Indoor air pollution and vulnerability to bacterial pneumonia in

advertisement
Indoor air pollution and vulnerability to
bacterial pneumonia in young children
Lessons from the developing world
Nigel Bruce
Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool,
UK
Overview
• Indoor (household) air pollution
• Available ‘measures’ of possible bacterial
pneumonia in young children
• Three types of evidence
– Ecological
– Epidemiological studies:
• Systematic review/meta-analysis
• RESPIRE trial
– Mechanistic studies
• Conclusions
• New/ongoing field trials
Household air pollution
• 3 billion use solid fuel as
primary cooking fuel
• 1.2 billion no electricity: use
simple kerosene lamps
• Inefficient stoves/lamps lead
to high emissions of ‘PIC’
• Health-damaging pollutants:
 Small particulates (PM2.5)
 Toxic gases, carcinogens and
irritants
• Typical PM2.5 levels 500
µg/m3, vs. WHO AQGs of 10
• Exposure highest for women
(pregnant) & young children
Solid fuel use for cooking: 2010
Available measures of (possible) bacterial
pneumonia in various types of study
• Mortality (bacterial higher CF):
– ALRI (mix): WHO stats; DHS
– Pneumonia: diagnosed; VA?
• Severe pneumonia (bacterial
more likely to be severe):
– Clinical signs
– Hypoxaemia (pulse oximetry)
• Aetiology:
– Antigen tests (NPA, urine, blood,
lung)
– Lung aspirate or blood culture
• Mechanistic studies:
– In vivo: survival after infection
with S. Pneumoniae (mice)
– In vitro: C-loaded AM killing of S.
pneumoniae.
Ecological association
Death rates from
ALRI in children
under 5 years
(2010)
Source WHO
Ecological association
Death rates from
ALRI in children
under 5 years
(2010)
Source WHO
Percentage of
homes relying on
solid fuels for
cooking (2010)
Source WHO
Systematic review of epidemiological
studies
• Published (Dherani et al 2008)
– Updated
• Eligible studies:
– Cross-sectional, analytic observational, RCT
– Exposure: very few measured HAP or exposure 
fuel, stove-type, behaviour contrast
– Outcome: reported symptoms/signs  community
ALRI  clinical diagnosis  CXR and bacteriology
• Results:
– All non-fatal ALRI (severity not defined); n=21
– Non-fatal, severe ALRI; n=4
– Fatal ALRI; n=4
SRMA: pooled ORs (95% CI)
Outcome
N
I2 (p-value)
Random or
Fixed effect
Publication
bias
(p-value)
All ALRI*
(severity not
defined)
21
61%
(p<0.0001)
Random
Begg’s: 0.56 1.56
P<0.0001
Egger’s: 0.09 (1.33, 1.83)
OR
(95% CI)
P-value
*Includes O’Dempsey (Gambia 1996): Pneumococcal disease on blood culture (79%
pneumonia) OR=2.55 (0.98 – 6.65)
SRMA: pooled ORs (95% CI)
Outcome
N
I2 (p-value)
Random or
Fixed effect
Publication
bias
(p-value)
All ALRI*
(severity not
defined)
21
61%
(p<0.0001)
Random
Begg’s: 0.56 1.56
P<0.0001
Egger’s: 0.09 (1.33, 1.83)
Severe1
4
51% (p=0.10) N/A
Random
2.04
P=0.001
(1.33, 3.14)
Fatal2
4
0% (p=0.64)
Fixed
2.80
P<0.0001
(1.81, 4,34)
N/A
OR
(95% CI)
P-value
1Severe:
includes physician clinical definition (n=3) and low oxygen saturation on pulse
oximetry (n=1)
2Fatal: includes verbal autopsy (n=2), parental recall of signs (n=1) and deaths in hospital
following radiological confirmation of pneumonia (n=1)
*Includes O’Dempsey (Gambia 1996): Pneumococcal disease on blood culture (79%
pneumonia) OR=2.55 (0.98 – 6.65)
RESPIRE Trial
• Objective: impact of HAP reduction on pneumonia
incidence in children <18 months
– Primary: ITT analysis
– Secondary: exposure-response analysis
• Rural, highland communities of Comitancillo and
San Lorenzo, alt. 2200 – 3000 m
• 518 homes (pregnant woman, child <4 months)
randomised to keep open fire or use ‘plancha’
• Children followed to 18 months: ~30,000 child
weeks
• Surveillance for pneumonia cases and all deaths
Control and intervention stoves
Traditional open 3-stone fire:
kitchen 48-hour PM2.5 levels of
500 - 1000 μg/m3
The plancha chimney wood stove,
locally made and popular with
households
Overview of child health outcomes assessment
Follow-up at weekly visit
Home
Weekly visit
• Well
Community
centre
Hospital
Study doctor
examines
Assessed by
duty doctor
• Mild illness
•Pulse oximetry
• Referral to
study doctor
•If pneumonia,
RSV* test and
refer for CXR
Study team
obtain CXR
and inpatient
data and
diagnosis
•Refer if very ill
Child dies
Verbal
autopsy
Child dies
Health outcome
definitions
Verbal
autopsy
* Respiratory syncytial virus
Home IAP and exposure assessment
methods
• All homes:
– 48 hr CO tube child
(3 monthly)
– mother (6 monthly)
• Random sub-sample
(n=40+40):
–
–
–
–
–
3-monthly
CO (tube, Hobo)
PM (filter, pump)
Continuous PM
Mother breath CO
(COHb)
Effect of intervention stove on (i) kitchen IAP
and (ii) personal exposure
8
Geometric mean CO (ppm)
7
6
↓90%
5
↓61%
4
↓52%
3
2
1
0
Kitchen
Child
Open fire
Mother
Plancha
Smith et al, J Exp Sci Env Epidemiol 2009
Physician-assessed outcomes (ITT)
Case finding
Outcome
Physician
diagnosed
pneumonia
Investigations:
- Pulse
oximetry
- RSV direct
antigen test
- Chest X-ray
RR (95% CI)
P-value
All
0.78 (0.59, 1.06)
0.095
- Severe (hypoxic)
0.67 (0.45, 0.98)
0.042
CXR +ve
0.74 (0.42, 1.15)
0.231
- CXR +ve & hypoxic
0.68 (0.36, 1.33)
0.234
RSV +ve
0.76 (0.42, 1.16)
0.275
- RSV +ve & hypoxic
0.87 (0.46, 1.51)
0.633
RSV -ve
0.79 (0.53, 1.07)
0.192
- RSV –ve & hypoxic
0.54 (0.31, 0.91)
0.026
Plancha
Open fire
Exposureresponse analysis
• Mean PM2.5 exposure
equivalent (µg/m3):
• OF: 250
• Plancha:125
• Lowest exposure
decile ~50 µg/m3
• Statistically significant
E-R relationships
• Implications: low
exposure (<30-50
µg/m3) needed to
prevent most cases
Mechanisms: focus on HAP
Pollutants
• Carbonaceous PM (<10
microns; <5 into alveoli)
• Gases (irritant, toxic):
– NO2, CO
• Hydrocarbons (cancer):
– Benzene
• Polyaromatic HC (cancer):
– benzo [A] pyrene
• Aldehydes (irritant):
– Formaldehyde
– Acrolein
Mechanisms: focus on HAP
Pollutants
Defence mechanisms
• Carbonaceous PM (<10
microns; <5 into alveoli)
• Gases (irritant, toxic):
Filtering
Muco-ciliary
clearance
– NO2, CO
• Hydrocarbons (cancer):
– Benzene
• Polyaromatic HC (cancer):
Physical
barrier of
epithelium
– benzo [A] pyrene
• Aldehydes (irritant):
– Formaldehyde
– Acrolein
Immune response including:
alveolar macrophages (AM),
opsonisation, IgA, IgG, surfactant,
plasma, etc.
AM function: carbon loading
• Biomass fuel users
show higher carbon
loading in AMs
• Human (BAL) study
(Malawi)*
– Wood fuel users
higher AM (p<0.01)
– Also for kerosene
lighting (P<0.001)
*Fullerton et al 2009
Impaired AM phagocytic function
• Human AM*:
– UF-CB; DEP
– 4 tests (silica, microorganisms)
– All ↓phagocytosis
• Rat AM** (see graph):
– Carbon-loaded AM
– reduced Strep
pneumoniae killing
• Mice AM***:
– CAP particles
– S. pneumoniae
– Increased adherence,
but reduced killing
– Iron chelation reversed
*Lundborg et al 2006
**Lundborg et al 2007 (graph)
***Zhou et al 2007
Oxidative stress
Mudway et al
2005
• Human respiratory tract lining
fluid model
• PM obtained from dung fuel
(DC PM-sample 1)
• Antioxidant (Ascorbate)
depleted by PM
Oxidative stress
Mudway et al
2005
• Human respiratory tract lining
fluid model
• PM obtained from dung fuel
(DC PM-sample 1)
• Antioxidant (Ascorbate)
depleted by PM
• Metal chelating agent (DPTA)
inhibits effect
• Conclude that redox active
metals in PM are important
In vivo survival following infection
Studies of mice
infected with S.
Pneumoniae
• Hatch (1985):
– Poorer survival
with PM
– For CB and AAP
derived PM
• Tellabati (2010)
Tellabati et al 2010
– Increased
survival with PM
(p<0.001)
– Used UF-CB
Summary: evidence for causality
Bradford Hill viewpoints
#
1
Viewpoint
Strength of association
Summary of evidence
2
Consistency across
populations/study designs
Majority of studies find report increased risk with
exposure (not all significant)
3
Specificity
N/A
4
Temporality (exposure
precedes outcome)
Exposure has preceded infection in all studies;
longitudinal studies available
5
Biological gradient
Statistically significant gradients in two studies
6
Biological plausibility
Studies show range of mechanisms are affected
(Ciliatoxic; ↓AM function; ↑oxidative stress, &c)
7
Coherence with natural
history, animal studies
HAP exposure consistent with mortality;
Some animal evidence available
8
Experiment
RESPIRE; adult cohort study from China
9
Analogy
Other main sources (AAP, smoking) increase risk
OR>2 for severe/fatal pneumonia
Conclusions and next steps
• 2.8 billion people exposed to high levels of HAP; >1
billion children through pregnancy and post-natally
• Does this cause bacterial pneumonia?
– Good evidence for ‘ALRI’
– Most ALRI in developing countries is bacterial pneumonia
– Evidence for severe, fatal, non-RSV, pneumococcal
disease
– Mechanistic studies show plausible pathways and effects
• What is needed to confirm?
– New RCTs (... Ghana, Nepal, Malawi, India)
– Include: exposure assessment, aetiology and severity
– Further mechanistic studies (in vitro and in vivo)
• Vaccine world?
– Reducing HAP may reduce risk via LBW, PTB, and in first
few months of life before vaccine has full effect
New and ongoing RCTs:
Birth outcomes and ALRI
Country Investigator
group
Intervention
Investigations
Status
Malawi
Liverpool;
Wellcome Trust
R/Centre
Fan stove
• Severity
• Aetiology
• Exposure
• Mechanisms
Preparation
phase
Nepal
Johns Hopkins
Rocket stove
LPG
• Severity
• Aetiology
Ongoing
Ghana
Columbia
University;
Kintampo
R/Centre
Fan stove
LPG
• Severity
• Aetiology
• Exposure
• Mechanisms
Recruiting
India
UC Berkeley;
INCLEN
TBC: Fan
stove and/or
LPG
• TBC
Pilot studies
Thank you!
Trends in SFU: 1980 - 2010
(b)
Open fire
Variance=0.36
0.5
1.0
1.5
Plancha stove
Variance=0.31
0.0
Probability Density
2.0
Exposure distributions in plancha and
open fire groups
-2
-1
0
1
Child Mean CO (ln(ppm))
2
3
Impact of 50% increase in exposure
Pneumonia
classification
Cases/child OR (95% CI; p-value) with doubling of exposure
weeks
A: Unadjusted
B: Adjusted for
C: As for B
confounders
plus stove type
All
263/
30270
1.22
1.05, 1.41)
P=0.011
1.25
(1.06, 1.48)
P=0.010
1.28
(1.05, 1.56)
P=0.015
Hypoxaemic
136/
30317
1.35
(1.12, 1.61)
P=0.001
1.38
(1.12, 1.69)
P=0.002
1.39
(1.07, 1.81)
P=0.014
Radiological
85/
30317
1.45
(1.11, 1.90)
P=0.006
1.45
(1.09, 1.93)
P=0.011
1.66
(1.15, 2.40)
P=0.007
Hypoxaemic
and
radiological
53/
30323
1.71
(1.25, 2.32)
P=0.001
1.71
(1.20, 2.44)
P=0.003
2.09
(1.29, 3.38)
P=0.003
The average exposure reduction for the intervention group was 50%
In vivo survival following infection
Studies of mice
infected with S.
Pneumoniae
• Hatch (1985):
Tellabati et
al 2010
RSV infection (Lambert 2003):
• Mice treated with CB, then infected with
RSV
• No increased replication of RSV
• Later increase in neutrophils and TNF
• 2o bacterial infection only seen for CB+RSV
– Poorer survival
with PM
– For CB and AAP
derived PM
• Tellabati (2010)
– Increased
survival with PM
(p<0.001)
– Used UF-CB
Integrated exposure-response function:
child ALRI incidence
Household Air Pollution
SHS
AAP
All ALRI:
mixed viral
and bacterial
Integrated exposure-response function:
child ALRI incidence
Household Air Pollution
SHS
AAP
Average
RESPIRE
plancha
Average
LMIC
exposure
Estimate
for
SRMA
All ALRI:
mixed viral
and bacterial
Integrated exposure-response function:
child ALRI incidence
Household Air Pollution
SHS
AAP
0.78
0.60
2.8
2.2
1.7
Average
RESPIRE
plancha
Estimate
for
SRMA
Average
LMIC
exposure
Download