An Extended Inverse Gaussian Model Iman Mabrouk Statistical and Actuarial Sciences Department The University of Western Ontario Supervised by: Dr. Serge Provost Outline • Introduction • Parameter Effect • Some Statistical Functions • Numerical Examples 1 Introduction • The proposed distribution referred to as an Extended Inverse Gaussian Model (EIG) has density function where • The EIG model is a generalization of a distribution introduced by Jørgensen (1982) whose density function is where is a Generalization of the Inverse Gaussian model (GIG) where the density of Inverse Gaussian model is Reduced Models 1) A reduced model called the Reduced Extended Inverse Gaussian(REIG) is obtained by omitting . The density function of REIG model is Reduced Models 2) Omitting yields a Reparameterized Generalized Gamma model (RGG) where the density of the generalized gamma model is and it can be obtained from letting by 2 Parameter Effect 2.1 The Extended Inverse Gaussian Model (EIG) 2) 1 2.2 The Reduced Extended Inverse Gaussian Model (REIG) 3 Some Statistical Functions 3.1 The Extended Gaussian Model (EIG) 3.2 The Reduced Extended Inverse Gaussian Model (REIG) 4 Numerical Examples 4.1 Goodness-of-fit statistics 4.2 Maximum Flood Levels 4.3 Snowfall Precipitations 4.1 Goodness-of-fit statistics: i. The Anderson-Darling statistic where and the are the ordered observations. ii. The Cramér-von Mises statistic 4.2 Maximum Flood Levels Maximum Flood Levels in millions of cubic feet per second for the Susquehanna River at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania over 20 fouryear periods. 0.654 0.740 0.297 0.613 0.416 0.423 0.402 0.338 0.379 0.379 0.315 0.3235 0.269 0.449 0.418 0.412 0.494 0.392 0.484 0.265 Maximum Likelihood Estimates Estimates of the Parameters and Goodnessof-Fit Statistics for the Flood Data Weibull -1 11 Gamma Inverse Gaussian - 2.5 Lognormal (-.898,.269) 339.1 RGG -16.57 GIG -10 REIG -9.95 EIG 3.53 352 1 1 0 .8213 .1400 0 .4433 .0712 1.03 2.82 .3514 .0558 .3470 .0540 .036 9600 0 .3390 .0560 1 1.73 5.73 .2861 .0449 2.3 0 .311 .2567 .0436 2.24 .09 .34 .2551 .0437 Notes The EIG model and its reduced version provide a better fit than that resulting from the other models The EIG and REIG models fit the data nearly equally well in this case. Note that The sample size is small Only scant data is available in the tails of the distribution CDF (solid line) and empirical CDF (dots) for the flood data set using EIG model 4.3 Snowfall Data Snow precipitation in centimeters over 63 consecutive years in the city of Buffalo. 25 39.8 39.9 40.1 53.5 54.7 55.5 55.9 69.3 70.9 71.4 71.5 78.2 78.4 79 71.3 83.6 83.6 48.8 85.5 90.9 97 98.3 101.4 110.5 110.5 113.7 114.5 46.7 58 71.8 79.6 87.4 102.4 115.6 49.1 60.3 72.9 80.7 88.7 103.9 120.5 49.6 63.6 74.4 82.4 89.6 104.5 120.7 51.2 65.4 76.2 82.4 89.8 105.2 124.7 51.6 66.1 77.8 83 89.9 110 126.4 Maximum Likelihood Estimates Estimates of the Parameters and Goodnessof-Fit Statistics for the Snowfall Data Inverse Gaussian -2.5 1 .055 353.3 .8676 .1504 .7752 .1284 Lognormal (-.898,.269) REIG 53.66 .167 0 650.2 .7417 .0886 Gamma GIG Weibull RGG EIG 8 1 .125 0 7.97 1 .122 .0025 .4291 .0532 -1 3.83 0 .2964 .0454 -.289 3.63 0 .2817 .0428 -0.056 3.14 .4840 .0792 1.743 .2625 .0403 CDF (solid line) and empirical CDF (dots) for the snowfall data set using EIG Model Conclusion The Extended Inverse Gaussian model provides more flexibility for fitting various types of data sets References 1. D'Agostino, R. B. and Stephens, M. A. (1986). Goodness-of-fit Techniques. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 2. Dumonceaux, R., Antle, C. (1973). Discrimination between the log-normal and the Weibull distributions, Technometrics, 15(4), 923-926. 3. Jorgensen, B. (1982). Lecture Notes in Statistics, eds. D. Brillinger, S. Fienberg, J. Gani, J. Hartigan, J. Kiefer, and K. Krickeberg, Springer-Verlag, New York. 4. Mathai, A.M. and Saxena, R.K. (1978). The H-function with applications in statistics and other discplines. Wiley, New York. 5. Seshadri, V. (1993). The Inverse Gaussian Distribution: A Case Study in Exponential Families. Oxford Science Publication, Oxford.