This Recovery is for Real: Solid, Sustainable, but Sub Par October 2009 Chris Varvares President, Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC www.macroadvisers.com © Macroeconomic Advisers The US Economic Outlook: Bottom Line • The recession is over (growth returns) & downside risks dwindle • Above-trend growth in 2nd half of 2009: 3.5% a.r. • Robust (but sub par) growth in 2010 (4.1%) & 2011 (4.2% ) • Unemployment rate peaks at 10% (or a bit higher) in 2009:q4 • Unemployment rate declines to 9.1% in ’10:q4 and to 7.7% in ’11:q4 • Core inflation very low: =1.4% in 2009, 0.8 in 2010 & 0.8 in 2011 • Revised higher versus recent forecasts --- but still below FOMC • Fed: Still expecting a late exit; but will “end easing” long before • Fiscal: Stimulus working for now; getting control of the deficit later October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 2 Back from the Abyss and Gaining Momentum Deep U.S. Recession Followed by a Sub Par Recovery 10 Percent 10 8 8 Unemployment rate 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 -2 09:2H 2010 2011 GDP Growth: 3.5% 4.1% 4.2% Real GDP growth -4 Un. Rate (Q4):10.0% 9.1% 7.7% -6 -2 -4 -6 History Forecast -8 -8 07 08 09 10 11 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 3 Slack Keeps Downward Pressure on Inflation Unit Labor Cost and Core PCE Inflation 4-quarter percent change 6 6 H F Core PCE inflation 4 4 2 2 0 0 -2 -2 Unit labor cost -4 -4 -6 -6 90 95 00 05 10 Note: The core PCE is Personal Consumption Expenditures Index excluding food and energy prices; the unit labor cost is the compensation paid per unit of output produced in the nonfarm business sector. Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 4 Below-Target Inflation & Lingering Slack Imply Late Exit Long-Rates are on the Rise, but the Fed Stands Pat Percent 10 10 H Conventional mortgage rate 8 F 8 10-year Treasury yield 6 6 4 4 Fed funds rate 2 2 0 0 95 00 05 10 Source: Federal Reserve Board, Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 5 Forecast Comparison 09Q2 09Q3 09Q4 10Q1 GDP Growth MacroAdvisers (Oct 7) Blue Chip (Oct 10) -0.7 -0.7 3.4 3.2 3.6 3.8 2.4 2.6 FOMC CT (Jul) PCE Growth MacroAdvisers Blue Chip -0.9 -0.9 2.7 2.5 1.2 0.8 4.6 1.7 2009 2010 Q4/Q4 -0.1 4.1 -0.4 2.8 −1.5-−1.0 2.1-3.3 Q4/Q4 0.9 3.5 0.7 2.1 Unemployment Rate MacroAdvisers Blue Chip 9.3 9.3 9.6 9.6 10.0 9.9 10.0 10.1 FOMC CT (Jul) GDP Price Inflation MacroAdvisers Blue Chip 0.0 0.0 0.7 1.5 0.2 1.2 0.8 1.5 Q4 Average 10.0 9.1 10.0 9.6 9.8-10.1 9.5-9.8 Q4/Q4 0.7 0.6 1.1 1.5 Fed Funds Rate MacroAdvisers Blue Chip* 0.18 0.18 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.25 Q4 Average 0.20 0.20 0.20 1.00 3.56 3.7 Q4 Average 3.40 3.99 3.5 4.3 10-yr Note Yield MacroAdvisers Blue Chip * Inferred from t-bill yield October 2009 3.31 3.31 3.50 3.5 3.40 3.5 © Macroeconomic Advisers 6 Factors Contributing to Above-Trend GDP Growth • Motor-vehicle production to rebound (with or without CARS) • Inventory liquidation to slow sharply; X-auto: Q3=+$37b, Q4=+$56b • Housing bounces off the bottom, will begin strong recovery • Home prices are stabilizing, to remain flat (emergence of upside risk?) • Broad financial conditions improving: – Especially equities – But spreads are narrowing too • Implies improving balance sheets for households • Helps stabilize & then boost consumer spending (pent-up demand!) • ARRA actually is providing stimulus • Global nature of the recovery • Despite “Minsky Moment,” recession/recovery dynamics at work! October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 7 Recession Dynamics Hint at Upside Risk Strength of Early Recovery Depends on Depth of Recession 10 4-quarter percent change 1957-58 9 y = 2.1x + 1.5 R2 = 0.7337 8 1981-82 1960-61 7 1953-54 1973-75 6 5 1970 1980 4 MA forecast 3 1990-91 2 NABE Consensus 2001 1 0 0 1 2 3 Peak-to-trough decline in real GDP (%) 4 •* All other includes interest, dividend and transfer income. Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 8 Significant Downside Risks Remain • Securitization markets in key segments still “dependent” or broken • CMBS market still facing a potential refi squeeze, with spillovers • RMBS spreads may widen sharply as Fed unwinds balance sheet • Bank lending to consumer remains stingy; More HH de-leveraging? • Home price stabilization could prove temporary, drag housing lower • Recovery in equities could falter; further erode HH balance sheets • Energy price increases still are a drag on growth • Foreign demand for $ assets could fall short, pressure $ and rates • Expiring Bush tax cuts could add drag • Back side of ARRA stimulus implies drag; will recovery have legs? • What about health care reform? Cap and Trade? October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 9 Q1 was not as Bad as it Appeared; Set up Q2 “Firming” MA’s Monthly GDP Index 13.6 Trillions of chained (2005) dollars 13.6 13.2 13.2 12.8 12.8 12.4 12.4 12.0 12.0 11.6 11.6 11.2 Jan.2001 11.2 Jan.2003 Jan.2005 Jan.2007 Jan.2009 Source: Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Last data plotted for August 2009 October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 10 Q3 Has the Makings of a Real Recovery GDP Final Sales of Domestic Product October Releases Total Final Sales to Domestic Purchasers Total PCE Reference Release Title Date MA Base Forecast Construction Unit Vehicle Sales Man. Ship, Inv, Orders Wholesale Trade International Trade Retail Sales Business Inventories Consumer Price Index Industrial Production Boeing Deliveries & Ords Monthly Treasury Statement Housing Starts Existing Home Sales Durable Goods Orders New Home Sales CQ Forecast as of BEA's Advance Est. 7-Oct-09 1-Oct-09 1-Oct-09 2-Oct-09 8-Oct-09 9-Oct-09 14-Oct-09 14-Oct-09 15-Oct-09 16-Oct-09 16-Oct-09 19-Oct-09 20-Oct-09 23-Oct-09 28-Oct-09 28-Oct-09 20-Oct-09 29-Oct-09 Month Aug Sep Aug Aug Aug Sep Aug Sep Sep Aug Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Change % ch Fixed Investment Nonresidential Total Struct. E&S 110 na na na 100 98 109 109 109 103 104 112 112 3.4 na na na 3.1 3.1 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.2 3.3 3.5 3.5 1.8 na na na 1.8 1.9 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.5 2.5 2.0 na na na 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.7 3.2 112 3.5 2.5 2.7 2.7 na -14.9 3.2 3.2 3.2 -5.7 na na na -5.7 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.6 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 3.2 -4.5 -14.9 na na 2.7 2.7 3.2 3.2 3.2 na na na -14.9 -14.9 -14.9 -14.9 -14.9 -14.9 -14.9 -14.9 -14.9 Resi- Net Exports Govern. Cons. & dential Gross Inv -0.4 na 19.9 1.5 na na na na na na 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 na na 19.9 19.9 19.9 19.9 19.9 19.9 19.9 19.9 2.7 19.9 1.6 19.9 -0.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.6 Change in Private Inventories % ch Level Change Ex Im -339 na na -9 na na 12.7 na na 12.4 na na na na na na 12.7 12.4 -339 -9 -341 -10 16.6 15.9 -341 -341 -341 -341 -10 -10 -10 -10 16.6 16.6 16.6 16.6 -339 -9 16.9 2.7 -339 -339 -9 -9 16.9 16.9 2.7 -339 -9 16.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 15.9 Level Change -109 na 51 na na na -119 -123 na na 41 37 -123 37 -123 37 -123 37 -130 30 -130 -130 -130 30 30 30 -130 30 Construction: These data were available when we prepared our base forecast and incorporated therein. Unit Vehicle Sales: These data were available when we prepared our base forecast and incorporated therein. Man Ship, Inv, and Ords: These data were available when we prepared our base forecast and incorporated therein. Wholesale Trade: These data were revised lower for July and WTE for August, this suggests less CIPI in Q3 than previously forecast. International Trade: Both ex. and im. were STE, about a wash for the chg. in net exports; net im. of autos were WTE lowering CIPI. Net capital goods imports were STE, raising E&S. Retail Sales: Core sales rose sharply in September, in contrast to our previous assumption of a decline. Business Inventories: The data on nonautomotive retail inventories were consistent with our previous estimate for Q3. Consumer Price Index: The components of the CPI that we use to deflate retail sales were, on balance, consistent with our previous estimate for real retail sales and PCE in September. Industrial Production: NSA motor-vehicle assemblies were in line with expectations, but revised seasonal factors implies less of a SA increase in motor-vehicle output in Q3. Boeing Deliveries and Ords: Boeing delivered 52 civilian aircraft in Sep, 11 more than assumed, but at lower average value than assumed. Monthly Treasury Statement: Defense outlays and defense-related outlays of the Dept. of Energy were well above expectations in Sep, implying more defense consumption and gross inv. in Q3. Housing Starts: Starts were below expectations in Sep, but 1-family starts were revised higher for previous months. On balance, residential investment was little effected in Q3. Existing Home Sales: Durable Goods Orders: New Home Sales: October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 11 Q4 Too! GDP Final Sales of Domestic Product October Releases Total Final Sales to Domestic Purchasers Total PCE Reference Release Title Date MA Base Forecast Construction Unit Vehicle Sales Man. Ship, Inv, Orders Wholesale Trade International Trade Retail Sales Business Inventories Consumer Price Index Industrial Production Boeing Deliveries & Ords Monthly Treasury Statement Housing Starts Existing Home Sales Durable Goods Orders New Home Sales NQ Forecast as of BEA's Advance Est. 7-Oct-09 1-Oct-09 1-Oct-09 2-Oct-09 8-Oct-09 9-Oct-09 14-Oct-09 14-Oct-09 15-Oct-09 16-Oct-09 16-Oct-09 19-Oct-09 20-Oct-09 23-Oct-09 28-Oct-09 28-Oct-09 20-Oct-09 29-Jan-10 Month Aug Sep Aug Aug Aug Sep Aug Sep Sep Aug Sep Sep Sep Sep Sep Change % ch Fixed Investment Nonresidential Total Struct. E&S 115 na na na 115 116 123 123 123 124 120 120 114 3.6 na na na 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.7 3.7 3.5 1.1 na na na 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.7 na na na 1.7 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.8 1.2 na -7.5 1.7 1.7 1.7 -0.1 na na na -0.1 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.8 -0.8 -0.8 1.7 114 3.5 1.1 1.8 1.7 -0.8 -7.5 na na 1.2 1.2 1.7 1.7 1.7 na na na -7.5 -7.5 -7.5 -7.5 -7.5 -7.5 -7.5 -7.5 -7.5 Resi- Govern. Cons. & dential Gross Inv 4.0 na 22.1 2.1 na na na na na na 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.8 2.8 na na 22.1 22.1 22.1 22.1 22.1 22.1 22.1 22.1 2.1 14.0 2.8 14.0 4.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.2 2.8 Change in Net Exports Private Inventories % ch Level Change Ex Im -360 na na -21 na na 2.9 na na 7.2 na na na na na na -360 -21 2.9 7.2 -359 -360 -18 -20 3.3 -360 -360 -360 -20 -20 -20 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 6.9 7.2 -362 -23 2.4 2.1 -362 -362 -23 -23 2.4 2.4 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 2.1 -362 -23 2.4 7.2 Level Change -32 na 78 na na na -41 -45 -48 -48 na na 78 78 75 75 -48 75 -54 76 -54 -54 -54 76 76 76 -54 76 Construction: These data were available when we prepared our base forecast and incorporated therein. Unit Vehicle Sales: These data were available when we prepared our base forecast and incorporated therein. Man Ship, Inv, and Ords: These data were available when we prepared our base forecast and incorporated therein. Wholesale Trade: These data were revised lower for July and WTE for August, this suggests less CIPI in Q3 than previously forecast; we maintained the same CIPI delta in Q4 as before. International Trade: Net trade was STE, but near enough to expectations, after allowing for stronger Q3 E&S and slightly weaker Q4 E&S, to leave GDP tracking unchanged. Retail Sales: The unexpected strength in core sales in September implies more growth of PCE in Q4, but also more growth of imports and less inventory investment. Business Inventories: The data on nonautomotive retail inventories were consistent with our previous forecast for Q4. Consumer Price Index: The components of the CPI that we use to deflate retail sales were consistent with our previous estimate of real PCE in September and, hence, Q4. Industrial Production: Given previous motor-vehicle production plans, revised seasonal factors imply slightly more of an increase of motor-vehicle output in Q4. Boeing Deliveries and Ords: Unexpected strength in deliveries in Sep implies fewer deliveries in Q4 than previously assumed, given latest annual guidance from Boeing. Monthly Treasury Statement: The unexpected strength in defense outlays through September did not persuade us to change our forecast of growth of government spending in Q4. Housing Starts: Single-family starts and permits were below expectations in Sep, implying less growth of residential investment in Q4. Existing Home Sales: Durable Goods Orders: New Home Sales: October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 12 Q3: Even Without CARS MVO Was Set to Jump Motor Vehicle Output Swings to the Plus Column 3.2 Millions of units, annual rate 2.4 80 60 Contributions to GDP growth (left) 1.6 40 0.8 20 0.0 0 -0.8 -20 -1.6 -40 Change (right) -2.4 -3.2 -60 -80 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 13 2nd Half and Beyond – Lift from Inventories Nonfarm Inventory Investment excl. Motor Vehicles & Parts Billions of chain-type (2005) dollars 100 H 100 F 50 50 0 0 -50 -50 -100 -100 -150 -150 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 14 2nd Half and Beyond – Lift from Housing! New and Existing Home Sales Turn Up SAAR, thousands SAAR, thousands 8000 7200 1425 1275 Existing (left) 6400 1125 5600 975 4800 825 4000 675 New (right) 3200 525 2400 375 1600 225 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 Source: Census Bureau; Last data plotted for August 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 15 2nd Half and Beyond – Lift from Housing! Housing Starts and Residential Investment Turn Up SAAR, thous. units 4-quarter percent change 2200 H F 2000 50 40 Private housing starts (left) 1800 30 1600 20 1400 10 1200 0 Residential investment (right) 1000 09:2H Cont. to GDP Growth: 0.5pp 800 600 2010 0.8pp -10 2011 0.7pp -20 -30 400 -40 90 95 00 05 10 Source: U.S. Census Bureau; U.S. Department of Commerce; Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 16 Are House Prices About to Turn Up? …An Upward Revision to the Forecast of House Prices 105 2005:Q1 = 100 105 LoanPerformance House Price Index A firming in home prices lowers the current user cost of housing and boosts demand for housing in a model that well understands the boom and bust…when fed the actual path of house prices! 100 95 100 95 90 90 Model predicted value 85 Base 909 80 Base 907 75 2006 2008 2010 85 80 75 2012 Source: LoanPerformance; Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 17 2nd Half and Beyond – Lift from Housing! Single-Family Housing Starts 2000 SAAR, thous. units 2000 1800 1800 1600 1600 1400 1400 1200 1200 Current forecast 1000 1000 800 800 600 600 400 400 Counterfactual assuming further 7½% decline in house prices 200 0 200 0 2004 2006 2008 2010 Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009 October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 18 2nd Half and Beyond – Lift from Housing! Contributions to Real GDP Growth 6 Percentage points 6 H F 4 4 2 2 0 0 Residential investment -2 -4 -2 -4 GDP excluding residential investment -6 -6 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 19 Financial Conditions: Healing Apace Credit Conditions Still Improving Percent 4 4 H F Conventional mortgage rate – 10-yr treasury spread 3 3 2 2 1 1 AAA – 10-yr treasury spread 0 0 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 Source: Federal Reserve Board, Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 20 Financial Conditions: Healing Apace Senior Bank Loan Officer Survey Diffusion Indexes 60 Index 60 Net percentage “loosening” terms on C&I loans 40 40 20 20 0 0 -20 -20 -40 -40 -60 -80 -100 1975 October 2009 Net percentage “loosening” Terms on real estate loans Willingness to make consumer installment loans 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 © Macroeconomic Advisers -60 -80 -100 1999 2003 2007 21 Financial Conditions: Healing Apace Interest Rates & Equity Values 24000 Billions of dollars Percent Conventional mortgage rate (right) 20000 H F Equity wealth (left) 10 8 16000 6 12000 4 8000 2 10-year Treasury yield (right) 4000 0 95 00 05 10 Source: Federal Reserve Board, Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 22 Household Net Worth: Stop the Pain! Household Net Worth Trillions 80 80 H F 60 -$14 tril. (-1.2) 60 40 -$5 tril. (-0.5) 40 Other Total 20 20 -$11 tril. -$9 tril. Equities 0 0 90 95 00 05 10 Source: Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 23 PCE Aided by Improving Financial Conditions PCE Growth & Contributions from Wealth 6 4-quarter percent change Percentage points 6 H F 3 3 0 0 -3 1991 -3 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 Bureau of Economic Analysis, Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 24 PCE Reset Lower; Saving Rate Reset Higher Personal Saving Rate Percent 12.5 H F 12.5 10.0 10.0 7.5 7.5 5.0 5.0 2.5 2.5 0.0 0.0 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 25 Consumption Ratios Reset Lower Comparative Consumption/Income Ratios 98 Percent Percent H 96 94 20 F 18 EC$/YPD$ (left) 16 CON$/YPD$ (left) 92 14 90 12 ECD$/YPD$ (right) 88 86 84 1985 October 2009 10 EC$ - Consumer expenditures ECD$ - Consumer expenditures durables CON$ - Service concept consumption YPD$ - Pers. Disposable Income 1989 1993 1997 2001 © Macroeconomic Advisers 8 6 2005 2009 26 Diminishing Drag as HH Balance Sheets Stabilize Contributions of Error-Correction Term to Growth of CON 1.5 Percent change, annual rate 1.5 H F 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -0.5 -1.0 -1.0 -1.5 -1.5 -2.0 -2.0 2005 October 2009 2006 2007 2008 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 2010 2011 27 Durables Bear Much of the Burden Light Vehicle Sales Millions of units, annual rate 22.5 22.5 Monthly sales 20.0 20.0 17.5 17.5 Quarterly sales and MA forecast 15.0 15.0 12.5 12.5 10.0 10.0 7.5 7.5 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis; Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 28 Global Recovery, Dollar Decline “Help” Foreign Growth and the Dollar . 4-quarter percent change Index 10 145 H F 8 135 6 125 4 115 2 105 Real foreign GDP (left) 0 95 Real trade-weighted exchange rate (right) -2 85 -4 75 95 00 05 10 Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 29 Sharply Rising Imports Depress Net Exports Exports, Imports, and Net Exports Billions of chain-type (2005) dollars 4-quarter percent change 400 20 Exports (right) Imports (right) 200 H F 10 0 0 -200 -10 -400 -20 Net exports (left) -600 -30 -800 -40 95 00 05 10 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 30 Pent-up Demand Helps CapEx Tepid Recovery Growth of Nonresidential Fixed Investment 4-quarter percent change 40 40 Computers and software H F 20 20 0 0 Structures -20 -20 “Other” equipment -40 -40 95 00 05 10 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 31 Not Quite a Jobless Recovery! Employment, Labor Force, and Unemployment Percent 4-quarter percent change 10 10 8 8 Unemployment rate (right) 6 6 H F 4 4 Labor force growth (left) 2 2 0 0 Employment growth (left) -2 -2 -4 -4 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 32 Not Quite a Jobless Recovery! Output per Hour in the Nonfarm Business Sector 4-quarter percent change 7 6 5 7 Overshoot on productivity in recession (cyclical anomaly) as firms shed workers quicker than typically (fearing deeper slump) argues for quicker re-hiring with recovery…somewhat slower productivity H F 6 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 -1 -1 90 95 00 05 10 Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 33 MA’s Unemployment Path versus Okun’s Law Simulation Results and MA Forecast 12 Percent 12 H F 11 11 +2 standard error 10 10 9 9 Base 909 8 8 Predicted value 7 7 -2 standard error 6 6 5 5 4 4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2008 2009 2010 2011 October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 34 Not Quite a Jobless Recovery! Blue Chip Forecast Compared to Okun’s Law Predicted Values 12 Percent 12 H F 11 11 Blue Chip forecast 10 10 9 9 Predicted value from Okun’s Law model using Blue Chip GDP forecast 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 Q1 October 2009 Q2 Q3 2008 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 2009 Q4 © Macroeconomic Advisers Q1 Q2 Q3 2010 Q4 35 Rising Energy Prices Marginally Boost Inflation Refiners’ Acquisition Cost of Imported Oil $/Barrel 120 120 Current $ 100 100 80 80 60 60 40 40 2005 $ 20 20 H F 0 0 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 Source: Department of Energy; Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 36 Inflation Revisions Reveal More Disinflation Pre-revised vs. Revised: 12-month Core PCE Inflation 2.75 12-month percent change 2.75 Revised 2.50 2.50 2.25 2.25 Pre-revised 2.00 2.00 1.75 1.75 1.50 1.50 1.3% - lowest since September 2001 1.25 1.25 2007 2008 2009 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 37 Model Uncertainty and the Inflation Forecast Simulated Core PCE Inflation From Models Estimated over Alternative Samples 3.5 12-month percent change 3.5 3.0 3 2.5 1996 - 2008 2.5 2.0 2 1.5 1.5 1986 - 2008 1.0 1 0.5 0.5 1981 - 2008 0.0 0 -0.5 -0.5 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis; Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 38 Split the Difference…Lean Toward Intermediate Result Unit Labor Cost and Core PCE Inflation 4-quarter percent change 6 6 H F Core PCE inflation 4 4 2 2 0 0 -2 -2 Unit labor cost -4 -4 -6 -6 90 95 00 05 10 Note: The core PCE is Personal Consumption Expenditures Index excluding food and energy prices; the unit labor cost is the compensation paid per unit of output produced in the nonfarm business sector. Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 39 Below-Target Inflation & Lingering Slack Imply Late Exit Long-Rates are on the Rise, but the Fed Stands Pat Percent 10 10 H Conventional mortgage rate 8 F 8 10-year Treasury yield 6 6 4 4 Fed funds rate 2 2 0 0 95 00 05 10 Source: Federal Reserve Board, Macroeconomic Advisers, LLC; Forecast prepared on October 7, 2009. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 40 The US Economic Outlook: Bottom Line • The recession is over (growth returns) & downside risks dwindle • Above-trend growth in 2nd half of 2009: 3.5% a.r. • Robust (but sub par) growth in 2010 (4.1%) & 2011 (4.2% ) • Unemployment rate peaks at 10% (or a bit higher) in 2009:q4 • Unemployment rate declines to 9.1% in ’10:q4 and to 7.7% in ’11:q4 • Core inflation very low: =1.4% in 2009, 0.8 in 2010 & 0.8 in 2011 • Revised higher versus recent forecasts --- but still below FOMC • Fed: Still expecting a late exit; but will “end easing” long before • Fiscal: Stimulus working for now; getting control of the deficit later October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 41 Back-up Slides MA Forecast Details Real GDP & Components Gross domestic product Contributions to Real GDP Growth Final sales Change in inventories Personal consumption expenditures Fixed investment Inventory investment* Net exports* Exports Imports Gov't consumption & gross invest. Private housing starts (thous. units) Light vehicle sales (mil. units) Industrial production (% change a.r.) Capacity utilization (mfg) Nonfarm payroll employment (mil) Unemployment rate (civilian, percent) GDP price index CPI (all urban) Core CPI (all urban) Core PCE Compensation per hour Output per hour Unit labor cost Exchange rate (FRB broad nominal) Price of Imported oil ($/barrel) Federal funds rate 10-year Treasury note yield Aaa corporate bond yield Corporate profits w/iva & ccadj Disposable Personal Income (bil chained 00$) Personal Saving as Percentage of Disposable Person HH equity net worth (eop)** Federal surplus (unified, FY. bil $) Q4/Q4 % change or annual avg. 2008 2009 2010 2011 2009.1 2009.2 2009.3 2009.4 2010.1 2010.2 2010.3 2010.4 -6.4 -0.7 3.4 3.6 3.8 3.8 4.1 4.6 -1.9 -0.1 4.1 4.2 -4.1 -2.4 0.7 -1.4 1.9 1.6 1.2 2.4 3.8 0.0 3.2 0.6 3.4 0.7 4.1 0.5 -1.4 -0.5 -0.1 0.0 3.6 0.5 3.9 0.3 0.6 -39.0 -113.9 -386.5 -29.9 -36.4 -2.6 -0.9 -12.5 -160.2 -330.4 -4.1 -14.7 6.7 2.7 -1.0 -109.2 -339.0 12.7 12.4 1.5 1.2 4.2 -31.6 -360.0 2.9 7.2 2.1 4.6 9.2 -30.5 -388.4 6.0 11.4 1.8 2.9 11.5 -10.6 -404.1 8.7 10.4 1.5 3.0 13.9 12.7 -420.2 8.7 10.4 0.7 3.5 16.2 29.7 -434.1 10.4 11.1 0.7 -1.8 -9.6 -25.9 -494.3 -3.4 -6.8 3.0 0.9 -13.9 -103.7 -354.0 -6.1 -10.1 1.9 3.5 12.7 0.3 -411.7 8.5 10.8 1.2 3.4 14.7 58.8 -455.4 11.0 9.9 -0.9 528 9.5 -19.0 66.7 133.7 8.1 540 9.6 -10.5 65.3 132.1 9.2 614 11.5 4.2 66.6 131.2 9.6 767 10.4 9.7 68.5 130.8 10.0 873 11.5 6.7 69.7 131.2 9.9 986 12.0 5.8 70.7 131.9 9.7 1113 12.5 5.8 71.6 132.7 9.4 1210 13.1 6.3 72.7 133.7 9.1 900 13.2 -6.7 75.1 137.0 5.8 612 10.2 -4.6 66.8 131.9 9.2 1046 12.3 6.1 71.2 132.4 9.5 1442 14.0 5.5 74.6 136.4 8.2 1.9 -2.4 1.5 1.1 -4.7 0.3 -5.0 0.0 1.3 2.4 2.0 0.5 7.0 -6.1 0.7 3.5 1.4 1.3 2.7 7.8 -4.7 0.2 0.8 0.9 1.0 2.0 5.2 -3.1 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 2.1 2.1 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.9 0.9 2.0 1.6 0.5 0.6 1.1 0.9 0.8 2.0 1.3 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.8 1.2 0.6 1.9 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.6 0.9 1.6 0.7 0.8 1.6 1.4 0.1 5.0 -4.7 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.8 2.0 1.5 0.4 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.9 1.0 0.9 111.1 40.5 107.1 57.6 103.7 67.1 103.1 66.2 102.6 66.1 101.8 66.8 101.5 68.0 101.3 68.7 99.8 92.3 106.2 57.8 101.8 67.4 101.6 69.9 0.18 2.74 5.27 0.18 3.31 5.51 0.20 3.50 5.27 0.20 3.40 5.11 0.20 3.56 5.17 0.20 3.71 5.22 0.20 3.86 5.29 0.20 3.99 5.37 1.93 3.67 5.64 0.19 3.24 5.29 0.20 3.78 5.26 0.43 4.31 5.68 22.8 0.2 3.7 -11.5 -1796.0 15.7 3.8 4.9 22.1 -1220.0 46.6 -2.9 3.6 15.8 -1663.0 25.0 -0.4 3.3 0.6 -1349.0 9.6 2.9 3.0 0.4 -1544.0 7.4 3.8 3.2 -0.1 -1018.0 7.4 1.7 2.9 -0.1 -1200.0 8.9 3.9 3.1 1.2 -1278.0 -25.1 0.3 2.7 -39.0 -455.0 27.0 0.2 3.9 25.8 -1502.0 8.3 3.1 3.0 1.4 -1278.0 5.5 4.2 3.8 7.0 -1235.0 *Billions of chained (2005) dollars **Percent change quarterly rate October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 43 Below-Target Inflation & Lingering Slack Imply Late Exit Real Fed Funds Rate and Real 10-year T-note Yield* Percent 12 12 H F 8 8 Real 10-year T-note yield 4 4 0 0 -4 -4 Real fed funds rate -8 -8 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 00 05 10 *Real long rate calculated as nominal rate less 10-year inflation expectations, real funds rate calculated as nominal rate less 4-quarter percent change in the core CPI. October 2009 © Macroeconomic Advisers 44 Wage & Salary Income Poised to Turn Up Contributions to Real Disposable Personal Income 10 4-quarter percent change 10 H F 8 8 Real disposable personal income 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 0 -2 Taxes -2 Wage, salary & proprietors’ income -4 -4 -6 1982 -6 October 2009 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 © Macroeconomic Advisers 2003 2006 2009 45