STAR3
Parent Advisory Council
UPDATE 2013
Questions to Parents
Fact: More than 28% of children enter
kindergarten more than 1 year below age level in
language, literacy and numeracy skills.
1.If you were a teacher, how would you want
to be judged?
A. Number of students who are proficient
B. Actual growth of student
Final Question
Fact: Incentive bonuses work in many industries.
They have not been adequately tested in public
schools.
3.Do you think bonuses based on more than
state average growth would work for
teachers?
A. Yes
B. No
Another Question…..
Fact: Growing students above the state average
in core subjects is hard work but necessary to
close gaps for individual students.
2.Would you be willing to experiment with
giving bonuses to teachers who grow
students more than the state average?
A. No
B. Yes
National Goal for STAR3
The impact of a PBCS
STAR3
Support
8 schools with
PBCS
7 schools with
1% bonus
Outcomes:
• Quality of SIP
• Quality of unit lesson plans
• Quality of teacher observations
• Achievement outcomes – measured primarily in terms of
growth at multiple levels
• PLC outcomes
Notes on Growth
• Goal: Growth above the state average.
• Objective: Close performance gap
between individual students and “typical”.
• Three levels:
.5 SE for Classroom Level (Increasing bonus
up to 2.0 SE)
1 SE for Grade Level
1 SE for Whole School Level
Bonus (Growth) Payout Summary
2011-12 Growth
Principal
Bonus
Teacher and
TA Bonus
Total
Number
Lowest
Median
Highest
7
1000
1500
2750
392
100
1000
8500
SAS Institute calculated growth measures.
ITSB: Used as the Kindergarten – 2nd grade measure.
Growth: .5 SE above state average.
Local Evaluation
Support for District Initiatives
PLC:
Professional
Learning
Communities
PDP: Targeted
Professional
Development
RtI: Response to
Instruction
Quality Lesson
Planning
Results to Date
• One year of implementation……
• 22 indicators in favor of the incentive
schools (bonus schools)
• 2 indicators in favor of the non-incentive
school
• 13 indicators are equal
We will keep you posted on the
progress!!!!!!
Elementary EOGs:
Percent Proficient
Reading Percent Proficient 4th and 5th Grade
EOG: 2011-12
Math Percent Proficient 4th and 5th Grade EOG:
2011-12
48
74
46
72
44
70
42
68
40
Series1
PBCS
Non-PBCS
47.9
42.8
66
Series1
PBCS
Non-PBCS
73.5
68.8
Elementary EOGs:
Growth in Percent Proficient Grade 3 to Grade 4
Reading: % Proficient Growth from Grade 3 (2011) to Grade 4 (2012)
Math: % Proficient Growth from Grade 3 (2011) to Grade 4 (2012)
8.0
1.0
6.0
0.5
0.0
4.0
-0.5
2.0
0.0
Series1
-1.0
-1.5
PBCS
Non-PBCS
7.4
1.5
Series1
PBCS
Non-PBCS
0.9
-1.3
Elementary EOGs:
Growth in Percent Proficient Grade 4 to Grade 5
Reading: % Proficient Grow th from Grade 4 (2011) to Grade 5 (2012)
6.0
Math: % Proficient Grow th from Grade 4 (2011) to Grade 5 (2012)
0.0
4.0
-2.0
2.0
0.0
-4.0
-2.0
-6.0
-4.0
-6.0
Series1
PBCS
Non-PBCS
4.9
-5.4
-8.0
Series1
PBCS
Non-PBCS
-1.4
-7.1
Elementary: ITBS
Kindergarten Percentile Growth BOY to EOY
Growth in ITBS Percentile BOY to EOY
40
30
20
10
0
Series1
PBCS
Non-PBCS
32.5
25.37
Note: No difference for 1st and 2nd grades.
Middle School EOGs:
Percent Proficient
Middle School Math EOG: 2011-12
Middle School Science EOG: 2011-12
60
68
66
40
64
62
20
60
58
Series1
PBCS
Non-PBCS
67.8
62.2
0
Series1
PBCS
Non-PBCS
51.4
39.3
Middle School EOGs:
Growth in Percent Proficient Grade 6 to Grade 7
Reading: Change in % Proficient from 6th grade
(2011) to 7th grade (2012)
Math: Change in % Proficient from 6th grade
(2011) to 7th grade (2012)
0
0
-5
-1
-10
-2
-15
Series1
PBCS
Non-PBCS
-12.8
-12.8
-3
Series1
PBCS
Non-PBCS
-2.45
-0.85
Middle School EOGs:
Growth in Percent Proficient Grade 7 to Grade 8
Reading: Change in % Proficient from 7th grade
(2011) to 8th grade (2012)
4
Math: Change in % Proficient from 7th grade
(2011) to 8th grade (2012)
10
3
2
5
1
0
-1
Series1
PBCS
Non-PBCS
3.25
-0.15
0
Series1
PBCS
Non-PBCS
8.9
2.65
Teacher Observations
PBCS Schools Numerically Greater in 7 of 9 Standards
Teacher Efficacy Surveys
The change from BOY
to EOY was
significant for the
non-PBCS schools.
Teacher Efficacy
4.15
4.1
4.05
4
PBCS
3.95
Non-PBCS
3.9
3.85
3.8
Fall
Spring
Growth Measures:
Teacher Level
Whole-School Payout
Qualification:
Average of at
least 1 SE of
growth across all
students.
25
20
15
10
5
0
PBCS
Non-PBCS
Growth Measures:
Grade Level
Grade-Level Payouts
Qualification:
At least 1 SE of
growth across all
students at a
grade level.
40
30
PBCS: 15 of 42
grade levels
20
Non-PBCS: 4 of
42 grade levels
10
0
PBCS
Non-PBCS
Growth Measures:
Whole-School Level
Teacher Level Payouts
Qualification:
30
At least .5 SE of
growth for
students in the
classroom.
25
20
PBCS: 53 of
167 teachers
15
Non-PBCS: 34
of 155 teachers
35
10
5
0
PBCS
Non-PBCS