Power Point Slides to Accompany: Public Finance by John E. Anderson Chapter 14 Corporate Income Taxes Introduction Organizing a business. Rationale for corporate taxation. Effects of profit taxation. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 3 Organizing a Business Legal form for business: – Sole proprietorship. – Partnership. – Corporation. Issue of incorporation involves limited liability and taxation. Hybrid forms of business include: – Limited liability partnerships (LLP). – Professional corporations (PC). Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 4 Rationale for Corporate Taxation Under a classical system, corporate income taxation is based on a benefitsreceived justification. The corporation is a legal entity separate and distinct from any person or group of persons involved. It receives benefits afforded by that legal status. Taxation is justified on that basis. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 5 Issues Arising Tax arbitrage. – Differences between the personal income tax rate, corporate income tax rate, and the capital gains tax rate provide opportunities to arbitrage. Double taxation. – Dividend income is taxed twice, at the corporate level and again at the individual level. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 6 Effects of a Profits Tax A tax on economic profit would be perfectly efficient, since it would not change firm behavior. But, the corporate income tax is not a tax on economic profit. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 7 Tax Base and Rates Net income—the tax base. Profits: economic and accounting. Corporate income tax rates Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 8 Net Income—the Tax Base Gross profit = gross receipts - cost of goods sold. Total income = gross profit - dividends interest - gross rents - gross royalties capital gain net income + other income. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 9 Net Income—the Tax Base, [continued] Taxable income = Total income - Total deductions. Total deductions = compensation of officers + salaries and wages + repairs and maintenance + bad debts + rents + taxes and licenses + interest paid + charitable contributions + depreciation + depletion + advertising + pension and profit-sharing plans + employee benefit programs + other deductions + NOL deduction. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 10 Figure 14.1: U.S. Corporate Income Tax Return – Form 1120 Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 11 Profits: Economic and Accounting Accounting profit is the difference between revenue generated by sales and costs incurred for inputs. Economic profit is the difference between revenue and cost, including the opportunity cost of capital. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 12 Figure 14.2: Competitive Firm Profits Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13 Figure 14.3: Monopolist Profit Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 14 Corporate Income Tax Rates Corporate income tax rates in the U.S. are progressive, depending upon the net income of the corporation. Most corporations pay a rate of 35%. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 15 Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 16 Incidence of the Corporate Income Tax Incidence of a partial factor tax. Evidence on incidence. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 17 Incidence of a Partial Factor Tax The corporate income tax is a partial factor tax. It applies to one factor, capital, In one sector of the economy, the corporate sector. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 18 Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 19 Evidence on Incidence Harberger conclusion on incidence evidence: – It is hard to avoid the conclusion that plausible alternative sets of assumptions about the relevant elasticities all yield results in which capital bears very close to 100 percent of the tax burden. The most plausible assumptions imply that capital bears more than the full burden of the tax. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 20 Taxation and the Capital Structure of the Firm Capital structure of the firm. Tax effects on the capital structure of the firm. Capital gains and the market value of the firm. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 21 Capital Structure of a Firm The firm’s choice of alternative forms of long-term financing is called its capital structure. We consider how the income tax affects its capital structure in terms of retained earnings and borrowing. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 22 Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 23 Fundamental Accounting Relationship of the Firm t ( Bt 1 Bt ) ( E t 1 E t ) Dt rBt I t , Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 24 Fundamental Accounting Relationship of the Firm [continued] The left-hand-side of this equation sums the three sources of receipts (profit, new bonds issued, and new equity issued), and the right-hand-side of the equation sums the three disbursements (dividends paid, interest paid on bonds, and investment). Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 25 Fundamental Accounting Relationship of the Firm [continued] Notice that the basic accounting identity of the firm in equation (4) implies that at least two financial variables must be changed at a time, one on each side of the equation. For example, a decrease in the firm’s profit this period (on the left-hand-side) must be balanced by some reduction in dividends paid, or new fixed investment (on the right-hand-side). Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 26 Implications The flow of financing to individuals is determined by the real variables in the model and is not affected by the firm’s financial structure. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 27 Implications, [continued] The real variables measure the firm’s real assets–assets used to produce goods and services (in contrast to financial assets, or securities, that are claims to the firm’s income, which is generated by its real assets). Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 28 Implications, [continued] This result is known as the ModiglianiMiller (MM) Theorem, named after the two economists who discovered the result. The MM Theorem says that in the absence of taxation and bankruptcy, corporate financial policy is irrelevant and has no effect on the value of the firm. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 29 Implications, [continued] The implication of the MM Theorem is that the firm is indifferent to its choice of financial policy, or capital structure. It makes no difference whether the firm finances new investment from the issuance of bonds or new equity. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 30 Implications, [continued] If financial policy has no impact on the value of the firm, it simply does not matter how the firm is financed. Of course, the presence of a corporate income tax may change this result, as we will see. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 31 Effects of Corporate Income Taxation First, consider the effect of a change in the way funds are transferred to households. Suppose that the firm reduces its dividends paid to households by one dollar and also reduces its outstanding equity by one dollar. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 32 Effects of Corporate Income Taxation, [continued] In effect, the firm is taking a dollar of its net income and using it to buy back a dollar’s worth of outstanding shares rather than paying out a dollar in dividends. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 33 Effects of Corporate Income Taxation, [continued] In so doing, the firm is not paying out dividends directly to shareholders but is rather increasing the value of shareholders stock. That is, Dt = -1 and (Et+1 - Et) = -1. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 34 Effects of Corporate Income Taxation, [continued] What is the impact on households? The reduced dividend results in an aftertax loss of income of 1-tp to the household. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 35 Effects of Corporate Income Taxation, [continued] On the other hand, the reduced equity outstanding benefits the household by the amount 1-tg. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 36 Effects of Corporate Income Taxation, [continued] Recall that the tax rate applied to capital gains is generally less than that applied to ordinary income: tg. < tp. If that is the case, this change benefits the household that owns stock in the firm. Bondholders are unaffected. Hence the corporate repurchase of stock is beneficial to some households and harmless to the rest–on balance an improvement. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 37 Effects of Corporate Income Taxation, [continued] So why do firms pay dividends rather than repurchase stock? As long as the tax rate on capital gains is less than that on ordinary income, it makes sense for the firm to buy back shares rather than pay out dividends, even though this generates capital gains. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 38 Effects of Corporate Income Taxation, [continued] Even so, many corporations still pay dividends. But, why would they? This is one of the major puzzles of corporate finance. An alternative to the repurchase of shares is the acquisition of another firm. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 39 Effects of Corporate Income Taxation, [continued] The increasing frequency of mergers and acquisitions is due, in part, to tax policy. Suppose that Firm A is in the position to pay out $100 million in dividends. As an alternative, suppose that Firm. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 40 Effects of Corporate Income Taxation, [continued] A can buy Firm B for $100 million. Shareholders benefit from the acquisition since Firm A is now worth $100 million more than it was before. Hence, shareholders have a potential capital gain that is taxed at a preferential rate, as compared to dividend income. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 41 Effects of Corporate Income Taxation, [continued] Hence, the two alternatives (paying out dividends and buying another firm) are equivalent in terms of the impact on shareholders. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 42 Effects of Corporate Income Taxation, [continued] It might seem like that equivalence only holds when the two firms are owned by the same person or group of people, but it holds more generally. As long as there is another firm in the world with the same riskiness as the one making the acquisition the equivalence still holds. The key is that shareholders adjust their portfolios. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 43 Effects of Corporate Income Taxation, [continued] Consider another possible change in financial policy on the part of the firm. Suppose that the firm increases dividends in the current period by borrowing. Of course, the loan has to be paid back in the future with interest. Table 4 provides a summary of the impacts on shareholders and bondholders in a simple twoperiod model where the tax rate on capital gains is zero. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 44 Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 45 Taxation and Investment Fundamentals of depreciation. Bond-financed investment. Investment financed from retained earnings. Taxation and market imperfections. Empirical studies of taxation and investment. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 46 Fundamentals of Depreciation Capital assets such as building, machinery, and equipment, generate income streams over time. Those assets wear out over time also. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 47 Fundamentals of Depreciation, [continued] If we are concerned with the net stream of income generated by these assets, we need to reduce the gross income stream they generate by some measure of the extent to which they wear out each year. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 48 Fundamentals of Depreciation, [continued] This is the process of deducting depreciation. If we could deduct true economic depreciation, the actual replacement cost of the physical wear and tear on the asset, then the process of allowing depreciation deductions would not affect the investment behavior of the firm. The depreciation method would be neutral in this sense, having no impact on investment. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 49 MACRS The U.S. corporate income tax currently provides a method of depreciation known as the modified accelerated cost recovery system (MACRS). Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 50 MACRS, [continued] This depreciation method permits higher tax deductions in early years of an asset’s life and lower deductions in later years. Real assets are put into one of six categories of asset life ranging from three years to twenty years. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 51 MACRS, [continued] For example, an asset with seven-year life is depreciated using the following percentages starting in year one: 14.29%, 24.49%, 17.49%, 12.49%, 8.93%, 8.93%, 8.93%, and 4.45%. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 52 MACRS, [continued] There are eight years listed in the seven-year asset life because the asset is assumed to be placed in service midway through year one and continue in use through the midpoint of year eight. The depreciation percentage is lower in the first year since the asset is assumed to be in service for just half the year. The MACRS pattern is one of declining depreciation percentages over the years. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 53 Bond-Financed Investment We can also consider the case where the firm chooses to finance its investment with bond financing rather than from borrowing. In years when investment exceeds retained earnings the firm borrows, but in years when retained earnings exceed investment the surplus can be used to reduce the firm’s debt. In this situation the marginal cost of capital is r(1 - tc) reflecting the after-tax interest cost, assuming that interest is deductible. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 54 Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 55 Taxation and Global Business Globalization Taxation and trade issues Apportionment issues Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 56 Globalization Globalization refers to the increasing tendency of business firms to operate across national borders or combine with firms in other countries in mergers or strategic alliances. It also refers to the reality that most product markets and factor markets are now global rather than local. What are the implications of increasing globalization of business for taxation? Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 57 Globalization, [continued] Does increasing international competition mean that the opportunities for governments to collect revenue from firms in their jurisdictions are now more limited because taxation may drive the firm away? Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 58 Globalization, [continued] Put in more colorful terms, we might recall the advice of Jean-Baptiste Colbert to Louis XIV. He said that the art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers with the smallest possible amount of hissing. In the global economy, we may have to worry not so much about the hissing as the goose flying away! Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 59 Policy Study: Less Than Zero—Enron’s Corporate Income Tax Payments 1996-2000. Analysis of the corporate income tax situation for Enron over the period from 1996 through 2000 by Citizens for Tax Justice (CTJ) reveals that the corporation effectively used more than 800 such tax havens along with stock options and other tax loopholes to reduce its tax liability substantially. In fact, the CTJ analysis illustrates that Enron paid tax in only one year and was effectively able to reduce its corporate tax liability to less than zero. Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 60 Copyright © by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 61