6-1 CHAPTER 6 Risk and Rates of Return Stand-alone risk Portfolio risk Risk & return: CAPM/SML Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6-2 What is investment risk? Investment risk pertains to the probability of actually earning a low or negative return. The greater the chance of low or negative returns, the riskier the investment. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6-3 Probability distribution Firm X Firm Y -70 0 15 100 Rate of return (%) Expected Rate of Return Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6-4 Annual Total Returns,1926-1998 Average Return Small-company stocks 17.4% Standard Deviation Distribution 33.8% 0 Large-company stocks 13.2 20.3 0 Long-term corporate bonds 6.1 17.4% 13.2% 8.6 0 6.1% Long-term government 5.7 9.2 0 5.7% Intermediate-term government 5.5 5.7 0 5.5% U.S. Treasury bills 3.8 3.2 0 3.8% Inflation 3.2 4.5 0 3.2% Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6-5 Investment Alternatives (Given in the problem) Economy Prob. T-Bill Recession 0.1 Below avg. 0.2 Average 0.4 Above avg. 0.2 Boom 0.1 1.0 HT Coll USR 8.0% -22.0% 28.0% 10.0% 8.0 -2.0 14.7 -10.0 8.0 20.0 0.0 7.0 8.0 35.0 -10.0 45.0 8.0 50.0 -20.0 30.0 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. MP -13.0% 1.0 15.0 29.0 43.0 All rights reserved. 6-6 Why is the T-bill return independent of the economy? Will return the promised 8% regardless of the economy. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6-7 Do T-bills promise a completely risk-free return? No, T-bills are still exposed to the risk of inflation. However, not much unexpected inflation is likely to occur over a relatively short period. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6-8 Do the returns of HT and Coll. move with or counter to the economy? HT: Moves with the economy, and has a positive correlation. This is typical. Coll: Is countercyclical of the economy, and has a negative correlation. This is unusual. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6-9 Calculate the expected rate of return on each alternative: ^ k = expected rate of return. k P. n k̂ = i i i =1 ^ kHT = (-22%)0.1 + (-2%)0.20 + (20%)0.40 + (35%)0.20 + (50%)0.1 = 17.4%. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 10 ^ k HT 17.4% Market 15.0 USR 13.8 T-bill 8.0 Coll. 1.7 HT appears to be the best, but is it really? Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 11 What’s the standard deviation of returns for each alternative? = Standard deviation. = = Variance = n (k i1 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. 2 k̂) Pi . 2 i All rights reserved. 6 - 12 n (k k̂ ) Pi . 2 i i1 T-bills (8.0 – 8.0)20.1 + (8.0 – 8.0)20.2 1/2 = + (8.0 – 8.0)20.4 + (8.0 – 8.0)20.2 2 + (8.0 – 8.0) 0.1 T-bills = 0.0%. HT = 20.0%. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. Coll = 13.4%. USR = 18.8%. M = 15.3%. All rights reserved. 6 - 13 Prob. T-bill USR HT 0 8 13.8 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. 17.4 Rate of Return (%) All rights reserved. 6 - 14 Standard deviation (i) measures total, or stand-alone, risk. The larger the i , the lower the probability that actual returns will be close to the expected return. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 15 Expected Returns vs. Risk Security HT Market USR T-bills Coll. Expected return 17.4% 15.0 13.8* 8.0 1.7* Risk, 20.0% 15.3 18.8* 0.0 13.4* *Seems misplaced. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 16 Coefficient of Variation (CV) Standardized measure of dispersion about the expected value: Std dev CV = Mean = ^ . k Shows risk per unit of return. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 17 B A 0 A = B , but A is riskier because larger probability of losses. = CVA > CVB. ^ k Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 18 Portfolio Risk and Return Assume a two-stock portfolio with $50,000 in HT and $50,000 in Collections. Calculate kp and p. ^ Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 19 ^ Portfolio Return, kp ^ kp is a weighted average: n ^ = S w^ k p iki. i=1 ^ kp = 0.5(17.4%) + 0.5(1.7%) = 9.6%. ^ kp is between ^kHT and ^kCOLL. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 20 Alternative Method Economy Prob. Recession 0.10 Below avg. 0.20 Average 0.40 Above avg. 0.20 Boom 0.10 Estimated Return HT Coll. Port. -22.0% 28.0% 3.0% -2.0 14.7 6.4 20.0 0.0 10.0 35.0 -10.0 12.5 50.0 -20.0 15.0 ^ kp = (3.0%)0.10 + (6.4%)0.20 + (10.0%)0.40 + (12.5%)0.20 + (15.0%)0.10 = 9.6%. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 21 p = 1/ 2 (3.0 – 9.6)20.10 + (6.4 – 9.6)20.20 + (10.0 – 9.6)20.40 = 3.3%. + (12.5 – 9.6)20.20 2 + (15.0 – 9.6) 0.10 CVp = 3.3% = 0.34. 9.6% Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 22 p = 3.3% is much lower than that of either stock (20% and 13.4%). p = 3.3% is lower than average of HT and Coll = 16.7%. ^ \ Portfolio provides average k but lower risk. Reason: negative correlation. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 23 General statements about risk Most stocks are positively correlated. rk,m 0.65. 35% for an average stock. Combining stocks generally lowers risk. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 24 Returns Distribution for Two Perfectly Negatively Correlated Stocks (r = -1.0) and for Portfolio WM Stock W . 25 . . 0 . . . 25 15 -10 Stock M . 0 0 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. 25 . 15 . . . . . 15 -10 Portfolio WM . . -10 All rights reserved. 6 - 25 Returns Distributions for Two Perfectly Positively Correlated Stocks (r = +1.0) and for Portfolio MM’ Stock M’ Stock M Portfolio MM’ 25 25 25 15 15 15 0 0 0 -10 -10 -10 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 26 What would happen to the riskiness of an average 1-stock portfolio as more randomly selected stocks were added? p would decrease because the added stocks would not be ^ perfectly correlated but kp would remain relatively constant. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 27 Prob. Large 2 1 0 15 Even with large N, p 20% Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 28 p (%) 35 Company Specific Risk Stand-Alone Risk, p 20 Market Risk 0 10 20 30 40 2,000+ # Stocks in Portfolio Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 29 As more stocks are added, each new stock has a smaller riskreducing impact. p falls very slowly after about 10 stocks are included, and after 40 stocks, there is little, if any, effect. The lower limit for p is about 20% = M . Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 30 Stand-alone Market Firm-specific = risk + risk risk Market risk is that part of a security’s stand-alone risk that cannot be eliminated by diversification, and is measured by beta. Firm-specific risk is that part of a security’s stand-alone risk that can be eliminated by proper diversification. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 31 By forming portfolios, we can eliminate about half the riskiness of individual stocks (35% vs. 20%). Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 32 If you chose to hold a one-stock portfolio and thus are exposed to more risk than diversified investors, would you be compensated for all the risk you bear? Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 33 NO! Stand-alone risk as measured by a stock’s or CV is not important to a well-diversified investor. Rational, risk averse investors are concerned with p , which is based on market risk. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 34 There can only be one price, hence market return, for a given security. Therefore, no compensation can be earned for the additional risk of a one-stock portfolio. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 35 Beta measures a stock’s market risk. It shows a stock’s volatility relative to the market. Beta shows how risky a stock is if the stock is held in a well-diversified portfolio. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 36 How are betas calculated? Run a regression of past returns on Stock i versus returns on the market. Returns = D/P + g. The slope of the regression line is defined as the beta coefficient. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 37 Illustration of beta calculation: _ ki 20 . 15 . Year kM 1 15% 2 -5 3 12 10 5 -5 0 5 10 Regression line: ^ ^ ki = -2.59 + 1.44 k M 15 20 ki 18% -10 16 _ kM -5 . -10 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 38 If beta = 1.0, average stock. If beta > 1.0, stock riskier than average. If beta < 1.0, stock less risky than average. Most stocks have betas in the range of 0.5 to 1.5. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 39 List of Beta Coefficients Stock Merrill Lynch America Online General Electric Microsoft Corp. Coca-Cola IBM Procter & Gamble Heinz Energen Corp. Empire District Electric Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. Beta 2.00 1.70 1.20 1.10 1.05 1.05 0.85 0.80 0.80 0.45 All rights reserved. 6 - 40 Can a beta be negative? Answer: Yes, if ri, m is negative. Then in a “beta graph” the regression line will slope downward. Though, a negative beta is highly unlikely. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 41 _ ki HT b = 1.29 40 b=0 20 T-Bills -20 0 -20 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. 20 _ kM 40 b = -0.86 Coll. All rights reserved. 6 - 42 Security Expected Return Risk (Beta) 17.4% 15.0 13.8 8.0 1.7 1.29 1.00 0.68 0.00 -0.86 HT Market USR T-bills Coll. Riskier securities have higher returns, so the rank order is OK. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 43 Use the SML to calculate the required returns. SML: ki = kRF + (kM – kRF)bi . Assume kRF = 8%. ^ Note that kM = kM is 15%. (Equil.) RPM = kM – kRF = 15% – 8% = 7%. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 44 Required Rates of Return kHT = 8.0% + (15.0% – 8.0%)(1.29) = 8.0% + (7%)(1.29) = 8.0% + 9.0% = 17.0%. kM kUSR kT-bill kColl = = = = 8.0% + (7%)(1.00) 8.0% + (7%)(0.68) 8.0% + (7%)(0.00) 8.0% + (7%)(-0.86) Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. = 15.0%. = 12.8%. = 8.0%. = 2.0%. All rights reserved. 6 - 45 Expected vs. Required Returns ^ HT k 17.4% k 17.0% Market USR 15.0 13.8 15.0 12.8 T-bills Coll. 8.0 1.7 8.0 2.0 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. Undervalued: ^>k k Fairly valued Undervalued: ^ k>k Fairly valued Overvalued: ^ k<k All rights reserved. 6 - 46 SML: ki = 8% + (15% – 8%) bi . ki (%) SML . HT kM = 15 kRF = 8 . . . . T-bills USR Coll. -1 0 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. 1 2 Risk, bi All rights reserved. 6 - 47 Calculate beta for a portfolio with 50% HT and 50% Collections bp= Weighted average = 0.5(bHT) + 0.5(bColl) = 0.5(1.29) + 0.5(-0.86) = 0.22. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 48 The required return on the HT/Coll. portfolio is: kp = Weighted average k = 0.5(17%) + 0.5(2%) = 9.5%. Or use SML: kp= kRF + (kM – kRF) bp = 8.0% + (15.0% – 8.0%)(0.22) = 8.0% + 7%(0.22) = 9.5%. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 49 If investors raise inflation expectations by 3%, what would happen to the SML? Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 50 Required Rate of Return k (%) D I = 3% New SML SML2 SML1 18 15 11 8 Original situation 0 0.5 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. 1.0 1.5 Risk, bi All rights reserved. 6 - 51 If inflation did not change but risk aversion increased enough to cause the market risk premium to increase by 3 percentage points, what would happen to the SML? Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 52 Required Rate of Return (%) After increase in risk aversion SML2 kM = 18% kM = 15% SML1 18 15 D RPM = 3% 8 Original situation 1.0 Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. Risk, bi All rights reserved. 6 - 53 Has the CAPM been verified through empirical tests? Not completely. Those statistical tests have problems that make verification almost impossible. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 54 Investors seem to be concerned with both market risk and total risk. Therefore, the SML may not produce a correct estimate of ki: ki = kRF + (kM – kRF)b + ? Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 - 55 Also, CAPM/SML concepts are based on expectations, yet betas are calculated using historical data. A company’s historical data may not reflect investors’ expectations about future riskiness. Copyright © 2001 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.