Feminist criticism: Power Dynamics, Portrayal of Women Effects of a patriarchal society on the woman: Aunt Julle, Thea, Hedda, Diana Brief overview: Aunt Julle & Thea harbour simplistic ideals of the acceptable role of a woman - to be relative to men (for Aunt Julle, Tesman is her source of pride & for Thea her meaning in life is enlarged and made noble by Lovborg). This is, however, a socially acceptable notion that Hedda despises. It is ironic though that Thea actually defies these social expectations and walks out on her husband not once but twice; Hedda, despite her skewed idealistic obsession with beauty, is too much of a coward to do so and that she is fundamentally a conventional woman. This illustrates that ultimately their destinies are determined by the strength of their character rather than by the repressive force of the patriarchal society, or the differences in social class. 1. Repression: just Hedda Actual or perceived repression? Hedda (self perceived repression) The Tesmans go out of their way to make Hedda feel like she belongs to their family but backfire as Hedda feels more repressed. Tesman - ‘no one in our way’’ Hedda - ‘leave me out of the equation’’ & walks away towards the drawing room. Aunt Tesman harps on Hedda’s pregnancy. No opportunities for women of larger aspirations? VS 3 men: brack is judge, lovborg writes books, tesman waiting for professorship Women as self-sacrificial figures: Everyone but Diana & Hedda 2. Power struggle/Imbalance (Male/Female roles) Hedda-Tesman - trophy wife; ornamental, relative to men - tesman, the husband, is the breadwinner of the family. hedda not expected to help, though this is because of class. thea has to work as governess to support her family. Hedda-Brack - ‘people don’t do such things’ - any woman is free game - hedda uses her sexual attractiveness as a means to an end - keep herself occupied by keeping brack interested Hedda-Lovborg/Lovborg-thea - lovborg, like brack, disrespects hedda’s status as a married person - also thinks of hedda as another conventional woman - assumes about her motivations - hedda uses her sexual attractiveness as a means to an end - keep herself occupied by keeping lovborg interested - . Mrs. Elfsted, who forces him into respectability, runs away from her husband. Hedda, who eggs him on beyond the limits, flinches from the thought of scandal. - hedda has to live vicariously through lovborg because society forbids her to do w/e she desires Lovborg/Tesman - Thea - ornamental, relative to men; Hedda-Aunt Julle (voice of society) - even aunt julle agrees with and voices the patriarchal & societal expectations of a woman even though shes a woman herself 3. Psychoanalytic criticism: character analysis Effect of society on individual Courage vs cowardice Desires behavior conflict defenses Desire to create beauty vs limitations of life Harbours a dangerous idealism about how life should be lived and how beauty is to be created o “I must be free of everything that’s ugly.” (235): Unattainable aesthetic standard borne of the decorative, ornamental military background Hedda hails from. Her high standards for her material surroundings as well as the people and way of life she’s associated with are a product of her background. Potential questions/things to consider How does cowardice and courage influence characters’ actions in Hedda Gabler? (I feel like we’re going to be asked questions on courage somehow...but what’s a question that also incorporates the effect of society on the individual? How can we reconcile the influence of society on the individual, and Hedda’s innate cowardice? you mean a question that focuses on both the society’s effect on hedda and her internal conflicts? I thought we were going to be given two to choose from? One about psychoanalytic theory and the other about gender? Yes but I think that in order to have a cohesive understanding of the play we need to figure out how to understand Hedda as a character, which means we have to consider both the impact of society on the individual (not just patriarchy either, but also the expectations of propriety due to her aristocratic status) and her innate cowardice. Personally the conflict lies in how even though Lovborg as a fellow aristocrat has the courage to defy society and live life wildly, he’s also cushioned by the relative freedom that is awarded to men? Whereas women are more strictly confined to an ideal of the well behaved, domesticated wife and mother. And there’s Thea, who has the courage to defy society despite being a woman, but isn’t from an aristocratic background, which suggests that she has courage by sheer strength of character, disproving the hypothesis that the characters in the play are all shaped by society’s influence (through class and gender). “Life just isn’t good enough for Hedda Gabler.” Why? stifled by her circumstance which does not match the great need for fulfilment she has “Hedda’s desires are base but the manifestation of those desires is complex.” Explore the truth of this statement. ‘base desires are those which are ignoble, lacking moral principles’ control over others’ lives? but that is due to her inability to control her own (which is a result of patriarchy, marriage) Hedda’s fascination with death the death and destruction seems to run parallel to everything else though she can control people in many ways that need not involve death but why that fascination with what is immoral, what is reprehensible because that’s exactly the crux of her unfulfilled desires in an aristocratic world fulfilled desires = freedom = beautiful this does not make sense to me please explain Death and destruction, that are inimical to the strict morality of society which Hedda is bound by, represent the externalisation of Hedda’s unfulfilled desire to be free of the constraints of society. This desire to be free of societal constraints is evidenced by Hedda’s hate of her own ‘cowardice’, her fear of ‘scandal’ and the resulting social backlash. Hedda speaks ‘in a different tone’ a regretful, intimate tone of confession when speaking about her fear of scandal. She desires to be free of those societal constraints…. Death and destruction is also the opposite of what Thea stands for; Hedda is jealous of Thea, so strives to disrupt Thea’s nurturing, life-giving actions with a dark intent on destruction. Mademoiselle Diana also acts a foil to Hedda. (not as major as thea-hedda tho) They both sell themselves out as women but in different ways. i.e they both own guns and are rather violent; do not conform to societal expectations of a woman - theres a quote smwhere by thea. Hedda attempts to live vicariously through lovborg’s narration of his wild parties - diana partakes directly in lovborg’s wild parties. hedda fears scandals and does whatever she can to avoid them even tho she’s morally corrupt like Diana who is a prostitute. she displays a skill to hide socially unacceptable things under the guise of socially acceptable things. ie newspapers and in room with lovborg. also their respective roles in lovborg’s suicide. I would say that she is jealous of Thea precisely because she herself is incapable of nurture (‘Everything I touch seems destined to turn into something mean and farcical), not that her destructiveness is due to a spiteful need to undo what Thea has done hmm that’s true manifestation is made complex because she needs to avoid social backlash and must do it all covertly, by manipulating peoples’ weaknesses - her ability to identify fracture points in another person’s character eg Lovborg’s hubris, Brack’s ego, aunt julle’s need to please complexity lies in how the sequence of events arises not from hedda’s desires on their own, but the weaknesses of others, the complex webs she weaves to create her own version of a beautiful myth Hedda’s desire for material comfort is also base. This desire can be seen in how she forsakes love and fulfilment for economic security in marrying Jorgen Tesman. She wants to lead a social life, to entertain. this base desire leads to her Explore how Hedda’s father General Gabler influences the play. ironic that hedda is ultimately still defined by a masculine figure - her father? so much for The New Woman It is said that ‘Life just isn’t good enough for Hedda Gabler’, and to understand why one need look no further than the title of the play. Unequivocally, Hedda is her father’s daughter rather than her husband’s wife, and with this assertion of independence comes the characteristics of masculinity, violence, aesthetic idealism and desire for control peculiar to the military aristocracy. From the moment the play opens, the imposing stage presence of General Gabler’s portrait implies that he will have great influence over his daughter, Hedda, whose subsequent actions orchestrate much of the play’s conflict and tragedy. His undoubtedly transformative shapes Hedda’s personality and her expectations of life which clash with what reality has to offer, and are arguably the root of her ultimate downfall. Visual evidence of his influence sets the tone o Stage presence in the form of portrait o Decorative (rather than homely) appearance of the sitting room Hedda as her father’s daughter: masculine, violent o Masculine: aloof (early scene with Aunt Julle: cruel and dispassionate, dismissing her hat as Berte’s) o Violent due to military influence: guns o Desires the control afforded by military, aristocratic status and available to men in power such as her father. ‘I am heartily glad you have no control over me’ o Expectation of aesthetic beauty Clashes with her new status: she marries down and never really acclimatizes to the standard of living Tesman has, looks down on Tesman’s unsubtle pursuit of material things o Dissonance between her expectations and her circumstances manifested: ‘Tesman’s for ever worrying about what people are going to find to live on’(194) do you think it would be valid to say Gabler was the one who taught hedda to desire masculine things? his guns, he went horseriding with her(168) not ‘taught’, but yes, I do think he shows her what agency can grant you, that power and opulence and control and she grew to desire it as well as to hate her womanhood + her further crippling living circumstances after marriage because of how it denied her that agency and this desire for masculine things causes hedda’s penis envy and leaves her choking in the stifling circumstance of a woman for a large part of the play Rejection of institution of marriage in favour of control and power over self, which, when coupled with the effects of an oppressive patriarchy, have devastating consequences for the married Hedda Aristocratic ideal of aesthetic beauty → Expectations of living standards (far beyond what Tesman’s meager salary can offer, evidence: ‘Hedda’s been lovely all her life.’(178)) (but which she is used to because of the aristocratic living her father’s salary could support) o Grandiose opulence: Lady Falk’s villa, new piano, extensive honeymoon, footman, horses, carriage o Married down, unsatisfied by her pitiful circumstances also as a result of his influence on hedda, she inherited the societal expectations that had to be imposed on the daughter of general gabler and on a member of the aristocrat -‘Hedda’s drama is to have started life with recklessness, flamboyance, and to have ended up with a dud; when we first meet her she has endured a honeymoon with a dazed, educated simpleton.’ LOL