Music Technology (Higher)

advertisement

Qualifications Update:

Music Technology (Higher)

Key Messages

• Provides progression from National 5 Music

Technology

• Develops an increased depth and complexity of knowledge, understanding and skills

• Offers personalisation and choice

• Provides flexibility

Course Structure

Three units:

• Music Technology Skills (Higher)

• Understanding 20th and 21st Century Music

(Higher)

• Music Technology in Context (Higher)

Internally assessed by centres

Externally verified by SQA

Pass/Fail

Course Assessment

• Assignment, marked by SQA (70 marks)

• Question paper, marked by SQA

(30 marks)

Both Assignment and Question

Paper contribute to final grade

Key messages from Verification (Round 1)

• Use valid and reliable assessments

SQA-produced Unit Assessment Support Packs

Centre devised assessments that have been prior verified

Your own assessments – strongly advise you have these prior verified

• Marking of assessments

SQA packs are designed on a pass/fail basis

Use Judging Evidence Tables to make assessment judgments against Assessment

Standards

Judging Evidence Tables have commentary on how to meet each Assessment Standard

A task/activity can meet most or all of the Unit Outcome and Assessment Standards

Indicate on candidate’s work that Unit Assessment Standards have been met

• Unit Assessment complementing learning and teaching

Unit Assessment is open and flexible

Assessment should allow you space to prepare for Added Value/Course Assessment

Sept 13

Oct 13

Feb 14

Feb 14

Mar 14

Apr 14

May 14

Jun 14

Assessment Support Schedule 2013/14

CfE Update Letter

Unit Assessment Support (Package 1)

Unit Assessment Support (Package 2)

Higher Specimen Question Paper

Coursework General Assessment Information

Unit Assessment Support (Package 3)

Update Mandatory Documents

Update Unit Assessment Support

Music Technology

Unit Assessment at Higher

Unit assessment - recap

Flexible and open Assessment Standards and Evidence

Requirements in Units

• Greater range of techniques and methodologies for assessment – encouraged through Unit assessment support packages

• Assessments can be designed to provide evidence across more than one outcome or Unit – combined assessments

• More opportunities to gather naturally occurring evidence – assessment as part of learning and teaching

Unit Assessment Support purpose

As at National 5, Assessment Support will be provided which you can use to:

• assess your candidates

• adapt for your own assessment programmes

• help you develop your own assessments

Unit Assessment Support at Higher

– key features

• Valid from August 2014

• Complement and support learning and teaching

Assess competence against Unit Outcomes and Assessment Standards

• Designed to encourage professional judgement

• Provide broad-based tasks – allow assessors to choose appropriate context and forms of evidence

• Show range of approaches to generating assessment evidence

• Give information on the type of evidence which could be gathered

Unit assessment support packages at Higher - approaches

Package 1 (Oct 2013)

• Portfolio approach – naturally occurring evidence

Package 2 (Feb 2014)

• Unit by Unit approach – discrete assessment tasks for each Unit

Package 3 (Apr 2014)

• Combined approach – groups Outcomes and

Assessment Standards from different Units

Assessment Support Package 1

• covers all 3 Units

• “portfolio” approach

• use of naturally occurring evidence

• independent work, with support

• describes appropriate evidence and success criteria for each assessment standard

• re-assessment by assessment standard is possible

Assessment Support Package 2

currently being developed (for Feb 2014)

• 1 package per Unit at each level

Music Technology Skills Unit: example task briefs

• Understanding 20 th and 21 st Century Music Unit: outcome 1 briefs, listening tasks, listening log / song plan

Music Technology in Context Unit: selection of task briefs in different contexts (3 required)

Assessment Support Package 3

currently being developed (for Apr 2014)

• 1 package covering all 3 Units

• task briefs providing evidence for MT Skills and

MT in Contexts Units

• alternative listening tasks for Understanding 20 th and 21 st Century Music Unit Music

Note: all 3 assessment support packs include the same judging evidence table – whatever method you choose to assess candidates, it must meet these standards.

Music Technology

Higher Course Assessment

Course Assessment at Higher

• Course Assessment at National 5 and Higher assesses Added Value

• Courses at Higher are normally assessed by one or two Components

• Courses at Higher are graded A – D, as at present

• Controlled Assessment of setting, conducting and marking

Course Assessment for Music Technology

For Music Technology, there are 2

Components:

• Question paper (30 marks = 30% of award)

• Assignment (70 marks = 70% of award)

• same structure as N5

Higher Question Paper

• 30 marks (30% of award); 1 hour

• listening paper (20/21 century music & audio)

• 12-15 marks related to relevant music concepts

• 15-18 marks related to technological concepts

• approx 5 marks multiple choice

• approx 5 marks short answer

• approx 20 marks from more challenging questions which may involve extended responses

Higher Assignment

• 70 marks (70% of award)

• set by centre following SQA guidelines

– apply technical skills from MTS Unit

– show musical understanding (2021CM Unit)

– understanding of context (MTiC Unit)

• 5 exemplars provided (each involving 2 contexts) – may be adapted

Higher Assignment

The production must

• involve complex sound design involving a wide range of processes and effects

• use (and justify) appropriate techniques to capture, manipulate and sequence audio

• involve multiple parts, at least two of which should involve the use of a microphone

• apply accurate synchronization and/or sequencing

• demonstrate (and justify) creative and appropriate use of music from more than one genre or style

• involve a combination of two or more different contexts

• be at least 4 minutes in length

Higher Assignment

• supervised conditions

• externally marked

• evidence to be gathered

– formal plan

– completed audio master

– record of progress (diary)

– evaluation report

• designed to differentiate

Download