Emotional Intelligence and the Brain Nancy Taylor and Shondi Lee County of Riverside Leadership Initiative *Emotional Intelligence * What is EQ and why is it important? How EQ develops The Brain the Mind and Relationships The first 4 years are key: Attachment Theory and Emotions Your EQ report: what it all means Retraining your brain My self awareness and ability to manage my own emotions while at the same time understanding what is happening with the other person and being able to make socially appropriate responses. * * * Significantly predicts success and overall wellbeing for individuals * 85% of an individual’s or organization’s financial success due to EQ…… (only 15% technical) * 4 times more predictive of future success than IQ * EQ = higher motivation, greater creativity, and higher achievement * Mind Energy & Information Flow Start* Brain Mechanical Adapted from The Developing Mind – Second Addition: Daniel J. Siegel Relationship Sharing-Attachment * Interpersonal Relationships * Influence how our mind functions throughout our lives * Shape the growth of the integrative, regulatory circuits * Have a dominant influence on the brain * Play an organizing role in the brain Subjective Experience * Shapes what energy and information enters the mind and how the brain processes the information * At birth there is no differentiation - infants use the upper brain functions of the care-giver to manage information flow. This directly impacts the development of the brain. Connections and pathways in a brain from birth to adult * * The need for attachment is innate with infants/children seeking proximity to key figures to provide safety and support for exploration. * Earliest attachments are formed by 7 months. * Nearly all infants become attached to only a few people. * Selective attachments are derived from social interaction. * Attachment relationships are crucial in the development of the brain. * The caregiving adult’s mind and patterns of communication directly shape the organization of the developing child’s brain. * The child learns to regulate through interactions with the caregiver. * 4 Attachment Strategies: Behaviors under stress * Securely attached (55-65%) Seeks parent for regulation, then moves to explore *Insecurely attached Avoidant (20-30%) Hides distress – avoids caregiver *Insecurely attached Ambivalent (5-15%) Seeks parent and remains distressed with focus on parent *Inconsistent attachment (20-40%) No organized strategy * SECURE * * * * – Caregivers: Sensitive and responsive to cues of infants and children Acknowledgement – Modulating - Mirroring Supported broad experience – managing injury and repair Open communication AVOIDANT – Caregivers: * * * * * Often unavailable to infants/children – unresponsive to cues Communication often broken or disconnected Acknowledgement and mirroring missing Denial of the child’s experience – “you’ll be fine, there’s nothing wrong” Learn independence early AMBIVILENT and Inconsistent– * * * * * Caregivers: High anxiety – Activated by needs of infants/children Erratic availability to infant/child – Sometimes “smothering” or “absent” Anxiety in family escalates easily Relationships, important and painful – wounded in relationships Children try to manage anxiety in family – to make it better * Lower Brain (brain stem)-reptilian brain * Regulates autonomic activity and provides physiological homeostasis Central Brain – limbic brain * Emotional seat of the brain Cortex – rational brain * Mediates complex information Neocortex Limbic Reptilian The reptilian brain • the oldest of the three • controls the body's vital functions • includes the main structures found in a reptile's brain (the brainstem and the cerebellum) • is reliable but tends to be somewhat rigid and compulsive. The limbic brain = emotional brain • emerged in the first mammals • (records memories of behaviors that produce agreeable and disagreeable experiences) • main structures are the hippocampus, the amygdala, and the hypothalamus* *produce hormones • the seat of value judgments we make, (often unconsciously), that exert a strong influence on our behavior. Neocortex Limbic Reptilian The neocortex • in primates and culminated in the human brain • two large cerebral hemispheres responsible for the development of human language, abstract thought, imagination, and consciousness. • is flexible and has almost infinite learning abilities. • has enabled human cultures to develop. These three parts of the brain do not operate independently of one another. They have established numerous interconnections through which they influence one another. The neural pathways from the limbic system to the cortex, for example, are especially well developed. “Emotions Drive the Bus!!!” * *Governs the flow of energy and information * Regulatory process that creates patterns in the energy flow * Core aspect of the mind is an embodied and relational process that regulates the flow of energy and information *Awareness occurs here – internal knowing * The minds process is always present *Our subjective, internal experience shapes our sense of self and our connections to others * * * The mind is relational Relationships shape how the mind emerges in our experience Integrative process makes relationships flexible and adaptive * * Yo-r br :n h s s-ff:c:ent b ckgro-nd :nformat:on from th:ngs yo-‘ve lre dy le rned to -nconsc:o-sly f:n:sh the words :n th:s sentence wh:ch re m:ss:ng letters. Your brain will fill in the “missing” information that your eyes are picking up through peripheral vision and process everything into a complete picture. Your brain will use the context of the phrase to assemble the full meaning for you. * Mind Energy & Information Flow Integration is Key Brain Mechanical Adapted from The Developing Mind – Second Addition: Daniel J. Siegel ©Learning In Action Technologies, 2012 Relationship Sharing-Attachment Hormone Releases * Cortisol flood – shuts down exec processes of the brain (strategy, trust building and compassion shut down). * Amygdala (instinctive brain) takes over and makes a chemical choice how to best protect itself (from shame and loss of power associated with being wrong). Results in the inability to regulate emotions or handle the responses. * Fight – keep arguing (most common and most damaging) * Flight – revert to and hide behind group consensus * Freeze – disengage from the argument by closing down * Appease – making nice by saying yes, meaning no; say what others want to hear * 4 Basic Human Fears 1. 2. 3. 4. Failure Being wrong Rejection Being emotionally uncomfortable * * The ratings are not as important as your willingness and ability to reflect on what the ratings mean to you and to provide behavioral illustrations of when, where, and how these patterns show up in your life. * 4 Dimensions Access to Range of Feelings Positive-Negative Orientation Self-Other Orientation Balanced Reliance on Thoughts, Wants, & Feelings Self-Reflection 2 Dimensions Empathy Empathy Accuracy Empathy Compassion * * Ability to: * Be aware now, in the moment * Notice your thoughts, wants, and feelings * Name your experience * Differentiate Self and Other * Ability to: * Accurately identify another’s experience * Experience a degree of compassion and sensitivity * Engage in empathic acknowledgement * * 7 categories of feelings * Anger, Anxiety, Fear, Joy, Love, Sadness, and Shame * Feelings are the primary drivers of our actions and decisions * Accessing all feelings at a healthy level expands our experiences and ability to make informed choices * Each feeling has a direct correlation to selfreflection and empathy dimensions * Each feeling has a gift * The ideal is to access Joy and Love approximately 50-55% of the time * Ideally the remaining 5 feelings (anxiety, fear, anger, shame, and sadness) should be accessed approximately 10% of the time * Number on top of bar reports the % of the time the feeling was reported. Bars add up to 100% of all reported feelings. Percentile ranking compares the % of time a particular feeling was reported with the total population for that same feeling. * • • • • Ideal (25-75th percentile) is the ability to feel anger without getting “caught” or “hijacked” there. Can give direction with the energy needed to make something happen. Can be helpful in setting appropriate boundaries. Shame is usually projected inward towards self, while anger is projected outward towards others Associated words: agitated, annoyed, appalled, disgusted, frustrated, irritated, outraged, rage, spiteful, upset, vindictive * ANGER High Reliance (>75th percentile) * * * * * * Common childhood family experience Be critical of others and/or place blame outside of themselves Tend to be “other” oriented Be intense in relationships and have high expectations of others Move towards being independent and intolerant of others Often bundle other feelings under Anger (e.g. High Anger, Low Anxiety and Fear) Low Reliance (<25th percentile) * * * * * Belief that anger is unacceptable and not tolerated Difficulty seeing risks and holding others accountable May tend to stay in unhealthy relationships longer than necessary May have difficulty setting personal boundaries May make excuses for others rather than accessing healthy anger * • Ideal (25-75th percentile) is the ability to feel anxiety without being immobilized. • Healthy levels serve to warn that something is not right. • Has the power to activate us to explore and be inquisitive. Associated words: confused, distant, dread, helpless, intense, nervous, numb, overwhelmed, paralyzed, perplexed, queasy, skeptical, stressed, uneasy * ANXIETY High Reliance (>75th percentile) * * * Planful, careful, cautious, develop a plan “B” * Childhood family experience included blaming and shaming with limited support or understanding from caregivers See the situation and other people with less clarity when stressed May have perfectionistic or compulsive tendencies – method used to decrease or manage anxiety Low Reliance (<25th percentile) * May bundle the anxiety feeling under something different, such as joy, fear, or anger (if high in these areas). Joy feels better than anxiety. * * * Rely upon a high degree of confidence in stressful situations Experienced by others as having a “low anxious presence” Open to take in information; feel grounded and safe * • Ideal (25-75th percentile) reflects an ability to feel fear, remain connected to others, and to manage it in effective ways. • Provides motivation to protect one’s self against some force. Associated words: alarmed, defensive, doubtful, dread, frightened, reluctant, startled, suspicious, tense, worried * FEAR High Reliance (>75th percentile) * * * * * Withdraw from others to protect themselves * * Be highly motivated by achievement and action as a way of managing fear Blame others or self May become highly anxious and become immobilized Lose trust easily in self and others May have spent all or some of their early years in “unsafe” environments where fear was very appropriate More negative, towards themselves and others Low Reliance (<25th percentile) * * * * * Feel safe in relationships Have high vitality and joy Have higher tolerance for allowing in information, even if not in agreement Experienced as more flexible and agile with great resilience Have grown up in “safe families” where there was limited fear or appropriate protection and support during frightening times for a child * • • • • Ideal (25-75th percentile) Measures ones level of emotional vitality, available emotional energy, and confidence for involvement during a challenging or difficult situation. Joy is NOT relational and is not a measure of happiness. “The more you are yourself, the more emotional energy you have.” Associated words: alive, bold, brave, capable, comfortable, confident, curious, delighted, dynamic, eager, elated, energized, excited, glad, gleeful, hopeful, joyful, optimistic, passionate, peaceful, relaxed, safe, self-assured, surprised * JOY High Reliance (>75th percentile) * * * * * * Highly confident Enjoy involvement when challenged Experience a vitality, eagerness, and energy for easy high energy involvement Experienced by others as larger than life (when coupled with high love) Be action oriented, easily taking charge Be more independent Low Reliance (<25th percentile) * * * * * Depleted with low emotional energy for relationships or involvement Depletion may be burn-out, depression, chronic fatigue, or general cautiousness in life Be more cautious in relationships – may have limited intimate relationships Watch and wait when being challenged Go inside of themselves to consider what is happening before getting involved * • Ideal (25-75th percentile) reflects an ability to retain some degree of positive feelings towards others when being challenged. • Love is relational. Associated words: attention, caring, comforting, compassion, concerned, encouraged, engaged, gentle, honored, open, respect, secure, tender * LOVE High Reliance (>75th percentile) * * * * * Be people oriented Feel safe in relationships Enjoy others Extend themselves to others Have warm relationships Low Reliance (<25th percentile) * * * * * Be more cautious in relationships Withdraw warm emotional energy from others when challenged Go inside of themselves as they consider what is happening Often have limited positive relationships with others Move towards protecting themselves by pulling inside and potentially disconnecting from relationships * • Ideal (25-75th percentile) reflects an ability to feel our sadness without being captured by it. • Sadness brings sensitivity to other’s pain as well as our own. • High sadness does not mean one walks around sad. • Sadness has an element of helplessness in it. • When we see someone we care about suffer, and we cannot help them, we often experience sadness. Associated words: crushed, disappointed, discouraged, distraught, distressed, empty, grief, lonely, lost, miserable, mournful, remorseful, resigned, sorry, terrible * SADNESS High Reliance (>75th percentile) * * * * Experience sadness from difficult situations (death, divorce, loss of a job, etc.) Blame others or a situation outside of themselves Have some degree of feeling helpless because the essence of loss Be touched when reading sad books or watching sad movies Low Reliance (<25th percentile) * * * Have not experienced significant loss in their lives where they have experienced grief Have lower Empathy Compassion because they do not identify with pain or loss At times have higher anger ratings where distress gets focused * • Ideal (25-75th percentile) reflects a healthy level of shame for essential well-being, healthy relationships, integrity, and sense of humility. • Shame is characterized by “not being good enough” and “not doing enough” • Characterized by perfectionism, overly developed sense of responsibility, strong values, high expectations of self and giving oneself very little margin for error. • Shame is usually projected inward towards self, while anger is projected outward towards others Associated words: ashamed, burdened, condemned, culpable, despised, disgrace, dread, embarrassed, guilty, harassed, humiliated, inept, inadequate, regretful * SHAME High Reliance (>75th percentile) * Hyper-vigilant in presenting themselves well to others, including looking good, sounding good, seeming highly competent, and living a respectable, moral life * * * * * * Easily become defensive Blame themselves and others Quickly personalize a situation Have a strong moral sense and judgment of others Get wounded easily in relationships – intense in relationships Be judgmental of others – allowing little grace Low Reliance (<25th percentile) * * * * Have poor boundaries May miss seeing risks or difficulties because they do not see they have limits Be more cautious in relationships Have difficulty seeing how they contributed to a difficult situation With a partner: 1. What about your feeling scores surprised you? Why? 2. What did your scores validate for you…(you already knew about yourself)? 3. For any/all emotions where your score exceeded the ideal range, how would you describe the behaviors you exhibit when these emotions are felt? 4. For any/all emotions where your score exceeded the ideal range, how did these scores validate feedback you have received in the past? * Positive-Negative Orientation measures the degree of optimism that one maintains even in the midst of stress or when one is being directly challenged. The ideal is 75% positive with 25% negative orientation. This maintains a positive orientation while maintaining the capacity to see real risk, problems, or potential danger. * High Level (>75th percentile) * Bring a positive orientation to situations and see the glass as half-full, even in the midst of chaos * Positive force with others – contributes to creativity and willingness to go for it * Too high (>80th percentile) fail to see risks, honest problems, and difficulties that could negatively impact the individual or the group Low Level (<25th percentile) * * * Focus on problem – what is wrong vs. right * See others as negative – create negative stories * Avoid risks More detail oriented May be the one in the group saying “it can’t be done” * Self-Other Orientation is the degree we focus on ourselves and the degree we focus on others when challenged. The ideal is 50/50 (80+ percentile ranking), moving between internal and external focus easily. This allows us to stay connected though we may have different values or views * OTHER FOCUSED * * * * * Focus outside of themselves at the situation, problem, or other person * Work hard for others – devastated when not rewarded or acknowledged Be excellent “fixers” – focus on fixing the problem vs. focusing on the relationship Withdraw/disconnect from relationships during times of high stress Don’t pay attention to their own feelings or experience; get depleted Focus on achieving and doing what is demanded without listening to their own voice or needs * SELF-FOCUSED * * * * * * Excessively responsible Easily wounded in relationships Struggle with boundaries – take on more than is theirs Personalize things that have nothing to do with them Relationships are important and take on responsibility for them May have grown up in families where they learned at a young age that they can make a difference. May have taken on parenting role. Tend to learn that they are more powerful than they really are and take on the responsibility with that. * This dimension measures one’s ability to access their thoughts, wants, and feelings while in a difficult interaction. The ideal is to rely upon them equally. This dimension offers powerful stability and strengthens a person’s ability to communicate effectively with others. With your partner: 1. Look at your Self/Other Orientation and the characteristics described. 2. Look at the Political Scripts we started with today. How does your ‘self’ or ‘other’ description mesh with the political scripts you use most often? * BALANCED (>75TH percentile) * Tend to be viewed as stable, reliable, consistent, someone to be counted on * Safe, easy to talk to and be with * “What you see is what you get” * Has a great ability to reduce anxiety among a group during stressful times * Sought out by others during stressful times or a crisis due to their stability * Note: this does not correlate with a strong positive orientation. One could be quite negative, but still valued for their stability and consistency * Stronger Reliance on WANTS * Move to action faster than others around them and may not allow time to analyze the situation * May “steamroll” over others in the group when they are not ready to move at the same pace * May miss their own feelings during stressful situations and increase the risk of a misstep * Lose trust and collaboration of others because “you will push through what you want anyway” * Use moving to action as a powerful self-soothing strategy – helps reduce tension or stress * Stronger Reliance on THOUGHTS * Highly developed analytical ability * Move into their own heads to solve problems, especially when stressed * Focus on problem-solving and detail * May move to decision-making slower than some would like * Want to ensure accuracy so may be overly cautious and careful * Stronger Reliance on FEELINGS * * Awareness of feelings in the moment * * Use feelings as important information to be considered in the moment May get “hijacked by the amygdale” or stuck in feelings if the dominant feelings are fear or anger May be experienced by others as “too feely” or emotional depending on how much is expressed Under Reliance on FEELINGS * * * * Difficult to name feelings during time of stress May be able to identify feelings after the crisis Be expressive with underlying emotion that is apparent to others but not the individual May “misstep” during times of emotional intensity because they do not have conscious access to the fundamental driver of everything we do * This dimension measures one’s ability to focus on the other and accurately identify what they are experiencing, including thinking, feeling, wanting, and their intentions. It does not imply any feelings towards the other person. The ideal level is to rate at or above the 75th percentile. * High Level * * Ability to easily and accurately focus on the other person Tune in to what is happening with another person, situation, or group Medium Level * Ability to read others well during normal times and lose some of the capacity when under stress * If they are experiencing strong levels of fear, anger, anxiety, or shame, they may stop attending to the other and/or misread others * To stop the negative “story” one may be telling themselves diminishing the quality or value of the relationship, it’s important to inquire with the other person about their experience Low Level * * * * Lose ability to see others accurately during times of stress – misreading or not noticing Misinterpret others when challenged or stressed Create negative “stories” about others Tend to minimize their impact on others because of the misinterpretation * This dimension measures one’s ability to know what it’s like to be in someone else’s shoes or to feel another person’s experience. This also measures one’s capacity to stay emotionally connected vs. disconnecting during stressful or difficult interactions. The ideal is to rate at the 75th percentile or greater. * High Level * * * * Value and enjoy relationships – experienced by others as sensitive, caring, and available Stay connected with others even when challenged or stressed Maintain positive orientation towards self and others when challenged As leaders, stating clear intentions may be useful at times which creates a boundary between being personally compassionate and holding others accountable Medium Level * * Ability to stay connected to others to some degree when challenged or stressed May become serious or task-oriented, but most likely will not withdrawal or disconnect from others Low Level * * * * Withdraw or disconnect from others when challenged or stressed May be dismissive and lack a sense of caring Turn inward to protect their emotional energy Have more difficulty creating and sustaining healthy relationships – challenges with intimacy With your partner: 1. What are the implications of your empathy accuracy and empathy compassion scores on your leadership effectiveness? 2. What do you feel you need to work on? * SELF-REGULATION How I manage myself in relationship under stress. Two Key points: 1. The relationship strategies measure the behavior we tend to call upon when challenged. 2. These behaviors are driven by the self-reflection and empathy dimensions. * Individual 4 bars add up to 100%. Top of bars report the % of time the strategy was reported. Percentile ranking compares individual ratings to entire population and shows the significance of the difference. * High Trust of Self & Other Measures the degree an individual can easily share authority, listen and be open to others, and works and plays with others collaboratively. The ideal is to rely on this strategy 50-60% of the time. The adult attachment strategy is Secure. * High Reliance (Ideal - 50-60%) * * * * Maintain access to their own experience and a desire to maintain access to the other Take responsibility for their own contribution in a conflict Capacity to feel compassion towards the other Capacity to recognize and welcome different perspectives Medium Level (45-50%) * * Ability to stay connected with others to a degree when challenged or stressed May become serious or task-oriented when challenged, but will most likely not disconnect Low Level (<45%) * * * * * Have difficulty staying connected in healthy ways with others Tend to withdraw or remain in a dependent position in relationships Often lack emotional energy (Joy) to rely heavily on this strategy May have high Disconnected where they lose trust in everyone Have difficulty creating and sustaining healthy relationships – challenges with intimacy * High Trust of Self - Low Trust of Other I’ll do it myself Characterized by a drive to withdraw from a relationship under stress and become very independent or to take authority in a “control and command manner.” The ideal is to rely on this strategy 15-20% of the time. The adult attachment strategy associated with independent is Avoidant. * Ideal Reliance (15-20%) * * * * * * Find ease and enjoyment working independently Can focus and take charge in times of crisis Can be decisive without disconnecting from others Can take appropriate risks, trusting themselves and their abilities Can both take and give authority to others As leaders, provide structure and clarity others need to achieve objectives Excessive Reliance (>25%) * * * * * Becomes very independent and disconnects from others Difficulty delegating and giving authority to others Take authority in a “control and command” manner Overly rely on structure, policy, and procedures which leave others feeling dismissed/demoralized Difficulty listening to others, staying connected, and valuing other opinions Low Reliance (<15%) * * * Difficulty being decisive Find difficulty in taking charge or command…doubt themselves May be experienced by others as a pushover or weak leader * Low Trust of Self - High Trust of Other Characterized by staying connected to others when challenged. The ideal is to rely on this strategy 15-20% of the time, having a similar or equal balance of reliance on the independent strategy. The adult attachment strategy is Anxious Ambivalent. * Ideal Reliance (15-20%) * * * * * * Stay connected to others when challenged and value/enjoy relationships Move towards others with high trust during crisis/high stress Approval and support of others is important Can be excellent leaders for mature teams and for mentoring Show appreciation of others, value others input and opinions, good listeners May be experienced as “overly sensitive” or “needy” by those relying heavily on independent Excessively High Reliance (>25%) * * * * Easily wounded in relationships Give away own personal and professional power to maintain relationships Difficulty making hard decisions Others may experience these leaders as weak Low Reliance (<15%) * * * Withdraw from others when challenged Find difficulty giving others authority and may rely on the Disconnected strategy Have more difficulty with creating and sustaining healthy relationships. * Low Trust of Self and Other Reflects a lack of emotional safety in relationships. This includes feelings of hopelessness and a readiness to give up. The ideal is to rely on this strategy 7-11% of the time. This strategy is useful because not all relationships are successful, regardless of the level of commitment or energy one invests. The adult attachment strategy is Disorganized. * Ideal Reliance (7-11%) * Can assess the situation and make a conscious choice about staying or leaving a relationship. This decision is based on all the dimensions in the tool. * Can state clear intentions which creates a boundary between being personally compassionate and holding others accountable * Have the internal capacity to weigh the situation, maintain awareness that they have choices, and rely on internal and external information to make wise decisions Excessively High Reliance (>14%) * May physically and emotionally leave relationships prematurely, personal or professional, without analyzing their options first * Others may stay (physically, not emotionally) in an unhealthy relationship (or job) unable to see other options * Staying in the unhealthy relationship then causes resentment, unhappiness. Individuals feel taken advantage of and blame others. Low Reliance (<5%) * * * * * Don’t allow themselves to feel pain or distress Have high joy and/or confidence in themselves Rely heavily on Interdependent strategy Believe that they can make things ok, or fix it, by working long and hard enough As leaders, these individuals risk not knowing when to quit or stop * Sample Profile #13 This individual is the leader of your organization. * * * * What strength(s) are represented in their report? Why? Which area(s) need development or a “work out”? Why? What implications could both of these have on the culture of the organization? How would you describe this individual as a leader if their report was representative of their leadership style? Sample Profile #18 This individual is the leader of your organization. * The path: eyes ears thalamus* amygdala before the neocortex (rational brain). The survival part of the brain has a hair trigger that can distort things and cause a quick but sloppy reaction. Animals and humans can respond to anything in the environment in one twelve thousandths of a second. *thalamus relays motor and sensory signals to the cerebral cortex. It also regulates sleep, alertness and wakefulness. * 1. Any strong emotion trips the amygdala – impairs the prefrontal cortex’s working memory. 2. The power of emotions overwhelms rationality which is why when we are emotionally upset or stressed we can’t think straight. 3. Amygdala - + blood and + oxygen = in cortex. Our thinking power is disrupted and there are deficits in our problem solving because of less blood in the brain! 4. It is like losing 10 to 15 IQ points temporarily… “What was I thinking???” …”Oh, wait…I wasn’t!” The “Invincible Power” cocktail 1 part cortisol 1 part adrenolin 1 part testosterone 1 part dopamine When the amygdala fires hormones, oxygen and blood goes away from the brain making thinking and problem solving almost impossible. Emotions overpower rationality= immediate loss of 15 IQ points * *Bill Clinton *Mike Tyson – Evander Holyfield’s ear *Eliot Spitzer, Gov of NY – involved in prostitution ring. Grad Princeton then Harvard Law seduced by pleasure and irrationality. *Organizational Hijack - ENRON * Emotions are contagious- if one person is emotionally hijacked on your team or organization most likely others will catch it, like the flu. * A team can quickly lose IQ points and jeopardize executive decisions and deteriorate the teamwork and collaboration. * The leaders’ ability to manage their emotions is paramount as they are the “emotional thermostat” for their team and can influence their team’s mood and productivity. The Hay Group has found that the leader has 70%+ influence over the climate of the team. * * Chemical Oxytocin –pituitary hormone * Activated by human connection and opens up the networks in our executive brain or prefrontal cortex – further increasing our ability to trust and open ourselves to sharing. * Goal: spur production of oxytocin in yourself and others while avoiding those spikes of cortisol and adrenaline. * * Women release more O than men. * As Oxy increases, empathy increases. * There is a direct link between O and concern for others. * The greater the O, the less cautious and more curious and more cooperative. * The more money humans have / get, the more testosterone that is produced. * The greater the testosterone, the greater the aggression, selfishness, entitlement and punishment. * New research* using the functional MRI science has learned that labeling strong feelings helps reduce their intensity and return some of the activity back to the cortex. For example, “You must be very sad about your loss.” * Labelling normalizes what they are feeling. The feelings are cognitively reappraised or reframed and thus less aroused. This is called “affect labeling.” * Self management is a leader’s ability to be aware of what they are experiencing as another data set of information and be able to accept, manage and adjust to their emotions. * 1. What am I thinking? (Basal ganglia- integrates feelings,thoughts and movements). 2. What am I feeling? (Basal ganglia- integrates feeling thoughts and movements) Temporal Lobes – emotional stability, name it to tame it – labeling affect.) 3. What do I want now? (Cerebellum – executive functions connects to Prefrontol Cortex (PFC), cognitive integration. 4. How am I getting in my way? Prefrontal Cortex – learning from mistakes. 5. What do I need to do differently now? (Prefrontal Cortex –the boss /supervisor of life – executive functioning, planning, goal setting, insight) Peer coach: value of having one. Pick one! Journal assignment: Identify the specific areas to work on. Look at the exercises in your manual and identify what, specifically you will do (and in what situations or with which individuals)? How will you know you are making positive progress in developing this area? Reptilian Most common: Rescue Rebel Look Good Be Pleasing Withdraw Be Aggressive Be Formal Be Super Rational * How do they see you … *Dealing with powerful people when you’re under stress? *Reacting when you know someone is disappointed in you? 2. Pick 2 or 3 political scripts: Identify what triggers each of these scripts. Write down how you use these scripts. What do you do? How do you respond? For Whom? * * Requires: 1. 2. 3. Facing the harsh realities. Seeing your contribution to the problem. Being authentic in the face of possible disapproval: what do you need to say and to whom do you need to say it?