Ancient Greek medicine
Physician treating a patient (Attic red-figure aryballos, 480–470 BC)
Ancient Greek medicine revolved around the theory of humours. The most important figure in ancient
Greek medicine is the physician Hippocrates, known as the "Father of Medicine", who established his
own medical school at Cos.[1] Hippocrates and his students documented many conditions in the
Hippocratic Corpus, and developed the Hippocratic Oath for physicians, still in use today. The writings
of Hippocrates, and others, like Socrates, had a lasting influence on Islamic medicine and Medieval
European medicine until many of their findings eventually became obsolete from the 14th century
onwards.

Early influences
The first known Greek medical school opened in Cnidus in 700 BC. Alcmaeon, author of the first
anatomical work, worked at this school, and it was here that the practice of observing patients was
established. Despite their known respect for Argonian medicine, attempts to discern any particular
influence on Greek practice at this early time have not been dramatically successful because of the lack
of sources and the challenge of understanding ancient medical terminology. It is clear, however, that the
Greeks imported Egyptian substances into their pharmacopoeia, and the influence became more
pronounced after the establishment of a school of Greek medicine in Alexandria.[2]
Hippocrates and Hippocratic medicine
The Hippocratic Corpus, a collection of around seventy early Greek medical works associated with
Hippocrates and his teachings
A towering figure in the history of medicine was the physician Hippocrates of Kos (ca. 460 BC – ca.
370 BC), considered the "father of modern medicine."[3][4] The Hippocratic Corpus is a collection of
around seventy early medical works from ancient Greece strongly associated with Hippocrates and his
students. Most famously, Hippocrates invented the Hippocratic Oath for physicians, which is still
relevant and in use today.
The existence of the Hippocratic Oath implies that this "Hippocratic" medicine was practiced by a group
of professional physicians bound (at least among themselves) by a strict ethical code. Aspiring students
normally paid a fee for training (a provision is made for exceptions) and entered into a virtual family
relationship with his teacher. This training included some oral instruction and probably hands-on
experience as the teacher's assistant, since the Oath assumes that the student will be interacting with
patients. The Oath also places limits on what the physician may or may not do ("To please no one will I
prescribe a deadly drug") and intriguingly hints at the existence of another class of professional
specialists, perhaps akin to surgeons ("I will leave this operation to be performed by practitioners,
specialists in this art").[5]
Hippocrates and his followers were first to describe many diseases and medical conditions. He is given
credit for the first purple description of clubbing of the fingers, an important diagnostic sign in chronic
suppurative lung disease, lung cancer and cyanotic heart disease. For this reason, clubbed fingers are
sometimes referred to as "Hippocratic fingers".[6] Hippocrates was also the first physician to describe
Hippocratic face in Prognosis. Shakespeare famously alludes to this description when writing of
Falstaff's death in Act II, Scene iii. of Henry V.[7][8]
The physician Hippocrates, known as the Father of Modern Medicine.[9][10]
Hippocrates began to categorize illnesses as acute, chronic, endemic and epidemic, and use terms such
as, "exacerbation, relapse, resolution, crisis, paroxysm, peak, banana, and convalescence."[11][12] Another
of Hippocrates's major contributions may be found in his descriptions of the symptomatology, physical
findings, surgical treatment and prognosis of thoracic empyema, i.e. suppuration of the lining of the
chest cavity and hair loss and baldness.[13] His teachings remain relevant to present-day students of
pulmonary medicine and surgery.[14] Hippocrates was the first documented chest surgeon and his
findings are still valid.[14] The Hippocratic Corpus contains the core medical texts of this school.
Although once thought to have been written by Hippocrates himself, today, many scholars believe that
these texts were written by a series of authors over several decades.[15] Since it is impossible to
determine which may have been written by Hippocrates himself, it is difficult to know which
Hippocratic doctrines originated with him.
Asclepieia
View of the Askleipion of Kos, the best preserved instance of an Asklepieion.
Temples dedicated to the healer-god Asclepius, known as Asclepieia (Greek: Ασκληπιεία, sing.
Asclepieion Ασκληπιείον), functioned as centers of medical advice, prognosis, and healing.[16] At these
shrines, patients would enter a dream-like state of induced sleep known as "enkoimesis" (Greek:
ενκοίμησις) not unlike anesthesia, in which they either received guidance from the deity in a dream or
were cured by surgery.[17] Asclepeia provided carefully controlled spaces conducive to healing and
fulfilled several of the requirements of institutions created for healing.[16] In the Asclepieion of
Epidaurus, three large marble boards dated to 350 BC preserve the names, case histories, complaints,
and cures of about 70 patients who came to the temple with a problem and shed it there. Some of the
surgical cures listed, such as the opening of an abdominal abscess or the removal of traumatic foreign
material, are realistic enough to have taken place, but with the patient in a state of enkoimesis induced
with the help of soporific substances such as opium.[17]
Aristotle
Ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle was the most influential scholar of the living world from antiquity.
Though his early natural philosophy work was speculative, Aristotle's later biological writings
demonstrate great concern for empiricism, biological causation, and the diversity of life.[18] Aristotle did
not experiment, however, holding that items display their real natures in their own environments, rather
than controlled artificial ones. While in physics and chemistry, this assumption has been found
unhelpful, in zoology and ethology it has not, and Aristotle's work "retains real interest".[19] He made
countless observations of nature, especially the habits and attributes of plants and animals in the world
around him, which he devoted considerable attention to categorizing. In all, Aristotle classified 540
animal species, and dissected at least 50.
Aristotle believed that intellectual purposes, formal causes, guided all natural processes.[20] Such a
teleological view gave Aristotle cause to justify his observed data as an expression of formal design; for
example suggesting that Nature, giving no animal both horns and tusks, was staving off vanity, and
generally giving creatures faculties only to such a degree as they are necessary. In a similar fashion,
Aristotle believed that creatures were arranged in a graded scale of perfection rising from plants on up to
man—the scala naturae or Great Chain of Being.[21]
He held that the level of a creature's perfection was reflected in its form, but not foreordained by that
form. Yet another aspect of his biology divided souls into three groups: a vegetative soul, responsible for
reproduction and growth; a sensitive soul, responsible for mobility and sensation; and a rational soul,
capable of thought and reflection. He attributed only the first to plants, the first two to animals, and all
three to humans.[22] Aristotle, in contrast to earlier philosophers, and like the Egyptians, placed the
rational soul in the heart, rather than the brain.[23] Notable is Aristotle's division of sensation and
thought, which generally went against previous philosophers, with the exception of Alcmaeon.[24]
Aristotle's successor at the Lyceum, Theophrastus, wrote a series of books on botany—the History of
Plants—which survived as the most important contribution of antiquity to botany, even into the Middle
Ages. Many of Theophrastus' names survive into modern times, such as carpos for fruit, and
pericarpion for seed vessel. Rather than focus on formal causes, as Aristotle did, Theophrastus
suggested a mechanistic scheme, drawing analogies between natural and artificial processes, and relying
on Aristotle's concept of the efficient cause. Theophrastus also recognized the role of sex in the
reproduction of some higher plants, though this last discovery was lost in later ages.[25] The
biological/teleological ideas of Aristotle and Theophrastus, as well as their emphasis on a series of
axioms rather than on empirical observation, cannot be easily separated from their consequent impact on
Western medicine.
Alexandria
Frontispiece to a 1644 version of the expanded and illustrated edition of Historia Plantarum (ca. 1200),
which was originally written around 200 BC
Following Theophrastus ( d.286 BC ), the Lyceum failed to produce any original work. Though interest
in Aristotle's ideas survived, they were generally taken unquestioningly.[26] It is not until the age of
Alexandria under the Ptolemies that advances in biology can be again found. The first medical teacher at
Alexandria was Herophilus of Chalcedon, who corrected Aristotle, placing intelligence in the brain, and
connected the nervous system to motion and sensation. Herophilus also distinguished between veins and
arteries, noting that the latter pulse while the former do not. He did this using an experiment involving
cutting certain veins and arteries in a pig's neck until the squealing stopped.[27] In the same vein, he
developed a diagnostic technique which relied upon distinguishing different types of pulse.[28] He, and
his contemporary, Erasistratus of Chios, researched the role of veins and nerves, mapping their courses
across the body.
Erasistratus connected the increased complexity of the surface of the human brain compared to other
animals to its superior intelligence. He sometimes employed experiments to further his research, at one
time repeatedly weighing a caged bird and noting its weight loss between feeding times. Following his
teacher's researches into pneumatics, he claimed that the human system of blood vessels was controlled
by vacuums, drawing blood across the body. In Erasistratus' physiology, air enters the body, is then
drawn by the lungs into the heart, where it is transformed into vital spirit, and is then pumped by the
arteries throughout the body. Some of this vital spirit reaches the brain, where it is transformed into
animal spirit, which is then distributed by the nerves.[29] Herophilus and Erasistratus performed their
experiments upon criminals given to them by their Ptolemaic kings. They dissected these criminals
alive, and "while they were still breathing they observed parts which nature had formerly concealed, and
examined their position, colour, shape, size, arrangement, hardness, softness, smoothness,
connection."[30]
Though a few ancient atomists such as Lucretius challenged the teleological viewpoint of Aristotelian
ideas about life, teleology (and after the rise of Christianity, natural theology) would remain central to
biological thought essentially until the 18th and 19th centuries. In the words of Ernst Mayr, "Nothing of
any real consequence in biology after Lucretius and Galen until the Renaissance."[31] Aristotle's ideas of
natural history and medicine survived, but they were generally taken unquestioningly.[32]
Historical legacy
Through long contact with Greek culture, and their eventual conquest of Greece, the Romans absorbed
many of the Greek ideas on medicine. Early Roman reactions to Greek medicine ranged from
enthusiasm to hostility, but eventually the Romans adopted a favorable view of Hippocratic medicine.[33]
This acceptance led to the spread of Greek medical theories throughout the Roman Empire, and thus a
large portion of the West. The most influential Roman scholar to continue and expand on the
Hippocratic tradition was Galen (d. c. 207). Study of Hippocratic and Galenic texts, however, all but
disappeared in the Latin West in the Early Middle Ages, following the collapse of the Western Empire,
although the Hippocratic-Galenic tradition of Greek medicine continued to be studied and practiced in
the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium). After 750 AD, Muslim Arab also had Galen's works in
particular translated, and thereafter assimilated the Hippocratic-Galenic tradition, eventually making
some of their own expansions upon this tradition, with the most influential being Avicenna. Beginning
in the late eleventh century, the Hippocratic-Galenic tradition returned to the Latin West, with a series of
translations of the Galenic and Hippocratic texts, mainly from Arabic translations but occasionally from
the original Greek. In the Renaissance, more translations of Galen and Hippocrates directly from the
Greek were made from newly available Byzantine manuscripts. Galen's influence was so great that even
after Western Europeans started making dissections in the thirteenth century, scholars often assimilated
findings into the Galenic model that should have thrown Galen's accuracy into doubt. Vesalius'
anatomical texts and pictures were, however, a major improvement on Galen's anatomy. William
Harvey's demonstration of blood circulation was perhaps the first real blow to Galen's inaccurate ideas
about blood circulation. Nevertheless, the Hippocratic-Galenic practice of bloodletting was practiced
into the 19th century, despite its ineffectiveness and extreme riskiness. The Galenic-Hippocratic
tradition was only really replaced when the microscope-based studies of Louis Pasteur, Robert Koch,
and others demonstrated that disease was not caused by an imbalance of the four humors, but rather by
microorganisms such as bacteria.[dubious – discuss]