E145 Fall 2007 Session 10 ABCs of Venture Teams + Lessons from the Movies + Team Dynamics Exercise Tom Kosnik, Alex Gould, Chi-Hua Chien, and Tom Byers Stanford University Copyright © 2007 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University and Stanford Technology Ventures Program (STVP). This document may be reproduced for educational purposes only. Page 1 Last Month: Idea Versus Opportunity This Month: Realities of Business Operations © 2003 Mark P. Rice, Babson Page 2 Our Agenda • Part I: ABCs of Venture Teams • Part II: Lessons from the Movies • Part III: Team Dynamics Exercise Page 3 Finding the right team mates can be difficult… Page 4 Part I: ABCs of Venture Teams A. Team … Recruiting B. Compensation … Rewards C. Culture … Norms Page 5 A. Recruiting Key Contributors Internal External Key issues: When to hire? Experience versus passion and energy? Qualifications versus motivation and character? When to use outsourcing? Key issues: How to select? How to manage? Founders or Initial Partners CEO and VPs Designers, Developers, “Architects” and Managers of Products & Services Sales and Marketing Operations and Administration Others? Board Of Directors Investors Advisory Boards Professional Services and Suppliers Others? Page 6 How should you pick your team mates for an entrepreneurial venture? Do I trust them? YES! Devils’ Advocates Soul mates Dream team mates Team mates Class mates NO! Bozos YES! Do I enjoy them? Play mates NO! Page 7 Q&A with VC John Doerr of KPCB Q. What is the most important part of any business plan? A. “I always turn to the bios of the team first. For me, it’s team, team, team. Others might say, people, people, people -- but I’m interested in the team as a whole.” Page 8 B. Compensation and Rewards Masayoshi Son CEO of SOFTBANK CORP. (Japan) “The way I attract these people to SOFTBANK is to explain what my dream is. It is not money because they actually come to work and we never talk about payment. They come to work, then a week passes, or longer, then we finally get around to talking about money. I’ll ask them, by the way, how much do you want? And they say, whatever you want to give me. Then I ask them, how much were you making last year? Then I give them the same amount. So they don’t come to SOFTBANK for the money. It’s for the dream that everyone has together. The dream of making the company successful.” Page 9 Understanding Rewards In High-Potential Ventures • Status Determined by Contributions to Improving Culture and Increasing the Value of the Company • Hence, Rewards Tend to Be Value-Enhancing such as Stock Options (Equity Ownership) Page 10 Compensation in Start-Ups • Cash Salary and Bonus Benefits • Equity Common Stock Plans (Incentive Stock Options Have Favorable Tax Rates) Vesting Schedule and Stock Budget Tax Implications (IRS in USA) and Security Laws (SEC in USA) Page 11 C: Culture … The Secret to Long-Term Success? Definition “A strong system of informal rules that spells out how people are to behave most of the time” Two Great Quotes “The most durable asset of a venture is its culture” (Cook) “First four letters of culture spell c-u-l-t” (Collins) Page 12 A Winning Culture Can Stimulate Innovation = f(creativity, teamwork) • Develop Sense of Teamwork • Include Creative and Unusual People • Understand Personalities of Key People • Develop Open Internal Communication • Remain Open to Ideas/Suggestions from Anywhere • Be the Customer • Be Willing to Experiment • Address the Issue of Autonomy Reference: Collins & Lazier, Chatman Page 13 Even E145 Has A Culture … Recall The “Success Formula” Show up on time (with cell phones and other stuff turned off loud please). Be nice to people (e.g., constructive comments only, listen carefully, and only one speaker at a time please). Do what you say you will do and deliver more than you promise (both in class and out). Do it with energy and passion. Reference: JM Perry Page 14 Part II: Lessons from the Movies Chariots of Fire Startup.com Page 15 Chariots of Fire: What worked? • The Context: • Movie released in 1982 • Based on real team: England’s Olympic Track Team • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYJzcUvS_NU • Key questions: • What motivated the runners? • What would motivate you as an Olympic runner? • Who would you trust to lead you? • Why or why not? Page 16 The Cast of Chariots of Fire Ian Charleson Ben Cross Nigel Havers Nicholas Farrell Cheryl Campbell Alice Krige Struan Rodger Ian Holm John Gielgud Lindsay Anderson Nigel Davenport David Yelland Eric Liddell Harold Abrahams Lord Andrew Lindsay Aubrey Montague Jennie Liddell Sybil Gordon Sandy McGrath Sam Mussabini Master of Trinity Master of Caius Lord Birkenhead Prince of Wales Page 17 Startup.com: What NOT to do • • The Context: • Movie released in 2001 • Based on real company: Govworks.com • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYJzcUvS_NU Key questions: • What motivated the co-founders of Startup.com? (Kaleil Tuzman and Tom Herman) • What would motivate you as a member of Startup.com? • Would you trust the co-founders to lead you? • Why or why not? Page 18 What tools can help you build a winning team? Use the Trust Spider to learn how to earn someone’s trust. Use Maslow Pyramid to explain what motivates you. Use 1 to 1 Diagnosis to understand a team mate’s behavior. Use Start-Stop-Keep to give each other feedback. Use the Seven Stage Model to manage teams. Get coaching and mentoring from the entrepreneurial Ecosystem Page 19 Use the Trust Spider to learn how to earn someone’s trust. Entrepreneurship Inspiration/ Optimism Chemistry/ Sense of Humor Perspective/ Humility Vision Communication Integrity Empathy Cooperation/ Commitment Competence Fairness Reliability Responsiveness The Trust Spider is under development by Kosnik (1995). See Kosnik for research sources. Page 20 Mark the 5 qualities that are most critical to earn your trust. X Entrepreneurship Inspiration/ Optimism Chemistry/ Sense of Humor Perspective/ Humility Vision X Communication X Integrity Empathy Cooperation/ Commitment Competence Fairness Reliability X X Responsiveness The Trust Spider is under development by Kosnik (1995). See Kosnik for research sources. Page 21 Compare notes with your team mates. X Entrepreneurship Inspiration/ Optimism Chemistry/ Sense of Humor Perspective/ Humility Vision X Communication X XX Integrity Reliability X Empathy Cooperation/ Commitment Competence X Fairness X X Responsiveness X The Trust Spider is under development by Kosnik (1995). See Kosnik for research sources. Page 22 Get feedback from team mates on how trustworthy you are. Fix the critical gaps. X Entrepreneurship Inspiration/ Optimism Chemistry/ Sense of Humor Perspective/ Humility Vision X XX Communication X Integrity Fairness Reliability X Empathy Cooperation/ Commitment Competence X X X Responsiveness Xmy trust X = One of the top 5 qualities that I think are critical to earn X = One of the top 5 qualities that are critical to earn team mate’s trust = my self assessment of my own trust worthiness. = my team mate’s assessment of my trust worthiness. Page 23 Use Maslow Pyramid to explain what motivates you. Self Actualization Esteem/ Achievement What motivates me to join an entrepreneurial team? • Making a difference? • Doing work that I love? • Challenging work? • Having fun? • Cool technology? • Getting funded by a top-tier VC? • Future flexibility? • Future wealth (Stock Options)? • A good salary? • Job security/low risk of layoff? • Other? Social/Belonging Safety/Security Physiological Sources: Maslow, Stephens and Heil (1999), Maslow on Management, Maslow (Stephens ed.) (2000), The Maslow Business Reader. Page 24 Use 1 to 1 Diagnosis to understand a team mate’s behavior. Culture Differences: Motivation Problems: Skill Problems: Principles Differences: Personality Differences: I didn’t know! Gender Differences Communication Problems : I don’t understand you. What’s in it for me? I don’t know how. It’s against my principles and values! That’s the way I am. It’s hard to change. External Problems: The 1 to 1 Diagnostic is based on work by Kosnik, Blair Ramfelt and Pfeifer from 1987-2000. I don’t have the time, money or authority. Page 25 Use Start-Stop-Keep to give each other feedback Start: Why? Stop: Why? Keep: Why? Page 26 Use the Seven Stage Model to manage your team. Creating Strategies Unresolved • Disorientation • Fear Unresolved • Mistrust • Caution • Facade Resolved • Orientation • Acceptance • Membership 1. Orientation WHY am I here? 2. Trust Building WHO are you? Unresolved • Apathy • Irrelevant competitiveness Sustaining Strategies Unresolved • Boredom • Burnout Resolved • Group trust • Spontaneity • Data flow 3. Goal Clarification WHAT are we doing? Unresolved • Dependence • Counterdependence Adapted from: Drexler / Sibbet, © 1987 Unresolved • Overload • Non-attunement Resolved • Calls for action • Options emerge • Tasks identified Unresolved • Conflict/ confusion • Nonalignment • Missed deadlines 4. Decision Making WHICH way? 7. Renewal WHY continue? 6. High Performance WOW! 5. Implementation HOW? Resolved • Commitment to renew • Congruence of vision, self, and team Resolved • Synergy in action • Flow state • Intuitive communications Resolved • Sequence is clear • Creative, productive results • Process is disciplined Resolved • Roles differentiated • Decisions Made • Work begins Page 27 Get coaching and mentoring from the entrepreneurial energy ecosystem Professors – Like your favorite profs in energy related specialties who worked with you on the first Energy Crossroads Conference, as well as new kids like Alex, Chi-Hua, Tomk and their STVP colleagues Entrepreneurial Leaders who are known for building winning Teams – like the ones who come to DFJ ETL VCs who know the importance of winning teams – Like the E 145 Mentors Entrepreneurial Alumni and the mentors they know, via BASES, ASES, NUSEA, SWIB, SEC, ATI, and your own network. Page 28 Summary: Use Tools and your Mentors to Build a Winning Team! Use the Trust Spider to learn how to earn someone’s trust. Use Maslow Pyramid to explain what motivates you. Use 1 to 1 Diagnosis to understand a team mate’s behavior. Use Start-Stop-Keep to give each other feedback. Use the Seven Stage Model to manage teams. Get coaching and mentoring from the entrepreneurial Ecosystem Page 29 Why do these tools matter for you? The tools we just presented can help you today on your E 145 Teams. 2. Use them now to increase your odds of success. 3. Thousands of alumni from Stanford, Harvard, NUS, KTH, and Silicon Valley players have learned the tools. 4. If you build a team without the right tools, your risks of losing escalate. 1. Page 30 Part III. Team Dynamics Exercise • Purpose and Objectives • Step #1: Team Process Evaluation Sheet • Step #2: Discussion of Two Basic Teamwork Concepts • Step #3: Preparation for Team Exercise • Step #4: Team Exercise on Your Own This class exercise is adapted from Managing the Small to Mid-Sized Company: Concepts and Cases by Jim Collins and Bill Lazier, Irwin. Page 31 Exercise Objectives 1. Chance to learn and practice exactly how to improve the productivity and effectiveness of a team. 2. Reinforces the importance of teamwork in new ventures. Page 32 Recall Session 1’s “Seven Important Skills for Tomorrows Leaders” • Creativity and Opportunity Evaluation • Real-time Strategy and Decision Making • Comfort with Change and Chaos • Basics of Start-Up Finance and Accounting • Evangelism, Selling, Negotiation, and Motivation through Influence and Persuasion • Oral and Written Communication • Teamwork 1. But what if things are going great? 2. Or what if things are going poorly? Page 33 Step #1: Please Fill Out the “Team Process Evaluation Sheet” Individually Number & Name of Group: ___________________________ Group Process Evaluation Sheet 1 There is a clear unity of purpose. There was free discussion of the objectives until members could commit themselves to them; the objectives are meaningful to each group member. 5 4 3 2 1 There is low unity of purpose – little or no evidence that the group is widely committed to common objectives or that the objectives are meaningful to each member of the group. 2 The group is self-conscious about its own operations. The group has taken time to explicitly discuss group process – how the group will function to achieve its objectives. The group has a clear, explicit, and mutually agreed-upon approach: mechanics, norms, expectations, rules, etc. Frequently, it will stop to examine how well it is doing or what may be interfering with its operation. Whatever the problem may be, it gets open discussion and a solution found. 5 4 3 2 1 The group tends to avoid discussion of its own maintenance. The group has taken little time to explicitly discuss group process – how the group will function to achieve its objectives. The group does not have a clear, mutually agreed-upon approach: mechanics, norms, expectations, rules, etc. There is often much discussion after a meeting of what was wrong and why, but this is seldom discussed within the meeting itself. 3 The group has set clear and demanding performance goals for itself and has translated these performance goals into well-defined concrete milestones against which it measures itself. The group defines and achieves a continuous series of “small wins” along the way to larger goals. 5 4 3 2 1 The group has low or ambiguous performance goals for itself. It has not defined concrete milestones against which it measures itself. The group has not given itself the stimulus of a continuous series of “small wins” along the way to larger goals. 4 The atmosphere tends to be informal, comfortable, relaxed. There are no obvious tensions, a working atmosphere in which people are involved & interested. 5 4 3 2 1 The atmosphere is likely to reflect either indifference (lots of side conversations, whispering, etc.), boredom, or tension. The group is not genuinely engaged. 5 There is a lot of discussion in which virtually everyone participates, but it remains pertinent to the purpose of the group. If discussion gets off track, someone will bring it back in short order. The members listen to each other. Every idea is given a hearing. People are not afraid of being foolish by putting forth a creative thought even if it seems extreme. 5 4 3 2 1 A few people tend to dominate. Sometimes their contributions are way off the point, but little is done by anyone in the group to keep the group clearly on track. People do not really listen to each other. Ideas are ignored or overridden. Conversations after group meetings reveal that people failed to express ideas or feelings. 6 People are free in expressing their feelings as well as their ideas. 5 4 3 2 1 Personal feelings are hidden. There is fear that these are too explosive if brought out. Page 34 Step #2: Two Basic Ways to Improve Performance Page 35 Example: “The group never gets all of its work done because meetings start late and, once they do start, the group strays constantly from the tasks at hand.” Systemic Causes? 1. The group meets at a time that makes it difficult for all members to arrive promptly. 2. The group doesn’t make any effort at the beginning of the meeting to create an agenda nor objectives. 3. No chair of the meeting is chosen to keep the group moving forward and finishing on time. Individual Causes? 1. One of the members is chronically late, no matter what time the meeting officially starts. 2. One of the group members loves to stray off into unrelated topics during the meeting -nobody feels comfortable saying “let’s get back to the task at hand.” Page 36 Step #3: Preparation for Exercise 1. Circle the three lowest scores on your Group Process Evaluation Sheet. Jot down what you think are the root cause or causes. Categorize each of them as either systemic or individual. 2. If you have identified a systemic problem, write down one suggestion that would improve the systemic functioning of your team. 3. For each of your teammates, list one characteristic or action that is helpful to the group. List one that is not helpful. 4. Write down one thing that you would do differently or better to improve the functionality of your group. Page 37 Step #4 Create “Team Dynamics” Summary Always Keep This In Mind Please … Is this going to be relevant and helpful to improving the functioning of our group? Please complete the exercise by the next class (Session 11) including sending the summary document by email to e145-homework. Page 38