quitting smoking

advertisement

Nancy Rigotti, MD

Treatment Review:

Overview of the Evidence Base for Tobacco Dependence Treatment

10/09/2011

OVERVIEW

 Why is tobacco treatment necessary for global tobacco control?

 Why do smokers keep smoking?

 What smoking cessation treatments are effective?

 Behavioral

 Pharmacological

 Role of health care providers

WHY TREATMENT MATTERS

 Tobacco use is the #1 preventable cause of death

 Stopping tobacco use reduces health risks

 Tobacco prevention works slowly

CESSATON vs. PREVENTION

WHY TREATMENT MATTERS

 Tobacco use is the #1 preventable cause of death

 Stopping tobacco use reduces health risks

 Tobacco prevention works slowly

 Tobacco use is an addictive disorder

 Tobacco treatment aids tobacco control policies overall (and vice versa)

MPOWER Report

World Health Organization – 2008

 M onitor tobacco use and tobacco control policy

 P rotect people from tobacco smoke

O

ffer help to quit tobacco use

 W arn about the dangers of tobacco

 E nforce bans on tobacco advertising, promotion

 R aise taxes on tobacco

OVERVIEW

 Why is tobacco treatment necessary for global tobacco control?

 Why do smokers keep smoking?

 What smoking cessation treatments are effective?

 Behavioral

 Pharmacological

 Role of health care providers

WHY DO SMOKERS KEEP SMOKING?

 Pharmacologic nicotine dependence

DOPAMINE

WHY DO SMOKERS KEEP SMOKING?

 Pharmacologic nicotine dependence

→ Craving (nicotine “hunger”)

→ Nicotine withdrawal symptoms

 Irritability, anger, impatience

 Restlessness

 Difficulty concentrating

 Insomnia

 Anxiety

 Depressed mood

 Increased appetite

WHY DO SMOKERS KEEP SMOKING?

Pharmacologic nicotine dependence

 Psychological factors

Cues (meals, alcohol, other smokers)

Coping with stress, emotions (anger)

WHY DO SMOKERS KEEP SMOKING?

Pharmacologic nicotine dependence

 Psychological factors

 Psychiatric co-morbidity

Depression

Schizophrenia

Substance abuse

THE CHALLENGE FOR TREATMENT

 We have effective treatments, but…

 We need better treatments

 We need to deliver the treatments we have to more of the smokers who need them

OVERVIEW

 Why is tobacco treatment necessary for global tobacco control?

 Why do smokers keep smoking?

 What smoking cessation treatments are effective?

 Behavioral

 Pharmacological

 Role of health care providers

LIMITATION OF OUR EVIDENCE

 The evidence about treatment comes mostly from studies done in high-income countries

 Few trials have been done in middle- or lowincome countries

 Less awareness of health risks

 Fewer have tried to quit and failed

 Biology is relatively constant

 Cultural context varies by country

SMOKING CESSATION METHODS

2008 US Public Health Service Guidelines

 Effective treatments

 Counseling

 Pharmacotherapy

Combination better than either one alone

 More is better but brief intervention works

 Treating tobacco is highly cost-effective

COUNSELING – Content

 Smokers who want to quit

 Cognitive-behavioral counseling

 Social support

 Encourage medication use and adherence

 Smokers who are unwilling to quit

 Motivational interviewing

 Effective in meta-analysis, quit rates low

COUNSELING – Method of Delivery

 In-person * - one-on-one or group

 By telephone * - proactive quitlines

 Self-help materials – little efficacy

 Newer technologies

 Web- based – evidence is growing but not definitive

 Text-messaging – 1 randomized trial (Lancet 2011)

 Social media – little evidence

* Endorsed as effective by 2008 USPHS Guideline Update

TELEPHONE QUITLINES

 Definition

Proactive multi-session counseling by phone

 Advantages

Convenience

Privacy

 Effective

(pooled OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.6)*

 Quitlines can also provide medication

Facilitate access to medications

Strategy for promoting calls to a quitline

*Stead LF et al. Tobacco Control 2007;16(suppl 1):i3

PHARMACOTHERAPY

1 st Line 2008 US Public Health Service Guidelines

 Nicotine replacement

Skin patch

Gum

Oral inhaler

OR

1.9

1.5

2.1

 Nasal spray

2.3

 Lozenge

2.0

 Bupropion SR

(Zyban,Wellbutrin SR) 2.0

 Varenicline

(Chantix/Champix) 3.1

PLASMA NICOTINE LEVELS

Cigarettes vs. Nicotine Replacement Products

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

18

16

14

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Time post administration (min)

Cigarette (1-2 mg)

Nasal spray (1 mg)

Gum (4 mg)

Patch (21 mg)

NICOTINE REPLACEMENT

Long-acting, slow onset → skin patch

Constant nicotine level to avoid withdrawal

Simplest to use, best compliance

User has no control of dose

Short-acting

Intermediate onset → oral (gum, lozenge, inhaler)

More rapid onset → nasal (spray)

User controls dose

Nicotine blood levels fluctuate more

 Requires more training to use properly

New Ways to Use

NICOTINE REPLACEMENT

(Supported by evidence and USPHS*)

 * Combine short- and long-acting forms

“Patch plus” regimen

 * Extend treatment to prevent relapse

 Start NRT 2 weeks before quit date

 Reduce to quit strategy

BUPROPION SR

(Zyban, Wellbutrin SR)

Doubles cessation rate independent of its antidepressant effect

Quit rates higher if add counseling

Reduces post-cessation weight gain

Reduces seizure threshold

(risk: 1/1000)

NH

VARENICLINE

N

N

Binds selectively to the α4β2 nicotinic receptor, which mediates nicotine dependence

Dual mechanism of action

 Partial agonist

Stimulates receptor to treat craving, withdrawal

Antagonist

Prevents nicotine from binding to the receptor →

Blocks reward, reinforcement of smoking

Varenicline efficacy across studies

Continuous Abstinence Rates (Weeks 9 –52)

25

OR: 3.14

(95% CI: 1.93 – 5.11) p < 0.0001

OR 4.04

(95% CI, 2.13, 7.67) p < 0.001

20 19.2

18.6

OR 2.86

(95% CI,1.72, 4.11) p < 0.001

22.4

Varenicline

Placebo

15

9.3

10

7.2

5.6

5

0 n = 355 n = 359

Stable CVD 1 n = 248 n = 251

COPD 2 n = 344 n = 341

Healthy smokers 3

1 Rigotti et al, Circulation 2010; 2 Tashkin D et al. Chest 2010 .

3 Gonzales et al ., JAMA 2006; Jorenby et al ., JAMA 2006.

FDA Public Health Advisory

July 2009

 “Chantix (varenicline) or Zyban (bupropion) has been associated with reports of changes in behavior such as hostility, agitation, depressed mood, and suicidal thoughts or actions.”

 “FDA is requiring the manufacturers of both products to add a new Boxed Warning:

People who are taking Chantix or Zyban and experience any serious and unusual changes in mood or behavior or who feel like hurting themselves or someone else should stop taking the medicine and call their healthcare professional right away.

Friends or family members …”

VARENICLINE SAFETY

The dilemma

 Smokers have an increased risk of suicide.

 Stopping smoking produces nicotine withdrawal symptoms (depressed mood, anxiety, and irritability)

 When these symptoms occur in a smoker who is stopping smoking on varenicline, did the drug or did quitting smoking cause the symptom?

 Case reports cannot answer this question.

 Clinical trials of varenicline detected no excess of depression or suicidal thoughts, but these studies did not include patients with mental illness.

VARENICLINE SAFETY

Cohort study (Gunnell et al, BMJ 2009)

 UK General Practice Research Database

 Population based data: 3.6 million patients in 500 practices

 Data from electronic medical records

 Patients starting smoking medication (9/06 – 5/08)

 NRT (n=63,265)

 Bupropion (n=6422)

 Varenicline (n=10,973)

 Outcome : rates of suicide, suicide attempt, suicidal thoughts, and new antidepressant therapy

 Results : No evidence of increased risk of suicidal outcomes for varenicline vs NRT, bupropion vs NRT

VARENICLINE SAFETY

My Bottom Line

 Varenicline may increase risk of psychiatric symptoms in some patients. The potential risk is not yet well defined.

 Prescribing varenicline, like prescribing any drug, requires balancing risks and benefits.

- Varenicline is one of the most effective drugs available to treat tobacco dependence

- Continuing to smoke is clearly hazardous

 In most cases, the benefits of varenicline outweigh the risks

Which drug is most effective?

Meta-analysis for 2008 USPHS Guideline

Drug

Nicotine patch

Other nicotine products or bupropion

Varenicline

Combinations

Long-term patch + gum or nasal spray

Patch + bupropion SR

Estimated OR (95% CI)

1.0 (reference)

Not significantly different from nicotine patch

1.6 (1.3-2.0)

1.9 (1.3-2.7)

1.3 (1.0-1.8)

Varenicline vs bupropion vs placebo

CO-Confirmed 4-Wk Continuous Quit Rates - Wks 9 – 12

100

60

OR=3.91

*

(95% CI 2.74, 5.59

)

OR=1.96

*

(95% CI 1.42, 2.72)

44.4

OR=3.85

*

(95% CI 2.69, 5.50)

OR=1.89

*

(95% CI 1.37, 2.61)

44.0

40

29.5

30.0

20

17.7

17.7

0

N=349 N=329 N=344 N=343 N=340

Study I

Varenicline Zyban Placebo

Study II

* p<0.0001 Jorenby et al, Gonzales et al, JAMA, July 5, 2006

N=340

VARENICLINE vs. NICOTINE PATCH

Open label randomized controlled trial

(5 countries, n= 746)

Varenicline NRT

60

50

40

30

20

56

43

10

0

Weeks 9-12

End of treatment

OR 1.70 (1.26-2.28)

Aubin HJ. Thorax 2008

26

20

Weeks 9-52

Continuous abstinence

OR 1.40 (0.99-1.99)

2 head-to-head randomized trials

Piper, Arch Gen Psychiat 2009; Smith, Arch Int Med 2010

 Tested 5 drug treatments (vs placebo)

 Monotherapy : Patch, lozenge, bupropion

 Combos : Patch + lozenge, bupropion + lozenge

 Tested drugs in 2 settings

 Clinical trial (on-site counseling)

 Primary care clinics (using state quitline)

 Results

Each drug was better than placebo

Combinations > monotherapy

No 1 combination was better than the other in both trials

CYTISINE

(Tabex)

 Used for many years in Eastern Europe, Russia

 Pharmacology is similar to varenicline

Binds selectively to the α4β2 nicotinic receptor

 Cheaper than varenicline

($6 in Russia, $15 in Poland)*

Missing data: Is it effective (and safe)?

New large placebo controlled trial *

740 adult smokers in Poland

 25 days of treatment (6 pills/day → 2 pills/day)

Validated abstinence at 1 yr : 8.4% vs 2.4%

(p<.001)

7-day abstinence at 1 yr: 13.2% vs 7.3%

(p<.01)

* West et al, NEJM 2011;365:1193

PHYSICIAN INTERVENTION

 Routine advice to quit is effective

Odds of quitting by 66% (vs no advice) *

 Brief counseling is more effective

Odds of quitting by 37% (vs brief advice) *

 Brief intervention by other clinicians is effective

* Cochrane reviews

5A BRIEF COUNSELING MODEL

2000 U.S. Public Health Service Guidelines

 ASK all patients about smoking

ADVISE

ASSESS all smokers to quit smoker’s readiness to quit

 ASSIST smokers to quit

 ARRANGE follow-up care

5A BRIEF COUNSELING MODEL

2000 U.S. Public Health Service Guidelines

 ASK

 ADVISE

 ASSESS

 ASSIST

 ARRANGE

Core physician role

5A BRIEF COUNSELING MODEL

2000 U.S. Public Health Service Guidelines

 ASK

 ADVISE

 ASSESS

 ASSIST

 ARRANGE

Done by office staff (‘vital sign’)

Core physician role

5A BRIEF COUNSELING MODEL

2000 U.S. Public Health Service Guidelines

 ASK

 ADVISE

 ASSESS

Done by office staff

Core physician role

 ASSIST Connect to office or community

 ARRANGE supports (clinics, quit lines,…)

TOBACCO USE

BY HEALTH PROFESSIONALS

 A problem in many countries

 Health professionals act as role models

 Clinicians who smoke are less likely to counsel patients who smoke

 Treatment strategies must include cessation programs for health care professionals and students

SMOKING CESSATION METHODS

2008 US Public Health Service Guidelines

 Effective treatments

 Counseling

 Pharmacotherapy

Combination better than either one alone

 More is better but brief intervention works

 Treating tobacco is highly cost-effective

FCTC Article 14 - Implementation

World Health Organization

Countries should offer 3 types of treatment

 Advice to quit in primary health care

 Telephone quit lines – free and accessible

 Pharmacotherapies – low-cost and accessible

Thank You

Download