Name of Teacher: School: HCPSS Student Learning Objective AP Microeconomics/Macroeconomics– Social Studies Content Component Student Learning Objective (SLO) Population Learning Content Instructional Interval Evidence of Growth Baseline Rationale for Student Learning Objective Target Description 100% of students will demonstrate growth toward mastery of analysis of given economic situations and presenting and evaluating general microeconomic or macroeconomic principles. Advance Placement Microeconomics/Macroeconomics; all students HCPSS Social Studies Essential Curriculum, College Board approved AP Economics syllabus, CCSS for History and Technical Subjects. School year 2013-2014 (one year) 1. First quarter administration of baseline free response question. Student responses will be scored using the district approved economic analysis rubric. 2. Quarterly administration of AP free response questions. Student responses will be scored using the district approved economic analysis rubric. Summary of score of baseline results: Basic - _____ students earned a score of _____ on the baseline assignment Developing - _____ students earned a score of _____ on the baseline assignment. Proficient - _____ students earned a score of _____ on the baseline assignment. Exemplary - _____ students earned a score of _____ on the baseline assignment. (Attach class roster to share students’ scores on Beginning-of-the-Year Assessment.) Growth in social studies skills, processes, concepts, and content will be measured by CollegeBoard developed tasks and a common district approved rubric in order to prepare students for success on the AP exam. Social studies content, skills, and processes are based on the State Social Studies Standards. These standards increase in rigor and complexity each year, and are designed to prepare students for high school social studies coursework and advanced level classes in history and other social sciences. Students will show growth in the application of macroeconomics and microeconomics skills, processes, concepts, and content on a range of summative assessments and/or performance tasks. Growth will be determined by improving scores on the district approved Economic Analysis Rubric or by maintaining scores on more complex tasks. This SLO is a sample. Targets need to be adjusted based on your students’ data. Student growth should be achieved for all students. Criteria for Effectiveness Strategies *Please note: Students identified by IEP teams as having significant cognitive disabilities will have individual targets. Partial Full Attainment of Insufficient Attainment of Attainment of Target Target Target More than 90% of Between 75% and Less than 75% of students students meet 90% of students meet agreed upon learning agreed upon meet agreed upon targets. learning targets. learning targets. Provide opportunities for students to demonstrate their understanding of social studies skills, processes, and content by representing knowledge in multiple ways. Students will analyze and evaluate economic problems which will then be used to support student free response essays. Provide opportunities for formative checks on student learning through performance tasks. This SLO is a sample. Targets need to be adjusted based on your students’ data. Student growth should be achieved for all students. Economic Analysis Rubric Topic is teacher generated Supports Practices from Common Core Dimensions 1, 3 & 4 Process Criteria Exemplary 4 Proficient 3 Developing 2 Claim/Topic Selection Succinctly states a manageable claim/topic that addresses all aspects of the prompt. Succinctly states a manageable claim/topic that addresses relevant aspects of the prompt. Evidence/ Background Research Analysis of Evidence and Reasoning Synthesizes in-depth information and data provided by the stimulus Presents in-depth information and data provided by the stimulus States a claim/topic that while manageable, is too narrowly focused and omits relevant aspects of the prompt. Presents information and data that addresses the stimulus in a limited capacity. Product Conclusions/ Implications Thoroughly identifies and explains appropriate economic concepts. Accurately interprets evidence without any misconceptions Cites patterns, differences, or similarities related to the question The question is fully answered citing textual and/or statistical evidence that skillfully addresses the stimulus. Identifies and explains most appropriate economic concepts Interprets evidence without interfering misconceptions. Cites some patterns, differences, or similarities related to the question. The question is answered citing textual and/or statistical evidence based on research and plausibly addresses the claim. Basic 1 States a claim/topic that is far too general and wide-ranging and does not address aspects Presents information and data that does not address the stimulus. States or briefly includes more than one point of view Interprets evidence with minimal misconceptions Cites limited patterns, differences, or similarities related to the question. Some attempt is made to answer the question citing textual and/or statistical evidence that minimally addresses the claim. The conclusions ineffectively address future imitations or implications This SLO is a sample. Targets need to be adjusted based on your students’ data. Student growth should be achieved for all students. Does not take into account more than one point of view No interpretation due to significant misconceptions Does not cite patterns, differences, or similarities related to the question Little or no attempt is made to answer the question using textual/statistical evidence and the claim is not addressed The conclusions are minimal or missing. AP Econ Assessment Topics Based on Previous AP Exams AP Macroeconomic Free Response Questions with links to the *task-specific rubrics can be found at: http://apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/members/exam/exam_information/2083.html *For the purpose of SLOs, teachers should use our locally designed, holistic rubric. This is designed to assess broad skills as opposed to specific content and ensures consistency across the school system. 1 2011 FRQ / Rubric 2011 B FRQ / Rubric 2010 FRQ / Rubric 2010 B FRQ / Rubric 2009 FRQ / Rubric 2009 B FRQ/Rubric 2 3 Loanable funds market, Phillips Curve (SR and LR), AD/AS, investment demand and real RRR, OMO, money multiplier, fiscal policy, OMO, money market, interest rates, forex market, bond market, SR to LR in AD/AS determinant of exchange rates AD/AS, determinants of AD, Phillips Forex markets, impact of Calculating GDP, nominal and Curve (SR and LR), automatic fiscal exchange rates on AD/AS, real, price indexes, nominal and policy, loanable funds market with monetary policy's effects on real wages, nominal and real crowding-out, SR to LR in the AD/AS exchange rates interest rates model AD/AS, fiscal policy, SR to LR in Forex markets, impact of Money market, money AD/AS, loanable funds market with exchange rates on AD/AS, demand, bond market, OMO crowding-out, Investment demand determinants of exchange rates OMO, money market, effect of Determinants of AD/AS, impact AD/AS, Fiscal policy, SR Phillips monetary policy on exchange of various supply and demand Curve, crowding-out, PPC rates shocks Forex market, loanable funds Phillips Curve (SR/LR) OMO, Money market, determinants of RRR, money multiplier, OMO Market, AD/AS exchange rates AS/AD, Phillips Curve, Fiscal Policy, Multiple Deposit Expansion, Long Run Adjustment Inflation, Money Market FOREX, Loanable Funds Phillips Curve, Budget, Multipliers, Loanable Funds, Growth Balance of Payments, FOREX Trade 2008 B FRQ/Rubric AS/AD, Fiscal policy, Loanable Funds, FOREX Trade Barriers, Balance of Payments GDP, Inflation 2007 FRQ/Rubric 2007 B FRQ/Rubric Money Market, FOREX, AS/AD Monetary Policy, Multiple Deposit Expansion, Nominal v. Real Interest rates GDP AS/AD, Money Market, Long run adjustment Loanable Funds, Growth Balance of Payments, FOREX 2006 FRQ/Rubric AS/AD, FOREX Money Market, Loanable Funds, Nominal v. Real interest rates Unemployment, Phillips Curve 2008 FRQ/Rubric This SLO is a sample. Targets need to be adjusted based on your students’ data. Student growth should be achieved for all students. 2006 B FRQ/Rubric AS/AD, Long run adjustment, Loanable Funds, Growth Multiple Deposit Expansion FOREX AS/AD, Monetary Policy, Nominal v. Loanable Funds, FOREX Real interest rates Phillips Curve 2005 B FRQ/Rubric Policy Mix, AS/AD, Phillips Curve Growth Loanable Funds, FOREX 2004 FRQ/Rubric AS/AD, Monetary Policy, Long run adjustment Interest rates, FOREX Multiple Deposit Expansion AS/AD, Phillips Curve, Monetary Policy, Supply – side Balance of Payments, FOREX, Trade interest rates, investment AS/AD, Policy Mix Inflation Trade AS/AD, Fiscal Policy, Loanable Funds, FOREX, Growth Trade Phillips Curve 2002 FRQ/Rubric Policy Mix, AS/AD Growth Balance of Payments, FOREX 2002 B FRQ/Rubric AS/AD, Policy Mix, FOREX Consumption & Saving, Loanable Funds, Growth Balance of Payments, FOREX 2001 FRQ/Rubric AS/AD, Fiscal Policy, Supply-side, Growth Interest rates, FOREX Multiple Deposit Expansion 2000 FRQ/Rubric AS/AD, Fiscal Policy, Investment FOREX Money Market, AS/AD 1999 FRQ/Rubric Interest rates, FOREX, AS/AD, Policy GDP, Growth Mix 2005 FRQ/Rubric 2004 B FRQ/Rubric 2003 FRQ/Rubric 2003 B FRQ/Rubric Growth This SLO is a sample. Targets need to be adjusted based on your students’ data. Student growth should be achieved for all students. AP Microeconomic Free Response Questions Year and form (A or B) FRQ #1 topic FRQ #2 topic FRQ #3 topic 2011 A Monopoly, profit maximization, efficiency, elasticity, price discrimination Perfect competition, labor market, marginal cost, PC labor market, MRC and MRP Market failure, negative externalities, lump-sum tax 2011 B Perfect competition in the shortrun and long-run Market failure, positive externalities, price ceiling, subsidies Labor market, monopsony, MRC and MRP, minimum wage 2010 A Perfect Competition, elasticity, related goods' prices, determinants of demand, Resource markets, derived demand, MRP=MRC, Consumer and Producer surplus, negative exernalities, MSB=MSC, excise tax 2010 B Natural Monopoly, allocative efficiency, accounting profit vs economic profit, elasticity and the TR test, effects of increased competition in a monopolistic market Labor market, MRP=MRC, Law of PED, PES, Excise tax and tax Diminishing Marginal Returns, burden, YED derived demand 2009 B Monopolistic Competition, MR=MC, shut-down rule, longrun equilibrium in imperfect competition, economies of scale Utility Maximization, XED, income and substitution effects Oligopoly, game theory, payoff matrix, dominant strategy, subsidy 2008 A Perfect Competition, subsidy, long-run equilibrium, MR=MC Utility maximization, PED, excise tax Price ceiling, natural monopoly, allocative efficiency 2008 B Natural Monopoly, MR=MC, Price ceiling, allocative efficiency, consumer surplus Market failure, positive externalities, MSC/MPC, MSB/MPB. Excise tax Diminishing returns, MRP=MRC, Resource markest 2007 A Market models, Monopoly, tax vs. subsidy PC Labor market, MRP=MRC, productivity Oligopoly, game theory, payoff matrixes, dominant strategy, collusion 2007 B Market models, monopolistic competition, MR=MC, elasticity, allocative efficiency Oligopoly, game theory, payoff matrixes, dominant strategy, collusion ATC vs. AVC, profit maximization and ATC, shutdown decision 2006 A Market Models, Monopoly, MR=MC, elasticity, subsidy MC, profit maximization, MR=MC, impact of tax S&D, determinants of D, subsidies, determinants of S, externalities, socially optimal level of output 2006 B Market models, Monopoly, MR=MC, shutdown decision Perfect Competition, S&D, consumer and produce surplus, price ceiling Labor Market, perfect competition, MRP=MRC 2005 A Market Models, MR=MC, Perfect competition, barriers to entry S&D, compliments, elasticity, consumer surplus DWL Labor Market, Perfect competition, MRP=MRC, Diminishing marginal returns This SLO is a sample. Targets need to be adjusted based on your students’ data. Student growth should be achieved for all students. 2005 B Market Models, MR=MC, Labor Markets, Monopoly, MRP=MRC Market Models, MR=MC, Perfect competition, cost curves, SR supply curve S&D, copmliments, elasticity, TR test 2004 A Market Models, externalities, Monopoly, PC, allocative efficiency S&D, trade and tariffs, consumer/producer surplus Market Models, MR=MC, monopolistic competition, LR changes in fixed costs 2004 B Market Models, MR=MC, monopoly, price/MR relationship, profits, elasticity Tax incidence, S&D, elasticity S&D, trade and tariffs, consumer/producer surplus 2003 A Market models, externalities, MR=MC, P=MC Market Models, MR=MC, monopoly, consumer surplus and DWL Market Models, Labor market, MRP=MRC, productivity 2003 B Market Models, MR=MC, PC/Monopoly, DWL, long-run profits S&D, tariffs and trade, consumer/producer surplus Labor market in perfect competition, MRP=MRC, changes in price and wages 2002 A Market Models, Labor market, PC in product and labor markets, long-run PC Negative externalities, S&D, free riders, MSC=MSB Marginal utility, equimarginal principal, MU/P = MU/P = 1 2002 B Market Models, MR=MC, PC, monopolistic competition, consumer/producer surplus Negative externalities, S&D, MSC=MSB Labor market, MRP=MRC, S&D, derived demand, price floor 2001 Perfect competition, MR=MC, price ceiling, supply curve in PC Negative externalities, P=MC, S&D, socially-optimal output level Labor market, MRP=MRC, PC 2000 Market models, MR=MC, PC/Monopoly, allocative efficiency Labor market, MRP=MRC, costs, profit S&D, tariffs and trade, world price, substitute goods, elasticity S&D, substitute goods, derived demand Comparative and absolute advantage, PPC, grid for comp. advantage, terms of trade Market models, MR=MC, PC/Monopoly, relationship b/w MR and P 1999 This SLO is a sample. Targets need to be adjusted based on your students’ data. Student growth should be achieved for all students.