SME Union, 7 October 2008, Brussels Relevance of SMEs’ Intellectual Capital Statements for the Financial Market Markus Will M.A. Fraunhofer IPK Division Corporate Management Director: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Kai Mertins Pascalstraße 8-9 10587 Berlin Germany Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin Markus Will Agenda 1. The InCaS Project 2. Does Intellectual Capital Reporting Matter to Financial Analysts? 3. SME Benefits of Intellectual Capital Statements (ICS) Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin Markus Will The InCaS Project (2006-2008) – Objectives Strengthen European SMEs’ competitiveness and innovation potential Establish Intellectual Capital Statement (ICS) as the strategic management and reporting tool for the knowledge driven economy Develop a pragmatic methodology for European SMEs Implement, test and improve the method Provide a European ICS Guideline and supporting software “ICS toolbox” Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin Markus Will What is Intellectual Capital (IC)? Human Capital Professional competence Leadership and social skills Employee motivation Structural Capital Internal co-operation and knowledge transfer Product innovation Process innovation Information technology and explicit knowledge Corporate culture Patente Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin Relational Capital Customer relationships Relations to suppliers, partners Relations to investors and the public Markus Will Financial Market Study: Research Design Action Resources Stage 1 Preliminary Study Literature survey Stage 2 Expert Workshop 9 invited experts evaluation Stage 3 Questionnaire Survey 68 respondents from banks and chartered accounting Stage 4 Case Study Experiment 17 selected experts from capital markets and chartered accounting Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin on enterprise Markus Will Stage 2: Structure of an Intellectual Capital Statement (ICS) as Required by the Financial Market Content Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin 1 Summary 2 Data related to market and industry (business environment) 3 Description and explanation of the business strategy 4 Definition and explanation of the most relevant drivers of intellectual capital 4.1 Data about the current status quo of intellectual capital 4.2 Analysis of intellectual capital 4.3 Measures for the utilization and development of poor performing drivers of intellectual capital 5. Appendix Markus Will Stage 3: The Most Important IC Indicators for the Financial Market Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin # Indicator 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Education and qualification of employees Fluctuation (recruits and exits) Turnover per customer segment Customer satisfaction based on surveys Number of customer complaints Number of new products in development Average costs of capital Dependency on key suppliers Rate of absence and illness Financial rating Defined successors for top management and key personnel Share of turnover with new products Structure of customer base (regular vs. new) Markus Will Stage 4: Main Results of Financial Market Impact Test (Case Study Experiment) High rating Case A 13,0 Case B 3,5 A12,50 12,11 12,0 3,2 BBB + 11,0 BBB 2,9 10,0 BBB - 2,6 Standard Deviation Mean Value 3,06 2,39 9,0 2,27 BB + Low rating 8,63 Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin 2,3 2,17 8,22 8,0 2,0 BB Without intellectual capital report With intellectual capital report Without intellectual capital report With intellectual capital report Markus Will Impact of ICS on Assessment of Future Earnings Potential Case A Case B 100% Negative Negative Neutral Neutral 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% Neutral 20% 10% Positive Neutral Positive Positive 0% Without intellectual capital report Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin With intellectual capital report Without intellectual capital With intellectual capital report report Markus Will ICS Qualification Concept for Quality Assurance Certified ICS-Auditor (Level 4): Certified ICS-Trainer (Level 3): ICS audit method Attended 2 audits ICS-Trainer (Level 2): ICS-Trainer (Level 1): Basics ICS method Case Studies Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin Moderation of 2 ICS 1 approved ICS Additional theory Moderation of 2 ICS Written and oral examination Submission of 1 ICS as exam paper Written and oral examination Markus Will ICS Audit Objectives Certification of ICS by an external third party… to ensure the reliability of ICS so that financial analysts will consider this information as a valid input for their rating decisions, to encourage sustainable usage of ICS as an internal management tool by checking the progress of realisation of measures, to support IC Management by suggesting further improvement recommendation. Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin Markus Will Benefits of ICS for SME Management Diagnosis: ICS as an instrument for analysing strengths and weaknesses of strategic IC factors. Decision Support : ICS as an instrument for prioritising fields of improvement with highest impact. Optimisation & Innovation: ICS as an instrument for implementing actions for organisational development. Internal Communication: ICS as an instrument for enhancing transparency and employees’ involvement. Monitoring & Risk Management: ICS as an instrument for controlling strategic risks and measuring success of actions. Reporting: ICS as an instrument for communicating corporate value to stakeholders. Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin Markus Will The InCaS Implementation Procedure in 5 Steps Define major strategic objectives Evaluate most influential IC factors Make them measurable Derive measures compliant with strategy Communicate ICS internally and externally Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin Markus Will SME Union, 7 October 2008, Brussels Thank you for your attention! Markus Will M.A. Wissensbilanzen Intellektuelles Kapital erfolgreich nutzen und entwickeln Eds.: Mertins, Alwert, Heisig Including contributions from over 20 wellknown experts. Knowledge Management Concepts and Best Practices Eds.: Mertins, Heisig, Vorbeck Including recommendations and project results, Siemens, Aventis, HP and many more Fraunhofer IPK, Berlin Fraunhofer Institute IPK Division Corporate Management Director: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Kai Mertins Pascalstraße 8-9 10587 Berlin Germany markus.will@ipk.fraunhofer.de +49(0)30 / 390 06 171 +49(0)30 / 393 25 03 http://www.um.ipk.fraunhofer.de Markus Will