Teaching EDD Online Jeremy Brownfield, Instructor Jim Hubbard, Assistant Principal Ozark High School, Ozark, MO History of Online Courses at Ozark High School Implementation and Administrative Support Establishing a Need for Online 2011-12 School Year • Block Schedule: teach three of four 86 minute blocks per day • PLTW= 7 of 8 blocks COURSE SETIONS TOTAL STUDENTS IED 3 60 POE 2 35 DE 1 15 EDD 1** 6 Establishing a Need for Online 2013-14 School Year • Block Schedule: teach three of four 86 minute blocks per day • PLTW= 7 of 8 blocks Plus EDD Online COURSE SECTIONS TOTAL STUDENTS IED 3 60 POE 2 30 DE 2 21 EDD 1(7)* 19** PREPARING THE COURSE Online Syllabus Components • • • • • • • • Outline the time commitment Instructor availability Instructor contact and response time Assignment submission Course Tools What to do if you have problems General course questions discussion forum Virtual office hours Email to parents and students late spring or during the summer PREPARING THE COURSE The First Lesson • Train the students on the LMS • Video tutorials • Make them use everything you will use through out the year Lesson 1: Blackboard Intro Delivering Content Delivering Content Assignment Submission • • • • Blackboard only Engineer’s notebooks: every 3 weeks Portfolios: semester Final prototype ***I will not accept assignments via email*** Assessing Students How will we ensure they learn it? • • • • Responsibility Matrix Work session summaries Contact Log Discussion Board – Class Discussion Board – Individual Group Discussion Board Responsibility Matrix Bridge Project Names. 1. 2. Responsibility Matrix ● ● ● ● ● ● This matrix is the tool you will use to divide the points for the tasks shown below. Make a copy of the matrix, fill it out and share it back with your instructor. Some tasks must be equally shared, these are filled in for you. Each team members’ column must add up to exactly 80 points for the research phase, and 195 points for the design/building phase. Make sure the students labeled “1”, “2” above match the similarly labeled columns below. The work may be divided between members as the members agree. Point allocations may be changed with the approval of your instructor. Indicate who will lead in each task by highlighting in yellow. Due Value Std 1 Std 2 Share back a completed matrix 2.12 6 3 3 Submit research proposal * 2.19 8 Meet with outside expert by* 2.21 8 Research results from past years, history, and possible research topics. Copy, answer, and share back with your instructor. 2.21 40 20 20 Assemble test apparatus 2.21 20 Poster presentation of results * 2.25 30 Report results to class, (pwpt, etc) * 2.25 40 20 20 Task Research Phase: Pts rcvd Stdt 1 Pts rcvd Stdt 2 Work Summary Work Session Summary Group Members Date: 1/24/2013 Jesse Serrano Time: 1:30 pm Gunnar Fritsch Photo(s) of session Location OHS Shop Mentors present MR. Widmar Tasks Accomplished Converted inventor file to V-Carve Set up tech isel Milled top initial prototype Determined changes to set up Summary Mr. Widmar helped us covert our inventor file into a file type that was recognizable by the techno isel. We then set up our Styrofoam block in the TI to test how our design would be cut out. With the ball end mills available Mr. Widmar suggested we go back and adjust our fillet sizes .After milling the initial test piece we determined we would also need to make some adjustments to the speed of the machine. Mr. Widmar gave us some resources on where to locate mill speeds for various materials and mill sizes. All in all for a first trial we were happy with the results of the test mill. Adjustments will be made prior to next week’s test. If that goes well we would like to mill our final top half out of the plastic we have obtained. Next Scheduled meeting 1/31/13 Mr. Widmars shop, Ozark High School 1:30 PM Contact Logs Weekly Submission Ozark High School Engineering Design & Development Mr. Brownfield Name: Date: Period: Contact Log Name: Organization: Address: e-mail Receptionist or Primary Contact: Time Zone: Best time to call: Fax Phone Date Conversations, interviews, letters send or received, thank-you notes sent, phone calls, e-mails, faxes send or received, etc… Type of correspondence: P = phone call W = written E = e-mail F = fax I = interview or face-to-face conversation Type . Discussion Board • Weekly Class Discussion Board • Individual Group Discussion Board Online Discussion Rubric Engineering Design and Development Each discussion forum will be worth 10 points. It is not simply enough to make a few posts throughout the course of the discussion. To ensure a high score make sure your posts are well developed, use references or supporting material when possible and advance the discussion into further threads. While it is beneficial to disagree with others points of view in this forum please make sure you are respectful of others opinions and disagree in a professional and courteous manner. Criteria Participation 0 points Does not participate in the forum. 1 point Posts 1 time during the forum period. Initial posting Does not make an initial post responding to forum topic. Makes an initial post that is somewhat related to forum topic. Follow up posts Does not respond to other posts. Responds to other posts, but does not add information to the discussion. Resources references Uses no references, images, supporting materials, etc. Uses references, images or supporting materials. 2 points Posts 2-3 times during the forum. On two or more days. Makes an initial post that relates to all aspects of the topic with most aspects well thought out. Responds to other posts, and adds some information to discussion. 3 points Posts 4 or more times during the forum on different days. Makes an initial post that relates to all aspects of topic, with all elements fully addressed. Responds to other posts and adds to the discussion which allows it to advance. Student Submissions Hurdles to Student Achievement 3 out of 14 of my students use the time they are scheduled for the class to work on assignments. Hurdles to Student Achievement • • • • Lack of time management skills Lack of group communication Different schedules Lack of utilizing collaboration tools within Blackboard Intervention Strategies • • • • Email the students Call Home O-time/tutoring Students report to my room during online time Instructor Workload • 2 hours per week prepping the course – Lesson for following week posted by Friday • 1-2 hours per week grading/reviewing • Monday morning-emails go out to those missing work What Students Say About It Course Evaluation • • • • • Easy to navigate BlackBoard 50/50 on open endedness Most recognize time management as an issue Average log in is 3 times per week Text #1 method of partner communication “During my scheduled class time I either sleep or eat. I do my work on Sunday nights.” Quote from Actual EDD student. Suggestions • • • • • Develop templates for all online courses Training both prior to teaching and ongoing Develop a plan for students who struggle Set reasonable expectations for the first year Always be one to two weeks ahead Instructional Resources Screen Capture • Jing – http://www.techsmith.com/jing.html • www.screencast.com • http://www.screencast-o-matic.com/ Instructional Resources Miscellaneous • • • • www.knovio.com www.screencast.com www.screencast-o-matic.com/ bigbluebutton.org/ Useful Links • Maryland Faculty Online http://www.mdfaconline.org/index.html • Pasadena City College Online and Hybrid Course Syllabus Example http://online.pasadena.edu/faculty/files/2012 /02/Online-Syllabus-Example-CANVAS-NewLogin.pdf • Netiquette http://www.albion.com/netiquette/ Questions jeremybrownfield@mail.ozark.k12.mo.us jameshubbard@mail.ozark.k12.mo.us