support for children and young people who are chronically or acutely unwell

• Strengthened thresholds and pathways for behavioural and neurological developmental issues

• Focus on key groups of vulnerable children and young people to prevent poor emotional wellbeing outcomes and ensure there are appropriate interventions when they require additional support

Northamptonshire Children and

Young People Community Health

Transformation Programme

When to make Referrals

Transitions

Occupational

Therapy

Looked

After

Children

Integrated Children & Young People’s

Specialist Health Service

Urgent

Referrals

Single

Specialism

CYP Referral

Management Centre

Integrated

Specialist

Pathway

Non-Urgent

Referrals

Integrated

Assessment &

Treatment

Speech

&

Language

Therapy

Physiotherapy

Countywide offer delivered in

Localities

CAMHS

Community

ADHD &

ASD

Children’s

Specialist

Nursing

Short

Breaks

Community

Paediatrics

CAMHS

In Patients

Children’s

Dietetics

Dealing with Child and Young People presentations within local settings

Doing Well – expected that universal services engage – e.g. the Talk Out Loud Anti Stigma programme/TaMHS work in schools to promote mindfulness

Doing alright or with a single issue. Targeted Services to cover –(largely NCC services) – Self Harm as a behaviour may fit into this. School Nursing or Health Visitors may be appropriate

Where professionals are uncertain, it may be worth contacting the CAF Co-ordinator and attending complex case meetings

SOME NOTICEABLE PROBLEMS – in more than one area. Variable functioning with sporadic difficulties or symptoms in several but not all social areas. Disturbance would be apparent to those who encounter the child in a dysfunctional setting or time but not to those who see the child in other settings. Targeted

Plus services to cover e.g. Counselling services or some services by NCC

If the presentation is largely effecting children within school settings, it may be worth using the pupil premium to commission any support such as family support or education psychology services.

When to make a referral to the Referral Management

Centre for CAMHS/Paediatrics?

Specialist Services (e.g. CAMHS) to cover - OBVIOUS PROBLEMS – moderate impairment in most areas or severe in one area - Moderate degree of interference in functioning in most social areas or severe impairment functioning in one area, such as might result from, e.g. suicidal preoccupations and ruminations, school refusal and other forms of anxiety, obsessive rituals, major conversion symptoms, frequent anxiety attacks, frequent episodes of aggressive or other antisocial behaviour with some preservation of meaningful social relationships.

SERIOUS PROBLEMS – major impairment in several areas and unable to function in one area

Major impairment in functioning in several areas and unable to function in one of these areas, i.e. disturbed at home, at school, with peers or in the society at large, e.g. persistent aggression without clear instigation; markedly withdrawn and isolated behaviour due to either mood or through disturbance, suicidal attempts with clear lethal intent. Such children are likely to require special schooling and/or hospitalisation or withdrawal from school (but this is not a sufficient criterion for inclusion in this category).

If uncertain, there is a CAMHS PROFESSIONAL CONSULTATION LINE

Monday to Friday

9.30am—1.00pm

Tel: 0300 1111 022

When issues are treated as urgent?

Highly Specialist Services (e.g. Crisis team/Inpatient) - SEVERE PROBLEMS - unable to function in almost all situations - Unable to function in almost all areas, e.g. stays at home, in ward or in bed all day without taking part in social activities OR severe impairment in reality testing OR serious impairment in communication (e.g. sometimes incoherent or inappropriate).

VERY SEVERELY IMPAIRED -considerable supervision is required for safety Needs considerable supervision to prevent hurting others or self, e.g. frequently violent, repeated suicide attempts OR to maintain personal hygiene! OR gross impairment in all forms of communication, e.g. severe abnormalities in verbal and gestural communication, marked social aloofness, stupor, etc.

• EXTREMELY IMPAIRED - constant supervision is required for safety Needs constant supervision

(24-hour care) due to severely aggressive or self-destructive behaviour or gross impairment in

reality testing, communication, cognition, affect or personal hygiene.Working as a self- harm team, consider peer support/supervision and confidentiality issues.

Websites and Links

Northampton Young Healthy Minds Gatewaywww.asknormen.co.uk

CAMHShttp://www.nhft.nhs.uk/main.cfm?type=CONTENTCAMHS

Northampton Youth Forumhttp://www.northampton.gov.uk/info/200124/forums/329/northampton_youth_forum

Northamptonshire Parent Forum Groupwww.northantspfg.co.uk

Out Therehttp://www.thelowdownevents.info/new-youth-group-out-there/

Shooting Starshttp://www.northantspfg.co.uk/shooting-stars/

Talk Out Loud – www.talkoutloud.info

Young Mindshttp://www.youngminds.org.uk/

Youth Space www.youthspace.me

Northamptonshire CAMHS Review: http ://www.neneccg.nhs.uk/cyp-services/

NORTHAMPTONSHIRE’S STRATEGY FOR THE EMOTIONAL WELLBEING AND MENTAL HEALTH OF CHILDREN

AND YOUNG PEOPLE 2014 –2017 http://www.neneccg.nhs.uk/modules/downloads/download.php?file_name=1156

Websites and Links – Youth Counselling

• Youth Counselling across the county http://www.servicesix.co.uk/

• Northampton http://thelowdown.info/

• Daventry http://www.time2talk.org.uk/

• Kettering and Corby http://kyi.org.uk/

• Oundle http://www.oundle.gov.uk/oundle-town-council-properties/courthouse/chat/

• Wellingborough http://www.servicesix.co.uk/

• ADHD Support http://www.autismconcern.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=195:newadhd-a-as-dual-diagnosis-provision-in-northamptonshire

• Prevention of Self-Harm and Suicidal Ideation Toolkit http://www.asknormen.co.uk/self-harm-andsuicidal-ideation-conference-resources/

• And new for supporting training in 2015/2016 https://www.minded.org.uk/

Self Harm and serious Case

Reviews – lessons learnt

Case Vignette

Maggie Beer

Was her death predictable or preventable?

Who was she?

She was bright, capable and articulate. She had experienced significant neglect in the first 5 years of her life and had been looked after since then.

She took her own life just before her 18 th birthday.

What did we learn?

History was not shared and therefore her journey was not understood.

Agencies did communicate but it was limited and not followed through.

As an articulate young person she was able to ‘keep people away’ but her ‘voice’ was not present.

Was her death predictable or preventable?

Who was she?

She was bright, capable and articulate. She had experienced significant neglect in the first 5 years of her life and had been looked after since then.

She took her own life just before her 18 th birthday.

What have we done?

What did we learn?

Who was she?

History was not shared and therefore her journey was not understood.

Agencies did communicate but it was limited and not followed through.

She was bright, capable and articulate. She had experienced significant neglect in the first 5 years of her life and had been looked after since then.

As an articulate young person she was able to ‘keep people away’ but her ‘voice’ was not present.

Was her death predictable or preventable?

She took her own life just before her 18 th birthday.

What have we done?

• Self-harm pathway developed

• Challenged National protocol for leaving care in terms of the information shared when young people subject to leaving care legislation move from one area to another.

• Reiterated the need to access young people’s history – this is a recurrent theme from local serious case reviews, where for adolescents or infants.

Is it suicide?

27 different definitions and Coronial process apply rules subjectively across country so different rates-affects ONS data

Small numbers of suicides in each local centre so learning impaired

Nottinghamshire’s

Experience

2012 audit

Majority of deaths were unpredicted

Minority were high levels of previous emotional health concern/deliberate self harm/child protection

So how do we PRECICT risk and learn?

Self-Harm – the acute story

Julie Quincey

Named Nurse Safeguarding Children

Northampton General Hospital

Young person up to 18 years presents at A&E following Deliberate Self-harm act

Triaged in A&E, and if no medical treatment is required, transfer to ward (Child or Adult setting) with child self-harm pathway documentation started by A&E staff

Clerked on the ward and medically assessed

Ward ring Child and Adolescent Mental

Services (CAMHS) to request risk assessment

• Prior to 12.00 midday Mon – Fri 9 – 5 call

CAMHS Newland House, 01605 656060

• Between 17.00-22.00 the CAMHS CRISIS team can be contacted for consultation via Berrywood hospital reception on

01604 682682

Patient refuses treatment and absconds from Hospital

Inform police (999) and ask for welfare check clearly record the incident number in the patient record

Police return with patient - continue with pathway

If patient admitted out of hours, they should be kept in overnight and CAMHS informed next working day

CAMHS undertake mental health risk assessment. If safeguarding concerns request ward contacts social care for joint assessment and inform Hospital Safeguarding team

Patient refuses to return, inform GP and refer to children’s social services and ask them to consider referral to CAMHS

Once assessment is completed, and medical review taken place, the patient can be discharged home. If there are safeguarding concerns then a joint discharge planning meeting with children’s social services should ensure safe discharge.

Ensure Paediatric Liaison Form is completed and copied to school nurse and GP, or if Interagency referral to social services has been completed, a copy of this will be sent to GP and School Nurse. Ensure

Safeguarding team is copied in. DOCUMENT EVERYTHING IN THE

PATHWAY, COMPLETE SAFEGUARDING CHRONOLOGY.

Why do we assess the next working day

As per NICE guidelines we do the following

First they need to be medically stable

Secondly they need time out to sleep, to reflect and to rest

Then CAMHS will come and assess

Catherine’s Story

Catherine’s story

• Catherine was admitted to NGH having taken an overdose of 24 paracetamol, 8 ibruprofen, 3 nytal and her father’s anti-depressants 15 tablets were missing

• I was present when Catherine was admitted she had come via ambulance

• She was in secondary school, looked very thin, nicely dressed and otherwise looked well looked after

• She came with her older brother, her father and her step-mother

• Her father and step mother were distressed and were struggling to come to terms with

Catherine’s actions, her brother seemed detached

The treatment

• Catherine’s paracetamol levels were high and therefore she required a parvolex drip and stayed in over night

• We weighed her and checked her eating pattern though thin she had a normal BMI and we observed her eating well on the ward

• The next morning she was pronounced medically fit for discharge

• CAMHS attended and did their assessment they felt she was not mentally ill but would follow her up in the community

Catherine and her family tell their story

• I told Catherine she could go home but she refused she said her brother was hitting her and she was not going to go home anymore, she had not shared this with the CAMHS worker

• As the safeguarding nurse I needed to understand more

• It took the next three hours to unpick the story. Catherine had originally lived with her birth mother who struggled with mental health problems both children suffered emotional abuse and after a case conference were placed with their father

• Catherine’s step mother was very calm and understanding but had found

Catherine emotionally shut down and non-communicative

Catherine and her family tell their story

• Catherine shared that her brother Toby was really hard to live with as he had behavioural problems

• I had observed Toby for a number of hours and he struck me as being on the autistic spectrum, I discussed this with his father and step-mother and they agreed to a referral to CAMHS to have him assessed, I later found out he had been diagnosed with high functioning autism

• Catherine agreed to go home once she knew Toby would get help

Catherine

• With the parents agreement we referred Catherine as a child in need to social services, the family were assessed and were eventually signed posted to a life story worker who worked with Catherine

• Though Catherine was not mentally ill she was struggling to make sense of her world as was her brother

• The family had been through a lot of trauma they needed time and help to make sense of the many changes

• To my knowledge Catherine did not self-harm again

Jack’s story

How Jack came to hospital

• Jack was seen by the police he was standing outside his girlfriends house at 3 am in the morning it was snowing heavily, his head and shoulders were covered in snow

• Jack was not making sense when the police spoke to him his words were slurred and his eyes looked dilated, he eventually admitted to the police he had taken an overdose

• The police brought him to A&E and he was admitted to the children’s ward, he was 17 years old effectively homeless and sofa surfing he originally was from out of county

The treatment

• Jack also required a parvolex drip

• He had also self harmed through cutting and required steristrips to his arms and the cuts to his legs were cleaned up

• He appeared to have a chest infection and bloods were taken

• During the night Jack slept deeply

• The next morning he was ready to see CAMHS

Jack takes his leave

• I was rung by the ward, Jack was refusing to stay as he was worried about his girlfriend

• We managed to calm Jack whilst we waiting for CAMHS Jack started to tell me that he had stood every night for the past week outside his girlfriends house, she and her mother didn’t know. He felt it was the only way he could keep her safe and he felt compelled to do it

• Jack appeared to be highly distractible and appeared to be listening to something, I shared my concerns with the CAMHS worker I was beginning to wonder if Jack was manic or indeed psychotic

CAMHS assessed

• CAMHS agreed that Jack was showing pressure of speech, had distorted thinking he believed his mobile was sending him messages but his mobile was completely dead and had been for a number of days

• He was also stating if he left the hospital he would jump from a building

• The CAMHS worker explained to Jack he was ill and said he needed to be admitted to psychiatric hospital

Jack ran

Jack

• Jack was returned to the ward by the police

• Eventually Jack was transferred to psychiatric hospital by the police and the AMHP worker under section 3 of the mental health act

• I do not know the outcome of Jack’s story

Kelsie’s story

Kelsie’s story

• Kelsie had over 20 admissions to NGH in a three month period in her late teens

• She allegedly took overdoses however the tox screen never showed toxic levels in her blood

• She frequently self-harmed by cutting, burning and using ligatures

• Kelsie during this time became looked after by social services

• As her story slowly unfolded it was discovered she had been sexually exploited

• Kelsie has learning difficulties

Kelsie to date

• Kelsie has been very hard to help

• Though she is not mentally ill she does use self-harming behaviour to express her feelings

• She frequently disappears from her foster carers

• She will return to her mother’s and then go missing again

• She is potentially at risk when she does not engage

• Kelsie is now a young adult and continues to be admitted to

NGH with self-harm

What can we learn

• These cases are pretty typical

• Catherine’s was due to the effect of coping with emotional abuse

• Jack had developed bi-polar

• Kelsie has a troubled background, learning disability and is at risk of sexual exploitation

Catherine

• Catherine had had many changes, her new school was aware of the troubles she had experienced with her birth family, but as Catherine was quiet and a good student it was assumed both by school and her parents that she was coping

• Catherine’s history is a high risk for vulnerability to self harm

• Parental mental illness

• Child protection proceedings

• Brother with emerging developmental disorder

• Mentoring at school may have helped

Jack

• Jack was homeless and only became known to services after admission

• Though his girlfriends mother knew Jack was troubled he had hid the homelessness from her and his girlfriend agreed to keep quiet

• The police responded really well, Jack has got an early diagnosis and if he follows his medical regime he should have better outcomes

Kelsie

• Kelsie had been permanently excluded on more than one occasion

• She was well known to social services

• Her learning difficulty had never been formally diagnosed

• Her mother rarely reported her missing

• Kelsie’s vulnerabilities made her ideal for men to sexually exploit

• All workers should be familiar with the CSE toolkit to spot the risk factors and take action sooner

Break

The Community & Schools Pathway and Toolkit

Cazz Broxton

CAMHS Community Liaison Lead

Mike Simons

Senior Educational Psychologist, NCC

& Lead for Northamptonshire TaMHS Programme

Annie Head

Counsellor, Northampton Academy

What is Self-harm?

• Self-harm in the literature is used to cover deliberate acts of injury which may or may not involve a wish to die.

• One example is that of physical mutilation e.g. cutting the skin, repeatedly banging a part of the body etc.

• Most people who injure themselves in what they call selfharm do not intend to intentionally risk their lives

Why do young people Self Harm ?

• Act of self-harm or self injury can be symptoms of distress

• The importance of the act is meaningful to the individual who carries it out

• It is important not to generalise about young people who selfharm

• It can be a way of coping with many different emotions

Explanation from people who Self-harm

To be able to feel anything

A sense of control

The pain proves your human

For the physical pain to overtake the emotional pain

To let the anger out

It is like an addiction

To break numbness

A way of punishing myself

I like watching the blood run

Cycle of self-harm

Negative emotions

Sadness, anger and despair

Tension

Inability to control emotions, maybe using dissociation to cope with tension

Self- harm act

Cutting, burning etc

Positive effects

Endorphins released, tension and negative feelings dispelled for a short period

Negative effects

Shame and guilt over self-harm act

Definition

‘Self-poisoning or self-injury, irrespective of the apparent purpose of the act’

NICE, 2004

The Two Pathways

The Community & School pathway and acute pathway

Community

& School

Pathway

If necessary,

Acute

Pathway

The Community & School Pathway

• Improved communication home, school and other agencies

• Self- harm team

• CAMHS consultation through liaison line

• Checking with safeguarding protocols

• Consideration of informing parent/carer

• Risk assessments and forms

The Toolkit

• Toolkit has been developed by Northamptonshire Multi-agency pathway development team and also includes guidance from other national and regional organisations

• Guidance for schools to support children, young people and families at an individual and systemic level

• Bringing a national perspective into the local framework including example policies for schools

• Tools can be used in either a preventative or supportive capacity

• Toolkit contains both practical and theoretical evidence based approaches to helping and supporting young people

Using the Toolkit and Pathway

Scenario....

You are approached by a young person who attends your organisation e.g. school/ community group who has indicated that they have self-harmed by cutting them self. They have shown you the cut on their forearm.

For five minutes on your tables, discuss how you would use the pathway and toolkit to help you to support this young person and decide on a plan of support...

Key aspects to consider

• Working as a self- harm team, consider peer support/supervision and confidentiality issues.

• Informing parents and use of scripts for telephone conversation/ letter to parents to arrange meeting

• Any necessary further referral e.g. Safeguarding, CAMHS, Educational Psychologist,

Community Support?

• Tools that may be useful e.g. proactive support plan, script for talking to a young person, coping strategies and distractions, risk assessment, protective behaviours

• Documenting the support- appropriately evidencing a plan of support in school and ensuring paperwork is clear and relevant should an ongoing referral need to be made

• Consistent documentation to be handed over when relevant between the two pathways in order that all agencies recognise plans of support.

Look after you-supervision and team support are paramount!

The Real Story in School

Northampton Academy

Responding to Self-harm Through an Emotional Health

& Wellbeing Team

Annie Head

Counsellor

Northampton Academy

The Pastoral Support Team

The aim of the Pastoral Support Team is to meet the Social, emotional and Mental Health needs of students. The team consists of two

Pastoral Support Managers, a Counsellor and an

Early Intervention Coordinator who works with families through the CAF process. The Team works alongside the SEND team within the

Inclusion faculty and is part of a graduated response

Responding To The Emotional

Health and Wellbeing of Students

Good referral policies and procedures are key in developing and maintaining a well-functioning team and should be revisited termly to be consistently good.

• They allow containment for students, staff and families.

• They remove reactionary behaviours and the risk of catastrophizing which can potentially increase stress and anxiety.

• They allow good communication and discussion. Confidentiality is always adhered to, yet a degree of transparency is required in the best interest of the student.

• They involve good record keeping, tracking referrals, both internally and externally. This allows us to identify emotional needs through trends and patterns of behaviour. Preventative work can then be tailored to meet the needs of students.

• They ensure the work is allocated appropriately to the right person with the right skill set who will assess the needs of the student accordingly and be able to make good onward referrals if necessary.

Self Harm Cases Presented To The PST

2013-2014

Self- Harm Cases Presented To

The PST 2013-2014

• 92 students – 7% (1:14) engaged in a form of self harm; cutting, scratching, drug use, alcohol, group identity activities (99 scratches, ice cube challenge etc), sexual activity, risky behaviours, negative influences of social media

• The most prevalent year group was 11 with 11% (1:9) of the year group presenting. This is very much in line with national trends. Of this, 48% were girls and 52% boys.

• The second most prevalent year group was 9 with 10% ( 1:10) of students presenting. Again this reflects national trends and thoughts about the developmental conflicts at this age; self and identity. 87% were girls and 13% boys.

• It is anticipated that figures for this academic year will be consistent with 2013-2014.

Responding To Self Harm

To manage this challenge within school it was evident that in addition to the established referral procedures ,the efficacy of which had already been tested, a stringent self harm policy was required.

Following discussions with key staff in school, including the

PST, the Lead Safeguarding manager, School Nurse and the

NHS Nurse:

• A pathway of support was drawn up

• The Self Harm toolkit, launched in October 2014, was tailored to meet the needs of the school

• Both documents were presented as one policy to the

Governing Body who ratified it as a working policy.

• All staff were made aware of this new policy.

9. PATHWAY OF SUPPORT

What you should do if you discover/ have concerns that a student is self-harming

If the student requires If Not

Medical attention

↓ ↓

Contact Mrs Head (0034)

Mrs Smith or Miss Grimes

(Pastoral Team 0047)

Assessment completed with

Contact Mrs Cason Student

School Nurse (0091) ↓

↓ Consider consultation with

If serious or in doubt CAMHS Liaison Line

Paramedics called

Parents/Carers informed ↓

CPO, Safe Guarding

Manager informed.

School Counsellor to

Consider a risk assessment

If yes, staff informed and

If meets CAMHS ← placed on T drive

threshold ↓

School NHS nurse

Informed.

Referral to CAMHS

If not, referral to school

Counsellor. Liasion with

Consider a CAF ← parents/carers support

offered through school or CAMHS

A Case Study- Jane

Jane is 14 years old and is in year 9. Her friends took her to a member of staff as she had told them she had taken some tablets in school after her friends became concerned about her. She had become very anxious and was unable to catch her breath.

The member of staff followed the policy by immediately seeking medical assistance. Jane presented to the school nurse in an extremely agitated manner as her anxiety increased. Other students were present in the medical room.

It was therefore important to contain any anxieties they may be experiencing.

Following immediate observations, the school nurse followed procedures by:

A Case Study - Jane

• Requesting paramedic support

• Contacting the PST

• Contacting parents

Throughout this time, Jane was monitored and kept safe.

I attended the medical room to discover Jane in a very distressed state. She was however able and willing to inform us that she had taken some tablets from home from a family member. She still had the empty blisters packs on her. She also reported that she had disposed of some tablets in a bin in school. Jane was attended to by paramedics who once they had retrieved the tablets from school took Jane to NGH.

• Jane’s friends were informed of events and supported, as was the member of staff who reported the event

• Jane’s tutor, head of year, teaching staff, attendance, the

Lead safe Guarding Manager were all informed.

A Case Study - Jane

Jane was admitted to NGH and assessed by CAMHS. The school NHS nurse was referred to . On her return to school:

• A risk assessment was drawn up and agreed with Jane and her family, to be reviewed monthly.

• A CAF was initiated to support the family. As issues came to light that were impacting negatively on Jane’s emotional well-being it was evident that the family needed support. Concerns were also raised regarding Jane’s risky behaviours and those of her brother, who is now also being supported by school. The case is now being taken to complex case.

• Counselling was arranged for Jane in school.

• Discussions were held with CAMHS who are supporting Jane.

• Jane has a cohesive support plan in place and we hope that through this she will make good progress.

Targeted Mental Health in Schools

A holistic approach to promoting MH addressing self-harm and other manifestations of child/young person distress

Capacity-building – through training, consultation and coaching.

Evidence-based – inc using learning from

TaMHS Project 2009-11

Collaborative & Multi-agency

Building-Blocks of Provision for Building

Mentally Healthy Schools in Northamptonshire

January

2015

As informed by

Northamptonshire

Targeted Mental Health in Schools Project & Programme 2009 - 2017

‘Drawing and Emotional Health /

Talking’ Wellbeing Team – to

KS1-4 support students in

KS3&4

Home-Focused Practitioner

Trained in ASD, 123 Magic,

Solihull Approach

Parenting, Theraplay

More Targeted

Programmes or Support

- Wave 3 focused

Peer Support

KS1&2

Peer Mentoring

KS3&4

Building Resilience thru:

‘Zippy’s Friends’ KS1

‘FRIENDS’ KS2/3/4

County PSHE

Prog inc SEAL.

Healthy Schools

Anti Bullying

(inc Cyber)

Shoe Box

& Mental

Health

Handbook

CBT based Group

Work e.g.

‘Growing Optimism’ or ‘RESPECT’

Peer Massage or

Relaxation

Techniques

Headteacher

& Staff Wellbeing

Programmes

Support for child experiencing Insecure

Attachment (inc Theraplay), Anxiety,

Loss, Bereavement, Separation, ADHD,

ASD, Self-harm & Domestic Abuse

Targeted

Programmes or

Support

- Wave 2 focused

Mindful ness

Solihull

Approach & or Protective

Behaviours

Well-Being

Wheels interactive resource

Solution

Focused

Approach

Building

Exam

Resilience

Mental Health

Team or Lead

Person in

School

Whole-School

Behaviour

Management Approach e.g. 123 Magic

Family

SEAL

Parent

Engagement –

Best Practice

Universal

Programmes or

Support-

Wave 1 focused

Essential

Foundation

Programmes

&

Approaches

Mental Health Stigma Programme (MHSP) inc Participation of Children & Young People

Children’s Workforce Core Competencies (from DCSF, ECM 2005)

For evidence base, see www.asknormen.co.uk

For enquiries, please contact tamhs@northamptonshire.gov.uk

Essential Underpinnings for work with children

A closing thought...

Remember you could be the one person who makes a difference... But you don’t have to help alone!

What will you do next?

Action planning

Closing Summary

Remember self-harm is only part of people’s stories...it does not define them as a person.

For more information please see: www.asknormen.co.uk

Download