New Atlantic Ventures Sweden-US Entrepreneurial Forum September 2011 #sweus John Backus john@navfund.com @jcbackus NAV “At A Glance” Early Stage Venture Capital 19 Companies: Boston (5) New York City (6) VA/DC/MD (3) (CA & WA) Modest Fund Size: ‒ $117m current fund (NAV III) East Coast Focus Top Decile Post-2000 Performance Blue Chip LP Base, 50% from EU Key Difference: Thesis-Led Investors NAV Office Portfolio company 2 Annual US VC fund-raising Volatility over the past decade 503 Amount raised (US$ B) ► Fund-raising has declined in the United States since 2007. ► 2009 marks the fewest funds raised in 16 years. ► In dollar terms, 2009 was the low point in terms of dollars raised since 1997, with the exception of 2003. ► 2010 is on pace for another annual decline – only US$6.4 billion raised in 33 funds as of 30 June 2010. Number of funds 353 289 223 186 155 129 107 161 173 167 172 146 113 91 76 76 48 $2.7 33 $4.6 $4.9 $6.9 $9.4 $14.1 $21.8 $53.5 $83.5 $44.8 $19.4 $8.9 $20.7 $27.9 $30.5 $37.4 $26.6 $14.5 $6.4 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: Dow Jones VentureSource; Ernst & Young Venture Insights US VC funds raised by stage focus Clear shift in dollars toward multi-stage funds as investors seek greater flexibility, growth equity opportunities 501 289 154 91 161 172 166 170 145 76 33 23% Multi-stage 37% 31% 34% 39% 9% 6% 30% 34% 34% 33% 30% 33% 30% 26% 35% 43% 9% 2% 8% 8% 5% 37% 42% 44% 53% 11% Late-stage 27% $83.3 $44.8 $ 19.2 $8.9 $20.7 $27.7 $30.3 $37.1 $26.4 $14.5 $6.4 9% 8% 9% 9% 55% 66% 16% 20% 13% 9% 17% Early-stage 22% 12% 8% 58% 60% 66% 58% 56% 65% 62% 11% 67% 56% 59% 58% 58% 58% 49% 50% 51% 46% 39% 17% 44% 36% 34% Source: Dow Jones VentureSource; Ernst & Young Venture Insights 17% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Number of funds closed 2008 2009 2010 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Amount of funds closed (US$b) 2009 2010 Declining number of VC firms actively investing United States Bay Area Number of firms making 4 or more investments in year Number of firms making 1-3 investments in year 1338 1240 1122 1053 1040 1018 1013 998 989 750 635 568 546 564 529 546 542 539 473 325 885 657 288 158 130 142 163 137 156 147 141 110 51 712 462 477 438 404 401 392 390 395 398 363 514 274 398 381 449 405 416 426 '00 375 313 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 1H'10 New England 167 454 377 306 301 340 304 300 302 249 236 150 86 626 726 724 672 591 613 597 572 614 572 60 42 490 49 49 58 42 52 44 368 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 Source: Dow Jones VentureSource; Ernst & Young Venture Insights '08 '09 317 264 243 291 255 258 250 11 205 202 1H'10 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 34 '08 139 '09 1H'10 US VC fundraising: median fund size $200 $172 Median amount raised (US$m) $155 $150 $140 $129 $102 $100 $100 $90 $61 $50 1992 $73 $75 $75 1996 1997 1998 $81 $72 $60 $45 1993 1994 1995 1999 Source: Dow Jones VentureSource; Ernst & Young Venture Insights 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Median fund size has grown with shift to multi-stage and growth equity funds LP flight to quality means that fewer small firms are succeeding in raising new funds 2010 Why the Decline? • Entrepreneurs, LPs & GPs got greedy in the late 1990s – – – – VC fund sizes ballooned Too many VCs = too many marginal companies funded Fund sizes drove shift to late stage Exit market dried up in US: 9/11 & 9/08 • Returns for the decade were flat, on average • BUT, many funds small early stage funds did quite well 7 Thesis-Led Approach Finds Winners in Emerging Fields • 5-10 years to “big exits” Need market evolution insight • A strong thesis targets leaders in the next wave: – Smart entrepreneurs find investors who “get it” – Faster decisions – More value as board members • We sharpen our investment theses over time: – As we explore new markets – As markets and technologies change “I skate to where the puck is going, not to where it has been” • Wayne Gretzky NHL Hall of Fame Player 8 Learning Sharpens Our Thinking • We learn as we go deeper NAV III Prior Funds AdTech Social Media • Markets evolve Digital Media • Old markets grow stale eCommerce • New markets emerge Mobile Financial Tech Security CustomerDriven Healthcare SAAS/ Software 9 Mobile: Info-Tainment Reinvented “Connected Mobile Devices (tablets, smart phones) will transform & disrupt information & entertainment industries.” NAV Companies to Watch • • • • Pandora for News/Info Benchmark + NEA > 300,000 Users 600 min/user/mo* • Software that enables Android tablets • 60m tablets in 2011 • Top-5 seller on Amazon *After first month. 10 Technology Wealth Creation / Destruction Cycles New Companies Often Win Big in New Cycles While Incumbents Often Falter Mainframe Computing 1960s Mini Computing 1970s Personal Computing 1980s New Winners New Winners New Winners IBM NCR Control Data Sperry Honeywell Burroughs Digital Equipment Data General HP Prime Computervision Wang Labs Microsoft Cisco Intel Apple Oracle EMC Dell Compaq Desktop Internet Mobile Internet Computing Computing 1990s 2000s New Winners Google AOL eBay Yahoo! Yahoo! Japan Amazon.com Tencent Alibaba Baidu Rakuten Note: Winners from 1950s to 1980s based on Fortune 500 rankings (revenue-based), desktop Internet winners based on wealth created from 1995 to respective peak market capitalizations. Source: Factset, Fortune, Morgan Stanley Research. 11 New Computing Cycle Characteristics Reduce Usage Friction Via Better Processing Power + Improved User Interface + Smaller Form Factor + Lower Prices + Expanded Services = 10x More Devices More than Just Phones Computing Growth Drivers Over Time, 1960 – 2020E Devices / Users (MM in Log Scale) 1,000,000 Mobile Internet 100,000 iPad Smartphone Kindle Desktop Internet 10,000 Tablet MP3 Cell phone / PDA 1000 100 Minicomputer 10 Mainframe 1960 Mobile Video 1B+ Units / 100MM+ Users Units Home Entertainment Games 10MM+ Units 1 1MM+ Units Car Electronics GPS, ABS, A/V 10B+ Units??? PC 1970 1980 Wireless Home Appliances 1990 2000 2010 2020 Note: PC installed base reached 100MM in 1993, cellphone / Internet users reached 1B in 2002 / 2005 respectively; Source: ITU, Mark Lipacis, Morgan Stanley Research. 12 Smartphone > PC Shipments Within 2 Years, Global – Implies Very Rapid / Land Grab Evolution of Internet Access Unit Shipments of Desktop PCs + Notebook PCs vs. Smartphones, 2005 – 2013E 700 2012E: Inflection Point Smartphones > Total PCs Global Unit Shipments (MM) 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 2005 2006 2007 Desktop PCs 2008 2009 Notebook PCs 2010E 2011E 2012E 2013E Smartphones Note: Notebook PCs include Netbooks. Source: Katy Huberty, Ehud Gelblum, Morgan Stanley Research. Data and Estimates as of 9/10 13 Digital Media: Ad $ Flow to Digital “$50B in advertising will go digital when new companies deliver the measurable results brand managers expect.” NAV Companies to Watch • Mobile Lead Generation • $15M+ Revenue • RRE, Greenhill • Brand messages in Captchas, e.g.: • Interaction retention • $15M+ bookings 14 Banner Blindness and Offer Fatigue Media Time Spent vs. Ad Spend Still Out of Whack Internet / Mobile (upside…) vs. Newspaper / Magazine / TV (downside…) % of Time Spent in Media vs. % of Advertising Spending, USA 2009 50% % of Total Media Consumption Time or Advertising Spending Time Spent Ad Spend 40% 39% 30% 31% 28% 26% ~$50B Global Opportunity 20% 16% 10% 13% 12% 9% 0% Print Radio TV Internet Note: Time spent data per NA Technographics (2009), ad spend data per VSS, Internet advertising opportunity assumes online ad spend share matches time spent share, per Yahoo!. Source: Yahoo! Investor Day, 5/10. 16 e-Commerce 2.0: Complex Becomes Easy “Complex products can be sold online: custom, expensive, and highly-regulated.” NAV Companies to Watch • High end runway fashion • NEA B round • $10M run rate after 6 months • • • • Daily deals 2.0 Mobile-based Better value for all Strong start in 6 markets 17 Golden Age of E-commerce More consumers buy online (over 70% of internet users) Cheaper to build e-commerce company New business models create new experiences (Groupon) Better marketing tools (social media, e-mail lists, video) Mobile smartphones Healthcare Services: Patients Become Customers “Unaffordable costs + healthcare reform drive customers to take control of healthcare spending, causing big change.” NAV Companies to Watch • Real time audits of corporate Rx bills • Recurring Revenue • $1M bookings/mo. • Generic Rx drugs for less than insurance co-pays • $15M+ revenue run rate • Growing 40%/quarter 19 The Rise of Health Care Consumerism $2.6 Trillion Industry Primary Care Rx Specialists Hospitals Consumers seeking lower cost & better care New ways of practicing medicine emerging Profit sanctuaries being destroyed Huge waste becomes opportunity when consumers gain control Policy Conclusions • Encourage Entrepreneurs – – – – Lower tax rates: capital gains Lower tax rates: stock options Remove stigma of failure Locate where partners are • Encourage LPs – – – – Relief from Basel 3 & AIFM Tax advantage to offset illiquidity Robust secondary markets Solve the “bite size” problem • Build the Ecosystem – Need lots of acquirors – Need lots of business partners – Need big companies to hire from • Great training programs • Domain expertise – Education system focused on entrepreneurs – Entrepreneur must be seen as a successful career – Pension, health, benefits must follow entrepreneur 21