Battery Box Presentation - School of Engineering and Technology

advertisement

Members

Brian Alano

Jae Shin

Korkut Ozuyener

Christopher Shelton

Matt Zwiesler

 Introduction

 Planning

 Design Specification

 Competitive Benchmark

 Concept Design

 Product Evaluation

 Impact Statement

 Conclusion

 Recommendation

462 Capstone design

Design of battery enclosure for

Toyota Prius

Used with existing Hybrid technology to further improve car performance

Plug-in technology used to double overall vehicle performance

Schedule in Microsoft Excel

Calendar in Yahoo! batterybox group

Weekly team meetings

ME462 Project Plan

Weekly and daily status reports

Task To

Man-

Hours hours complete

% complete Inputs Deliverables

Specification Definition 38.5

approved QFD

Description of customers

Generate customers requirements

Jae

Jae

Weigh customer requirements Jae

1

4

0.5

0% approved PDP

ME462 Project

0 0% Handout sponsor, ME462

0 0%

Project Handout, who on QFD research, ME462

Project Handout,

0 0% what on QFD who on QFD what on QFD

Evaluate competition against cust. requirements

Generate engineering specifications

Evaluate competition against engr. specifications

Set targets

QFD approval

Matt

Matt

Matt

Jae

Team

12

6

4

6

5

0 0% research, what on

QFD

0 0% now, what on QFD

0 0% now, how on QFD now, what, how on

0 0% QFD

0 0% QFD what on QFD

Now v. What on QFD

(benchmarks v. requirements)

What v. how & how v. how on QFD

Now v. How on QFD

(benchmarks v. specifications) how v. how much and now v. how much on approved QFD

Deadline

01-31

Currently

Projected

Completion

Actual

Completion

01-30

01-24

01-24

01-24

01-27

01-28

01-28

01-29

01-30

 Maintenance cost ($/year)

 Total cost of prototype

 Trunk space after installation (sq. in)

 Number of battery modules that fit (#)

 Max internal temp at max power draw

(deg. C)

 Explosive force experienced without fragmenting (kg TNT)

 Hymotion

Pros

Compact

Appearance

Cons

No analysis

Stress & Thermal

No spare tire solution

No fans

 Jerry’s Box

Pros

Cheap

Compact

Cons

Weak Material

No Analysis

Stress & Thermal

Dangerous

No fan

 Latch

High Strength

Material

SS + Rugged Alloy

Steel

High Holding Capacity

7500 lbs

Easy to use

Simple design

Adjustable

 Constraints

Interference check with trunk interior

 Potential energy contained by batteries equal to

25.2 MJ

 Laws of thermodynamics- pressure that results from complete release of energy equal to 21.58 ksi

9.6” thick Al-7075T6 necessary

 BlastWrap data indicates it can absorb 4.9 MJ

 Leaves energy that could result in pressure of

17.38 ksi

8.4” thick Al-7075T6 necessary

 This is worst case scenario, and disregards any ventilation also

 Rectangular pressure vessel calculations from

ASME Boiler and

Pressure Codes

 1/4” thick Al-7075T6 can handle 22.17 psi.

 This equals about 25.82 kJ.

 Added to energy absorbed by BlastWrap results in total energy designed enclosure can handle= 4.9258 MJ

Thickness (in)

0.01

0.1

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.4

0.5

Pressure (psi)

Alum 2014T6 Alum 2024T3 Alum 7075T6

0.033554634 0.030199171 0.035951394

3.338898164 3.005008347

3.57739089

13.28273245

11.9544592 14.23149905

20.69781195 18.62803075 22.17622708

29.72399151 26.75159236 31.84713376

52.55748475 47.30173627

56.3115908

81.68028005 73.51225204 87.51458576

 Hand calculated allowable pressure used

 Bottom of enclosure used as it would experience largest moments

 Symmetry- Forces applied to two sides

 Static Pressure

Analysis

Von Mises Failure

Criteria

Max stress=60.33 ksi

 Ansys Stress

Analysis

Solid Brick 8 Node

45

Aluminum 7075T6

1/10 th Scale Model

Boundary Condition

Symmetry

Geometry

Applied Pressure =

22.176 Psi

 Ansys Model

 Free Meshing  Deformation

 VonMises Stress  Maximum Stress

 c

Conclusion

Maximum stress: 21226 psi

Max ultimate strength of material: >

75000 psi

The selected battery enclosure can withstand the calculated explosion force: 22.176 psi

Boundary

Fluent model boundary conditions

Fluent

Boundary

Type

Enclosure wall Wall

Parameter and Value

Adiabetic (heat flux = 0)

Battery module surface

Intake

Outlet

Wall Constant heat flux

1000 W/m 2 (run 1)

50 W/m 2 (run 2)

Inlet vent T air

= 323 K

Exhaust fan Δp = 3500 Pa

Fluent mesh

 20C discharge rate

 Velocity

Streamlines

20C discharge rate

Aluminum

Price ($)

Grade

2014T6

Ultimate Strength (ksi)

Ksi

70

4'x12' 4'x8'

Unable to obtain unable to obtain

2024T3 58-63 $170.95

$114.54

7075T6 68-75 $153.95

$117.95

 Al-2014T6 much rarer than expected

 Al-7075T6 is the strongest, then 2014T6, and then

2024T3.

 even with a higher ultimate strength, the price of

7075T6 cheaper than that of 2024T3

 Aluminum 7075T6 chosen

Bill of Materials

Item

Purchasing

Information

Aluminum Sheet

(t = 0.025") Grade = 7075T6

Aluminum Sheet

(t = 0.025")

BlastWrap (t =

1.0")

Grade = 7075T6

Toggle Clamp

Fan

Vent

Metal Feet

Attachment

CL-500-PA

SF-90

Retractable Cord

Apparatus 5000-30GF

Unit

4'x8' sheet

4'x4' sheet sqft piece piece piece piece piece

Quantity

1

4

1

1

16

2

2

1

Price

$117.95

Total

$33.00

$51.27

$16.00

$64.00

$2.50

$3.99

$18.20

Total

$117.95

$51.27

$256.00

$128.00

$5.00

$3.99

$72.80

$33.00

$668.01

Enclosing the battery pack safely, securely, and conveniently

Protection from accidental battery explosion

Reduces customer’s budget

Safety concerns of Toyota Plug-in Hybrid customers

Safety concerns of Toyota manufacture

 Satisfied the majority of our sponsor’s requirements

Fit in the trunk space and hold two battery modules inside safely and securely

 Analysis

Hand calculations, Pro-Engineer analysis,

Ansys analysis, and CFD analysis gave the team more confidence

 Satisfied the cost requirement

 will help the future product to be completed satisfactorily.

 BlastWrap is such a new material, even they do not have many solid data points on their material

Design and conduct small scale tests, utilizing the

BlastWrap during explosions

Compare results to other scaled explosion tests that do not utilize the BlastWrap.

 Possibility to prove its efficiency and more

Different material could be chosen for the outside of the enclosure.

Cheaper, lighter weight

 If tests show BlastWrap not as efficient

Choose stronger, heavier, more expensive material

Ensure customer’s safety.

 Explosion analysis with software

Live demo

Dynamic analysis

 Ansys Analysis Limitation

Explosion force simulation

Computer limitation

 Redesign of ventilation system

Eliminate hot spots

 Presentation on HPEV battery technology http://enerdel.com/pdfs/EnerDelT echnicalPresentation.pdf

 Lithium Ion Battery http://electronics.howstuffworks.

com/lithium-ion-battery1.htm

 Jerry's Battery Box

Jerry's battery box, used for competitive benchmarking http://jerryrig.com/convert/step1

0.html

 Hymotion http://www.hymotion.com/

 Hymotion Installed good view of installation http://www.hybridfest.com/image s/26.jpg

 About explosions by Aristatek equation for peak overpressure http://www.aristatek.com/explosi ons.aspx

 Blast Wrap http://www.blastgardintl.com/pdf s/BLGA_AP_12805.pdf

 Blast Wrap specs http://www.blastgardintl.com/bp_ blastwrap.asp

 Calculating overpressures from

BLEVE

(Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor

Explosion http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.20

04.08.002

 Vapor Cloud Explosion Estimates http://www.questconsult.com/99spring.pdf

 Vapor Cloud Explosion Estimates http://www.questconsult.com/99spring.pdf

 Dr. Hazim El-Mounayri

Through out the whole project

 Dr. Sohel Anwar

Project Sponsor

 Jack Waddell

Information of new product – Blast Wrap

 Dr. Erdal Yilmaz

CFD Analysis

 TA. Rapeepan Promyoo

Ansys Modeling

Download