MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORIES
FEBRUARY 2014
CONFIRMED
CONFIRMED MINUTES
FEBRUARY, 24-27, 2014
LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM
These minutes are not final until confirmed by the Task Group in writing or by vote at a
subsequent meeting. Information herein does not constitute a communication or recommendation
from the Task Group and shall not be considered as such by any agency.
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 24 to THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 27
1.0
OPENING COMMENTS – CLOSED/OPEN
1.1
Call to Order / Quorum Check
The Materials Testing Laboratories Task Group (MTL) was called to order at 9:00 a.m., 24-Feb2014.
It was verified that only SUBSCRIBER MEMBERS were in attendance during the closed portion
of the meeting.
A quorum was established with the following representatives in attendance:
Subscriber Members/Participants Present (* Indicates Voting Member)
NAME
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Bruno
David
Thomas
Arielle
George
Herve
Doug
George
Dan
Stephen
Stuart
Hongping
Muriel
Jennifer
Angelina
Olivier
Tim
Amanda
Gary
Verl
COMPANY NAME
Addivinola
Bale
Brendel
Corne
Coste
Courreges
Deaton
Doviak
Graves
Haines
Hunt
Li
Malhomme
McKeegan
Mendoza
Molinas
Myers
Rickman
Winters
Wisehart
Alenia Aermacchi S.p.A.
Pratt & Whitney Canada
MTU Aero Engines AG
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.
SAFRAN Group
Airbus
GE Aviation
Goodrich (UTAS)
Goodrich (UTAS)
Honeywell Aerospace
Airbus
COMAC
Airbus
Cessna Aircraft Company
Goodrich (UTAS)
Airbus Helicopters
Honeywell Aerospace
Raytheon Co.
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Rolls-Royce
Other Members/Participants Present (* Indicates Voting Member)
NAME
*
COMPANY NAME
Vanesa
Aragón
Soorena
Ariaie
Pedro
Astola
Umberto
Corwyn
Baratta
Berger
TITANIA, Ensayos y Proectos
Industriales S.L.
Triumph StructuresFarnborough, Ltd.
TITANIA, Ensayos y Proectos
Industriales S.L
Bytest SRL
Exova, Inc.
Chairperson
Vice-Chairperson
Acting Secretary
MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORIES
FEBRUARY 2014
CONFIRMED
Greg
Peter
Bermel
Bittner
Michael
Massimo
Eric
Matthew
Gail
Julien
Chris
Niall
Chris
Eric
Kay
David
Michelle
Mirko
Luis
Brandt
Capriolo
Chabault
ChamberlainWebber
Cole
Corato
Cowap
Doods
Downs
Farley
Fisher
Fluck
Glass
Grotto
Guelbenzu
*
Robert
Bryan
Johanna
Christoph
Don
Eric
Angelique
Roger
Annette
Bob
Marcus
Larry
Bill
James
Haldane
Hall
Harrer
Henkel
Huffman
Kissell
Lornage
Ng
O’Connell
Olevson
Owens
Phipps
Rogers
Rossi
*
Peter
Scrimshire
*
David
Michal
Tsunao
Ed
Donna
Serbousek
Szmidt
Terzuka
Walters
Warner
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Monogram Aerospace Fasteners
Constellium Rolled Products
Ravenswood, LLC
Alcoa Inc.
Bytest SRL
Bureau Veritas Laboratoires
Timet UK Limited ( Witton )
Howmet Corporation
Exova, Inc.
Exova s.r.o.
Exova (UK) Limited
Instron Calibration Laboratory
Alcoa, Inc.
Bohler Edelstahl GmbH & Co KG
Haynes International, Inc.
Kennametal Stellite LP
RTM Breda S.r.l.
APPLUS LGAI
TECHNOLOGICAL CENTER
S.A.
Alcoa, Inc.
NSL Analytical Services, Inc.
Bohler Edelstahl GmbH & Co KG
AMAG Rolling GmbH
Lisi Aerospace
Materion Brush, Inc.
Bureau Veritas Laboratoires
Sulzer Metco (Canada), Inc.
Haynes International, Inc.
Element Materials Technology
Timken Aerospace
Alcoa Fastening Systems
Alcoa, Inc.
Westmoreland Mechanical
Testing
Special Metals Wiggin Ltd. –
IncoTest
Olympic Scientific, Inc.
Institute of Aviation
IHI Corporation
Laboratory Testing, Inc.
Heartland Precision Fasteners
PRI Staff Present
Robert
Jim
Joe
Kevin
Hoeth
Lewis
Pinto
Wetzel
1.2
Introductions
1.3
Code of Ethics/Antitrust and Meeting Conduct
The PRI video regarding the Code of Ethics, Antitrust and meeting conduct was shown. The
meeting rules and meeting voting protocol were also reviewed.
MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORIES
FEBRUARY 2014
CONFIRMED
1.4
Review Agenda
Please refer to eAuditNet for more information: Resources → Public Documents → Materials
Testing Laboratories → Nadcap Meeting Presentations → February 2014. These presentations
contain the information reviewed in the meeting.
1.5
Review and Accept Minutes from October 2013
The minutes from October 2013 meeting were approved as written.
1.6
RAIL Review
The Rolling Action Item List (RAIL).
MTL RAIL
15-Feb-2014.xls
For specific details, please see the current MTL Task Group Rolling Action Item List posted at
www.eAuditNet.com, under Public Documents.
2.0
AUDIT REPORT REVIEWER DELEGATION OVERSIGHT – CLOSED
The Metrics tab on the eAuditNet Dashboard and the t-frm-07 for all reviewers were reviewed. All
current delegated reviewers (Kevin Wetzel, Jim Lewis, Rob Hoeth, and Bob Lizewski) continue to
meet the requirements defined in NOP-003. All reviewers maintained their delegated status.
3.0
AUDITOR EVALUATIONS – CLOSED
Auditor Evaluations were presented along with the Dashboard on eAuditNet; no action was
required.
Supplier Feedback per auditor was presented. The majority of the evaluations showed favorable
feedback on the auditor performance. The limited negative feedback pertaining to auditor
conduct/professionalism was reviewed. Task Group agreed monitor the auditors with no further
action required at this time.
Only one observation was conducted since the last meeting. The Audit Report Observation
Report was reviewed and discussed. NOP-007 was reviewed as this procedure describes the
process for scheduling and participation for an audit observation. The Task Group reviewed
currently scheduled observations and highlighted auditors for future consideration. Larry Weller,
Mehmet Demir (observation scheduled), and Masashi Tanaka need observations scheduled.
It was also reiterated that NOP-012 section 4.3.2 Audit Observation contains requirements for
Subscriber audit observation.
ACTION ITEM: MTL Subscribers to review Masashi Tanaka audit schedule and coordinate
observation. (Due Date: 07-May-2014)
4.0
MATTERS OF ACCREDITATION – CLOSED
NOP/NIP/NTGOP documents where Subscribers have responsibilities were discussed to ensure
Subscriber understanding of responsibilities.
MTL Subscriber
Responsibilities 2013.pdf
MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORIES
FEBRUARY 2014
CONFIRMED
Kevin Wetzel reviewed the action item from IRR #770 in regards to the allegation against a
Nadcap accredited testing laboratory. ‘The Subscriber voting members to investigate internally
and report back to the Task Group’. Two Subscribers have noted they conducted their own
investigations and have declined further comment due to advice of legal authority. This item is
considered complete and closed by PRI.
Kevin Wetzel discussed the recent revision to NOP-011, Audit Failure Process, and NOP-012,
Auditor Consistency, pertaining to the new requirements being placed upon the subscribers and
to raise Task Group awareness items. No other actions are required at this time.
ACTION ITEM: Tim Myers to update the MTL Subscriber Responsibilities to include the
responsibilities described within NOP-011 and NOP-012 (Due Date: 02-May-2014)
Muriel Malhomme - Airbus brought a question to subscribers regarding the acceptance of ISO
17043 qualified Proficiency Testing (PT) providers. Does MTL accept all ISO 17043 qualified PT
providers as an option for suppliers? General discussion followed in regards to aerospace
requirements and some deficiencies that might be within the ISO 17043 systems. (See also
agenda item 9.0.)
ACTION ITEM: All Subscribers are to review their PT requirements with flow down and thoroughly
review the ISO 17043 requirements. Subscribers are to report back June 2014 and answer the
question: do ISO17043 accredited providers meet your company requirements (including test
type/material) and do you have concerns that need to be addressed? (Due Date: 23-June-2014)
5.0
MEMBER PARTICIPATION PRESENTATION – OPEN
MTL TG Participation
February 2014.ppt
All Voting members have been contacted concerning their participation.
All Subscribers met the requirements.
Four (4) Suppliers have missed two (2) consecutive ballots.
Three (3) Suppliers have been removed from Task Group voting status: Ray Schiltz – AADFW,
Mary Lee Bogensperger – PCC Airfoils, LLC., Bryan Engel - Consolidated Precision Products
CPP – Syracuse.
One (1) Supplier has been approved by the Chairperson to be maintained as a voting member
Jennifer Tret – Sherry Laboratories of Indiana LLC (Element).
Two (2) Suppliers have missed three (3) consecutive meetings. These Suppliers have been
removed from Task Group voting status: Anil Joshi - Praxair Surface Technologies, Andrew
Cantrel - Jorgensen Forge Corp
6.0
NEW VOTING MEMBERS – OPEN
Stuart Hunt of Airbus was proposed as an Alternative Subscriber Voting Member. Motion made
and seconded to accept Stuart Hunt as an Alternative Subscriber Voting Member. Subscriber
meets the background requirements of NTGOP-001 App MTL. Motion passed.
Robert Haldane of Alcoa, Inc. was proposed as a Supplier Voting Member. There were no
objections. Robert Haldane is accepted as a Supplier Voting Member.
Massimo Capriolo of Bytest SRL was proposed as a Supplier Voting Member. There were no
objections. Massimo Capriolo is accepted as a Supplier Voting Member.
MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORIES
FEBRUARY 2014
CONFIRMED
Eric Chabault of Bureau Veritas Laboratories was proposed as a Supplier Voting Member. There
were no objections. Eric Chabault is accepted as a Supplier Voting Member.
Peter Scrimshire of Special Metals Wiggin Ltd. – IncoTest was proposed as a Supplier Voting
Member. There were no objections. Peter Scrimshire is accepted as a Supplier Voting Member.
Don Huffman of Lisi Aerospace was proposed as a Supplier Voting Member. There were no
objections. Don Huffman is accepted as a Supplier Voting Member.
Ben Ransom of RTI Int’l Metals, Inc. Tradco, Inc. was proposed as a Supplier Voting Member.
There were no objections. Ben Ransom is accepted as a Supplier Voting Member.
An m-frm-01 has been completed by all new voting members.
7.0
PRESENT FEEDBACK FROM PITTSBURGH – OPEN
Bryan Hall gave a brief presentation concerning the Supplier Support Committee. This was an
effort to increase MTL supplier attendance at the SSC meeting scheduled for February 25 th.
Tim Myers gave a review of feedback received from the Pittsburgh October 2013 MTL meeting.
Meeting comments






Very little feedback provided (only 6 written comments)
Good balance of info for first day
Ballot resolution is best done in small groups and/or on the phone
Small group activity is still useful to encourage more participation, allow new ideas, avoids
cumbersome feeling of large groups. Perhaps TAGs can meet as small groups for checklist
revision activities.
Interested in technical presentations of test methods
Perhaps TAGs can report on top NCRs in some useful manner.
No action is required.
8.0
NADCAP TUTORIAL – OPEN
An MTL Task Group Tutorial was presented. No further discussion followed.
MTL TG Tutorial February 2014.ppt
Review presentation ‘Ineffective NCR Responses or 60 ways to add a cycle’.
No further discussion followed.
9.0
ACTIVITY REPORTS – OPEN
9.1
TECHNICAL ADVISORY GROUPS (TAGs)
TAGs reported on TAG function and a summary of activity/challenges





AC7101/1 – No Updates or Requests
AC7101/2 – No Updates or Requests
AC7101/3 – No Updates or Requests
AC7101/4 – No Updates or Requests
AC7101/4 – No Updates or Requests
MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORIES
FEBRUARY 2014
CONFIRMED





AC7101/4 – No Updates or Requests
AC7101/5 – No Updates or Requests
AC7101/6 – No Updates or Requests
AC7101/7 – No Updates or Requests
AC7101/9 – No Updates or Requests
It was discussed to use the TAGs to report on the Top NCRs in the open meetings. It was
decided to hold off this TAG activity until enough data has been generated with the latest
checklist revision. Motion Made by Kay Fisher to accrue top NCR data for 18 months after
checklist revision release by ad hoc committee. Bryan Hall seconds motion and also moves to
amend motion to include TAG representation in the ad hoc committee. Motion passed
unopposed.
PRI staff stated the top NCR data will be generated annually as required. As checklists are
released for use, the data will be reviewed
A presentation was given on “How to Use a TAG”.
How to use a TAG
Send an email request with subject “Nadcap MTL TAG/Handbook Action” for TAG consideration
to the TAG Chair, PRI Staff Engr (Kevin Wetzel), and TG Chair
(tim.myers@honeywell.com). The TAG Chair is expected to take action appropriately in
accordance with the MTL Audit Handbook Appendix A. The requester is responsible for any
follow-up necessary.
Topics for TAG support may include:
•
Clarification of audit criteria before or after an audit (TAGs should not be used to resolve
issues between a supplier and an auditor during an audit)
•
Request for audit criteria change
•
Request for Handbook change or content addition
•
Issues of perceived auditor inconsistent interpretations of audit criteria
•
Conflicting opinions about audit criteria interpretations
•
Questions about your planned objective evidence (example: “My cert says “per ASTM E
18”, is that good enough for AC7101/1 Para X?”)
Note: TAG response is not short-term: a response can take a week or longer
TAG Roster is available in eAuditNet, Documents/Public Documents/Materials Testing
Laboratories/TAG
Tim Myers made a motion to adopt the revised “How to use a TAG” into the Audit Handbook, App
A. This is to align with “How to use a TAG” presented in February 2014 Task Group meeting and
22-Jan-2014 email. Motion seconded. Motion passed.
ACTION ITEM: Audit Handbook coordinator to revise method for how to use the TAG process
(Due Date: 09-May-2014)
TG adopted proposal to create Handbook Supplements for each checklist which will link the new
criteria to the old criteria along with applicable source requirements (satisfying NOP-002), auditor
guidance, and reasons for change. Ad-hoc team was created to generate Excel files.
Tim Myers made a motion to accept the AC7101/1 Handbook Supplement entitled “AC7101-1F
Handbook supplement approved by TG” and embed that file into the Audit Handbook. Motion
seconded. Motion passed.
ACTION ITEM: Audit Handbook coordinator to add ‘AC7101-1F Handbook supplement’ to the
Audit Handbook upon release of checklist AC7101/1F (Due Date: 31-Aug-2014)
MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORIES
FEBRUARY 2014
CONFIRMED
9.2
PT/IRR ad hoc committee – Muriel Malhomme-Airbus, team lead
The requirement for Internal Round Robin (IRR)/PT for test code L code was removed.
It was reiterated to the suppliers that it is not required to use the exact alloy/shape which is used
daily in the laboratory. PT is to confirm the testing process. It is recognized that due to sample
preparation sometimes different alloys/shapes cannot be utilized.
An ongoing effort is being made to provide a list of qualified ISO 17043 providers for PT. It was
noted that ISO 17043 was acknowledged by motion at the Pittsburgh 2013 meeting as an
acceptable PT provider when accredited by an ILAC source. General discussion concerning this
approved motion followed. It was noted from prior discussion (see agenda item 4.0) that the
subscribers have committed to a review of their PT requirements flow down and to the review of
ISO 17043. The subscribers are to report back on their requirements and opinions at the June
2014 meeting.
Julien Corato presented Exova (AGSPTP) 2014 offering. Complete listing of AGSPTP offerings
can be found at www.proficiency-testing-programs.com.
9.3
SAE Technical Committee AMEC/MTL
Progress on the development of the SAE Industry Standard for Aerospace Materials Testing was
reviewed.





Initial meeting held Feb 12, 2014.
AMEC/MTL website live
http://www.sae.org/servlets/works/committeeHome.do?comtID=TEAAMECMTL
Draft charter reviewed in meeting and to be presented for comment/adoption through the
SAE ballot process
Next steps: designate officers, acknowledge support, adopt charter.
Update to NMC Oversight Committee in London
ACTION ITEM: MTL Subscribers to contact Tim Myers to describe support for or against SAE
industry standard development (Due Date: 09-May-2014)
The ad-hoc committees were reviewed to ensure all committees were identified, leaders and
participants were identified, and objectives were understood (verbally).
10.0
AGENDA REVIEW – OPEN
The agenda for the balance of the meeting was reviewed and adjusted.
11.0
TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS – OPEN
Thomas Brendel MTU Aero Engines GmbH gave a presentation on Strain controlled Low Cycle
Fatigue (LCF): Typical Deviations in Test Process.
12.0
HT/MTL HARDNESS MOU – OPEN
Rob Hoeth coordinated the following MOU between the Heat Treating and Materials Testing
Laboratories Task Groups.
The purpose of this MOU is to clarify responsibility and audit criteria for laboratory furnaces. The
outcome of this MOU is as follows:
MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORIES
FEBRUARY 2014
CONFIRMED
1. When the supplier has both a MTL accreditation to AC7101/9 for Materials Testing
Laboratories - Specimen Heat Treating and a HT accreditation to AC7102 for Heat Treating,
MTL auditors will audit laboratory furnaces.



If the supplier uses a laboratory furnace with load thermocouples, MTL auditors will use
AC7101/9.
If the supplier uses a laboratory furnace without load thermocouples, the MTL auditor
shall perform an audit to AC7101/9 and AC7102/8.
HT auditors will only audit laboratory furnaces when they are also used for production
hardware acceptance.
2. When the supplier has only MTL accreditation and uses a laboratory furnace without load
thermocouples, the MTL auditor will perform the audit using AC7101/9 and AC7102/8.
ACTION ITEM: Tim Myers to sign the MOU between HT and MTL as outlined above. (Signed: 25Feb-2014)
ACTION ITEM: Rob Hoeth to provide training on the AC7102/8 checklist at the October 2014
Auditor Conference. (Due Date: 19-Oct-2014)
13.0
MTL VISION GROUP WORK – OPEN
The attendees broke out into small groups to perform a review of the vision statement in
response to identified barriers. Groups worked to determine the most important items and present
potential short/long term actions in this regard. Suggestions for short term and long term actions
were collated.
14.0
CONCURRENT WORK BREAK OUT SESSIONS – OPEN
Break out groups formed:



15.0
AC7101/1 ballot comment were resolved
AC7101/1 Audit Handbook was revised
AC7101/11 revision continuation - ballot to follow
NTGOP-001 APP MTL REVIEW – OPEN
Kevin Wetzel reviewed the latest revision of NTGOP-001 App. MTL which was in the final stages
of approval. It is currently in NMC affirmation ballot. The addition of how to handle a main and
satellite facility for audit failure was reviewed. No other action is required.
16.0
GROUP WORK – OPEN
Small groups were organized to discuss the MTL Auditor Conference. The discussions focused
on: how to better engage the Task Group; how can the Auditor Conference support the MTL
Vision; what is your vision of the best auditor conference. The groups presented the results of
their discussions; these were collated for future analysis.
Auditor Conference
Group Report.docx
Small groups were also organized to discuss the MTL Checklist Vision. The discussion focused
on: what checklist characteristics/process elements are important to achieve the MTL Vision;
does the checklist facilitate good audits; how can they be better; what post ballot activity needs to
be completed prior to checklist release. The groups presented the results of their discussions;
these were collated for future analysis.
MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORIES
FEBRUARY 2014
CONFIRMED
Checklist Vision
Group Report.docx
Checklist Revision Implementation was discussed by the Task Group. Various ideas were
discussed on best practices for communicating changes to the checklist. This would be both for
suppliers and MTL auditors. These ideas included making a video, a powerpoint presentation,
and handbook additions. It was agreed to form an ‘Implementation Sub-Team’ This subteam is to
develop the required information to be presented to the MTL auditor. The Checklist TAG would be
a part of this sub-team along with the Task Group Chair and Audit Handbook coordinator. The
sub-team would be established with the release of each checklist revision.
The AC7101/1 TAG has been tasked with creating training material for AC7101/1F to be
presented to the MTL auditors via WebEx, with future auditor training to be conducted through the
PRI LMS system.
Pilot audits were also discussed. The Task Group elected to have volunteers conduct self-audits
utilizing the most recent draft version of AC7101/1F.
ACTION ITEM: Volunteers to conduct self-audit to AC7101/1F (Element, Exova, NSL, LISI, Timet,
Haynes, Alcoa EPS, Heartland) with feedback sent to Kevin Wetzel (PRI) and Kay Fisher (Bohler).
(Due Date: 15-Apr-2014)
17.0
SUPPLIER TOPICS – OPEN
Joe Pinto gave a brief account of a recent meeting between PRI and A2LA and the possibility of
bundled audits for Nadcap and ISO/IEC 17025. There is no action for the Task Group at this time
The Supplier feedback process was discussed. The current system is considered adequate to
assess the Auditors, but does not provide any opportunity for feedback on the remainder of the
process for root cause and corrective action, audit report reviewers or Task Group. This is
already an NMC initiative with PRI staff already supporting this effort.
The TG discussed the possibility of a MTL specific supplier survey, but no actions were proposed.
18.0
NOP-012 REVIEW – OPEN
The recently implemented auditor consistency process was described. The key points discussed
were:



19.0
A better defined Auditor evaluation process
Improved emphasis using subscriber observations
Improved effectiveness of the observation process
PLAN DUBLIN MEETING – OPEN
Open discussions established the following items to be included in the February Agenda:









Discussion on redundant audits
Group session report outs
Auditor conference vision discussion and breakout group sessions
Discuss Handbook for PT
Gather feedback on /1 implementation
A2LA – Nadcap relationship update
Continue revision for NOP compliance
Working sessions on AC7101/11
Technical presentation
MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORIES
FEBRUARY 2014
CONFIRMED
The meeting will be four (4) days (Monday – Thursday).
20.0
MTL PROGRAM STATUS – OPEN
Kevin Wetzel presented a review of the health of the MTL Task Group via the Dashboard in
eAuditNet. The NMC metrics were reviewed by the Task Group. No action was required.
Kevin Wetzel presented 2013 data for the Task Group to review concerning NOP-011, Audit
Failure Criteria for Appendix A, Mode B Excessive Number of NCR’s. It is required to review this
annually. General discussion followed on the failure criteria.
MTL Failure Criteria
Review 2013 data final feb 2014.docx
Motion made by David Bale (Pratt & Whitney Canada) to accept the 95% data for failure criteria
for mode B. Motion Seconded. General discussion. Bryan Hall (NSL) moved to amend to stipulate
the 98% data for initial audits. Motion seconded. General discussion. Bryan Hall (NSL) withdrew
his amendment. The original motion was called for vote. Motion Passed
ACTION ITEM: Kevin Wetzel to send agreed MTL NOP-011 Audit Failure Criteria Appendix A to
NOP-011 Document Owner for revision. (Sent: 3-Mar-2014)
21.0
FEEDBACK – OPEN
Feedback of the current meeting was requested.
22.0
NADCAP MEETING REPORTS – OPEN
Bryan Hall presented an overview of the SSC and items of interest from the SSC meeting. For
complete details of the meeting, see the SSC Minutes posted on www.pri-network.org.
Tim Myers reported on Planning and Ops meeting. For complete details of the meeting, see the
Planning and Ops meeting minutes posted on www.pri-network.org.
23.0
CONCURRENT WORK BREAK OUT SESSIONS – OPEN
Break out groups formed:



24.0
AC7101/2 revision continuation – Ready for ballot
AC7101/12 revision continuation – Ready for ballot
AC7101/5 revision continuation – Ready for ballot
CONCURRENT WORK BREAK OUT SESSIONS
This breakout was intended to be for AC7101/1, AC7101/3 and/or AC7101/4 guidance review.
These breakout items were not needed.
ADJOURNMENT – 27-Feb-2014 – Meeting was adjourned at (5:10) p.m.
Minutes Prepared by: Verl Wisehart verl.wisehart@rolls-royce.com
***** For PRI Staff use only: ******
Are procedural/form changes required based on changes/actions approved during this meeting? (select
one)
MATERIALS TESTING LABORATORIES
FEBRUARY 2014
CONFIRMED
YES* ☒ NO ☐
*If yes, the following information is required:
Documents requiring revision:
Who is responsible:
NOP-011 Appendix A
Kevin Wetzel/Mike Graham
Due date:
March 31, 2014