Frantz Fanon
“Unveiling Algeria”
Fanon (1925-1961)
psychiatrist, revolutionary, theorist
biography
• Born in Martinique, then a French colony
• Studied psychiatry in France; wrote Black Skin,
White Masks (1952)
• Went to work in a psychiatric hospital in
Algeria, a French colony
• 1954: Joined the Front de Liberation
Nationale, the Algerian revolutionary group
• 1961: The Wretched of the Earth
“Unveiling Algeria”
• The veil: signifier of Arab society and its women: “she who
hides behind the veil” (36)
• The colonial specialists fixated on the veil; women seen as
victims of native patriarchy; a medieval and barbaric
practice
• Native reaction: preserving a constructed tradition
• The essay traces the checkered history of the veil in Algeria-its strategic adoption and repudiation, and a re-adoption
in the final phase of the revolution--that, according to
Fanon is entirely modern and evidence of the veil's
"historical dynamism" (63), for the traditional sense of the
veil had been exorcised through the medium of the
revolution.
Colonial images of Algerian women
Transforming the rules of engagement
• Drawing critically on the traditional conceptual equation of
femininity and space such that "both are charged with
absence of politics" or "the inability to act politically",
Fanon opens his description of the Arab city, soft,
feminized, as surrounded and "immobilized" by the
aggressive masculinized power of Europeans . This dynamic
of sexualized territorialization leaves the Algerian woman
"exposed".
• In response to this siege, the Arab town weaves a
"protective mantle" and "organic curtain of safety" around
the woman in the city who is firmly located at home (51). It
is precisely and specifically the revolutionary nationalist
upsurge that changes these terms of engagement.
Towards freedom
• What is unveiled in Fanon’s text is neither an
essence (native woman) nor a passage into
freedom (native woman who is emancipated),
but a demonstration of the uses that Algerian
women make of their assignation as subjects
lacking agency, thereby enabling them to
evade the logic of their discursive
determination as such.
Sadia Abbas, “The Echo-Chamber of
Freedom”
• The language of individualism and freedom,
secularism and modernity—hegemonised by
the West; used to mark boundaries
• The case of Turkey (as in Pamuk’s novel
Snow)—state-enforced secularism, leading to
a pan-Islamist reaction against secularism,
associated with the decline of Islamic power
Engendering Islam
• The choice to wear the veil subjected to manipulation
by both the state and the Islamists
• Women’s suicides—refusing the world: “Self-extinction
emerges as a refusal to surrender to extinction by
someone else, as a tragically ironic form of selfassertion.” ( 159)
• the veil as metonym: “The Muslim woman is the
object of imperial rescue, justification for imperial
warfare, Orientalist cipher, target of jihadist violence,
and, increasingly, the discursive site upon which the
central preoccupation of our time—how do you free
yourself from freedom?—is worked out.”
Academic discourse
•
•
•
•
•
Women as bearers of Muslim identity
Anxieties generated by the veil: both philic and phobic
Badiou, Scott, Le Carre, Puar, Mahmood
“adjudicating among Muslims”
“an erasure of struggles over patriarchy and misogyny in
Muslim contexts”
• Scott: coercion reworked as tradition, religion into culture
• “within the postsecularist universe, there can be no secular
or anti-Islamist Muslims or Muslim reformers.14 There is, in
other words, a recurrent invocation of the plurality of
Islamicate cultures and yet a continuous subsumption of
most Muslims to the most orthodox kinds.” (p. 165)
Nawal el-Sadaawi, b. 1931
Egyptian doctor, writer, feminist
Woman at Point Zero (1975)
• Set in Egypt, under the rule of Pres. Sadat
(1970-1981), succeeding Pres. Nasser who had
come to power after the Egyptian revolution
of 1952. Moved Egypt to the centre.
• Critique of the masculinist+capitalist nation
state that manages and polices the cultural,
economic and social spaces available to
women
• Production of normative (domestic) femininity
Gender and class
• the structural implementation of this normative
domestic femininity--the economic spaces
available for specifically working and lowermiddle class women are restricted to the
domestic sphere.
• The limitation of discourses of normative
femininity to the domestic sphere is not
portrayed simply as cultural dogma, but the
materialisation of a set of structural policies
instituted by the state.
Structural limits
• Firdaus’ early history is situated as typical for a girl of her class—the only
economically viable, and therefore available space for a rural, working
class girl, is in the domestic sphere. As a “poor peasant farmer”, her
father’s decision to “sell his virgin daughter for a dowry” is portrayed as
being as economically necessary as knowing how to “grow crops” (10).
Indeed, as she is unable to inherit money or participate in waged labour, it
is only through marriage that Firdaus’ body can be economically sustained.
• This structural limitation is re-emphasised when Firdaus’ brief time in
education, which allows her to temporarily occupy a space outside the
private sphere, comes to an end, as it is no longer economically viable for
her to continue.
• The inability of Firdaus’ uncle, as a “government official” whose salary
“only rises by a few millimes” (37) amidst increasing living costs
determines the choices available to Firdaus.
The exchange of bodies
• a powerful critique of the structural reduction of the
female body to a productive and reproductive role
under capitalism, through the recurring motif of
prostitution as a metaphor for womanhood.
• Having illustrated the fundamentally economic
necessity of marriage, El-Saadawi uses Firdaus, who
has lived both as a wife and a prostitute, to
demonstrate how the political economy of the female
body is consistent in both roles. As Firdaus states,
under a capitalist economy, women are forced “to sell
their bodies at a price” as they give up sexual
autonomy in exchange for economic security.
The sexual economy
• marital sex is exclusively portrayed as marital
rape, or as sex in which the wife is entirely
passive. This is because the economic necessity
of marriage for women renders them powerless
sexually.Whilst married to Sheikh Mahmoud,
Firdaus “surrenders” her “body to his body” like a
“piece of dead wood” (47). Things are no
different for her uncle and his wife, despite her
endorsement of marriage; in response to her
refusal of him, he tells her, “you woman, you”, to
submit as “I’m your husband and you’re my wife”
(40).
Body as instrument
• This sexual dynamic is mirrored by Firdaus’ experience as a
prostitute, where she too would passively “lay on the bed,
crucified” as “every hour a man would come in” (61).
• In light of this, Firdaus’ circumcision at the beginning of her
narrative becomes more than a cultural practice. It is also an
economic one, as by removing her ability to experience sexual
pleasure, her body is prepared for its place within the capitalist
economy; that is, an instrumentalised body exchanged for
economic security.
• the capitalist nation-state creates a structural situation in which,
particularly poor women, cannot escape a singular, commodified
political economy of the female body. The state’s economic
structure--a key force in the production of a narrowly defined
notion of normative, alienated femininity.
Limits of solidarity
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
the structural limitation of women to the home impedes the possibility of spaces in which female
bonds can be formed.
Firdaus moves from home to home, in which she is economically dependent on a male
breadwinner and isolated from other women. When this is not the case, she is largely living alone
as a prostitute.
El-Saadawi portrays some contexts in which Firdaus is able to interact with other women, such as at
school and in her brief time working as a secretary. Indeed, El-Saadawi uses these moments to
demonstrate the importance of female relationships; the ability of women in these spaces to
“reveal” their “depths to one another” (24) are emphasised as highlights within an otherwise bleak
narrative.
In particular, her experience at the school allows Firdaus to gain some political consciousness in
solidarity with her female colleagues; she finds herself “riding high up on the shoulders of girls” at a
protest shouting “down with the government” (24).
In the context of state monopolisation of feminist culture, this is a subversive moment. However,
Firdaus’ access to these spaces is either not sustainable or limited by the patriarchal context in
which they exist. Education is not economically viable, and the office is still ultimately a
misogynistic space in which women are expected to trade sexual favours with their male bosses in
return for promotions.
In this way, El-Saadawi demonstrates the importance of female bonds, and yet their impossibility
within the context she is signifying.
Representation
• Whilst El-Saadawi situates the first-person narrative as
the “story of a real woman” (1) whom she met as a
psychiatrist at Qanatir Prison, the framed narrative
structure precludes the interpretation of the novel as a
direct representation of Firdaus’ life.
• Firdaus’ story is preceded and followed by El-Saadawi’s
story of meeting her; indeed, the novel charts the
development of both Firdaus and the fictionalised
representation of El-Saadawi. In this way, El-Saadawi
as a novelist clearly exercises creative control. The
novel must therefore be read as her artistic representation of Firdaus’ story.