18: Min Zhong - Organic aerosol and its climate impact

advertisement

2013 FL A&WMA Conference

Organic aerosol and its climate impact

Min Zhong and Myoseon Jang

Sept. 24, 2013

Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences

University of Florida

Aerosol: Key to improve climate prediction cooling heating

Green House Gases, small uncertainty

Atmospheric aerosol, large uncertainty

How aerosol affects climate

Direct effect

• scattering

• absorbing

Indirect effect

• modifying cloud properties

3

Why study aerosol light absorption?

1 Only absorption causes heating

2

Only a few types of aerosol absorb light,

BC, OC , and mineral dusts.

4

POA & SOA

Direct

Emission

P rimary

O rganic

A erosol

VOC

Emissions

Oxidation

Reactions

(OH, O

3

, NO

3

)

Nucleation or

Condensation

S econdary

O rganic

A erosol

5

Role of OC in climate forcing

5%

22%

1. OC is 95 wt% of carbonaceous aerosol

73%

BC POA SOA global OC budget (154 Tg/yr)

Source: IPCC 2007

2. Climate effect of OC has been poorly understood

 Current model assumption: OC has no light absorption

(Maria et al. 2004 ; Hoyle et al. 2009)

 Recent research: OC has light absorbing capacity, d-limonene SOA, POA

(Bones et al. 2010; Laskin et al. 2010 )

SOA

Non-absorbing aerosol POA Black carbon

Motivation: What is the role of OC in climate system?

6

Objectives

To quantify aerosol’s climate impact, light absorption parameter is required.

MAC: mass absorption cross section (m 2 /g)

Light absorption property

SOA

Warming or cooling

POA

7

Integrating sphere

Light absorption measurement

Principle of the method: Beer Lambert’s law ln(I

0

/I) = b v

V/A detector filter sample ln(I

0

/I) = C b v

V/A

UV/Vis light

How to obtain mass absorption cross section(MAC) ?

MAC = b v

/M b v

: absorption coefficient (m -1 ) V: the volume of air drawn through the filter during a given sampling time, A is the area of the sample spot, M : aerosol mass concentration,

C=1.4845

8

SOA experiments

SOA generation  SOA UV-Vis spectra recording

NO x

O

3

UV lamp

2 m 3 Teflon Chamber

GC-FID filter holder pump

UV/Vis light

SMPS filter sample

VOCs, NO x

Inorganic seed

RUV-IS

9

15

Toluene

(TOL)

12

9

6

MAC of SOAs d -limonene

(DL)

α -pinene

(AP)

1,0

TOL SOA

DL SOA

AP SOA

0,8

0,6 toluene d-limonene

α-pinene

0,4

3

0,2

0

280 330 380 430 480 530 580 wavelength(nm)

0,0

λ = 350nm λ = 450nm

 MAC of TOL is 10 times higher than DL and AP

 more double bond , higher light absorbing

Zhong and Jang, AE, 2011

East

52m 3

POA experiment

West

52m 3

TUVR

T/RH

TUVR T/RH

Wood smoke

O

3

SMPS

FTIR

NO x

GC-MS

TEOM

RUV-IS

OC/EC

Hickory wood

Smoldering burning to reduce the formation of BC

11

MAC of POA

b abs ( OC )

1 A

Abs

OC ln

C V

MAC

OC

 b abs ( OC )

M

OC

 Increase in morning : chromophore formation in SOA or POA

 Decrease in afternoon : sunlight bleach

Zhong and Jang, ACPD, 2013 12

Radiative forcing of organic aerosol

RF of SOA is -0.09 ~ -0.06 w/m 2 (Hoyle et al. 2009)

“Aerosol optical properties of SOA were taken to be similar to POA”

(Hoyle et al. 2009).

In Myhre et al. (2007), they assume POA optical properties are equal to sulfate…

SOA = POA = Sulfate ?

13

Optical parameters from Mie calculation

Extinction cross section Aerosol asymmetry factor Single scattering albedo

1. Particle size distribution assume lognormal distribution, with count median diameter of

138nm, geometric standard of 2 nm (Kaul at el. 2012)

2. Complex refractive index

 assume n=1.44 (measured by Kim and Paulson, 2013), same from 280nm to 900nm.

 k is from my measurement k

MAC

 

4

,

Mie code from: http://www.hiwater.org/ , shared by Dr. Tami Bond

14

Optical parameters

Extinction cross section Aerosol asymmetry factor Single scattering albedo

Extinction cross section: similar

 Asym >0 scattering in the forward direction

SSA (SOA) > SSA(POA)

Mie code from: http://www.hiwater.org/

15

First estimation of radiative impact

 simple radiative efficiency: watts/(cm 3 aerosol)

2

Chylek, P. and Wong, 1995

1,5

1

0,5

0

-0,5

-1

-1,5

-2

280 380 sulfate RH=0%

POA RH=0%

SOA RH=0%

480 580 wavelength (nm)

680 780

1. SOA and sulfate are similar, cooling aerosol

2. POA is warming aerosol.

3. It should be cautious to replace with each other.

SOA = Sulfate ≠ POA

16

Radiative efficiency code from: http://www.hiwater.org/

Conclusions

 MAC of toluene SOA was the highest compared with MAC values for α-pinene SOA and d-limonene SOA

 MAC of POA increased in the morning and decreased in the afternoon due to the competition between chromophore formation and sunlight bleaching

 SOA is a cooling aerosol, with negative radiative forcing similar to sulfate. POA is a warming aerosol, with positive net forcing

17

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by grants from the National

Science Foundation (ATM-0852747) and the Alumni

Scholarship from the University of Florida.

18

Thank you

19

Download