Assessing Academic and Career Technical Objectives

advertisement
Institutional Learning Outcomes:
Assessing Academic and Career
Technical Objectives
Convocation – Fall 2014
College of the Redwoods
Angelina Hill
ILO 1: Academic & Career Technical
Objectives
• Students will successfully acquire program outcomes and
complete degrees and/or certificates. This institutional
outcome indicates if the objectives stated for degrees and/or
certificates are being met. Students earning degrees will
acquire the College’s general education outcomes: Effective
Communication, Critical Thinking, and Global/Cultural
Context.
• Possible assessment tools:
▫
▫
▫
▫
▫
Program assessment data
General Education Outcomes assessment data
Degree/Certificate completion rates
Transfers & transfer eligibility
External accreditation of programs
ILO 2:Personal and Professional
Development
• Students will reach their career, transfer, or personal goals. This
outcome indicates if a student's individual goals are being met. This
includes the goals of students earning degrees, or of students taking
only a few courses for training and/or personal enrichment.
• Possible assessment tools:
▫
▫
▫
▫
▫
▫
Graduating exit survey
CTE employment survey
External licensure and certifications
Students with comprehensive SEPs
Student Satisfaction Inventory
Students declaring a CTE- or transfer-related degree or certificate (vs.
enrichment)
▫ Meeting/Exceeding SLO expectations – use of existing course
assessment reports.
ILO 3: Community and Global
Responsibility
• Students will develop the awareness and skills needed to
contribute to local and global communities. This outcome
indicates if students recognize ways to contribute to their
community and the value of effectively engaging in crosscultural environments.
• Possible assessment tools:
▫ Student awareness and appreciation of diverse perspectives (exit
survey)
▫ Service learning and internship work
▫ Student club service work; community outreach performed by
student athletes
▫ Student awareness of, and attitudes toward campus activities and
services related to diverse student populations (survey)
▫ Class and club community activities (survey of faculty and clubs)
ILO 1: Academic & Career Technical
Objectives
• Possible assessment tools:
▫
▫
▫
▫
▫
Program assessment data
General Education Outcomes assessment data
Degree/Certificate completion rates
Transfers & transfer eligibility
External accreditation of programs
Program Assessment Data
• Programs were evaluated looking at 63 courses.
▫ 1/63 (1.6%) Did not meet
▫ 39/63 (61.9%) Met
▫ 23/63 (36.5%)Exceeded
• Nearly all courses indicated successful delivery
of program-level outcomes
Course Assessment Data
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
Above
20%
Met
10%
0%
Below
ILO 1: Academic & Career Technical
Objectives
• Possible assessment tools:
▫ Program assessment data
▫ General Education Outcomes assessment
data
▫ Degree/Certificate completion rates
▫ Transfers & transfer eligibility
▫ External accreditation of programs
General Education Assessment
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
• Critical Thinking
GE Area
Overall
A: Natural Sci
B: Social Sci
C: Human
D: Lang & Rat
GE Area
Overall
A: Natural Sci
B: Social Sci
C: Human
D: Lang & Rat
Exceeds
56.8%
64.6%
58.6%
35.4%
60.0%
Exceeds
38.21%
44.73%
30.59%
36.67%
36.90%
Meets
34.0%
31.5%
30.4%
49.2%
40.0%
Meets
42.69%
43.46%
41.67%
52.22%
32.14%
Does not
meet
9.2%
3.9%
11.0%
15.4%
0.0%
# courses
evaluated
14
4
6
3
1
Does not # courses
meet evaluated
19.10%
21
11.81%
5
27.65%
7
11.11%
5
30.95%
4
#
Participants
403
127
201
65
10
General Education Assessment
Spring 2012
• Global/Cultural Context
GE Area
Overall
A: Nat Sci
B: Soc Sci
C: Human
D: Lang & Rat
Exceeds
47.9%
57.7%
38.1%
55.6%
51.5%
Meets
36.2%
30.8%
34.4%
25.0%
46.3%
Does not
#
meet Participants
16.0%
420
11.5%
52
27.5%
160
19.4%
72
2.2%
136
#
# courses
N/A evaluated
50
13
5
3
15
2
7
4
23
4
General Education Assessment
Fall 2012
• Effective Communication
GE Area
Overall
A: Nat Sci
B: Soc Sci
C: Human
D: Lang & Rat
Exceeds
50.9%
61.5%
52.7%
56.8%
40.8%
Meets
39.6%
26.4%
39.1%
35.1%
49.0%
Does not
#
meet Participants
9.5%
505
12.1%
91
8.2%
220
8.1%
37
10.2%
157
# # courses
N/A evaluated
73
14
20
4
31
3
12
3
10
4
ILO 1: Academic & Career Technical
Objectives
• Possible assessment tools:
▫
▫
▫
▫
▫
Program assessment data
General Education Outcomes assessment data
Degree/Certificate completion rates
Transfers & transfer eligibility
External accreditation of programs
Degree/Certificate Completions
• Completers by gender
▫ 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13
▫ All enrolled degree-seeking students
Gender
Degree/Cert
Seeking
Cohort
Completers
Completion
rate
Female
3045
961
32%
Male
2501
579
23%
Degree/Certificate Completions
• Completers by age
▫ 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 degree-seeking students
Age
24 and
younger
25 - 34
35 - 49
50 and older
Degree/Cert
Seeking Cohort
3096
Completers
Completion rate
671
22%
1534
639
277
512
237
119
33%
37%
43%
Degree/Certificate Completions
• Completers by ethnicity
▫ 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 degree-seeking students
Ethnicity
Not
Progressed
Progressed
Total
Progression
Rate
Hispanic
American
Indian
68
70
32
35
100
105
32%
33%
White
Unknown
521
98
357
75
878
173
41%
43%
Completions (2008-09 to 2012-13)
Row Labels
Sum of Total Sum of Percent
Liberal Arts: Behavioral & Social Sciences
447
14.6%
Liberal Arts: Humanities & Communications
228
7.5%
Liberal Arts: Science Exploration
213
7.0%
CSU General Education Requirements
211
6.9%
NURS Registered Nursing - AS
187
6.1%
AJ Basic Law Enforcement Academy - CA
162
5.3%
ECE Early Childhood Education - CA
149
4.9%
NURS Licensed Vocational Nursing - CA
142
4.7%
GENED General Studies - AS
96
3.1%
DA Dental Assisting - CA
91
3.0%
CT Fine Woodworking I - CA
88
2.9%
NURS Licensed Vocational Nursing - AS
79
2.6%
Liberal Arts: Business
71
2.3%
General Studies
69
2.3%
ADCT Addiction Studies - CA
59
1.9%
NURS LVN to RN Career Mobility - AS
56
1.8%
Liberal Arts: Fine Arts
54
1.8%
DA Dental Assisting - AS
51
1.7%
MA Medical Assisting - CA
46
1.5%
ECE Early Childhood Education - AS
35
1.1%
BUS General Business - AS
27
0.9%
CT Fine Woodworking II - CA
MA Medical Assisting - AS
DM Digital Media - AS
Liberal Arts: Science
AJ Administration of Justice - AS
CT Cabinetmaking & Millwork - CA
CIS Networking - AS
CT Residential Construction I - CA
Liberal Arts: Mathematics
CT Residential Construction II - CA
CT Construction Technology - AS
DT Architectural Drafting - AS
MS Marine Science - AS
MT Manufacturing Technology - CA
CT Historic Preservation &
Restoration - CA
IGETC General Education
Requirements
AG Plant Science - AS
27
26
24
23
20
20
19
18
18
17
16
16
15
13
0.9%
0.9%
0.8%
0.8%
0.7%
0.7%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0.4%
12
0.4%
12
10
0.4%
0.3%
Degree/Certificate Completions
• IPEDS 150% graduation rate –
▫ first-time full-time degree/cert seeking students
 2009 CR cohort = 13%, Comparison group = 21%
 2008 CR cohort = 4%, Comparison group = 20%
 2007 CR cohort = 6%, Comparison group = 21%
Transfer-out rate
• IPEDS transfer rate –
▫ first-time full-time degree/cert seeking students,
 2009 CR cohort = 10%, Comparison group = 15%
 2008 CR cohort = 18%, Comparison group = 17%
 2007 CR cohort = 23%, Comparison group = 20%
2012-2013 CSU Transfers
COMMUNITY
COLLEGES
COLLEGE OF
THE
REDWOODS
BA CHI
1
DH
FRE
1
1
1
180
SAC
SB
SD
SF
SJ
SLO
11
1
2
6
1
3
6
FUL HUM
LB
LA
NOR
1
1
1
SON TOTAL
3
220
Transfers to HSU
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
2012-2013: 180
2011-2012: 175
2010-2011: 162
2009-2010: 137
2008-2009: 154
2007-2008: 221
2006-2007: 227
2005-2006: 244
2004-2005: 247
2003-2004: 274
FTES at CR
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
Conclusion
• ILO: Students will successfully acquire program
outcomes and complete degrees and/or certificates.
This institutional outcome indicates if the objectives
stated for degrees and/or certificates are being met.
Students earning degrees will acquire the College’s
general education outcomes: Effective
Communication, Critical Thinking, and
Global/Cultural Context.
• There is evidence of successful attainment of
program outcomes and general education outcomes.
Conclusion
• Students do not always earn declared degrees or
certificates for many reasons
▫ Declared degree/cert may not be accurate
▫ Employment opportunity may present itself
▫ Value of degree/certificate may be unclear
What next?
• In what ways do we have room for
improvement?
• What can we do to help students?
Download