Institutional Learning Outcomes: Assessing Academic and Career Technical Objectives Convocation – Fall 2014 College of the Redwoods Angelina Hill ILO 1: Academic & Career Technical Objectives • Students will successfully acquire program outcomes and complete degrees and/or certificates. This institutional outcome indicates if the objectives stated for degrees and/or certificates are being met. Students earning degrees will acquire the College’s general education outcomes: Effective Communication, Critical Thinking, and Global/Cultural Context. • Possible assessment tools: ▫ ▫ ▫ ▫ ▫ Program assessment data General Education Outcomes assessment data Degree/Certificate completion rates Transfers & transfer eligibility External accreditation of programs ILO 2:Personal and Professional Development • Students will reach their career, transfer, or personal goals. This outcome indicates if a student's individual goals are being met. This includes the goals of students earning degrees, or of students taking only a few courses for training and/or personal enrichment. • Possible assessment tools: ▫ ▫ ▫ ▫ ▫ ▫ Graduating exit survey CTE employment survey External licensure and certifications Students with comprehensive SEPs Student Satisfaction Inventory Students declaring a CTE- or transfer-related degree or certificate (vs. enrichment) ▫ Meeting/Exceeding SLO expectations – use of existing course assessment reports. ILO 3: Community and Global Responsibility • Students will develop the awareness and skills needed to contribute to local and global communities. This outcome indicates if students recognize ways to contribute to their community and the value of effectively engaging in crosscultural environments. • Possible assessment tools: ▫ Student awareness and appreciation of diverse perspectives (exit survey) ▫ Service learning and internship work ▫ Student club service work; community outreach performed by student athletes ▫ Student awareness of, and attitudes toward campus activities and services related to diverse student populations (survey) ▫ Class and club community activities (survey of faculty and clubs) ILO 1: Academic & Career Technical Objectives • Possible assessment tools: ▫ ▫ ▫ ▫ ▫ Program assessment data General Education Outcomes assessment data Degree/Certificate completion rates Transfers & transfer eligibility External accreditation of programs Program Assessment Data • Programs were evaluated looking at 63 courses. ▫ 1/63 (1.6%) Did not meet ▫ 39/63 (61.9%) Met ▫ 23/63 (36.5%)Exceeded • Nearly all courses indicated successful delivery of program-level outcomes Course Assessment Data 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% Above 20% Met 10% 0% Below ILO 1: Academic & Career Technical Objectives • Possible assessment tools: ▫ Program assessment data ▫ General Education Outcomes assessment data ▫ Degree/Certificate completion rates ▫ Transfers & transfer eligibility ▫ External accreditation of programs General Education Assessment Fall 2012 Spring 2013 • Critical Thinking GE Area Overall A: Natural Sci B: Social Sci C: Human D: Lang & Rat GE Area Overall A: Natural Sci B: Social Sci C: Human D: Lang & Rat Exceeds 56.8% 64.6% 58.6% 35.4% 60.0% Exceeds 38.21% 44.73% 30.59% 36.67% 36.90% Meets 34.0% 31.5% 30.4% 49.2% 40.0% Meets 42.69% 43.46% 41.67% 52.22% 32.14% Does not meet 9.2% 3.9% 11.0% 15.4% 0.0% # courses evaluated 14 4 6 3 1 Does not # courses meet evaluated 19.10% 21 11.81% 5 27.65% 7 11.11% 5 30.95% 4 # Participants 403 127 201 65 10 General Education Assessment Spring 2012 • Global/Cultural Context GE Area Overall A: Nat Sci B: Soc Sci C: Human D: Lang & Rat Exceeds 47.9% 57.7% 38.1% 55.6% 51.5% Meets 36.2% 30.8% 34.4% 25.0% 46.3% Does not # meet Participants 16.0% 420 11.5% 52 27.5% 160 19.4% 72 2.2% 136 # # courses N/A evaluated 50 13 5 3 15 2 7 4 23 4 General Education Assessment Fall 2012 • Effective Communication GE Area Overall A: Nat Sci B: Soc Sci C: Human D: Lang & Rat Exceeds 50.9% 61.5% 52.7% 56.8% 40.8% Meets 39.6% 26.4% 39.1% 35.1% 49.0% Does not # meet Participants 9.5% 505 12.1% 91 8.2% 220 8.1% 37 10.2% 157 # # courses N/A evaluated 73 14 20 4 31 3 12 3 10 4 ILO 1: Academic & Career Technical Objectives • Possible assessment tools: ▫ ▫ ▫ ▫ ▫ Program assessment data General Education Outcomes assessment data Degree/Certificate completion rates Transfers & transfer eligibility External accreditation of programs Degree/Certificate Completions • Completers by gender ▫ 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 ▫ All enrolled degree-seeking students Gender Degree/Cert Seeking Cohort Completers Completion rate Female 3045 961 32% Male 2501 579 23% Degree/Certificate Completions • Completers by age ▫ 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 degree-seeking students Age 24 and younger 25 - 34 35 - 49 50 and older Degree/Cert Seeking Cohort 3096 Completers Completion rate 671 22% 1534 639 277 512 237 119 33% 37% 43% Degree/Certificate Completions • Completers by ethnicity ▫ 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13 degree-seeking students Ethnicity Not Progressed Progressed Total Progression Rate Hispanic American Indian 68 70 32 35 100 105 32% 33% White Unknown 521 98 357 75 878 173 41% 43% Completions (2008-09 to 2012-13) Row Labels Sum of Total Sum of Percent Liberal Arts: Behavioral & Social Sciences 447 14.6% Liberal Arts: Humanities & Communications 228 7.5% Liberal Arts: Science Exploration 213 7.0% CSU General Education Requirements 211 6.9% NURS Registered Nursing - AS 187 6.1% AJ Basic Law Enforcement Academy - CA 162 5.3% ECE Early Childhood Education - CA 149 4.9% NURS Licensed Vocational Nursing - CA 142 4.7% GENED General Studies - AS 96 3.1% DA Dental Assisting - CA 91 3.0% CT Fine Woodworking I - CA 88 2.9% NURS Licensed Vocational Nursing - AS 79 2.6% Liberal Arts: Business 71 2.3% General Studies 69 2.3% ADCT Addiction Studies - CA 59 1.9% NURS LVN to RN Career Mobility - AS 56 1.8% Liberal Arts: Fine Arts 54 1.8% DA Dental Assisting - AS 51 1.7% MA Medical Assisting - CA 46 1.5% ECE Early Childhood Education - AS 35 1.1% BUS General Business - AS 27 0.9% CT Fine Woodworking II - CA MA Medical Assisting - AS DM Digital Media - AS Liberal Arts: Science AJ Administration of Justice - AS CT Cabinetmaking & Millwork - CA CIS Networking - AS CT Residential Construction I - CA Liberal Arts: Mathematics CT Residential Construction II - CA CT Construction Technology - AS DT Architectural Drafting - AS MS Marine Science - AS MT Manufacturing Technology - CA CT Historic Preservation & Restoration - CA IGETC General Education Requirements AG Plant Science - AS 27 26 24 23 20 20 19 18 18 17 16 16 15 13 0.9% 0.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.7% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 12 0.4% 12 10 0.4% 0.3% Degree/Certificate Completions • IPEDS 150% graduation rate – ▫ first-time full-time degree/cert seeking students 2009 CR cohort = 13%, Comparison group = 21% 2008 CR cohort = 4%, Comparison group = 20% 2007 CR cohort = 6%, Comparison group = 21% Transfer-out rate • IPEDS transfer rate – ▫ first-time full-time degree/cert seeking students, 2009 CR cohort = 10%, Comparison group = 15% 2008 CR cohort = 18%, Comparison group = 17% 2007 CR cohort = 23%, Comparison group = 20% 2012-2013 CSU Transfers COMMUNITY COLLEGES COLLEGE OF THE REDWOODS BA CHI 1 DH FRE 1 1 1 180 SAC SB SD SF SJ SLO 11 1 2 6 1 3 6 FUL HUM LB LA NOR 1 1 1 SON TOTAL 3 220 Transfers to HSU • • • • • • • • • • 2012-2013: 180 2011-2012: 175 2010-2011: 162 2009-2010: 137 2008-2009: 154 2007-2008: 221 2006-2007: 227 2005-2006: 244 2004-2005: 247 2003-2004: 274 FTES at CR 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 Conclusion • ILO: Students will successfully acquire program outcomes and complete degrees and/or certificates. This institutional outcome indicates if the objectives stated for degrees and/or certificates are being met. Students earning degrees will acquire the College’s general education outcomes: Effective Communication, Critical Thinking, and Global/Cultural Context. • There is evidence of successful attainment of program outcomes and general education outcomes. Conclusion • Students do not always earn declared degrees or certificates for many reasons ▫ Declared degree/cert may not be accurate ▫ Employment opportunity may present itself ▫ Value of degree/certificate may be unclear What next? • In what ways do we have room for improvement? • What can we do to help students?