Notes on Chapter Two
Paul Bacon
SILS
IR201
Economic liberalism
• According to Nye, there are three main strands to liberal
thought, economic, social and political.
• The economic strand focuses mainly on trade. Trade is
important not because it prevents states from going to war,
but because it may lead states to define their interests in a
way that makes war less important to them.
• Japan is an interesting example of a country which has
become more successful through trade than through war.
• Liberals would argue that Japan has become non-militarist,
and that there is no incentive to challenge US hegemony.
The benefits of trade have created a social structure that is
less inclined to war in Japan.
Social liberalism
• Social liberalism argues that person-to-person contacts
reduce conflict by promoting understanding.
• Transnational contacts occur at many levels, including
students (SILS?), businesspeople and tourists.
• Nye is not convinced by this, and says that the
evidence for this argument is mixed.
• Theorists such as Samuel Huntington have argued that
people from different civilizations have fundamentally
incompatible worldviews.
• More contact is therefore dangerous, because people
from different cultural groups will realize how different
they are.
Institutional liberalism
• A third form of liberalism emphasizes the role of
institutions.
• Institutions allow people to believe that conflict will
not occur. They lengthen the ‘shadow of the future’,
and reduce the problem of the security dilemma.
• Institutions stabilize expectations in four ways:
– 1. They provide a sense of continuity, regularity and
predictability.
– 2. They provide an opportunity for reciprocity.
– 3. They provide a flow of information.
– 4. They provide ways to resolve conflicts.
Democratic peace 1
• Liberals believe that there are basically only two different
types of state in the international system.
• These are democracies and non-democracies.
• If this is true, it follows that three types of dyadic relationship
are possible.
• 1. Non-democracy – non-democracy.
• 2. Non-democracy – democracy.
• 3. Democracy – democracy.
• Can you give me examples of wars for each of these dyadic
types of international relations?
Democratic peace 2
• Republican liberalism is based on the claim that liberal
democracies are more peaceful than other types of political
system.
• Republican liberals argue that democracies do not fight each
other.
• This is known as the “democratic peace” theory.
• This argument was first made by the German philosopher
Immanuel Kant. More recently, writers such as Dean Babst,
Michael Doyle and Bruce Russett have updated the theory.
• Because of democratic peace theory, liberals are optimistic
about the long-term prospects for world peace.
Democratic peace 3
• War is one of the most serious problems in the international
system.
• If democratic peace theory is true, then it provides us with a
way to break the realist cycle.
• This also suggests that domestic politics DO matter. – The
domestic politics of a state dictate the international relations
which that state is capable of engaging in.
• Moreover, the number of democracies in the world is
increasing, and, if democratic peace theory is correct, this
suggests that the number of conflicts will reduce.
• Theoretically, if all of the countries in the world became
democratic, then the threat of war would disappear.
Reasons for the democratic peace 1
• According to Doyle, there are three reasons why
democracies do not fight each other.
• 1. Democracies have domestic political cultures
based on the principle of peaceful conflict
resolution.
• Democratic governments are controlled by their
citizens, who will not support the idea of war with
another democratic country.
• 2. Democracies hold common moral values which
lead to the formation of a “Pacific Union” or a
“zone of peace”.
• This is based on the common moral foundations
of all democracies.
Reasons for the democratic peace 2
• 2. continued… Peaceful conflict resolution at the domestic
level is seen as morally superior, and this attitude is
transferred to relations between democracies.
• Freedom of expression and free communication promote
mutual understanding across political boundaries.
• 3. Peace between democracies is strengthened by economic
cooperation and interdependence.
• The economies of countries in the zone of peace are
complexly interdependent (Keohane and Nye).
6 arguments for democracy:
• Democracies do not fight wars against each
other.
• Democracies do not experience famines.
• Democracies do not commit democide.
• Democracies have better human rights
records than non-democracies.
• Democracies have higher living standards than
non-democracies.
• Democracies are more economically
productive than non-democracies.
Prospects for the Zone of Peace
• Most liberals argue that there is a democratic
zone of peace among the consolidated liberal
democracies of Western Europe, North America
Japan, South Korea and Australasia.
• However, the expansion and consolidation of this
zone is far from assured.
• There is an important distinction between liberal
democracy and electoral democracy.
• Electoral democracies may not have a free press
and effective checks on executive power.
• There is interesting evidence that young
democracies may be warlike (against nondemocracies).
Constructivism 1
• Constructivism is a relatively new addition to
international relations theory.
• An important breakthrough was the publication of Alex
Wendt’s article ‘Anarchy is what states make of it’.
• This article argued that individual states do have more
choice than realists suggest they do, that agents can remake structures, and that this may be easier than we
thought.
• Wendt talked about the idea of ‘friendly’ nuclear
weapons, and the idea that the US is more worried by
small numbers of North Korean nuclear weapons, than
large numbers of British and French weapons.
Constructivism 2
• Constructivists argue that:
• 1. Agents and structures interact in a cyclical and
reciprocal way.
• 2. The identities and interests of agents are not
fixed, but are the product of social interaction.
• 3. Over time, the rules, norms and expectations
that make social life meaningful and orderly will
change as a result of social interaction.
Constructivism 3
• Constructivism is at the moment more a way of studying
and understanding change, rather than a theory in its own
right.
• For example, constructivists have studied the following
issues:
–
–
–
–
Why did slavery and apartheid gradually become unacceptable?
Why have most countries now abolished the death penalty?
Why has Japan become anti-militarist?
Why is it now very unlikely that some states, for example
member-states of the EU, will ever fight each other again?
– Why, after the end of the Cold War, have many states become
more likely to support humanitarian intervention?
Definitions 1
• System – a set of inter-related units
• International system – the pattern of
relationships among states.
• The structure of a system refers to its
distribution of power.
• The process refers to patterns and types of
interactions among states.
Definitions 2
• The agency-structure debate – neo-realists
prefer structural explanations.
• Counterfactuals – contrary-to-fact conditionals.
• If… then. But must be plausible to be
worthwhile.
• Proximate cause – how directly was a major
event caused by something?
• Nye distinguishes between primary, secondary
and tertiary causes.
Kenneth Waltz
• In the first half of this textbook, Nye follows a
method of analysis developed by the leading
realist Kenneth Waltz.
• Waltz developed this approach in two books,
Man, the State and War, and Theory of
International Politics.
• Waltz identified three ‘images’ or levels of
analysis – the system, the state and the individual.
• Waltz is a neo-realist, and therefore believes that
the ‘third’ image, the system, is the most
important, and has the most explanatory power.
Nye’s additions to Waltz’s method
• Joseph Nye adds three elements to Waltz’s basic framework.
• At the system level, he makes a further distinction between
structure and process.
• He also introduces two additional concepts, proximate cause
and the notion of a counterfactual.
• Taken together, for the purposes of this class, we can refer to
Waltz and Nye’s method of analysis.
• Nye uses this method to analyze the origins of WWI and WWII,
the origins of the Cold War, and the end of the Cold War.
• It is therefore important for you to understand this way of
thinking, and to apply it to your reading of the next three
chapters, and your exam preparation.
Waltz and Nye’s method of analysis
• 3. International System
– Structure
– Process
• 2. State/society
• 1. Individual
• Proximate cause(s)
• Counterfactuals