NSW INDEPENDENT TRIAL EXAMS – 2011 LEGAL STUDIES YR 11 EXAMINATION MARKING GUIDELINES Section I 1 D 2 A 3 B 4 C 5 D 21 D 22 C 23 C 24 B 25 B 6 D 7 B 8 D 9 C 10 D 11 D 12 A 13 C 14 B 15 A 16 C 17 B 18 A 19 C 20 A Section II Question 26(a) Criteria Accurately details how the legislation allows challenges to state power Provides some information relating to the legislation and/or state power Question 26(b) Criteria Accurately identifies and provides detailed information about ONE condition for law reform Integrates an appropriate example Identifies ONE condition and some explanation of how this relates to the reform of the law Use of an example Some reference to law reform Question 26(c) Criteria Accurately outlines (at least TWO) law reform agencies and explains their role in the law reform process Outlines (a) law reform agency/s and provides some explanation of their role in the law reform process Some (implied) reference to law reform agencies Question 27 Criteria Correctly defines terra nullius AND concisely illustrates that native title was not possible under the doctrine of terra nullius as it meant that Indigenous people had no legal status as Australia was “land belonging to no-one” – it was considered not to have permanent inhabitants, or a legal or political system, and thus British law applied automatically. Consequently, Indigenous people could not claim the land, as there was a legal fiction that they never owned it. Correctly defines terra nullius and outlines in general terms how terra nullius provided an obstacle to native title claims Tries to define terra nullius and makes disjointed links to native title Question 28(a) Criteria Correctly outlines the role of the United Nations as a forum for global peace and security and to promote cooperation in solving international problems Outlines only one role of the UN or with only a superficial description of its role Marks 2 1 Marks 4 2–3 1 Marks 4 2–3 1 Marks 5 3–4 1–2 Marks 2 1 NSW Independent Trial Exams 2011 – Legal Studies Yr 11 Preliminary Exam: Marking Criteria - Page 1 Question 28(b) Criteria Concise explanation indicating a binding international instrument is an international agreement signed by those nations exercising their sovereignty to agree to abide by its terms. Somalia and the USA have exercised their sovereignty by not signing. Breaches of certain international instruments can result in ICJ action. Defines an international instrument and implies that nations can choose to sign Only defines an international instrument OR indicates that nations can choose to sign Question 29 Criteria Accurately details and makes a judgement about the effectiveness of internal and external reviews in dispute resolution between individuals and the state Clear analysis of effectiveness and consistent use of legal terminology Provides information about internal and external reviews and dispute resolution between individuals and the state Some reference to dispute resolution and internal and/or external reviews Question 30 Criteria Provides a thorough examination of a technology issue and fully explains the impact on the individual Clear reference to the statement Sound assessment of law reform in relation to the issue Clear and consistent use of legal terminology Provides an examination of a technology issue and explains the impact on the individual Some reference to the statement Some assessment of law reform in relation to the issue Use of legal terminology Information about technology and/or law reform in relation to the issue Marks 3 2 1 Marks 5 3–4 1–2 Marks 8–10 4–7 1–3 Section III Question 31(a) Criteria Correctly identifies and outlines key features of TWO contemporary legal issues involving Marks 3–4 groups or individuals suffering from disadvantage in Australia. Identifies and outlines key features of ONE contemporary legal issue involving groups or 1–2 individuals suffering from disadvantage in Australia. OR Provides limited detail of the key features of TWO legal involving groups or individuals suffering from disadvantage in Australia. Question 31(b) Criteria Accurately identifies a range of legal AND non-legal responses to both issues With reference to criteria (explicit or implicit), makes a sound judgement of the effectiveness of both legal and non-legal responses in achieving justice Integrates relevant examples such as legislation, cases, media and international instruments and documents in the response Presents a sustained, logical and cohesive answer using relevant legal terminology and concepts Marks 13–16 Question 31(b) continues on the next page NSW Independent Trial Exams 2011 – Legal Studies Yr 11 Preliminary Exam: Marking Criteria - Page 2 Question 31(b) continued Identifies a range of legal and/or non-legal responses to both issues Attempts a judgement of the effectiveness of both legal and/or non-legal responses in 8–12 achieving justice Uses relevant examples such as legislation, cases, media, international instruments and documents in the response Presents a logical answer using relevant legal terminology and concepts Outlines some legal and/or non-legal responses to legal issues May refer to legislation, cases, media, international instruments and documents Presents an answer using some legal terminology and concepts Presents some information about legal issues 4–7 1–3 NSW INDEPENDENT TRIAL EXAMS – 2011 LEGAL STUDIES YR 11 EXAMINATION MARKING GUIDELINES QUESTI ON MARKS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OUTCOME ASSESSED Section I P1, P2, P3, P5 Section II 26(a) 26(b) 26(c) 27 28(a) 28(b) 29 30 2 4 4 5 2 3 5 10 31(a) 32(b) 4 16 P1, P5, P6 P1, P2, P3, P5, P6, P9 P1, P2, P3, P5, P6, P9 P1, P2, P3, P5, P6, P9 P1, P2, P3 P1, P2, P3, P6, P9 P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P9 P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, P10 Section III P1, P2, P3 P1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, P10 NSW Independent Trial Exams 2011 – Legal Studies Yr 11 Preliminary Exam: Marking Criteria - Page 3 NSW Independent Trial Exams 2011 – Legal Studies Yr 11 Preliminary Exam: Marking Criteria - Page 4