STD Update WAPA Winter Conference, 2013 Julie Dombrowski, MD, MPH Assistant Professor, Medicine/Infectious Diseases Medical Director, King County STD Clinic Overview Cases highlighting key points Chlamydia and gonorrhea - gonorrhea resistance NGU Syphilis - testing algorithm Genital Herpes Vaginitis Miscellaneous key points Revisit cases Case 1 A 22 year-old woman comes to your clinic for “a check-up”. She is sexually active with her boyfriend and had one other male partner in the past year. She had a “negative STD screen” prior to starting her relationship with her boyfriend. She does not need a Pap test today. Which is the most appropriate testing in this case? A) Urine specimen for chlamydia and gonorrhea culture B) Cervical swab for chlamydia and gonorrhea nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) C) Vaginal swab for chlamydia and gonorrhea NAAT D) None of the above – she does not need STD screening Case 2 A 24 year-old man comes to see you for urethral discharge and burning with urination x 3 days. He has had 4 female sex partners in the past year. On exam, you find yellowish penile discharge. You do not have access to a microscope, but you plan to send a urine sample for gonorrhea and chlamydia NAAT. How will you treat him? A) No indication for treatment today – await lab results B) azithromycin 1gram po x 1 C) cefixime 400mg po x 1 + azithromycin 1gram po x 1 D) ceftriaxone 250mg IM + doxycycline 100mg po BID E) ceftriaxone 250mg IM + azithromycin 1 gram po Case 3 A 29 year-old new patient comes to see you about “sores on my penis”. On exam, you see: What is the most important history question for diagnosis and appropriate treatment in this case? A) Have you ever had this before? B) Do you have sex with men, women or both? C) Did you have tingling before you saw the sores? D) Are these painful? Case 4 You are seeing a 26 year-old woman for follow-up after her first prenatal visit (G0P1), at which she was screened for syphilis. She and her husband have been monogamous and married for 3 years. Her test results are: T. pallidum EIA: POSITIVE Rapid plasma reagin (RPR): NEGATIVE T. pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA): NEGATIVE What do you tell her? A) She has syphilis and needs treatment B) She has syphilis, she needs treatment, and her husband needs testing and treatment C) She might have syphilis, she needs treatment, and her husband needs testing and treatment D) She does not have syphilis. She has a false positive test result. Case 5 A 27 year-old woman who requested serologic screening for herpes has a positive HSV-2 antibody using a FOCUS EIA assay with a value of 3.8. She has no history of clinical herpes. What do you tell her? A) She very likely has genital herpes caused by HSV-2, and just never had a symptomatic outbreak B) The HSV-2 antibody result is probably a false positive C) She is probably actively seroconverting to HSV-2, having acquired it from her current partner D) You need to check a Herpes IgM antibody to clarify the results Chlamydia & Gonorrhea Chlamydia—Rates by Sex, United States, 1991–2011 NOTE: As of January 2000, all 50 states and the District of Columbia have regulations that require the reporting of chlamydia cases. 2011-Fig 1. SR Pelvic inflammatory disease — Initial visits to physicians’ offices by women 15 to 44 years of age: United States, 1980–2010 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 0 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 SOURCE: National Disease and Therapeutic Index (IMS Health) Chlamydia Incidence Rates Among Women By County Washington State, 2010 Whatcom 422 Okanogan San Juan 385 Pend Ferry Skagit Stevens 421 245 Island 334 188 Snohomish Clallam 371 334 Jefferson 261 Chelan 366 King Mason Grays 346 Harbor Douglas 317 Kittitas Thursto n 684 324 237 * Wahkiakum 524 509 Adams Whitman 796 421 Lewis 332 Cowlitz 496 Clark Washington State Department of Health Spokane * Grant 453 Pacifi c Lincoln 407 46 3 Pierce 321 469 Yakima Franklin 825 726 Garfield Columbia * * Benton 531 Skamania Walla Walla 420 299 Klickitat 238 STD/TB Services IDRH Assessment Unit Oreille * Rates are not calculated from 0 to 4 cases because they are unreliable. Asotin Asotin 284 5 County Incidence Rates Per 100,000 Rates not calculable <300 301-500 >500 Chlamydia Incidence increasing Morbidity appears to be decreasing We need to: Improve screening Improve partner treatment ~57% of eligible women in WA State screened annually Expedited partner therapy Improve rescreening Rescreen all persons diagnosed with chlamydia 3 months after treatment Major Clinical Syndromes Caused by C. trachomatis Syndrome Anatomic Site Women 10-20% Sequellae Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Urethra Urethritis Bartholin’s glands abscess Cervix Cervicitis Ectopic pregnancy Rectum Proctitis Chronic pelvic pain Infertility Most (80-90%) women infected with chlamydia have normal cervix / no signs ~24,000 women per year in the US Randomized Trials of Chlamydial Screening Author Population Design PID Incidence in Untested (per 100 person yrs) RR Scholes (1996) ♀ GHC RCT screening vs. no screening 2.2 0.44 (0.20.9) Prevalence 7% Ostergaard (2000) Danish high school students Prevalence 5% RCT Screening vs. no screening via mail 4.2 0.50 (0.231.1) Oakshott* (2010) ♀ UK Students RCT screening vs. specimen collection but not testing 1.9 0.65 (0.341.22) Prevalence 5.4% * 83% reduction in PID among women who tested CT positive at baseline. 79% of PID cases occurred in women who tested negative for chlamydia at baseline 9.5% of women with CT at baseline who were untreated developed clinical PID within 1 year CDC Guidelines 2010: CT & GC Screening for Women Annual Chlamydia screening for all sexually active women age ≤ 25 Older than 25 – screen women at increased risk Gonorrhea screening recommended also Multiple partners, drug use, commercial sex work, inconsistent condom use, previous STDs Other Criteria – IDU insertion, pregnancy Above applies to women who have sex with women Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing (NAAT) Culture: cultivates live organisms Not widely available for Chlamydia trachomatis NAAT: detects genetic material (DNA or mRNA) More sensitive than culture for GC and CT at all anatomic sites Vaginal swabs preferred specimen for screening women, but urine and cervical also acceptable Clinician-obtained Patient-obtained Partner Notification & Treatment Sex partners from past 60 days should be evaluated, tested, and treated Expedited partner therapy (EPT) for GC/CT Increases likelihood that partners are treated and decreases Washington State DOH, 2004: “If treatment is not otherwise assured, the patient should be provided antibiotics for their partner(s). These medications must include appropriate written information for the treated third party.” Heterosexuals with GC or CT should be routinely offered medication for their sex partner if you are not confident that you can otherwise treat the partner(s) PDPT Individual RCT Trends in Chlamydia Positivity Among Women Age 15-25 Tested Through IPP Clinics and Gonorrhea Incidence in WA State Women Chlamydia Positivity 16 14 Cases/100,000 Percent 10 Gonorrhea Incidence 8 6 4 12 10 8 6 4 0 1 2 Time 3 4 0 1 2 3 Time P<.001 for both chlamydial positivity and gonorrhea incidence Slide courtesy of Dr. Matthew Golden 4 Effect of EPT on Chlamydial Positivity and Gonorrhea Incidence in Women, Randomized Trial ITT Analysis Chlamydial positivity in women Gonorrhea incidence in women Risk Ratio 95% CI .89 .77-1.04 .86 .69-1.08 * Analysis controls for secular trend that may have been ongoing independent of the study intervention Slide courtesy of Dr. Matthew Golden Reporting a Case (WA example) Step 1: Google “STD case report WA” and click on first link Case Reports - Washington State Department of Health (DOH) Home Page Jul 30, 2010 ... Access Washington Logo linking to Access Washington. Notifiable Condition Case Report Forms for STD, by County. Click on the map to go to the Case Report ... www.doh.wa.gov/cfh/std/casereports/de... - Cached - Similar Step 2: Click on your county on this map Step 3: Fill out this form & fax to the number at the top of the page (partner instructions on back) PDPT Packs in WA State Information provided with EPT Information about medications & STD Advice about complications and need for care (e.g. PID) Where to seek care Recurrent Gonorrhea & Chlamydial Infection* 14 Men Women 13.3 Percent 12 11.7 10 8 12.6 9.4 6 4 2 0 Gonorrhea * In absences of PDPT Chlamydia Retesting: Test of cure vs. Rescreening Test of cure for GC & CT? Not recommended, unless Pregnancy Persistent symptoms in patient or partner Uncertain adherence to treatment Do not use NAAT sooner than 3- 4 weeks Rescreen anyone with a positive test 3 months post treatment High rates of reinfection (not treatment failure) Gonorrhea—Rates by Sex, United States, 1991–2011 2011-Fig 17. SR GC: Tremendous Disparities By race: Rates in African Americans >20x those in whites By sexual orientation: MSM rates16x those in heterosexual men in King County CDC Guidelines 2010: CT & GC Screening for Men Selective male chlamydia screening in high prevalence settings Adolescent clinics, correctional facilities, STD clinics, military MSM A test for urethral GC and CT if insertive intercourse in past year* A test for rectal GC and CT if receptive intercourse in past year* A test for pharyngeal GC if receptive oral sex in past year Rescreen anyone with a positive test 3 months after treatment *regardless of reported condom use MSM: Extra-genital Screening is Key N=6434 men Site % of all GC cases* % of all CT cases* Urethra 21 29 Rectum 15 54 Pharynx 36 7 Rectum & Pharynx 12 4 Rectum & Urethra 6 6 Urethra & Pharynx 5 <1% All 3 sites 5 <1% 53% of chlamydia and 64% of gonorrhea cases would be missed with urethral screening only Kent CK, et al. CID 2005;41:67-73 NAAT for rectal and pharyngeal testing >2x sensitivity of culture for rectal and pharyngeal chlamydia and gonorrhea Not FDA-approved, but can be done if laboratory validation is complete (Lab Corp has done this) Can use vaginal swab for these sites Update to CDC’s STD Guidelines, 2010: Oral Cephalosporins No Longer a Weekly / Vol. 61 / No. 31 gust 10, 2012Recommended Treatment for Gonococcal Infections Uncomplicated genital track or rectal gonorrhea RECOMMENDED Ceftriaxone 250 mg IM PLUS Azithromycin 1g po x 1 OR doxycycline 100mg po bid x 7d ALTERNATIVE Cefixime 400mg po x 1 PLUS Azithromycin 1g po x 1 OR doxycycline 100mg po bid x 7d PLUS Test of Cure in 1 week Rationale for Treatment Recommendations • Pharyngeal infections • • • ~30% of MSM and women with genital tract gonorrhea also have pharyngeal infection Oral cephalosporins have poor penetration Decreased susceptibility to oral cephalosporins • Multi-drug resistant (PCN, quinolones, azithromycin) • Ceftriaxone still extremely effective • Higher doses of ceftriaxone and dual agent use may discourage development of resistance Percentage of N. gonorrhoeae Isolates with Elevated MICs to Oral Cephalosporins, 2005- June 2011 Source: Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project Distribution of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) of Ceftriaxone Among Neisseria gonorrhoeae Isolates, Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP), 2007– 2011 2011-Fig 30. SR Percentage of PHSKC STD Clinic Patients with Pharyngeal Gonococcal Testing Positive for N. gonorrhoeae within 180 Day of Treatment • Patients diagnosed by culture 1993-2009 - Passive follow-up • Patients treated with cefixime or cefpodoxime 400mg • 277/817 (34%) patients retested – No variation by treatment regimen 50 Percentage Patients Retesting Positive P<0.05 Cephalo+AZM vs Cephalo 40 Alone or with Doxy 31 Percent 30 25 20 10 12 4 0 Cephalo + Cephalo + AZM Doxy N=119 N=62 AZM Alone Cephalo Alone N=21 N=48 Source: Golden. ISSTDR 2009 Gonorrhea Treatment Summary Decreased susceptibility to oral cephalosporins is primarily a concern for MSM No gonococci in US are resistant to ceftriaxone (yet) Decreased susceptibility strains are rare in heterosexuals Recommendations: All patients with GC should be treated with ceftriaxone and azithromycin (preferable to ceftriaxone + doxycycline) Continue EPT for heterosexuals with oral cephalosporins MSM should not receive EPT All patients with GC should be rescreened 3 months after treatment Gonorrhea Summary & Treatment Recommendations • No gonococci in the U.S. are resistant to ceftriaxone • Decreased susceptibility to cefixime remain very rare in heterosexuals • Recommendations: • Ceftriaxone + Azithro is first choice – NOT doxy • Cefixime/Azithro is reasonable alternative when IM therapy is not an option (try to avoid in MSM) • Test of cure only indicated for: • Persistent signd/symptoms • Pharyngeal GC treated with non-ceftriaxone regimen • Pregnant women • EPT recommendations unchanged – NO EPT in MSM Non-gonococcal urethritis ORGANISMS DETECTED in MEN with NGU Seattle MEGA Trial (n=524) NIH Trial (n=305)* C. trachomatis 26% 43% M. genitalium 14% 31% U. ureealyticum-biovar 2 24% T. vaginalis 2% 21% Idiopathic 38% 29% * Birmingham, AL; Baltimore, MD; New Orleans, LA; Durham, NC. Randomized Trials of Azithromycin vs. Doxycycline for NGU: Clinical Cure Doxy 100 Azithromycin Percent Cured 80 77 81 60 75 78 84 69 40 20 0 Stamm Schwebke* Manhart Manhart L. CDC STD Prevention Conference Randomized Trials of Azithromycin vs. Doxycycline for NGU: M. genitalium Microbiologic Cure Doxy 100 Percent Cured 80 Azithromycin 87 60 40 67 45 40 31 20 30 0 Mena* *P<.05 Schwebke* Manhart Manhart L. CDC STD Prevention Conference Persistent NGU Treatment CDC Approach Initial Rx: Doxy or Azithro ? Defined etiology, reexposure/partner treatment Document evidence of inflammation – positive GS or urine LE If positive – Treat with Doxy or Azithro +/Metronidazole (+/- trich culture) Seattle Approach Initial Rx: Doxy or Azithro ? Defined etiology, reexposure/partner treatment Document evidence of inflammation – positive GS or urine LE If positive – Treat with Moxifloxicin 400mg po qd x 7 ? Defined etiology, reexposure/partner treatment Document evidence of inflammation – positive GS or urine LE If positive – Treat with Moxifloxicin 400mg po qd x 7 Syphilis Primary and Secondary Syphilis—Rates by Sex and Male-to-Female Rate Ratios, United States, 1990– 2011 2011-Fig 38. SR King County: Early syphilis*, 1994-2011 400 376 MSM syphilis** 350 Early syphilis cases Heterosexual syphilis 300 263 250 200 179 174 188 185 145 140 150 100 32 50 2 16 23 11 5 15 4 60 58 50 60 9 12 77 26 2 3 5 13 10 0 *Reported P, S, and EL syphilis **Excludes some male cases with unknown MSM status 5 6 9 13 Syphilis – A Brief Refresher Few hours: lymph -> bloodstream Chancre ~ 3 weeks (10-90 days) spontaneously heals 1-6 weeks later Syphilis – A Brief Refresher Few hours: lymph -> bloodstream Chancre ~ 3 weeks (10-90 days) spontaneously heals 1-6 weeks later 15% overlap 3-6 weeks after chancre Transmission Risk: ~30% per sex act (compared to 0.07-2% per sex anal sex act for HIV*) *Cassels et al, AIDS 2009;23:2497 Reverse Sequence Syphilis Screening Algorithm •Why? Decreased cost for the laboratory •Traditional • Screen with nontreponemal test (RPR or VDRL) • Confirm with a treponemal specific test (TPPA, MHATP) •Reverse •Screen with treponemal specific EIA •Confirm with RPR •If conflict: resolve with older treponemal test (TPPA) EIA Screening Algorithm Negative EIA or CLIA No Syphilis Positive or Equivocal RPR Positive Negative TP-PA Negative Unlikely syphilis Probably false positive EIA But if high suspicion, repeat in 1 month Syphilis Positive Syphilis -early disease -past infection (treated) -untreated, long duration Reverse Sequence Syphilis Screening EIA + RPR- Among EIA+ TPPA- Among (Old Syphilis or False+) RPR- (False+) 3.4% 57% 32% Low Prevalence 2.3% Pops 61% 41% High Prevalence 14.5% Pops 51% 14% Total MMWR 2011;60:133 Geographical Distribution of Endemic, Non-venereal Treponematoses Vaginitis Key Features of Normal Vaginal Environment Normal pH <4.7: Maintained by dominant vaginal bacteria, Lactobacillus, that produce lactic acid Favors growth of lactobacilli and inhibits growth of other organisms (residents and invaders) Human lactobacilli Major species: L. crispatus and L. jensenii Need to produce hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for maximal benefit Vaginitis Very common National Health and Examination Survey (ages 14-49) 28% of women reported symptoms BV prevalence: 27% White women: 23% Non-Hispanic black women: 51% Trichomonas prevalence 3% White women: 1% Non-hispanic black women: 13% Top 3 causes Bacterial Vaginosis Candidiasis Trichomoniasis Koumans, STD 2007 Sutton, Clin Infect Dis 2007 Diagnosis Lack of specificity in clinical presentation = syndromic diagnosis doesn’t work A pH-Based Framework for Evaluating Common Causes of Vaginitis Nyirjesy & Sobel, Curr ID Reports 2005 Bacterial Vaginosis: Dx Typical discharge: homogenous, greyish, adherent to vaginal epithelium Clinical findings (Amsel criteria): 3 of the following must be present: homogeneous discharge pH >4.5 clue cells (>20%) amine odor on addition of KOH (+whiff test) PCR amplification of vaginal bacteria BV negative BV positive Fredricks et al. NEJM Nov 2005; 368:1899-1911 Vaginitis Treatment BV Metronidazole 500mg po BID x 7 days Or gel 0.75% vaginally QD x 5 days Or clindamycin cream 2% vaginally x 7 days 15-20% of women fail initial treatment ~75% recurrence over 1 year Trichomonas Metronidazole 2g po x 1 Or tinidazole 2g po x 1 ($) Nitroimidazole resistance: only useful drug class Time to BV Recurrence (ITT), Biweekly MTZ Gel vs. Placebo Sobel AJOG 2006 Herpes HSV-2 Seroprevalence in U.S. Prevalence (%) MMWR 59 (15), 2010 AW-245 8-13-1996 Herpes: Key Points Most persons with HSV do not know they have it Do not have or do not recognize symptoms Most transmission occurs by subclinical genital shedding Distinct from unrecognized infection Suppressive antiviral therapy decreases, but does not eliminate risk of transmission Know how to interpret serology results Genital Ulcers – Exam is non-specific Sensitivity/Specificity Incubation Herpes 2-7 days Primary Lesion Base Size Edges Induration Pain ≥3 lesions Erythematous, serous 1-2mm Erythematous None Tender 63%/64% Syphilis 9-90 days Papule (one) 60%/50% Smooth, Non-purulent 5-15mm Classic herpes triad (≥3 superficial, tender lesions): 94% specificity, but seen only in a minority of patients Elevated, Demarcated Firm Non-tender 47%/95% 67%/58% DiCarlo RP, CID 1997;25:292 Herpes Testing: Lesions Test to confirm diagnosis Highest yield: vesicles, pustules (early lesions) Unroof & scrape base PCR more sensitive than culture (N>36,000 samples) Sensitivity False positive Viral Culture 24% 76% PCR 99.9 0.1% Specificity 100 Ratio PCR:Viral culture positivity 3.1 (presence of lesions) 5.1 (absence of lesions) Wald et al JID 2003: 188 Slide adapted from Christine Johnston, MD Herpes Testing: Serology Type-specific serology tests may be useful: Median time to seroconversion: 3 weeks Recurrent/atypical symptoms with negative culture Clinical diagnosis without lab confirmation Patients with a partner with genital HSV Upper limit: 4 months HSV-2 serologic testing can be offered to persons presenting for a STD evaluation Personal health service Screening for HSV-1 or HSV-2 in the general population is not indicated. Type-Specific gG-Based HSV Serology: Commercial Kits 2012 Sensitivity Specificity HerpeSelect-2 ELISA (Focus) 96-100* 97-100 HerpeSelect Immunoblot (Focus) HerpeSelect Express (Focus) biokitHSV-2 (biokitUSA ) Cobas-HSV-2 (Roche) Captia Select-HSV-2 (Trinity) 97-100 86-100 93-100 93 90-92 98 97-100 94-97 98 91-99 • Cost varies; $30-$180 • Western blot assay, considered gold standard, available through University of Washington Median time to seroconversion: 3 wk (<4m) False Positive HerpesSelect: A function of prevalence Positive Predictive Value (%) 100 89 80 85 78 60 63 98% Specificity 40 20 0 5% 10% 15% Prevalence 20% Interpreting Common Serologies HerpeSelect (Focus) ELISA is commonly used Although package insert states that an index value >1.1 should be interpreted as positive, several experts use a cutoff of 3.5 PPV as low as 38% in college students with very low HSV2 seroprevalence (3.4%) [Mark 2007] Leads to higher negative predictive value [Golden 2005; Philip 2008] Correctly reports uninfected people as uninfected Fewer false positives For patients who REALLY want to know, consider Western blot Call #206-598-6066 to request HSV Type-Specific Serology information packet http://depts.washington.edu/herpes/ Herpes Serology: Limitations Does not tell Cannot diagnose a lesion False positives How long infected If person has had or will have symptoms How likely a person is to shed asymptomatically Where infected (HSV-1) Decreased PPV in low prevalence populations AND in patients with HSV-1 infection False negatives 77% of patients have antibodies by 6 weeks after HSV-2 primary infection and 59% after HSV-2 non-primary infection. Herpes Serology No role for IgM No role for non-type specific IgG tests Which Patients Should Receive Suppressive Antiviral Therapy? Frequent recurrences Psychological distress Acyclovir – excellent safety for 10 years Famciclovir and Valacyclovir – safety for 1 year Higher bioavailability (GI absorption) allows less frequent dosing) Consider discontinuation after 1 year No need to monitor safety labs or to caution women against getting pregnant while taking it To observe rate of recurrence To monitor adjustment to recurrences No evidence of emergence of resistant strains in immunocompetent persons Prevention strategies for HSV-2 Disclosure of serostatus Avoid sex with lesions (imperfect, but higher viral load when present) Condoms Antiviral therapy Vaccine (may prevent HSV1 in women; Belshe NEJM 2012) Topical microbicides…stay tuned • Can’t predict with symptoms as guidance (Wald 1995) • Frequency of shedding higher with history of symptomatic outbreaks (20% of days), but still 10% of days in asymptomatic persons (Tronstein 2011) • Shedding most frequent first year after initial outbreak, but persists for years after Asymptomatic Shedding & Transmission • Most transmissions from persons without clinical history of genital herpes • Subclinical Recurrences • Viral shedding 10% of asymptomatic days • Suppressive therapy can prevent transmission Corey et al. N Engl Jour Med 2004; 350 (1): 11-20 Genital HSV-2 Shedding Rate Percent of swabs with HSV detected 25 Trial 1 IRR=0.05 95% CI=0.03-0.08, p<0.001 20 15 Trial 2 IRR=0.79 95% CI=0.63-1.00, p=0.052 10 Trial 3 IRR=0.54 95% CI=0.44-0.66, p=0<0.001 5 0 No Medication Estimated Acyclovir AUC 0 SD-ACV 7.7 SD-VAL 10 HD-ACV 25 SD-VAL 10 HD-VAL 88 Johnston, JAMA 2012 Genital HSV-2 Shedding Rate Percent of swabs with HSV detected 25 Trial 1 IRR=0.05 95% CI=0.03-0.08, p<0.001 • Frequent short bursts of HSV-2 reactivation occur in the 20 presence of both standard dose suppressive antivirals and on high dose therapy 15 – While shedding frequency and quantity is reduced on high dose Trial 3 valacyclovir, breakthrough shedding at a similar IRR=0.54 episode rate on Trialoccurs 2 IRR=0.79 95% CI=0.44-0.66, all doses 95% CI=0.63-1.00, 10 p=0<0.001 p=0.052 • Antiviral therapy, though clinically effective, does not alter the underlying pathobiology of frequent HSV-2 reactivation 5 0 No Medication Estimated Acyclovir AUC 0 SD-ACV 7.7 SD-VAL 10 HD-ACV 25 SD-VAL 10 HD-VAL 88 Johnston, JAMA 2012 Counseling the Newly Diagnosed Patient with HSV2 Consider serologic testing of partner(s) Recognize risk of subclinical shedding Discuss value of suppressive antiviral therapy Effective in reducing outbreaks, reducing BUT NOT ELIMINATING days with shedding Discuss other preventive measure Condoms Avoiding sex with outbreaks Things to You Might Want to Say I know this must be really hard news for you to hear This is a manageable disease, even though there is no cure yet You are not alone—1 in 4 adults is infected with HSV-2 Genital herpes is usually not associated with serious health issues, including effects on reproductive health Give yourself some time to adjust; don’t expect it to happen overnight There are a lot of good resources online Miscellaneous Key Points HPV Vaccine Don’t Miss Acute HIV HIV Testing Regulations Take-Home Points Screen women <26 for chlamydia annually Offer heterosexuals with GC and CT EPT Treat gonorrhea with ceftriaxone + azithromycin Rescreen for GC and CT 3 months after treatment Be vigilant for syphilis among MSM Social history should include gender of sex partners Syphilis EIA has high false positive rate in low prevalence populations Know how to interpret your herpes serologic test Index values are key Most herpes is transmitted through subclinical shedding and most people with herpes don’t know they have it Thank You jdombrow@uw.edu Acknowledgements Jeanne Marrazzo, MD, MPH Matthew Golden, MD, MPH Devika Singh, MD, MPH Sue Szabo, PA Christine Johnston, MD, MPH Joanne Stekler, MD, MPH Caroline Mitchell, MD CDC (slides) STD Web Resources Herpes Web resources ASHA patient herpes hotline University of Washington Viral Diseases Research Clinic (206) 7204340 www.ashastd.org www.herpeshelp.com www.westoverheights.com www.healthcheckusa.com www.herpesdiagnosis.com www.herpeshomepage.com (919) 361-8488 reading materials Glaxo web site handbook order own tests diagnosis data posts, pharmacy link