~ Elliot Aronson ~ Helmreich, R., Aronson, E. J LeFan, J. (1970). To err is humanizing sometimes: Effects of self-esteem, competence, and a pratfall on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16(2), 259-264. Leon Festinger THEORY OF COGNITIVE DISSONANCE (1957) BASIC HYPOTHESIS If a person held two cognitions that were psychologically inconsistent, he or she would experience dissonance and would attempt to reduce dissonance much as one would attempt to reduce hunger, thirst, or any drive. The existence of dissonance, being psychologically uncomfortable, will motivate the person to try and reduce the dissonance and achieve consonance. Earthquake Research by Singh in India Epicenter In unaffected areas far away from the epicenter, people exhibited high levels of anxiety and spread rumors of impending further disaster. Why? Insufficient justification Why was the theory of cognitive dissonance (“insufficient justification) such a big deal? Helped to shift psychology from the focus on behaviorism (e.g., reinforcement paradigms) by: •Promoting the key role of cognition and motivation •Questioning the basic assumptions that greater rewards lead to an increase in behavior and that greater punishments are more effective •Showing that dissonance can produce long-term change •Demonstrating dissonance can affect important (major) issues •Use of a “new” experimental methodology (“experimental reality’) – extravagant scenarios/events (scripts, acting involved) Power of Large Reward/Severe Punishment versus Small Reward/Mild Punishment Also, offered different prediction regarding the catharsis hypothesis (psychoanalytic theory) Catharsis Hypothesis Dissonance Theory Aggress against another (hit, yell, call names); release violent tendencies; feel better; less likely to be aggressive in the future Aggress against another; justify one’s aggression by disparaging the victim; feel more hostile to victim; may aggress against victim again Inconsistency Attitude: “I’m not going to smoke cigarettes anymore” Behavior: Smoke cigarettes Some Options 1) Change behavior (e.g., Throw pack away) 2) Change cognitions (e.g., “Smoking isn’t all that bad”; “I don’t really smoke that much”) 3) Add supporting cognitions (e.g., “ Smoking relaxes me” “it helps me think better” More Cognitive Dissonance Occurs When: • Choice is involved • Individuals are responsible for any consequences of their behavior (and if the consequences could be anticipated) • Belief that negative consequences are likely to occur • One’s self-concept is involved. Regarding the self-concept, people strive to: • Preserve a consistent, stable, predictable sense of self • Preserve a competent sense of self • Preserve a morally good sense of self Administered an exam with prizes for winners. Almost impossible to win without Cheating is not good but not cheating. Made it so bad either fairly easy to cheat. Decide to cheat Do NOT cheat Cheating is no big deal Mills, J. (1958) Cheaters ought to be expelled COGNITIVE DISSONANCE FESTINGER & CARLSMITH (1$ - $20 Study) Asked to tell participant that the task was interesting (to lie) Perform boring task $1 $20 $20 | Boring Rate task $1 | Interesting • Which group rated the task as more interesting after lying, those paid $1 or $20 and why? Key is lack of sufficient external justification for one’s behavior Are aversive consequence necessary for dissonance to be produced? Hypocrisy and Condom Use Study Hypocrisy: Compose arguments for using condoms on video to be shown to HS students, Make a list of times they found it difficult to use them ~ Shower Study ~ Commitment Condition: Mindful Condition: Asked students if they were willing to sign a flyer (to be displayer on posters) encouraging people to save water in a gym Asked students to complete a water conservation survey designed to make them award of their proconservation attitudes, and that they sometimes were wasteful while showering. “Take shorter showers. Turn off water while soaping up. If I can do it, so can you.” Results: Those who signed the petition and were made aware of their past, wasteful showering behavior, took much shorter showers (average of 3.5 minutes! “TOY” STUDY Children rate desirability of toys Attractiveness Told not to play with the most desirable toy Attractiveness High High MILD THREAT SEVERE THREAT Children did not play with the “forbidden” toy Low Low Children rate the desirability of the toys a 2nd time after not playing with the desired Which group viewed the desirable toy most attractive? Why? From Freedman (1965). Results several weeks after receiving a mild versus severe threat to not play with the desirable (forbidden) toy Effort Justification Role of Severe Initiation Aronson & Mills (1959) ATTITUDES REGARDING MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION Original belief = “No” Asked to give speech opposite of their attitude (for legalization) Speech watched by research team Told speech taped and would be shown to high school students More positive views of legalization Attitudes regarding marijuana legalization