September 19, 2012 1914 Association Drive Suite 201 Reston, VA 20191-1539 Phone: FAX: 703-860-2100 888-247-2113 Engineering byDesign™ OVERVIEW and FACT SHEET EbD™-STEM Standards-Based Program Model The EbD™ program is standards-based. ITEEA developed the national standards for technological and engineering literacy (funded through the NSF and NASA), which serves as the primary organizer from which the program is based. Here are more facts about the EbD™ program: Curriculum is developed by a team of technology/engineering, mathematics and science (STEM) educators and business and industry professionals. EbD™ curriculum writers base their work on the EbD™ Standards Responsibility Matrix (which assigns standards and benchmarks to each course) and aligns with the common core standards to ensure that the curriculum builds knowledge and skills as students progress. EbD™ curriculum is on a three-year revision cycle, meaning that curriculum goes through a rigorous review process, and is updated to meet the needs of participating consortium states and the profession. This occurs every three years so it remains current with educational pedagogy and everchanging content. EbD™ and the Common Core EbD™ is actively engaged in the process of aligning the Common Core Standards with the EbD™ Program. The two Common Core standards available are Language Arts and Mathematics. Additionally, the program utilizes the concepts from the Framework for K-12 Science Standards: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. These Common Core standards are being integrated into all EbD™ development through the revision process. Additionally the EbD™ program is currently designed to integrate STEM from development to implementation (professional development). It is based on: Standards for Technological Literacy (ITEA, 2000/2002/2007) Project 2061: Benchmarks for Science Literacy (AAAS, 1993/2009) Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM, 2000) National Science Education Standards (NAP, 2006) EbD™ and NAEP 2014 The ITEEA has and continues to be involved with both the Steering and Planning Committees in the development of the NAEP 2014 policies, priorities, frameworks and specifications. ITEEA and the STEM Center for Teaching and Learning will ensure the involvement of teachers and engineers concerned with education about technology and engineering. Additionally EbD™, through its standards-based STEM content and strategies will prepare all students to be successful on all three areas specified in the NAEP 2014 Technology and Engineering Literacy Assessment (see Figure 1). EbD™ and Race to the Top EbD™ is currently involved with a number of states that are involved with the requirements for Race to the Top (RTT). RTT focuses on four core education reform areas: Figure 1 The nationally-recognized standards upon which EbD™ curriculum ©International Technology and Engineering Educators Association www.engineeringbydesign.org Engineering byDesign™ OVERVIEW & FACT SHEET P a g e |2 and assessments are based help prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace and to compete in a global economy. The system for collecting and reporting EbD™ assessment data measures student growth and success and informs teachers and principals about how they can improve instruction. – The STEMCTL has formed a coalition of states to develop an assessment system that will provide real-time data for teachers, and provide data that addresses teacher effectiveness as determined by RTT and states. This Technology and Engineering Assessment Coalition is separate from the Consortium of States but is available to them at reasonable pricing. Recruiting, developing, rewarding, and retaining effective teachers is supported using a variety of methods: – Professional learning communities through the EbD™ Network and an online system (ebDonline™) connects over 300 schools and 500 teachers nationwide that are teaching EbD™ courses. – Annual workshops (EbDLabs™) at the annual ITEEA conference. Consortium states receive an identified number of passes to these workshops from their state. – Opportunities for state, district, and local workshops via a cadre of trained Teacher Effectiveness Coaches (TECs), or for the STEMCTL to train a cadre of state trainers for in-state workshops. Lowest achieving schools benefit because EbD™ targets every student. EbD™ continues to support the mission of the Standards for Technological Literacy, that all students can and should become technologically literate. EbD™ is not written for only the top 18 percent of the class, although it serves that population as well through flexibility and advanced course offerings. EbD™ Endorsements EbD™ is supported by several states and school systems and agencies. The Standards for Technological Literacy document was reviewed by the National Research Council and includes a foreword by William A. Wulf, President of the National Academy of Engineering (at the time of publication). The foreword states, among other things, that: “[ITEEA] has successfully distilled an essential core of technological knowledge and skills we might wish all K-12 students to acquire.” Additionally, EbD™ has been endorsed by the States’ Career Clusters for the STEM and IT clusters. Additionally, the Technology and Engineering Education Association of Pennsylvania (TEEAP) has endorsed EbD™. EbD™ = Flexibility, Affordability, Accountability The EbD™ program is built on these three simple concepts: flexibility, affordability, and accountability. EbD™ is made available to states as a model. It is a common rallying point, a consistent program that illustrates very clearly what integrated STEM education should be. – Specialized equipment is a plus, not a necessity. If students have access to specialized equipment, the curriculum is flexible enough that it can be used to increase learning and hands-on application. – In all cases of required software, free open source software is available to schools that meet EbD™ requirements. For more information via email (ebd@iteea.org) or telephone (703-860-2100), or visit www.engineeringbydesign.org . ©International Technology and Engineering Educators Association www.engineeringbydesign.org