Flight Validation Process of RNP APCH Procedures: Thailand Case Study ICAO Asia-Pacific GNSS Seminar Bangkok, Thailand 26 March 2012 1 Presentation Outline • • • • Background Objectives of Flight Validation for RNP APCH Requirements Step-by-step process – – – – Pre-flight In-flight Post-flight Reporting Background • • • • • RNP APCH = RNAV (GNSS) Using GNSS for approach operation For aircraft with RNP 0.3 capability Utilize Aircraft-Based Augmentation System (ABAS) May include Baro-VNAV Phuket PBN Implementation 4 Procedures for Phuket 09 Yellow – Current VOR Track Green - PBN Track 5 Objectives of Flight Validation Proposes of Flight Validation of RNP APCH – Correctness of Procedure • Correctness of Chart • Correctness of Navigation Database – Reliability of Navigation System • Signal interference – Important GNSS parameters will be automatically recorded • Conformity with ground based Navaids (VOR, DME) as necessary – Environmental Conditions • Obstacle Clearance thus FLC needs to be conducted during day-time – Flyability Requirements • Standards – ICAO Doc 9906 Vol 5 and 6 (Flight Validation) – ICAO Doc 8071 (as necessary) • Qualification – Pilots and FIS technicians trained on RNAV flight validation and GNSS (ICAO Doc 9906 Vol 6) • Equipment – Flight Management System (FMS) • Baro-VNAV capability for Baro-VNAV procedures – Flight Inspection System (FIS) – Navigation Database Requirements: Flight Management System FMS – HS-CNS equipped with Pro Line 21 avionics Certified GPS Receiver – TSO 129a is continuously checking the integrity of the GPS position solution through RAIM Fault Detection Capability Requirements: Flight Inspection System Automatic Flight Inspection System (AFIS) • Fully automated • Record archives both as print-out and electronic database Pre-Flight Activities • • • • Initial Validation ATC coordination Weather forecast GNSS service prediction – Number of GPS satellite – Dilution of Precision (DOPs) – RAIM Outage • Satellite image of expected flight path (recommended) • Assessment of GNSS interference as needed Pre-flight: Initial Validation Simulation of Procedure – Using FMS simulator and FIS software to validate the design • Reduce risks of error • If no error detected, upload to aircraft FMS and FIS Pre-flight: GNSS Service Prediction Pre-flight: Satellite Image Yellow – Current VOR Track Green - PBN Track 13 In-Flight For each RNAV(GNSS) Approach - Fly all segments and holdings - At least one FLC for each LNAV and LNAV/VNAV profiles - At least one FLC for entire missed approach profile - Preferably fly using auto-pilot - Fly final approach segment as designed and at 100 ft below the designed altitude - Identify controlling obstacles - Check obstacle clearance - Assess fly-ability and workloads - Record GNSS data for all legs flown In-Flight: GNSS Interference • As necessary • Under scope of flight inspection, not flight validation • Look at impact on service interruption • RAIM Alert • Loss of GNSS Service • Interference may not result in full loss of GNSS services In-Flight: GNSS Interference Importance Parameters • Number of Satellites • Signal to Noise Ration • Dilution of Precision Post-Flight Activities • Data Analysis and Interference Assessment • Flight Validation Report Post-flight: Automated Data Recording Post-flight: GNSS Interference Assessment Record and analysis of satellite availability, signal-to-noise ratio, and Dilution of Precision (DOPs). Post-flight: Flight Validation Report Summary • To ensure safety of flight operation, proper flight validation needs to be conducted using: – Proper equipments – Qualified personal – Proven process Thank you for your attention. Thank you for your attention.