GEOG 101: Day 22 Environmental Ethics and Economics: Values and Choices (read Chapter 21 – very important!) Housekeeping Items We’re going to have to go light on environmental policy this week in order to cover environmental ethics and social change adequately, but read both Chapters 21 and 22. I’ll give a few assignments back today. Remember that the environmental education reflection pieces are due on April 9th at the latest. Apparently, Earth Hour was year – down from kilowatts and saved in 2013. The top were Whistler, ….. Nanaimo a flop in BC this saved in 2012 five communities was Upon successfully completing this chapter (21), you will be able to Characterize the influences of culture and world view on the choices people make Outline the nature, evolution, and expansion of environmental ethics in Western cultures Describe some basic precepts of economic theory and summarize their implications for the environment Compare the concepts of economic growth, economic health, and sustainability Explain the fundamentals of environmental economics, ecological economics, and natural 21-3 accounting Culture, World View, And The Environment 21-4 Culture, world view, and the environment • Environmental issues often highlight trade-offs between conflicting economic benefits and social or ethical concerns • Both disciplines – ecology and economics – deal with what we value • Our values affect our environmental decisions and actions • In our culture, economic objectives usually trump ecological or social objectives. Any examples or counter-examples? First Nations? Africa? Gibson’s Landing? 21-5 Culture and world view influence our perception of the environment Our relationship with the environment depends on assessments of costs and benefits, some of which in turn can be influenced by denial, resistance, discounting, fear, and cognitive dissonance. Culture and worldview also affects this relationship Culture = knowledge, beliefs, values, and learned ways of life shared by a group of people (examples?) World view = a person’s or group’s beliefs about the meaning, purpose, operation, and essence of the world Culture and worldview affect our perception of the environment and environmental problems. Examples? 21-6 Many factors shape our world views and perception of the environment (examples?) Religion Communities Political ideology Economics Individual interests Vested interest = an individual with strong interests in the outcome of a decision that results in gain or loss for that individual 21-7 What examples come out in your media analyses and what conflicting values are at play? I did a paper with a friend of mine who has been active in securing protection for Echo Heights in Chemainus (91% has now been protected). The focus was the different lenses through which people see land: Commodity Resource Environment Ecosystem Heritage/ homeland Bioregion weighing issues the Mining in Mecca…? Suppose a mining company discovered uranium near the Sacred Mosque at Mecca—or the site in Bethlehem believed to be the birthplace of Jesus or the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem. What do you think would happen if the company announced plans to develop a mine close to one of these sacred locations, assuring the public that environmental impacts would be minimal and that the mine would create jobs and stimulate economic growth? Also: why, in contrast with Europe and other parts of the world, is beauty valued so little in relation to commercial values in North America? Why are ecosystems valued so little? 21-9 Take Your Pick… There are many ways to understand the environment Scientific knowledge Traditional or indigenous ecological knowledge = the intimate knowledge of a particular environment possessed and passed along by those who have inhabited an area for many generations (e.g. Mirrar Clan in Australia vs. a second uranium mine) Medicinal properties of local plants Migration habits of local animals Geographic and microclimatic variations 21-11 For more information, see The Earth’s Blanket by Nancy Turner. Environmental Ethics 21-12 Environmental ethics Ethics = the study of good and bad, right and wrong Relativists = ethics varies with (social) context Universalists = right and wrong remains the same across cultures and situations What would be an example of each perspective? Ethical standards = criteria that help differentiate right from wrong The golden rule Utilitarian principle = something is right that produces the most benefits for the most 21-13 people (Jeremy Bentham) weighing issues the The Atlantic seal hunt No environmental issue identified with Canada is more emotionally charged than the Atlantic seal hunt. Each year environmentalists and animal activists mobilize to try to stop the hunt, arguing that too many seals are killed and that the methods used are inhumane. The hunters and supporters counter that they are continuing a way of life that has been practiced by Aboriginal people for at least 4000 years (and also Newfoundlanders and others), that it is their right to practice their traditional ways, and that the hunt is vital for the economic well-being and survival of their communities. What do you think? Who should decide which of these sets of values—animal rights or Aboriginal selfdetermination—should take precedence in this case? 21-14 Tanya Tagaq’s controversial “sealfie” Environmental ethics pertains to humans and the environment Environmental ethics = application of ethical standards to relationships between human and non-human entities Should we conserve resources for future generations? Is is OK to destroy a forest to create jobs for people? Are humans justified in driving other species to extinction? Is it OK for some communities to be exposed to excess pollution? Only two nations have enshrined the rights of ecosystems 21-16 their legal systems: Bolivia and Ecuador. into We have started to extend ethical consideration to non-human entities (examples?) Why have we expanded our ethical concerns? Economic prosperity: more leisure time, less anxieties Science: interconnection of all organisms Non-western cultures often have broader ethical domains (e.g. First Nations, Hindus, Jains, and Buddhists, etc.) Three perspectives in Western ethics Anthropocentrism = only humans have rights Biocentrism = certain living things also have value Ecocentrism = whole ecological systems have value What are some of the sources of anthropocentrism? 21-18 Environmental ethics has ancient roots People have questioned our relationship with the environment for centuries • Environment as sacred: • Aboriginal oral traditions • Jain Dharma (Compassion for all life) • Anthropocentric view or stewardship over nature? • Christianity, Judaism, and Islam • The Industrial Revolution intensified debate about our relationship with the environment, with the Romantic Revolution seeking to reestablish the value of nature. It was felt that 21-19 contact with nature refreshed and ennobled people. • The Industrial Revolution inspired environmental philosophers and other commentators • As long ago as George Perkins Marsh (author of Man and Nature, 1864), authors began to write about the environmental crisis. • Transcendentalism = viewed nature as a direct manifestation of the divine - Ralph Waldo Emerson - Henry Thoreau - Walt Whitman - John Muir, and others Modern environmentalism, at least some strands, has built on these traditions. 21-20 Conservation and preservation arose at the start of the twentieth century John Muir (right, with President Roosevelt at Yosemite National Park) had an ecocentric viewpoint and founded the Sierra Club. 21-21 Conservation and preservation arose at the start of the twentieth century (cont’d) Preservation ethic = holds that we should protect the natural environment in a pristine, unaltered state James Bernard Harkin was the first commissioner of Dominion Parks (eventually Parks Canada) Conservation ethic = holds that humans should put natural resources to use but also that we have a responsibility to manage them wisely Clifford Sifton was the first chairman of the Commission for the Conservation of 21-22 Natural Resources The land ethic and deep ecology enlarged the boundaries of the ethical community • Aldo Leopold – “The Land Ethic” in 1949 humans should view themselves and “the land” as members of the same community People are obligated to treat the land in an ethical manner based on mutual respect • Deep ecology = humans are inseparable from nature Since all living things have equal value, they should be protected 21-23 Ecofeminism recognizes connections between the oppression of nature and women • Ecofeminism = the patriarchal structure of society is the root cause of both social and environmental problems - A world view traditionally associated with women (interrelationships and cooperation) is more compatible with nature than that associated with men (hierarchies and competition) Ecofeminists note that women have also been traditionally associated with nature (e.g. Mother Nature, and the naming of hurricanes until relatively recently). God has, in the Abrahamic tradition, always 21-24been seen as male. - Ecofeminists in Practice Chipko or ‘treehugger’ movement in India Waangari Mathhai, founder of the ‘Green Belt’ movement in Kenya Environmental justice seeks equitable access to resources and protection from environmental degradation • Environmental justice = based on the principle that all people have the right: - To live and work in a clean, healthy environment To receive protection from the risks and impacts of environmental degradation - To be compensated for having suffered such impacts - To have equitable access to environmental resources - A good example is the campaign, led by Majora Carter, to create a “Sustainable South Bronx” – see http://www.ted.com/talks/majora_carter_s_tale_of_urban _renewal?language=en 21-26 Majora Carter Regarding environmental racism, see: http://www.toler ance.org/sites/de fault/files/genera l/air%20pollution %20map.pdf Economics: Approaches and environmental implications • Conflict between ethical and economic motivations is a recurrent theme in environmental issues • Environmental protection is seen as working in opposition to economic progress, hence Harper’s neutering of environmental protection legislation • Arguments are made that environmental protection costs too much money, interferes with growth, and leads to job loss (short-term view) • Environmental protection can be good for the economy both in terms of creating ‘green’ jobs, and in preserving needed resources (long-term view). As the organization Earth First! used to 21-28 say, “there are no jobs on a dead planet!” Economics studies the allocation of scarce resources • Economics = the study of how people decide to use scarce resources to provide goods and services in the face of demand for them • Most environmental and economic issues are linked, including through the process you have studied with the LCAs – throughput: the transformation of raw materials into products, waste, and pollution. • Root “oikos” (household) gave rise to both 21-29 ecology and economics Environment and economy are intricately linked Economies receive inputs from the environment, process them in complex ways Open system = economies are open systems integrated with the larger environmental system of which they are part of Closed system = earth is a closed system, the material inputs Earth can provide are finite and so is the wasteabsorbing capacity biosphere economy biosphere “Over-full world” 21-30 i.e. cyclical not linear 21-31 but “throughput” is linear 21-32 Environment and economy are intricately linked (cont’d) o Ecosystem services = essential services support the life that makes economic activities possible and yet we put no price on them Soil formation Pollination Water purification Nutrient cycling Climate regulation Waste treatment o These services have only recently become widely recognized, and still don’t have dollar values put on them. 21-33 Aspects of neoclassical economics have profound implications for the environment Assumptions of neoclassical economics: Resources are infinite or substitutable Costs and benefits are internal to the production and consumption process (not!) – producers and consumers don’t pay for many of these “externalities” Long-term effects are discounted – i.e. “a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.” Growth is good and necessary! 21-34 Aspects of neoclassical economics have profound implications for the environment (cont’d) Assumption: Resources are infinite Economic models treat resources as substitutable and interchangeable A replacement resource will be found But, Earth’s resources are limited Nonrenewable resources, by definition, are depleted Renewable resources can also be depleted if not managed properly 21-35 Moreover, some ‘resources,’ such as biodiversity, clean air and water, and a stable climate cannot be substituted for. Aspects of neoclassical economics have profound implications for the environment (cont’d) Assumptions: Long-term effects should be discounted A future event counts less than a present one Discounting = short-term costs and benefits are more important than long-term costs and benefits Policymakers ignore long term consequences of our actions Economic growth is necessary to maintain employment and social order Promoting economic growth creates opportunities for poor to become wealthier Progress is measured by economic growth 21-36 Aspects of neoclassical economics have profound implications for the environment (cont’d) Assumption: Costs and benefits are internal Costs and benefits are experienced by the buyer and seller alone Do not affect other members of the society or other species or ecosystems Pricing ignores social, environmental or economic costs Externalities = costs or benefits involving people other than the buyer or seller External costs = cost borne by someone not involved in a transaction Human health problems Resource depletion Hard to account for and eliminate 21-37 Is the growth paradigm good for us? More and bigger is better The dramatic rise in per-person consumption has severe environmental consequences Critics fear that economic growth will destroy the ecological system on which we all depend ECOSPHERE ECONOMY 21-38 As Ban Ki-moon says, “There is no Plan B because there is no Planet B.” Economists disagree on whether economic growth is sustainable Are endless improvements in technology possible? Ecological economists argue that civilizations do not overcome their environmental limitations in the long run Could we continue this activity forever and be happy with the outcome? Environmental economists argue that economies are unsustainable if population growth is not reduced and resource use is not made more efficient 21-39 Economists disagree on whether economic growth is sustainable (cont’d) • Steady-state economy = economies that do not grow and do not shrink but rather are stable and mirror natural ecological systems • Will not evolve on its own from a capitalist market system • Critics assume that an end to growth means an end to a rising quality of life; is this necessarily true? • Requires reforms 21-40 We can measure economic progress differently • Gross Domestic Product (GDP) = total monetary value of final goods and services produced 21-41 Does not account for non-market values Not necessarily measure desirable economic activity A large oil spill would increase GDP, as would people dying of cancer from smoking or poor diets. We can measure economic progress differently (cont’d) GPI: An alternative to the GDP Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) = differentiates between desirable and undesirable economic activity Positive contributions (i.e. volunteer work) not paid for with money are added to economic activity Negative impacts (crime, pollution) are subtracted 21-42 21-43 Although GDP of Alberta has increased, GPI shows a decline 21-44 Other Alternatives to GDP The Kingdom of Bhutan a number of years ago adopted what they called “Gross National Happiness,” in which every national decision was supposed to be based on making people better off. The New Economics Foundation has created the “Happy Planet Index” to measure how happy people in different countries relative to their ecological footprint. The UN also has the Gender Empowerment Index (GEI) and the Human Development Index, based on life expectancy, education levels, and gross national income per capita. We can give ecosystem goods and services monetary values Economies receive from the environment vital resources and ecosystem services Ecosystem services are said to have nonmarket values, values not usually included in the price of a good or service Existence values Option values Aesthetic values Scientific values Educational values Cultural values Use values 21-46 Markets can fail Market failure occurs when markets do not account for: the environment’s positive effects on economies the negative effects of economic activity on the environment or people Government intervention counters market failure Laws and regulations Green taxes = penalize harmful activities Economic incentives to promote conservation and sustainability 21-47 Corporations are responding to sustinability concerns Industries, businesses, and corporations can make money by “greening” their operations Corporate sustainability has gone mainstream Be careful of greenwashing, where consumers are misled into thinking companies are acting sustainably Examples from the LCAs? 21-48 Conclusion Corporate responsibility, alternative ways of measuring growth, and the valuation of ecosystem goods and services offer different, but potentially complementary, economic approaches to environmental protection Environmental ethics has expanded people’s ethical consideration Distributional equity = equal treatment for all True income is sustainable income If economic welfare can be enhanced in the absence of growth, economies and environmental quality can benefit from one 21-49 another