Overview & Outlook for the P/C Insurance Industry: Trends & Challenges for 2013 and Beyond Casualty Actuaries of Greater New York New York, NY December 6, 2012 Download at www.iii.org/presentations Robert P. Hartwig, Ph.D., CPCU, President & Economist Insurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038 Tel: 212.346.5520 Cell: 917.453.1885 bobh@iii.org www.iii.org The Strength of the Economy Will Influence P/C Insurer Growth Opportunities Growth Will Expand Insurer Exposure Base Across Most Lines Will the “Fiscal Cliff” Adversely Impact Insurers? 2 -5% -7% 1.4% 2.3% 2.2% 2.6% 2.4% 0.1% 2.5% 1.3% 4.1% 2.0% 1.3% 2.7% 1.7% 1.6% 2.2% 2.6% 2.9% 2013 is expected to see modest growth depending on the outcome of the “Fiscal Cliff” situation -8.9% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 07:1Q 07:2Q 07:3Q 07:4Q 08:1Q 08:2Q 08:3Q 08:4Q 09:1Q 09:2Q 09:3Q 09:4Q 10:1Q 10:2Q 10:3Q 10:4Q 11:1Q 11:2Q 11:3Q 11:4Q 12:1Q 12:2Q 12:3Q 12:4Q 13:1Q 13:2Q 13:3Q 13:4Q -9% Recession began in Dec. 2007. Economic toll of credit crunch, housing slump, labor market contraction has been severe but modest recovery is underway -0.3% -3% -5.3% -1% -3.7% 1% 1.3% 3% -1.8% 5% The Q4:2008 decline was the steepest since the Q1:1982 drop of 6.8% 1.1% 1.8% 2.5% 3.6% 3.1% 2.7% 0.5% 3.6% 3.0% 1.7% 7% 4.1% Real GDP Growth (%) 5.0% US Real GDP Growth* Demand for Insurance Continues To Be Impacted by Sluggish Economic Conditions, but the Benefits of Even Slow Growth Will Compound and Gradually Benefit the Economy Broadly * Estimates/Forecasts from Blue Chip Economic Indicators. Source: US Department of Commerce, Blue Economic Indicators 11/12; Insurance Information Institute. 3 Percent Change in Real GDP by State, 2011 Growth varied considerably across states but in total was weak in 2011 with US overall growth at just 1.7% TX has been an economic growth leader Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis at http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/regional/gdp_state/gsp_glance.htm ;Insurance Information Institute. 4 Consumer Sentiment Survey (1966 = 100) January 2010 through November 2012 69.9 75.0 75.3 76.2 76.4 79.3 73.2 72.3 74.3 82.6 82.7 Nov-12 Oct-12 Aug-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 May-12 Apr-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Jan-12 Nov-11 Dec-11 Oct-11 Sep-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Jun-11 May-11 Apr-10 May-10 Mar-10 Feb-10 40 Jan-10 45 Mar-11 Apr-11 50 Feb-11 55 Jan-11 Optimism among consumers Increased in September, and is well above year-ago levels; Suggests concern, but not fear on the part of consumers. 55.7 59.5 60.9 64.1 60 Nov-10 Dec-10 65 Oct-10 70 Aug-10 Sep-10 75 Jul-10 80 Jun-10 85 74.4 73.6 73.6 72.2 73.6 76 67.8 68.9 68.2 67.7 71.6 74.5 74.2 77.5 67.5 69.8 74.3 71.5 63.7 90 Consumer confidence has been low for years amid high unemployment, falling home prices and other factors adversely impact consumers, but improved substantially in late 2011 and in 2012 Source: University of Michigan; Insurance Information Institute 5 Auto/Light Truck Sales, 1999-2022F 11.6 10.4 15.4 15.5 15.4 15.1 14.7 14.9 12.7 14.4 New auto/light truck sales fell to the lowest level since the late 1960s. Forecast for 2012-13 is still far below 1999-2007 average of 17 million units, but a recovery is underway. 13.2 16.1 16.5 16.9 16.9 16.6 17.1 17.5 17.8 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 17.4 (Millions of Units) Job growth and improved credit market conditions will boost auto sales in 2012 and beyond 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12F 13F 14F 15F 16F 17F 1822F Car/Light Truck Sales Will Continue to Recover from the 2009 Low Point, Bolstering the Auto Insurer Growth and the Manufacturing Sector. Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (10/11 and 11/12); Insurance Information Institute. 6 Monthly Change* in Auto Insurance Prices, 1991–2012* 10% 8% Cyclical peaks in PP Auto tend to occur approximately every 10 years (early 1990s, early 2000s and likely the early 2010s) Pricing peak occurred in 2010 at 5.1%, falling to 2.8% by Mar. 2012 6% 4% 2% 0% “Hard” markets tend to occur during recessionary periods The Oct. 2012 reading of 4.0% is up from 2.9% a year earlier -2% '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 *Percentage change from same month in prior year; through Oct. 2012; seasonally adjusted Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns. Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes. 7 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.5 Low inventories of existing homes, and low mortgage rates and stimulating new home construction for the first time in years 0.55 0.59 0.61 0.77 0.93 2.1 New home starts plunged 72% from 2005-2009; A net annual decline of 1.49 million units, lowest since records began in 1959 1.19 1.01 1.20 1.29 1.46 1.35 1.48 1.47 1.62 1.64 1.57 1.60 1.71 1.85 1.96 2.07 1.80 1.36 0.91 (Millions of Units) 1.34 1.23 1.32 1.38 1.42 New Private Housing Starts, 1990-2022F Job growth, improved credit market conditions and demographics will eventually boost home construction 0.3 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12F13F14F15F 16F17F 1822F Little Exposure Growth Likely for Homeowners Insurers Until at least 2014. Also Affects Commercial Insurers with Construction Risk Exposure, Surety Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (10/11 and 11/12); Insurance Information Institute. 10 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 2/30/2 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 5,550 5,500 5,529 5,552 5,559 5,518 5,507 5,491 5,511 5,492 5,499 5,488 5,477 5,456 5,489 5,496 5,495 5,498 5,495 5,508 5,498 5,528 5,519 5,520 5,546 5,564 5,563 5,549 5,542 5,510 5,514 5,517 5,520 5,522 5,539 5,600 5,593 Construction Employment, Jan. 2010—October 2012* (Thousands) 5,650 Construction employment is still below where it was in Jan. 2010. In a normal recovery, construction employment would be growing robustly 5,450 5,400 *Seasonally adjusted Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://data.bls.gov; Insurance Information Institute. 11 Value of Construction Put in Place, October 2012 vs. October 2011* Growth (%) Private: +15.5% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25% Public: -1.0% 20.8% 15.5% 10.7% 9.6% Private sector construction activity is up in both the residential and nonresidential segments -0.4% -1.0% Public sector construction activity remains depressed -20.9% Total Construction Total Private Residential-Construction Private NonResidential-Private Total Public Construction ResidentialPublic NonResidential-Public Overall Construction Activity is Up, But Growth Is Entirely in the Private Sector as State/Local Government Budget Woes Continue *seasonally adjusted Source: U.S. Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/construction/c30/c30index.html ; Insurance Information Institute. 12 Value of Private Construction Put in Place, by Segment, Oct. 2012 vs. Oct. 2011* 33.9% 20.8% 10.7% 18.8% 18.5% 17.6% 9.5% 3.6% Manufacturing Power Communication Transportation -3.0% -3.0% -6.6% Amusement & Rec. Religious -3.6% Educational Health Care Commercial Office Lodging -0.3% Total Nonresidential Total Private Construction 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15.5% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% Led by the Residential Construction, Lodging and Power industries, Private sector construction activity is up by double digits in many segments after plunging during the “Great Recession” Residential Growth (%) Private Construction Activity is Up in Most Segments, Including Residential Construction *seasonally adjusted Source: U.S. Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/construction/c30/c30index.html ; Insurance Information Institute. 13 Value of Public Construction Put in Place, by Segment, Oct. 2012 vs. Oct. 2011* 22.0% 22.5% 13.5% 6.0% 1.3% Conservation & Develop. -13.6% Water Supply Sewage & Waste Disposal Highway & Street Educational Health Care Commercial Office -20.9% Power -15.7% -16.1% Transportation and -5.0% -4.9% Power projects lead public sector construction Transportation -8.1% Amusement & Rec. -2.8% Public Safety -0.4% Total Nonresidential Total Public Construction 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -1.0% -10% -15% -20% -25% Public sector construction activity is down substantially in many segments, but is actually now up in some segments Residential Growth (%) Public Construction Activity is Down in Many Segments as State, City and County Budgets Remain Under Stress *seasonally adjusted Source: U.S. Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/construction/c30/c30index.html ; Insurance Information Institute. 14 ISM Manufacturing Index (Values > 50 Indicate Expansion) 55 50 40 Manufacturing activity contracted in 4 of the past 6 months, but only slightly. The recent trend is basically flat. Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 45 51.4 52.5 52.5 51.8 52.2 53.1 54.1 52.4 53.4 54.8 53.5 49.7 49.8 49.6 51.5 51.7 49.5 60 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 65 58.3 57.1 60.4 59.6 57.8 55.3 55.1 55.2 55.3 56.9 58.2 58.5 60.8 61.4 59.7 59.7 54.2 55.8 January 2010 through November 2012 The manufacturing sector expanded for 33 of the 35 months from Jan. 2010 through Oct. 2012. The question is whether this will continue. Source: Institute for Supply Management at http://www.ism.ws/ismreport/mfgrob.cfm; Insurance Information Institute. 15 Dollar Value* of Manufacturers’ Shipments Monthly, Jan. 1992—Oct. 2012 $ Millions $500,000 $400,000 ENERGY INTENSIVE The value of Manufacturing Shipments in Oct. 2012 were up 35% to $482B from its May 2009 trough. June figure is only 0.7% below its previous record high in July 2008. $300,000 Ja n92 Ja n93 Ja n94 Ja n95 Ja n96 Ja n97 Ja n98 Ja n99 Ja n00 Ja n 01 Ja n 02 Ja n 03 Ja n 04 Ja n 05 Ja n 06 Ja n 07 Ja n 08 Ja n 09 Ja n 10 Ja n 11 Ja n 12 $200,000 Monthly shipments are nearly back to peak (in July 2008, 8 months into the recession). Trough in May 2009. Growth from trough to Oct. 2012 was 35%. Manufacturing is an energy intensive activity and growth leads to gains in many commercial exposures: WC, Commercial Auto, Marine, Property and Various Liability Coverages *seasonally adjusted Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Full Report on Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders, http://www.census.gov/manufacturing/m3/ 16 Manufacturing Growth for Selected Sectors, 2012 vs. 2011* Growth (%) Non-Durables: +2.3% Durables: +7.4% 14.6% 11.0% 9.4% 7.4% 7.2% Manufacturing of durable goods has been especially strong in 2012 5.3% 4.7% 2.7% 4.3% 4.8% 2.3% 2.7% Textile Products Plastics & Rubber Chemical Petroleum & Coal Food Products Non-Durable Mfg. Transportation Equip. Electrical Equip. Machinery Fabricated Metals Primary Metals Wood Products -1.3% Durable Mfg. All Manufacturing 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4.6% 4% 2% 0% -2% -4% Manufacturing Is Expanding Across a Wide Range of Sectors that Will Contribute to Growth in Energy Demand and Insurable Exposures Including: WC, Commercial Property, Commercial Auto and Many Liability Coverages *Seasonally adjusted; Date are YTD comparing data through October 2012 to the same period in 2011. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Full Report on Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders, http://www.census.gov/manufacturing/m3/ 17 Recovery in Capacity Utilization is a Positive Sign for Commercial Exposures March 2001 through October 2012 “Full Capacity” The US operated at 77.8% of industrial capacity in Oct. 2012, above the June 2009 low of 68.3% Percent of Industrial Capacity 82% Hurricane Katrina 80% 78% 76% The closer the economy is to operating at “full capacity,” the greater the inflationary pressure March 2001November 2001 recession Sep 12 Jun 11 Sep 11 Dec 11 Mar 12 Jun 12 Dec 10 Mar 11 Jun 10 Sep 10 Sep 09 Dec 09 Mar 10 Mar 09 Jun 09 Sep 08 Dec 08 Jun 07 Sep 07 Jun 06 Sep 06 Sep 04 Dec 04 Dec 03 Mar 04 Jun 04 18 Jun 03 Sep 03 Dec 02 Mar 03 Source: Federal Reserve Board statistical releases at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/Current/default.htm. Jun 02 Sep 02 Sep 01 Dec 01 Mar 02 Mar 01 Jun 01 66% Dec 07 Mar 08 Jun 08 December 2007June 2009 Recession 68% Dec 06 Mar 07 70% Sep 05 Dec 05 Mar 06 72% Mar 05 Jun 05 74% 18 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 2/30/2 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 12,400 12,200 12,000 11,800 11,600 11,458 11,462 11,470 11,502 11,536 11,546 11,566 11,549 11,551 11,551 11,560 11,575 11,627 11,664 11,690 11,718 11,726 11,738 11,768 11,771 11,768 11,777 11,780 11,808 11,860 11,890 11,932 11,942 11,955 11,962 11,980 11,967 11,953 11,966 Manufacturing Employment, Jan. 2010—October 2012* (Thousands) Manufacturing employment is up by more than 500,000 or 4.4% since Jan. 2010—a surprising source of strength in the economy—though employment is down slightly since mid-year. 11,400 11,200 11,000 *Seasonally adjusted Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://data.bls.gov; Insurance Information Institute. 19 ISM Non-Manufacturing Index (Values > 50 Indicate Expansion) January 2010 through November 2012 60 55 50.7 52.7 54.1 54.6 54.8 53.5 53.7 52.8 53.9 54.6 56 57.1 59.4 59.7 56.3 54.4 53.3 53.4 53.8 52.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 53.0 56.8 57.3 56.0 53.5 53.7 52.1 52.6 53.7 55.1 54.2 54.7 65 50 40 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 45 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Optimism among nonmanufacturers iss stable and remained expansionary in 2012 Non-manufacturing industries have been expanding and adding jobs. The question is whether this will continue. Source: Institute for Supply Management at http://www.ism.ws/ismreport/nonmfgrob.cfm; Insurance Information Institute. 20 Business Bankruptcy Filings, 1980-2012:H1 90,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 1980-82 1980-87 1990-91 2000-01 2006-09 58.6% 88.7% 10.3% 13.0% 208.9%* 2011 bankruptcies totaled 47,806, down 15.1% from 56,282 in 2010—the second consecutive year of decline. Business bankruptcies more than tripled during the financial crisis. Through H1:2012, filings are down 18.3% vs. H1:2011 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12:H1 70,000 43,694 48,125 80,000 69,300 62,436 64,004 71,277 81,235 82,446 63,853 63,235 64,853 71,549 70,643 62,304 52,374 51,959 53,549 54,027 44,367 37,884 35,472 40,099 38,540 35,037 34,317 39,201 19,695 28,322 43,546 60,837 56,282 47,806 19,622 % Change Surrounding Recessions Significant Exposure Implications for All Commercial Lines as Business Bankruptcies Begin to Decline Sources: American Bankruptcy Institute at http://www.abiworld.org/AM/AMTemplate.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=61633; Insurance Information Institute 21 Private Sector Business Starts, 1993:Q2 – 2012:Q1* 230 220 210 200 190 180 170 Business Starts 2006: 872,000 2007: 843,000 2008: 790,000 2009: 697,000 2010: 742,000 2011: 748,000* 175 186 174 180 186 192 188 187 189 186 190 194 191 199 204 202 195 196 196 206 206 201 192 198 206 206 203 211 205 212 200 205 204 204 197 203 209 201 203 192 192 193 201 204 202 210 212 209 216 220 223 220 220 210 221 212 204 218 209 207 207 199 191 193 172 176 169 184 175 179 188 200 183 187 191 197 193 (Thousands) Business starts were up 2.2% to 748,000 in 2011 vs. 2010. 742,000 new business starts were recorded in 2010, up 6.0% from 700,000 in 2009, which was the slowest year for new business starts since 1993 160 150 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Business Starts Were Down Nearly 20% in the Recession, Holding Back Most Types of Commercial Insurance Exposure, But Are Recovering Slowly * Data through Mar. 31, 2012 are the latest available as of Dec. 2, 2012; Seasonally adjusted. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, http://www.bls.gov/news.release/cewbd.t08.htm. 22 NFIB Small Business Optimism Index January 1985 through October 2012 Small business optimism has increased but is still only at the level it was when the Financial Crisis began Source: National Federation of Independent Business at http://www.advisorperspectives.com/dshort/charts/indicators/Sentiment.html?NFIBoptimism-index.gif ; Insurance Information Institute. 23 12 Industries for the Next 10 Years: Insurance Solutions Needed Health Care Health Sciences Energy (Traditional) Alternative Energy Petrochemical Agriculture Natural Resources Technology (incl. Biotechnology) Many industries are poised for growth, though insurers’ ability to capitalize on these industries varies widely Light Manufacturing Insourced Manufacturing Export-Oriented Industries Shipping (Rail, Marine, Trucking) 24 Fiscal Cliff: Implications for P/C Insurance Industry Premium Growth Rates Vary Tremendously by State 25 The Fiscal Cliff: Key Issues for the P/C Insurance Industry Growth: P/C Insurance Industry Shares This Concern with All Industries Worried that the simultaneous combination of higher taxes and sharp spending cuts will slow the economy—even push it into recession—and hurt growth Consumer/Business spending could be reduced and/or postponed Investments: Markets Hate Uncertainty Will the uncertainty hurt stock markets? Will the Fed have to redouble efforts to keep interest rates low (hurting inv. Inc.)? Agent/Brokers: Higher Marginal Tax Rates & Capital Gain Tax Hikes Many agencies/small brokers are effectively small businesses, so higher marginal tax rates hurt owners and a higher capital gains tax rate reduces value in M&A Tax Reform—After the Fiscal Cliff There is a general view that the US tax code is badly in need of reform Part of the reform could mean casting a wider net for revenue Deductibility of reserves, tax treatment of muni bonds are issues of future concern Health Insurers Have the Most to Be Concerned About Source: Insurance Information Institute research. 26 Growth Analysis by State and Business Segment Premium Growth Rates Vary Tremendously by State 27 Direct Premiums Written: Total P/C Percent Change by State, 2006-2011* Top 25 States A limited number of states showed strong growth over the past 5 years 71.5 80 60 50 41.8 6.6 6.3 6.1 5.8 4.9 4.7 4.2 3.9 2.4 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.4 LA AR WI TN IN AK DE NM NC KY SC WA DC MO VT MS 10.5 TX OK MT SD 0 ND 10 MN 11.8 20.8 KS WY 22.6 NE 20 18.2 22.8 30 IA 40 26.4 Pecent change (%) 70 Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute. 28 Direct Premiums Written: Total P/C Percent Change by State, 2006-2011* Bottom 25 States Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute. NV AZ -19.2 -13.5 -12.0 CA -10.8 WV -11.7 -10.5 NH FL -10.3 -6.0 MI RI MD CO NJ HI -5.8 -4.4 OR ME -4.1 ID -5.2 -3.5 -3.2 -3.1 -2.5 -2.0 PA CT GA US UT NY VA OH AL -20 IL States with the poorest performing economies also produced the most negative net change in premiums of the past 5 years -15 -25 MA -10 -1.9 -5 -1.6 -1.4 -1.3 -1.1 -0.8 -0.6 Pecent change (%) 0 -0.8 0.4 5 29 Direct Premiums Written: Comm. Lines Percent Change by State, 2006-2011* Top 25 States 80 NC -7.9 NY -7.8 WA -7.6 MS -6.7 NM -6.6 MA -6.6 OH -6.4 IL -6.3 -0.5 AR -3.0 0.0 IN DC 0.2 VT -2.5 0.9 WI TN 2.7 AK -1.5 2.9 TX WY OK MT SD -20 ND 0 LA 4.0 MN 8.3 25.6 KS 20 14.9 27.9 NE 40 28.9 38.9 60 IA 60.8 Pecent change (%) 100 Only 12 states showed any commercial lines growth 20065 and 2011 100.9 120 Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute. 34 Direct Premiums Written: Comm. Lines Percent Change by State, 2006-2011* Bottom 25 States 0 NV WV -33.0 -26.4 -24.4 AZ -19.9 HI -23.7 -19.8 NH FL -19.4 -16.7 DE CA -16.0 MI -15.0 OR NJ MD ID GA VA AL SC CT ME PA KY -35 US -30 MO States with the poorest performing economies also produced the most negative net change in premiums of the past 5 years -25 -40 -14.7 -13.6 CO -20 UT -13.2 RI -13.2 -12.9 -12.7 -12.2 -11.6 -11.4 -10.8 -10.1 -15 -10.0 -9.0 -8.1 -8.0 -10 -7.9 Pecent change (%) -5 Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute. 35 Direct Premiums Written: Workers’ Comp Percent Change by State, 2006-2011* 350 321.6 Top 25 States 250 160.5 200 150 *Excludes monopolistic fund states: ND, OH, WA, WY as well as WV, which transitioned to a competitive structure during this period. Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute. AL-19.8 RI-19.4 VA-18.6 NM-17.2 LA-17.0 NC-16.4 MA-16.1 IN-15.3 ME-14.8 MI-14.6 MN-13.4 NJ-13.3 NE -11.6 PA -10.5 OH -10.4 -7.0 CT -1.5 KS IL -6.9 0.6 NY WY -6.3 1.2 10.9 OK MT -50 ND 0 WI 12.7 IA 50 13.2 100 SD Pecent change (%) 300 36 Direct Premiums Written: Worker’s Comp Percent Change by State, 2006-2011* Bottom 25 States -28.4 -29.0 -29.2 -29.6 -29.8 AK MO NH AZ CA *Excludes monopolistic fund states: ND, OH, WA, WY as well as WV, which transitioned to a competitive structure during this period. Sources: SNL Financial LC.; Insurance Information Institute. FL -52.5 -49.0 WV -46.1 NV -45.2 -44.2 DE HI -43.8 WA -40.3 UT VT KY MD DC GA TX AR SC MS TN -50 ID -45 OR States with the poorest performing economies also produced the most negative net change in premiums of the past 5 years -40 -55 -36.1 -35 CO -26.1 -25.6 -30 -25.5 -23.6 -23.4 -23.1 -23.1 -23.0 -22.9 -22.2 -21.0 -19.9 -25 US Pecent change (%) -20 -19.8 -15 37 Presidential Politics & the P/C Insurance Industry How Is Profitability Affected by the President’s Political Party? 38 P/C Insurance Industry ROE by Presidential Administration, 1950- 2012* 16.43% Carter Reagan II 15.10% G.W. Bush II 9.40% Nixon 8.93% 8.65% Clinton I G.H.W. Bush OVERALL RECORD: 1950-2012* Democrats 7.67% Republicans 7.97% 8.35% Clinton II 7.98% Reagan I 7.68% Nixon/Ford 6.98% Truman 6.97% Obama 6.65% Eisenhower I 5.43% 5.03% Eisenhower II G.W. Bush I 4.83% Johnson 4.43% Kennedy/Johnson Party of President has marginal bearing on profitability of P/C insurance industry 3.55% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% *Truman administration ROE of 6.97% based on 3 years only, 1950-52; ROEs for the years 2008 forward exclude mortgage and financial guaranty segments. Estimated ROE for 2012 = 7.0%. Source: Insurance Information Institute P/C insurance Industry ROE by Presidential Party Affiliation, 1950- 2012* Clinton Bush II Obama Reagan/Bush I 94 96 RED = Republican President 82 84 Nixon/Ford Carter Kennedy/ Johnson 20% Truman 25% Eisenhower BLUE = Democratic President 15% 10% 5% 0% *ROEs for the years 2008 forward exclude mortgage and financial guaranty segments; Estimated 2012 ROE = 7.0% Source: Insurance Information Institute 12E 08 10 02 04 06 98 00 90 92 86 88 78 80 74 76 70 72 66 68 60 62 64 56 58 52 54 50 -5% Labor Market Trends Massive Job Losses Sapped the Economy and Commercial/Personal Lines Exposure, But Trend is Improving 41 Unemployment and Underemployment Rates: Stubbornly High in 2012, But Falling January 2000 through Oct. 2012, Seasonally Adjusted (%) 18 U-6 went from 8.0% in March 2007 to 17.5% in October 2009; Stood at 14.6% in Aug. 2012 Traditional Unemployment Rate U-3 Unemployment + Underemployment Rate U-6 16 Recession ended in November 2001 14 12 Unemployment kept rising for 19 more months Recession began in December 2007 Unemployment stood at 7.9% in Oct. 2012 10 Unemployment peaked at 10.1% in October 2009, highest monthly rate since 1983. 8 6 Peak rate in the last 30 years: 10.8% in November December 1982 4 2 Jan 00 Jan 01 Jan 02 Jan 03 Jan 04 Jan 05 Jan 06 Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 10 Jan 11 Jan 12 Sep. 12 Stubbornly high unemployment and underemployment constrain overall economic growth, but the job market is now clearly improving Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute. 42 (600) (800) (1,000) Monthly Losses in Dec. 08–Mar. 09 Were the Largest in the Post-WW II Period -734 -667 -806 -707 -744 -649 -452 -297 -215 -186 -262 -334 -161 -253 -230 -257 -347 (400) -456 -547 (200) -14 -83 -12 -85 -58 -109 0 144 400 229 51 61 117 143 112 193 128 167 119 257 261 264 108 102 175 52 216 139 178 234 277 254 147 85 116 63 163 134 128 184 16 62 75 213 186 127 65 97 23 42 15 65 79 200 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Monthly Change in Private Employment January 2008 through Oct. 2012 (Thousands) 184,000 private sector jobs were created in October Private Employers Added 5.08 million Jobs Since Jan. 2010 After Having Shed 4.66 Million Jobs in 2009 and 3.81 Million in 2008 (State and Local Governments Have Shed Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs) Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute 43 -4 -6 -8 -10 -0.074 -0.132 -0.293 -0.546 -0.776 -1.033 -1.380 -1.836 -2.383 -3.117 -3.784 -4.590 -5.297 -6.041 -6.690 -7.024 -7.476 -7.773 -7.988 -8.174 -8.436 -8.361 -8.444 -8.428 -8.366 -8.222 -7.993 -7.942 -7.881 -7.764 -7.621 -7.509 -7.316 -7.188 -7.021 -6.902 -6.645 -6.384 -6.120 -6.012 -5.910 -5.735 -5.683 -5.467 -5.328 -5.150 -4.916 -4.639 -4.385 -4.238 -4.153 -4.037 -3.974 -3.811 -3.677 -3.549 -3.365 -2 0.023 0.011 0 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 MayJun-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 MayJun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 MayJun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 MayJun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11 Nov-11 Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 MayJun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Millions Cumulative Change in Private Employment: Dec. 2007—Oct. 2012 December 2007 through October 2012 (Millions) 2 Cumulative job losses peaked at 8.444 million in December 2009 Cumulative job losses as of Oct. 2012 totaled 3.365 million All of the jobs “lost” since President Obama took office in Jan. 2009 have been recouped Private Employers Added 5.08 million Jobs Since Jan. 2010 After Having Shed 4.66 Million Jobs in 2009 and 3.81 Million in 2008 (State and Local Governments Have Shed Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs) Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute 44 Cumulative Change in Private Sector Employment: Jan. 2010—Oct. 2012 January 2010 through October 2012* (Millions) 5.079 4.895 4.767 4.633 4.470 4.407 4.291 4.206 4.059 3.805 3.528 3.116 2.977 2.761 2.709 2.534 2.432 2.060 Oct-12 Sep-12 Aug-12 Jul-12 Jun-12 May-12 Apr-12 Mar-12 Feb-12 Jan-12 Dec-11 Nov-11 Oct-11 Sep-11 Aug-11 Jul-11 Jun-11 May-11 Cumulative job gains through Oct. 2012 totaled 5.08 million Mar-11 1.799 Feb-11 1.542 Jan-11 1.423 Dec-10 1.256 0.935 Sep-10 Nov-10 0.823 Aug-10 0.563 Jun-10 0.680 0.502 May-10 Jul-10 0.451 Apr-10 Mar-10 0.078 Feb-10 0.0 Jan-10 0.016 1.0 0.222 2.0 1.128 3.0 Apr-11 4.0 Oct-10 Millions 5.0 2.324 Job gains and pay increases have added more than $600 billion to payrolls since Jan. 2010 3.294 6.0 Private Employers Added 5.08 million Jobs Since Jan. 2010 After Having Shed 4.66 Million Jobs in 2009 and 3.81 Million in 2008 (State and Local Governments Have Shed Hundreds of Thousands of Jobs) Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics: http://www.bls.gov/ces/home.htm; Insurance Information Institute 45 Cumulative Change in Government Employment: Jan. 2010—Oct. 2012 January 2010 through Oct. 2012* (Millions) Government at all levels has shed nearly half a million jobs since Jan. 2010 even as private employers created 5.08 million jobs, though losses may now be ending. 518 700 259 500 86 -8 0 40 100 109 300 -475 -455 -468 Sep-12 Oct-12 -504 Apr-12 Aug-12 -487 Mar-12 -533 -483 Feb-12 Jul-12 -488 Jan-12 Jun-12 -551 -486 Dec-11 -533 -475 Nov-11 May-12 -454 -427 Sep-11 Oct-11 -413 Aug-11 -446 -367 Jun-11 Jul-11 -349 May-11 -295 Apr-11 -230 Jan-11 -282 -221 Dec-10 Mar-11 -201 Nov-10 -267 -188 Oct-10 Feb-11 -212 Sep-10 Aug-10 Jul-10 Jun-10 May-10 Apr-10 Mar-10 Jan-10 -500 Feb-10 Temporary Census hiring distorted 2010 figures -300 -700 Cumulative job losses through Oct. 2012 totaled 468,000 -70 -100 Governments at All Levels are Under Severe Fiscal Strain As Tax Receipts Plunged and Pension Obligations Soared During the Financial Crisis, Causing Them to Reduce Staff Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics http://www.bls.gov/data/#employment; Insurance Information Institute 46 Unemployment Rates by State, October 2012: Highest 25 States* 7.4 7.5 7.9 7.9 8.0 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.2 8.4 8.5 8.1 8 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.7 8.8 8.9 9.0 9.1 9.3 9.7 10.1 10 10.4 Unemployment Rate (%) 12 11.5 14 8.5 In October, 37 states and the District of Columbia reported overthe-month unemployment rate decreases, 7 states had increases, and 6 had no change. 6 4 2 0 NV RI CA NJ NC MI CT MS IL GA NY OR SC DC FL KY TN WA AL AZ PA IN US CO WV ME *Provisional figures for October 2012, seasonally adjusted. Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute. 48 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 6.9 6.9 7.0 7.1 3.8 4.5 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.8 6.0 6 In October, 37 states and the District of Columbia reported over-the-month unemployment rate decreases, 7 states had increases, and 6 had no change. 6.3 4 3.1 Unemployment Rate (%) 8 7.2 Unemployment Rates by State, October 2012: Lowest 25 States* 2 0 AR AK ID MO OH WI DE MD LA MA TX NM MT MN KS NH VA HI VT OK UT WY IA SD NE ND *Provisional figures for October 2012, seasonally adjusted. Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute. 49 US Unemployment Rate Forecast 2007:Q1 to 2013:Q4F* 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% Unemployment peaked at 10% in late 2009. 9.3% 9.6% 10.0% 9.7% 9.6% 9.6% 9.6% 8.9% 9.1% 9.1% 8.7% 8.3% 8.2% 8.1% 7.9% 7.9% 7.8% 7.7% 7.6% 9.0% 8.1% 10.0% Rising unemployment eroded payrolls and workers comp’s exposure base. 4.5% 4.5% 4.6% 4.8% 4.9% 5.4% 6.1% 6.9% 11.0% Jobless figures have been revised slightly downwards for 2012/13 Unemployment forecasts have been revised slightly downwards. Optimistic scenarios put the unemployment as low as 7.3% by Q4 of next year. 07:Q1 07:Q2 07:Q3 07:Q4 08:Q1 08:Q2 08:Q3 08:Q4 09:Q1 09:Q2 09:Q3 09:Q4 10:Q1 10:Q2 10:Q3 10:Q4 11:Q1 11:Q2 11:Q3 11:Q4 12:Q1 12:Q2 12:Q3 12:Q4 13:Q1 13:Q2 13:Q3 13:Q4 4.0% * = actual; = forecasts Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (11/12 edition); Insurance Information Institute. 50 Payroll vs. Workers Comp Net Written Premiums, 1990-2012E Payroll Base* $Billions $7,000 7/90-3/91 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 WC NWP $Billions Wage & Salary Disbursements 3/01-11/01 WC NPW 12/07-6/09 WC premium volume dropped two years before the recession began +9% in 2012E $50 $45 $40 WC net premiums written were down $14B or 29.3% to $33.8B in 2010 after peaking at $47.8B in 2005 $2,000 $35 $30 $25 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12* Continued Payroll Growth and Rate Increases Suggest WC NWP Will Grow Again in 2012; +7.9% Growth in 2011 Was the First Gain Since 2005 *Private employment; Shaded areas indicate recessions. Payroll and WC premiums for 2012 is I.I.I. estimate based YTD 2012 actuals. Sources: NBER (recessions); Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis at http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/WASCUR ; NCCI; I.I.I. 52 Mass Layoff Announcements, Jan. 2002—October 2012* 3,500 Mass layoff announcements peaked at more than 3,000 per month in Feb. 2009 3,000 There were 1,360 may layoffs announced in Oct. 2012, close to pre-recession levels 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 *Seasonally adjusted. Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns. Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://www.bls.gov/mls/; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute. '12 53 P/C Insurance Industry Financial Overview Profit Recovery in 2012 After High CAT Losses; Ultimate Impact of Sandy Still Unclear 55 $16,423 $19,150 $3,043 $28,672 $35,204 $65,777 $44,155 $38,501 $30,029 $20,559 $20,598 $10,870 $3,046 $10,000 $19,316 $20,000 $5,840 $30,000 $14,178 $40,000 $21,865 $50,000 P-C Industry 2012:H1 profits were up 245% from 2011:H1, due primarily to lower catastrophe losses $30,773 $60,000 2005 ROE*= 9.6% 2006 ROE = 12.7% 2007 ROE = 10.9% 2008 ROE = 0.1% 2009 ROE = 5.0% 2010 ROE = 6.6% 2011 ROAS1 = 3.5% 2012:H1 ROAS1 = 5.9% $36,819 $70,000 $24,404 $80,000 $62,496 P/C Net Income After Taxes 1991–2012:Q2 ($ Millions) $0 -$10,000 -$6,970 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * ROE figures are GAAP; 1Return on avg. surplus. Excluding Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers yields a 6.2% ROAS for 2012:H1, 4.6% ROAS for 2011, 7.6% for 2010 and 7.4% for 2009. Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute 11 12:H1 A 100 Combined Ratio Isn’t What It Once Was: Investment Impact on ROEs Combined Ratio / ROE 15.9% 110 A combined ratio of about 100 generates an ROE of ~7.0% in 2012, ~7.5% ROE in 2009/10, 10% in 2005 and 16% in 1979 106.4 14.3% 12.7% 105 100.6 100 100.1 101.0 100.8 99.3 95.7 95 7.4% 92.7 8.8% 15% 10.9% 9.6% 97.5 18% 101.1 100.9 7.6% 12% 9% 6.2% 4.4% 4.6% 90 6% Year Ago 85 3% 2011:H1 = 109.4, 2.3% ROE 0% 80 1978 1979 2003 2005 2006 2007 Combined Ratio 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012:H1 ROE* Combined Ratios Must Be Lower in Today’s Depressed Investment Environment to Generate Risk Appropriate ROEs * 2008 -2012 figures are return on average surplus and exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers. 2012:H1 combined ratio including M&FG insurers is 102.2, ROAS = 5.9%; 2011 combined ratio including M&FG insurers is 108.2, ROAS = 3.5%. Source: Insurance Information Institute from A.M. Best and ISO data. Profitability Peaks & Troughs in the P/C Insurance Industry, 1975 – 2012:H1* ROE History suggests next ROE peak will be in 2016-2017 25% 1977:19.0% 1987:17.3% 20% 2006:12.7% 1997:11.6% 15% 9 Years 2012:H1: 6.2% 10% 5% 2011: 4.6%* 0% 1975: 2.4% 1992: 4.5% 2001: -1.2% 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11* 12: -5% 1984: 1.8% *Profitability = P/C insurer ROEs. 2011 figure is an estimate based on ROAS data. Note: Data for 2008-2012 exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers. 2012:H1 ROAS = 5.9% including M&FG. Source: Insurance Information Institute; NAIC, ISO, A.M. Best. Hurricane Sandy Summary Sandy Will Become One of the Most Expensive Events in Insurance History 67 Summary of Key Financial Issues Related to Hurricane Sandy Sandy Will Likely Become the 3rd Most Expensive Hurricane in US History in Terms of Insured Losses—With Insured Losses of Up to $25 Billion Ranks behind 2005’s Katrina ($47.6B) and 1992’s Andrew ($25.0B) [in 2011 $] Total Claim Count is Estimated at Approximately 1.38 million Hurricane Katrina produced 1.743 million claims 2012 Could Become the 3rd Costliest Year in US History in Terms of Insured Losses—Totaling Approximately $34-$35 Billion as of Late 2012 Ranking behind 2005 ($71.7B) and 1992 ($36.9B) [both stated in 2011 dollars] 2012 Will Likely Be the 2nd Costliest Year for the NFIP (~$7B+), Likely Exhausting the Flood Program’s Remaining Borrowing Authority Record was $17.74B in 2005 (original dollars), the year of Hurricane Katrina Too Soon to Determine Impact on P/C Insurance Industry Financials Impact of US insurers’ combined ratio and ROEs will be influenced by the degree to which reinsurance coverage is triggered US Cat losses had been running 40% - 50% below 2011 levels prior to Sandy P/C Insurance Industry Entered 2012 Hurricane Very Strong Financially Industry remains very strong in the wake of Sandy, despite high losses 68 Hurricane Sandy Insured Loss Estimates: Late Season Large Loss* ($ Billions) RMS Average of the midpoints of the 3 risk modeler estimates is $18.8 billion $16 - $22B AIR $10 - $20B Eqecat $0 $20 - $25B $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 *US insured property and business interruption losses only. Sandy’s landfall in the northeast US occurred Oct. 29, 2012. Sources: RMS (11/14/12 est.), AIR (11/26/12 est.), Eqecat (11/1/12 est.); Compiled by the Insurance Information Institute. US Insured Catastrophe Losses $7.3 $10.3 $34.3 $28.5 $32.9 $15.9 $7.4 $6.0 $11.3 $14.0 $3.7 $10.7 $12.3 $8.6 $10 $7.8 $20 $4.7 $30 $13.7 $40 $25.8 $36.9 $50 $33.9 $60 $32.3 $70 2012 CAT losses were down nearly 50% from 2011 until Sandy struck in late October $14.1 $80 $11.2 $71.7 ($ Billions, 2011 Dollars) $0 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12* US CAT Losses in 2012 Could Become the 3rd Highest in US History on An Inflation-Adjusted Basis. 2011 Losses Were the 5th Highest Record Tornado Losses Caused 2011 CAT Losses to Surge *As of 11/26/12 in 2012 dollars. Includes $18.8B gross loss estimate for Hurricane Sandy. Note: 2001 figure includes $20.3B for 9/11 losses reported through 12/31/01 ($25.9B 2011 dollars). Includes only business and personal property claims, business interruption and auto claims. Non-prop/BI losses = $12.2B ($15.6B in 2011 dollars.) Sources: Property Claims Service/ISO; Insurance Information Institute. 71 71 Top 16 Most Costly Disasters in U.S. History (Insured Losses, 2011 Dollars, $ Billions) $50 $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 Hurricane Sandy could become the 5th costliest event in US insurance history Includes Tuscaloosa, AL, tornado Includes Joplin, MO, tornado $24.0 $25.0 $18.8 $19.1 $8.5 $9.0 $6.5 $6.9 $7.3 $7.7 $5.5 $4.3 $4.4 Irene (2011) Jeanne (2004) Frances (2004) Rita Tornadoes/Tornadoes/ Hugo (2005) T-Storms T-Storms (1989) (2011) (2011) Hurricane Irene became the 12th most expense hurricane in US history in 2011 $47.6 Ivan (2004) Charley (2004) $11.9 $13.1 Wilma (2005) Ike (2008) Sandy* Northridge9/11 Attack Andrew (2012) (1994) (2001) (1992) Katrina (2005) NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo has requested $42 billion in federal aid. NJ Gov. Chris Christie has requested $29.4B *Estimate as of 11/26/12 based on average of range midpoints from AIR, RMS and Eqecat.. Sources: PCS; Insurance Information Institute inflation adjustments. 72 Top 12 Most Costly Hurricanes in U.S. History (Insured Losses, 2011 Dollars, $ Billions) 10 of the 12 most costly hurricanes in insurance history occurred over the past 8 years (2004—2012) Hurricane Sandy could become the 3rd costliest hurricane in US insurance history $50 $45 $40 $35 $30 $25 $20 $15 $10 $5 $0 Hurricane Irene became the 12th most expense hurricane in US history in 2011 $4.3 $4.4 $5.5 $6.5 Irene (2011) Jeanne (2004) Frances (2004) Rita (2005) $47.6 $25.0 $18.8 $7.7 $8.5 $9.0 Hugo (1989) Ivan (2004) Charley (2004) $11.9 $13.1 Wilma (2005) Ike (2008) *Estimate as of 11/26/12 based on average of range estimate midpoints from AIR, Eqecat and RMS.. Sources: PCS; Insurance Information Institute inflation adjustments. Sandy* (2012) Andrew (1992) Katrina (2005) 73 Residential NFIP Flood Take-Up Rates in NJ (2010) & Sandy Storm Surge Flood coverage penetration rates were extremely low in many very vulnerable areas in NJ, with take-up rates far below 50% in many areas Source: Wharton Center for Risk Management and Decision Processes, Issue Brief, Nov. 2012; Insurance Information Institute. 80 Residential NFIP Flood Take-Up Rates in NY, CT (2010) & Sandy Storm Surge Flood coverage penetration rates were extremely low in many very vulnerable areas of NY and CT, with take-up rates far below 50% in many areas Source: Wharton Center for Risk Management and Decision Processes, Issue Brief, Nov. 2012; Insurance Information Institute. 81 U.S. Insured Catastrophe Loss Update 2012 Catastrophe Losses Were Close to “Average” in the First Half of 2012 2011 Was the 5th Most Expensive Year on Record 87 Natural Disasters in the United States, 1980 – 2012:H1 Number of Events (Annual Totals 1980 – 2011 and First Half 2012) 300 250 There were 90 natural disaster events in the first half of 2012 Number 200 150 100 22 6 50 61 1 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 Geophysical (earthquake, tsunami, volcanic activity) Source: MR NatCatSERVICE 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 Meteorological (storm) Hydrological (flood, mass movement) 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Climatological (temperature extremes, drought, wildfire) 91 U.S. Thunderstorm Loss Trends, 1980 – 2012:H1 Hurricanes get all the headlines, but thunderstorms are consistent producers of large scale loss. 2008-2012 are the most expensive years on record. Average thunderstorm losses are up more than 5 fold since the early 1980s. 2012 will likely be among the top 5 years on record. Source: Property Claims Service, MR NatCatSERVICE Thunderstorm losses in 2012:H1 totaled $8.8 billion, the 3rd highest first half on record 95 U.S. Acreage Burned by Wildfires, 1980 – 2012* 1.7 millions acres were burned by wildfires in the first half of 2012. Most of the insured losses were in CO totaling close to $500 mill. *Through June 30. Source: National Forest Service, MR NatCatSERVICE 96 Combined Ratio Points Associated with Catastrophe Losses: 1960 – 2011* 8.0 8.1 4.4 2010 2008 2006 1.6 2.6 2.7 3.3 3.3 1.6 2002 2004 1.6 2000 1998 1.0 1996 5.0 5.4 3.6 2.9 2.3 2.1 1990 1992 1.2 1988 1986 1984 1982 1980 1978 1976 1974 1972 1970 1968 1.2 0.4 0.8 1.3 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.5 1.0 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.8 1.1 0.6 1.4 2.0 1.3 2.0 0.5 0.5 0.7 1966 3.0 3.6 0.4 1964 1962 0.8 1.1 1.1 0.1 0.9 1 0 1960 5 4 3 2 5.9 1960s: 1.04 1970s: 0.85 1980s: 1.31 1990s: 3.39 2000s: 3.52 2010s: 6.20* 8 7 6 3.3 2.8 10 9 8.8 Avg. CAT Loss Component of the Combined Ratio by Decade 1994 Combined Ratio Points The Catastrophe Loss Component of Private Insurer Losses Has Increased Sharply in Recent Decades *Insurance Information Institute estimates for 2010 and 2011 based on A.M. Best data. Notes: Private carrier losses only. Excludes loss adjustment expenses and reinsurance reinstatement premiums. Figures are adjusted for losses ultimately paid by foreign insurers and reinsurers. Source: ISO; Insurance Information Institute. 97 Homeowners Insurance Catastrophe-Related Claim Frequency and Severity, 1997—2012* Avg. catastrophe claim cost rose approximately 200% from 1997-2011 Cat claim frequency in 2011 was at historic highs and more than double the rate in 1997 *All policy forms combined, countrywide. Source: Insurance Research Council, Trends in Homeowners Insurance Claims, Sept. 2012 from ISO Fast Track data. 101 Federal Disaster Declarations Patterns: 1953-2012 Despite Sandy, Fewer Disasters Were Declared in 2012 than the Record Number of Declarations in 2010 and 2011 102 Number of Federal Disaster Declarations, 1953-2012* 99 81 75 46 59 63 48 52 56 44 32 36 32 38 43 45 11 31 34 24 21 15 23 22 25 27 28 23 38 30 29 17 17 19 11 11 22 20 25 25 12 12 46 federal disasters were declared through Dec. 6, 2012 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 7 7 13 17 18 16 16 40 0 42 48 46 46 60 20 69 65 80 The number of federal disaster declarations set a new record in 2011, with 99, shattering 2010’s record 81 declarations. 50 45 45 49 100 There have been 2,081 federal disaster declarations since 1953. The average number of declarations per year is 35 from 1953-2011, though that few haven’t been recorded since 1995. 75 120 The Number of Federal Disaster Declarations Is Rising and Set New Records in 2010 and 2011. Hurricane Sandy Produced 9 Declarations in 2012. *Through Dec. 6, 2012. Source: Federal Emergency Management Administration; http://www.fema.gov/disasters; Insurance Information Institute. 103 Federal Disasters Declarations by State, 1953 – 2012: Highest 25 States* Over the past 60 years, Texas has had the highest number of Federal Disaster Declarations 39 46 47 46 42 40 40 47 47 48 48 48 51 51 51 53 53 56 57 65 50 50 59 60 66 70 72 Disaster Declarations 80 78 90 86 100 30 20 10 0 TX CA OK NY FL LA AL KY AR MO IL TN MS WV IA MN KS NE PA VA OH WA ND NC IN *Through Dec. 5, 2012. Includes Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia. Source: FEMA: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema; Insurance Information Institute. 104 Federal Disasters Declarations by State, 1953 – 2012: Lowest 25 States* Over the past 60 years, Wyoming and Rhode Island had the fewest number of Federal Disaster Declarations 9 15 15 13 11 10 10 17 17 22 23 24 24 24 25 26 26 27 28 34 35 36 38 39 18 20 30 30 36 Disaster Declarations 40 39 50 0 ME SD AK GA WI NJ VT NH OR MA PR HI MI AZ MD NM ID MT CT NV CO DE SC DC UT RI WY *Through Dec. 6, 2012. Includes Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia. Source: FEMA: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema; Insurance Information Institute. 105 2012 TORNADO & SEVERE STORM SUMMARY 2012 Got Off to a Worrisome Start, But Is No Repeat of 2011 106 Number of Tornadoes and Related Deaths, 1990 – 2012* 800 600 1,692 400 1,043 1,691 1,282 1,098 1,103 1,376 1,216 1,071 1,148 1,173 1,234 1,082 1,173 1,297 1,132 553 500 941 1,000 1,133 1,200 600 1,043 tornadoes have been recorded so far this year, 68 deaths* 400 300 200 Number of Deaths Number of Tornadoes 1,600 1,345 1,424 Number of Deaths 1,800 1,400 1,819 1,146 Number of Tornadoes 1,264 2,000 Tornadoes claimed 553 lives in 2011, the most since 1925 100 200 0 0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12* 2012 Tornado Losses Got Off to an Ominous Beginning, but Slowed. First Half 2012 Insured Losses from Tornadoes and Thunderstorms Totaled $8.8B. *Through Nov. 30, 2012. Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Storm Prediction Center, National Weather Service at http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/online/monthly/newm.html 107 U.S. Tornado Count, 2005-2012* There were 1,897 tornadoes in the US in 2011 far above average, but well below 2008’s record 2012 count is running far behind 2011 *Through Dec. 4, 2012. Source: http://www.spc.noaa.gov/wcm/ 108 The BIG Question: Where Is the Market Heading? Catastrophes and Other Factors Are Pressuring Insurance Markets New Factor: Record Low Interest Rates Are Contributing to Underwriting and Pricing Pressures 118 Historical Criteria for a “Market Turn”: Low Interest Rates Add New Pressure Criteria Sustained Period of Large Underwriting Losses Material Decline in Surplus/ Capacity Status Comments Large CAT Losses in 2011/12 Pushed Up Combineds •CAT Losses contributing to higher underwriting losses •Apart from CAT losses, overall p/c underwriting losses remain modest •Combined ratios (ex-CATs) still in low 100s (vs. 110+ at onset of last hard market); CR= 101.1 in H1:2012 (ex-M&FG) •Prior-year reserve releases continue to reduce u/w losses, boost ROEs, though more modestly Small Decline Due to 2011 Cats; Could drop in 2012 •Surplus fell 0.5% as of 6/30/12 from 3/31 record $570.7B •Fell 1.6% in 2011 due to CATs •Little excess capacity remains in reinsurance markets •Modest growth in demand for insurance should begin to absorb some capacity Tight •Much of the global “excess capacity” was eroded by cats Reinsurance Somewhat in •Higher prices in Asia/Pacific Market Place •Modestly higher pricing for US risks Renewed Underwriting Firming Broad, •Commercial lines pricing trends have turned from negative & Pricing Sustained,esp. to flat and now positive, esp. Property & WC; Discipline in Property, WC •Markets remain competitive in most segments Sources: Barclays Capital; Insurance Information Institute. 119 INVESTMENTS: THE NEW REALITY Investment Performance is a Key Driver of Profitability Depressed Yields Will Necessarily Influence Underwriting & Pricing 120 Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Investment Income: 2000–2012F1 ($ Billions) $60 $54.6 $52.3 $50 $40 $51.2 $49.5 $47.1 $38.9 $38.7 $37.1 $36.7 01 02 $39.6 $47.6 $49.0 $47.4 Investment earnings in 2012 are running 13% below their 2007 pre-crisis peak $30 00 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12F Investment Income in 2011 Was Surprisingly Strong, Though Investment Income Is Likely to Weaken in 2012 Due to Persistently Low Interest Rates 1 Investment gains consist primarily of interest and stock dividends. *2012F is based on annualized H1:2012 actual figure of $23.718B. Sources: ISO; Conning Research & Consulting; Insurance Information Institute. Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Investment Gain: 1994–2012F1 ($ Billions) $70 $64.0 $58.0 $60 $52.3 $55.7 $51.9 $53.4 $56.2 $50.8 10 11 12F $48.9 $47.2 $50 $59.4 $56.9 $45.3 $44.4 $42.8 $40 $35.4 $39.2 $36.0 $31.7 $30 $20 Investment gains in 2012 are running approximately 20% below their pre-crisis peak $10 $0 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05* 06 07 08 09 Investment Gains Are Slipping in 2012 as Low Interest Rates Reduce Investment Income and Lower Realized Investment Gains; The Financial Crisis Caused Investment Gains to Fall by 50% in 2008 1 Investment gains consist primarily of interest, stock dividends and realized capital gains and losses. * 2005 figure includes special one-time dividend of $3.2B; 2012F figure is III estimate based on annualized actual H1:2012 result of $25.424B. Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute. $1.71 -$7.90 -$19.81 -$15 -$20 -$25 $7.19 $5.85 $8.92 $3.52 $9.70 -$1.21 $6.61 $6.63 $9.13 Realized capital gains through 2012:H1 are down 53% from $3.61B in 2011:H1 $16.21 $13.02 $10.81 $9.24 $6.00 $9.82 $9.89 $1.66 $5 $0 -$5 -$10 $4.81 $20 $15 $10 $2.88 ($ Billions) $18.02 P/C Insurer Net Realized Capital Gains/Losses, 1990-2012:H1 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 1112:H1 Insurers Posted Net Realized Capital Gains in 2010, 2011 and 2012 Following Two Years of Realized Losses During the Financial Crisis. Realized Capital Losses Were the Primary Cause of 2008/2009’s Large Drop in Profits and ROE Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute. 124 U.S. 10-Year Treasury Note Yields: A Long Downward Trend, 1990–2012* 9% 8% Yields on 10-Year U.S. Treasury Notes recently plunged to all time record lows 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% Yields on 10-Year U.S. Treasury Notes have been essentially below 5% for a full decade. 1% '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 Since roughly 80% of P/C bond/cash investments are in 10-year or shorter durations, most P/C insurer portfolios will have low-yielding bonds for years to come. *Monthly, through Nov. 2012. Note: Recessions indicated by gray shaded columns. Sources: Federal Reserve Bank at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/data.htm. National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes. 125 Treasury Yield Curves: Pre-Crisis (July 2007) vs. Nov. 2012 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 4.82% 4.96% 5.04% 4.96% 4.82% 4.82% 4.88% Treasury yield curve remains near its most depressed level in at least 45 years. Investment income is falling as a result. Fed is unlikely to hike rates until well into 2015 at the earliest. 5.00% 4.93% 5.00% 5.19% 2.80% 2.39% 1.65% 1.08% 0.67% 1% 0.12% 1M 0.09% 0.14% 0.18% 0.27% 3M 6M 1Y 2Y 0.36% September 2012 Yield Curve Pre-Crisis (July 2007) 0% 3Y 5Y 7Y 10Y 20Y 30Y The Fed Is Actively Signaling that it Is Determined to Keep Rates Low Through Mid-2015; This Adds to Pricing Pressure for Insurers. Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors; Insurance Information Institute. 126 Reduction in Combined Ratio Necessary to Offset 1% Decline in Investment Yield to Maintain Constant ROE, by Line* s ne i L -5.7% -5.2% -4.3% -3.7% -3.3% -3.3% -3.1% -2.1% -1.9% -3.6% -2.0% -1.8% 0% -1% -2% -3% -4% -5% -6% -7% -8% -1.8% s ty l e e o p t r a s n i a ro p l Li y rc Su Au s o t P C a / al r e l s s n y n t a t P u M m m m m li P di so s pl rra d e m m m m r r r t e C a e d o o r o o Pe Pv Pe C C C C C Fi W Su M W to u A R a ur s n ei ** e nc -7.3% Lower Investment Earnings Place a Greater Burden on Underwriting and Pricing Discipline *Based on 2008 Invested Assets and Earned Premiums **US domestic reinsurance only Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute. 127 1. UNDERWRITING Underwriting Losses in 2011 and 2012 Are Elevated by High Catastrophe Losses 128 P/C Insurance Industry Combined Ratio, 2001–2012:H1* Heavy Use of Reinsurance Lowered Net Losses As Recently as 2001, Insurers Paid Out Nearly $1.16 for Every $1 in Earned Premiums Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases 120 115.8 110 Best Combined Ratio Since 1949 (87.6) 107.5 Cyclical Deterioration Higher CAT Losses, Shrinking Reserve Releases, Toll of Soft Market Avg. CAT Losses, More Reserve Releases 106.4 101.0 100.8 100.1 99.3 98.4 100 Lower CAT Losses 101.1 100.8 95.7 92.6 90 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011* 2012:H1 * Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers 2008--2012. Including M&FG, 2008=105.1, 2009=100.7, 2010=102.4, 2011=108.2; 2012:H1=102.2. Sources: A.M. Best, ISO. 129 Underwriting Gain (Loss) 1975–2012:H1* ($ Billions) $35 $25 Cumulative underwriting deficit from 1975 through 2011 is $479B Underwriting losses in 2012 totaled $7.0B $15 $5 -$5 -$15 -$25 High cat losses in 2011 led to the highest underwriting loss since 2002 -$35 -$45 -$55 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Large Underwriting Losses Are NOT Sustainable in Current Investment Environment * Includes mortgage and financial guaranty insurers in all years. Sources: A.M. Best, ISO; Insurance Information Institute. Combined Ratios by Predominant Business Segment, 2012:H1 vs. 2011:H1 The combined ratios for both personal and commercial lines improved substantially in 2012:H1 (Percent) 114 2011:H1 2012:H1 112.1 112 110 109.4 109.3 107.3 108 106 103.4 104 102 101.5 101.1 100 98.8 98 96 All Lines Personal Lines Predominating Source: ISO/PCI; Insurance Information Institute Commercial Lines Predominating Diversified Insurers 131 Financial Strength & Underwriting Cyclical Pattern is P-C Impairment History is Directly Tied to Underwriting, Reserving & Pricing 134 0 34 16 19 21 18 19 16 12 18 14 15 31 35 41 49 50 47 60 58 5 9 13 12 9 9 11 7 8 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 10 15 12 20 16 14 13 19 30 29 34 40 50 48 50 31 34 60 49 70 36 3 small insurers in Missouri did encounter problems in 2011 following the May tornado in Joplin. They were absorbed by a larger insurer and all claims were paid. 55 P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2011 The Number of Impairments Varies Significantly Over the P/C Insurance Cycle, With Peaks Occurring Well into Hard Markets Source: A.M. Best Special Report “1969-2011 Impairment Review,” June 2012; Insurance Information Institute. 135 P/C Insurer Impairment Frequency vs. Combined Ratio, 1969-2011 120 Combined Ratio after Div P/C Impairment Frequency 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 110 1.2 1.0 105 0.8 100 0.6 Impairment Rate Combined Ratio 115 0.4 95 2011 impairment rate was 0.91%, up from 0.67% in 2010; the rate is slightly higher than the 0.82% average since 1969 0.0 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 90 0.2 Impairment Rates Are Highly Correlated With Underwriting Performance and Reached Record Lows in 2007; Recent Increase Was Associated Primarily With Mortgage and Financial Guaranty Insurers and Not Representative of the Industry Overall Source: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute 136 Reasons for US P/C Insurer Impairments, 1969–2010 Historically, Deficient Loss Reserves and Inadequate Pricing Are By Far the Leading Cause of P-C Insurer Impairments. Investment and Catastrophe Losses Play a Much Smaller Role Reinsurance Failure Sig. Change in Business 3.6% 4.0% Misc. 8.6% Investment Problems (Overstatement of Assets) 7.3% 40.3% Affiliate Impairment Deficient Loss Reserves/ Inadequate Pricing 7.8% 7.1% Catastrophe Losses 7.8% Alleged Fraud 13.6% Rapid Growth Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2010 Impairment Review, Special Report, April 2011. 137 Top 10 Lines of Business for US P/C Impaired Insurers, 2000–2010 Workers Comp and Pvt. Passenger Auto Account for Nearly Half of the Premium Volume of Impaired Insurers Over the Past Decade Title Surety Med Mal Financial Guaranty 2.0% 4.4% 4.8% 6.5% Workers Comp 26.6% Other Liability 6.9% 7.7% Commercial Auto Liability 8.1% Commercial Multiperil 22.2% Pvt. Passenger Auto 10.9% Homeowners Source: A.M. Best: 1969-2010 Impairment Review, Special Report, April 2011. 138 Workers Compensation Operating Environment The Weak Economy and Soft Market Have Made the Workers Comp Operating Increasingly Challenging 140 10 11 12F 116.0 117.1 08 116.6 104.6 07 110.4 103.6 98.5 102.7 97 105.1 96 108.6 101.0 100 100.0 105 97.0 110 102.0 115 107.0 120 112.6 115.3 125 118.2 130 121.7 Workers Compensation Combined Ratio: 1994–2012F 95 90 85 80 94 95 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 09 Workers Comp Underwriting Results Are Deteriorating Markedly and the Worst They Have Been in a Decade Sources: A.M. Best; Insurance Information Institute. 141 Workers Compensation Medical Severity Moderate Increase in 2011 Medical Claim Cost ($000s) Average Medical Cost per Lost-Time Claim Annual Change 1991–1993: Annual Change 1994–2001: Annual Change 2002–2010: +1.9% +8.9% +6.0% Cumulative Change = 245% (1991-2011p) Accident Year 2011p: Preliminary based on data valued as of 12/31/2011 1991-2010: Based on data through 12/31/2010, developed to ultimate Based on the states where NCCI provides ratemaking services; Excludes high 142 deductible policies Workers Comp Indemnity Claim Costs: Modest Increase in 2011 Average Indemnity Cost per Lost-Time Claim Indemnity Claim Cost ($ 000s) Average indemnity costs per claim resumed its upward climb in 2011 25 23 21 Annual Change 1991–1993: Annual Change 1994–2001: Annual Change 2002–2010: 19 17 +2% +8.8%+0.6% -2.8% +6.5% +5.5% +3.6% +4.6%+1.0% +9.2%+3.1% -1.7% +7.3% +3.4% +10.1% $22.3 $21.9 $22.5 $20.8 $19.3 $18.3 $17.6 $17.5 $16.7 $16.2 $14.8 $13.5 $11.2 $10.4 $9.8 $9.7 $9.2 $9.5 7 $9.8 9 $12.2 +10.1% +9.0% 13 +7.7% +5.9% 11 +1.0%-3.1% +4.9%+1.7% -2.8% $22.3 15 5 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011p Accident Year 2010p: Preliminary based on data valued as of 12/31/2011 1991–2010: Based on data through 12/31/2010, developed to ultimate Based on the states where NCCI provides ratemaking services Excludes high deductible policies Workers Compensation Premium: First Increase in Years Net Written Premium $ Billions 50 46.5 State Funds ($ B) 47.8 46.5 44.3 Private Carriers ($ B) 42.3 40 39.3 37.7 31.0 31.3 30 34.6 33.8 32.1 29.8 30.5 29.1 28.2 26.3 26.9 25.9 25.0 28.6 20 31.0 31.3 29.8 30.5 29.1 10 36.3 34.7 26.3 25.2 25.0 26.1 24.2 23.3 22.3 29.2 37.8 38.6 37.6 31.1 33.8 30.3 29.9 32.2 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20102011p p Preliminary Calendar Year Source: 1990–2010 Private Carriers, Best's Aggregates & Averages; 2011p, NCCI 1996–2011p State Funds: AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, KY, LA, MD, MO, MT, NM, OK, OR, RI, TX, UT Annual Statements State Funds available for 1996 and subsequent Average Approved Bureau Rates/Loss Costs History of Average WC Bureau Rate/Loss Cost Level Changes Percent 15 Cumulative 2000–2003 12.1 +17.1% 10.0 10 Approve rates/loss costs are seeing their first significant increase since 2003 7.8 7.4 6.6 Cumulative 1994–1999 4.9 -27.8% 5 Cumulative 2004–2011 -25.6% 3.5 2.9 1.2 0.4 0 -0.7 -5 Cumulative 1990–1993 -2.6 -3.2 +36.3% -8.0 91 92 93 94 95 96 -5.1 97 -6.0 -5.7 -6.6 Calendar Year -10 90 -3.1 -5.4 -6.0 -6.4 -2.0 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 *States approved through 7/31/12. Note: Countrywide approved changes in advisory rates, loss costs and assigned risk rates as filed by applicable rating organization. Source: NCCI. 10 11 12* Current NCCI Voluntary Market Filed Rate/Loss Cost Changes (Excludes Law-Only Filings) Ratio 25 0.0 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.7 2.9 2.9 3.5 3.6 3.7 4.1 4.4 4.5 4.9 5.2 6.0 6.2 6.4 6.7 7.3 7.4 8.9 9.9 10.5 20 15 10 5 -5 -10 -15 -9.3 -8.1 -7.5 -4.1 -3.8 -3.0 -1.7 -0.5 -0.3 -0.3 0 -20 -25 AL WV KY AR MEMOOK KS SD TX MT TNNC*NV MD UT OR IN* AK GA ID IL HI CO VT IA CT NE AZ LA DC RI NH SC NM FL MS VA Effective Dates 1/1/2012 and Prior •IN and NC filed in cooperation with state rating bureau Source: NCCI Effective Dates Subsequent to 1/1/2012 Filed and Pending 148 2. SURPLUS/CAPITAL/CAPACITY How Will Large Catastrophe Losses Impact Capacity? 150 Policyholder Surplus, 2006:Q4–2012:H1 ($ Billions) Drop due to near-record 2011 CAT losses 2011:Q1 Previous Surplus Peak $580 $566.5 $559.2 $560 $544.8 $540.7 $530.5 $540 $520 $500 $480 $460 $440 $521.8 $517.9$515.6 $512.8 $505.0 $496.6 $487.1 $478.5 $570.7 $567.8 $559.1 $550.3 $538.6 $511.5 $490.8 $463.0 The Industry now has $1 of $455.6 surplus for every $0.80 of NPW, close to the strongest claims$437.1 paying status in its history. Surplus as of 6/30/12 was down $2.9B or 0.5% from the all time record high of $570.7B set as of 3/31/11. $420 06:Q4 07:Q1 07:Q2 07:Q3 07:Q4 08:Q1 08:Q2 08:Q3 08:Q4 09:Q1 09:Q2 09:Q3 09:Q4 10:Q1 10:Q2 10:Q3 10:Q4 11:Q1 11:Q2 11:Q3 11:Q4 12:Q1 12:H1 *Includes $22.5B of paid-in capital from a holding company parent for one insurer’s investment in a noninsurance business in early 2010. Sources: ISO, A.M .Best. 152 3. REINSURANCE MARKET CONDITIONS Record Global Catastrophes Activity is Pressuring Pricing 153 Global Property Catastrophe Rate on Line Index, 1990—2012 (as of July 1) Year Over Year % Change 100% 237 76% 68% 80% 255 250 233 230 60% 215 200 200 154 150 100 -3% -16% -9% -6% 7% 10% 145 -12% 14% 14% 152 133 -11% -11% -18% -20% -8% 196 184 3% 115 -13% -20% 121 111 108 -3% 0% 0% 100 20% 25% 15% 20% 147 141 190 195 173 184 40% 300 -40% 50 Cumulative Rate on Line (1990=100) Year Over Year % Change in ROL Cumulative Rate on Line Index Property-Cat reinsurance pricing is up about 7% as of 7/1/12 but much more over the past 7-12 years—a cost that must be reflected in LPI rates 0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 Sources: Guy Carpenter; Insurance Information Institute. 155 4. RENEWED PRICING DISCIPLINE Evidence of a Broad and Sustained Shift in Pricing 157 Net Premium Growth: Annual Change, 1971—2012:H1 (Percent) 1975-78 1984-87 25% 2000-03 Net Written Premiums Fell 0.7% in 2007 (First Decline Since 1943) by 2.0% in 2008, and 4.2% in 2009, the First 3Year Decline Since 1930-33. 20% 15% 2012:H1 growth was +3.6% 10% 5% 0% 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 -5% Shaded areas denote “hard market” periods Sources: A.M. Best (historical and forecast), ISO, Insurance Information Institute. 159 20% 5% -5% -10% Sources: ISO, Insurance Information Institute. 1.3% 2.3% 1.7% 3.5% 1.6% 4.1% 3.8% 3.1% 4.2% 0.5% 2.1% 0.0% 0% 10.3% 10.2% 13.4% 6.6% 15.1% 16.8% 16.7% 12.5% 10.1% 9.7% 7.8% 7.2% 5.6% 2.9% 5.5% 10% 10.2% 15% 2002:Q1 2002:Q2 2002:Q3 2002:Q4 2003:Q1 2003:Q2 2003:Q3 2003:Q4 2004:Q1 2004:Q2 2004:Q3 2004:Q4 2005:Q1 -4.6% 2005:Q2 -4.1% 2005:Q3 -5.8% 2005:Q4 -1.6% 2006:Q1 2006:Q2 2006:Q3 2006:Q4 2007:Q1 -1.6% 2007:Q2 2007:Q3 2007:Q4 -1.9% 2008:Q1 2008:Q2 -1.8% 2008:Q3 -0.7% 2008:Q4 -4.4% 2009:Q1 -3.7% 2009:Q2 -5.3% 2009:Q3 -5.2% 2009:Q4 -1.4% 2010:Q1 -1.3% 2010:Q2 2010:Q3 2010:Q4 2011:Q1 2011:Q2 2011:Q3 2011:Q4 2012:Q1 2012:Q2 P/C Net Premiums Written: % Change, Quarter vs. Year-Prior Quarter In 2011, growth in personal lines predominating cos. (+2.9%) and commercial lines predominating cos. (+4.3%), diversified (+2.4%) Finally! A sustained period of growth in written premium growth (vs. the same quarter, prior year) 160 Growth in Net Written Premium by Segment, 2012:H1 vs. 2011:H1* (Percent) 6% 5% Personal lines insurer growth accelerated modestly as auto pricing remains stable 2012:H1 5.6% 3.8% 4% 3% 2011:H1 Commercial lines growth improved dramatically as a 7year long soft market came to an end and an improving economy bolstered demand 2.7% 2.7% 2.9% 3.0% 2.8% 2.3% 2% 1% 0% All Lines Personal Lines Predominating *Excludes mortgage and financial guaranty insurers. Source: ISO/PCI; Insurance Information Institute Commercial Lines Predominating Diversified Insurers 161 Shifting Legal Liability & Tort Environment Is the Tort Pendulum Swinging Against Insurers? 170 Over the Last Three Decades, Total Tort Costs as a % of GDP Appear Somewhat Cyclical, 1980-2013E ($ Billions) $300 2.25% Deepwater Horizon Spike in 2010 $200 2.00% $150 $100 1.75% Tort costs in dollar terms have remained high but relatively stable since the mid-2000s., but are down substantially as a share of GDP $50 Tort Costs as % of GDP 2.21% of GDP in 2003 = pre-tort reform peak $250 Tort System Costs 2.50% Tort Costs as % of GDP Tort Sytem Costs 1.68% of GDP in 2013 1.50% $0 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 Sources: Towers Watson, 2011 Update on US Tort Cost Trends, Appendix 1A 02 04 06 08 10 12E 171 Business Leaders Ranking of Liability Systems in 2012 Worst States 41. Florida 42. Oklahoma 43. Alabama 44. New Mexico 45. Montana 46. Illinois 47. California North Dakota 48. Mississippi Utah 49. Louisiana 50. West Virginia Best States 1. Delaware 2. Nebraska 3. Wyoming 4. Minnesota 5. Kansas 6. Idaho 7. Virginia 8. 9. 10. Iowa New in 2012 Wyoming Minnesota Kansas Idaho Drop-offs Indiana Colorado Massachusetts South Dakota Source: US Chamber of Commerce 2012 State Liability Systems Ranking Study; Insurance Info. Institute. Newly Notorious Oklahoma Rising Above Arkansas 174 The Nation’s Judicial Hellholes: 2011 Illinois Watch List Eastern District of Texas Cook County, IL Southern NJ Franklin County, AL Smith County, MS Louisiana Madison , St. Clair and McLean counties West Virginia Philadelphia California Dishonorable Mention New York Albany and NYC MI Supreme Court AK Supreme Court MO Supreme Court Nevada Clark County South Florida Source: American Tort Reform Association; Insurance Information Institute 175 Insurance Information Institute Online: www.iii.org Thank you for your time and your attention! Twitter: twitter.com/bob_hartwig 181