Robin A. Graham Needham & Company, Inc. The Emerging Growth Investment Bank for Technology Leaders Page 1 Today’s M&A discussion • Understand the M&A environment that you are in • How to find and engage the right investment bank for M&A advice • Working with an investment banker to prepare for a negotiation/sale • The range of services provided by bankers in the M&A process • • Issues in selecting the best merger or acquisition partner Where M&A bankers are focused today and why Page 2 The Mergers and Acquisitions Environment Market Capitalization Over Time Valuation corrections in 2001 altered the Market Cap landscape dramatically • More than half of large-cap companies ($1bn+) reassigned to the middle market ($500M - $1bn) • Only 93 companies went public in 2001, yet the small-cap sector continued its growth trend grow due to devaluation of large and mid-cap stocks Market Capitalization Analysis U.S. Targets January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2001 6,000 0 - $500MM > $500MM - $1B > $1B 5,500 5,000 4,500 Number of Companies 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Source: FactSet Page 4 Macro Trends in M&A • An extended period of high valuations followed by tight credit markets have caused financial buyers to be an insignificant factor in the overall M&A market as compared to earlier periods. • Overall M&A volume has retreated dramatically from the past few years all-time highs • M&A activity is still driven by corporate buyers fulfilling strategic imperatives Value of Completed M&A Transactions Acquisitions Completed by Financial Buyers U.S. Targets January 1, 1987 to April 30, 2002 U.S. Targets January 1, 1987 to April 30, 2002 ($ in billions) (% of Total Volume) 30% $1,740.1 $1,800 23.8% $1,600 25% $1,352.2 $1,317.5 20.2% $1,400 20% $1,091.7 $1,200 16.2% $1,000 15% $740.7 $800 10% $600 $402.7 $292.3 $311.0 $400 10.0% $613.5 $210.2 5.9% $198.2 $137.0 $121.1 4.9% 4.6% $287.2 $180.5 $110.8 3.9% 3.6% 5% 1.2% 1.9% 0.8% 0.5% $200 0.5% 0.5% 0.2% 0% $0 1987 1988 Source: Securities Data Company. 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ytd 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ytd Source: Securities Data Company. Page 5 The Impact on Technology M&A Technology M&A volume was most significantly impacted • 2001 tech M&A volume was down more than 60% from 2000 levels after an unprecedented run that began in 1994. • Broken deals were prevalent as business fundamentals and expectations eroded. • 2002 YTD M&A volume is even more depressed Value of Completed Technology M&A Transactions U.S. Targets January 1, 1987 to April 30, 2002 ($ in billions) $800 $722.8 $700 $600 $513.2 $500 $400 $271.5 $300 $222.8 $162.3 $200 $100 $125.5 $45.5 $13.4 $10.2 $10.2 $13.5 $14.4 $8.7 $67.9 $27.5 $9.7 $0 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ytd Source: Securities Data Company. Page 6 Mergers & Acquisitions Environment M&A Currency - what is different now? • Cash is King - reversing the accelerating use of high p/e stock seen 1995-2000 • New FASB rules no longer penalize creative structures using stock and cash • Cash is an increasingly attractive currency to sellers and low P/E buyers. M&A Currency Analysis U.S. Technology Transactions greater than $25MM January 1, 1990 to April 30, 2002 350 Cash Stock Combination 325 300 275 Number of Transactions 250 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 25 0 1990 1991 Source: Securities Data Company. 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ytd Page 7 The Public/Public M&A Story M&A dollar volume between public companies fell dramatically after Q1 2001 • Most of Q1’s dollar volume were CY 2000 transactions that closed in early 2001 • Public companies froze merger discussions due to valuation uncertainty and eroding business performance at both buyers and sellers. • The number of transactions consummated declined >6x Q1/Q1 M&A Activity Between Public Companies U.S. Targets January 1, 2000 to April 30, 2002 $400 400 # of Transactions $350 350 $300 300 $250 250 $200 200 $150 150 $100 100 $50 50 $0 Number of Transactions Volume of Completed Transactions $ Volume 0 2000 - Q1 2000 - Q2 Source: Securities Data Company. 2000 - Q3 2000 - Q4 2001 - Q1 2001 - Q2 2001 - Q3 2001 - Q4 2002 - Q1 Page 8 The Private Company Liquidity Path Private companies found liquidity paths scarce in 2001 • Of the 93 IPOs in 2001, just 19 were technology companies This compared to 308 tech IPOs in 1999 and 221 tech IPOs in 2000 The period 1980 – 1998 averaged just 61 IPOs per year • M&A continually reinforced as the most likely liquidity path for private companies U.S. Private Company Liquidity Events January 1, 1990 to April 30, 2002 6,000 IPO M&A 4,949 5,036 5,000 4,463 4,243 Number of Transactions 4,097 3,873 4,000 3,466 3,000 2,732 2,549 2,337 2,082 1,986 2,000 818 1,000 604 874 645 629 578 403 389 536 386 214 93 258 24 0 1990 1991 Source: Securities Data Company. 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ytd Page 9 The Good Old Days… The BOOM Economy Unprecedented wealth creation and high consumer confidence M&A EXIT: High p/e stock currency used in “strategic” MA& boom Low cost and easy access to capital IPO EXITs: underdeveloped companies go public early Investors seeking abnormal returns increasingly turned to private equity “Public” Venture Capital Phenomenon Proliferation of venture funds M&A outpaces IPO’s 11-1 Explosion of young VCbacked tech and Internet companies Page 10 Mergers & Acquisitions Environment Significantly reduced M&A activity seen in 2001 will continue • Classic “Buyers Market”, yet the universe of buyers contracted dramatically • The number of sellers remain high as the valuation-sensitive sellers are more than outnumbered by the illiquid desperate sellers Distressed public companies and stranded / capital-starved private companies • Industry leaders that had built their businesses through aggressive acquisition were on the M&A sidelines -- until very recently In 2001, corporate buyers were waiting for valuations and their businesses to stabilize. Examples: Cisco, Lucent, Nortel, Broadcom However, “Gorilla” acquisition appetites are renewed in 2002 — Cisco just announced two “spin-in” acquisitions and 2002 M&A intentions — Broadcom just re-entered with acquisition of Mobilink ($258M) Page 11 Mergers & Acquisitions Environment The results are: • Fewer M&A transactions and lower valuations for M&A transactions • Longer cycle times for transactions Much greater emphasis on detailed financial/business due diligence Management cautious throughout process Greater degree of Board involvement in acquisitions Slow, difficult negotiations – every point counts • More carefully structured M&A transactions the return & proliferation of earn-outs for acquired companies Passing EPS accretion/dilution acid test is critical Page 12 Mergers & Acquisitions Environment M&A Market Outlook for 2002 • Significant transition made in 2001 from Sellers market to Buyers market • Companies with strong balance sheets, experienced management teams and profitable business models are now the drivers of the M&A market. • M&A transactions will continue to suffer higher attrition rates and lower net valuations • An increasing percentage of transactions will be“distressed sales” or bankruptcies • Leveraged companies and undercapitalized companies will be at a tremendous negotiating disadvantage Choosing and using the right M&A advisor and experienced legal counsel will be all the more critical to a successful outcome Page 13 The M&A transaction Assembling the Transaction Team • The Core Working Group: Senior management team, legal counsel, Investment Banker & their M&A team • Getting to know investment bankers Who can make the right introductions — Directors — Venture Capitalists — Legal counsel If your company is an attractive acquisition candidate, bankers have probably been beating down your door Take the time to get to know bankers well before a transaction is imminent – a long-standing relationship benefits everyone involved Page 15 Selecting the Right Banker • Bankers who know your industry sector and its competitive dynamics • Active M&A team with current & recent experience on transactions • An investment bank with a tradition of representing companies that are your size and profile • Research analysts who cover your industry sector and follow its public companies • Leverage the relationship with your banker Hire a full service investment who can advise you on a multitude of possible alternatives to M&A (alternatives = negotiating leverage) Page 16 Current Structure of the Investment Banking Industry Independent National Emerging Growth Firms Needham & Company Thomas Weisel Partners Wit Soundview Emerging Growth Firms Now Owned by Major Commercial Banks ABN Amro / ING Barings / Furman Selz Bank of America Securities / Montgomery JP. Morgan / Chase / H&Q CIBC World Markets / Oppenheimer Deutsche Bank / Bankers Trust / Alex. Brown Firstar / US Bancorp / Piper Jaffray Fleet / BancBoston / Robertson Stephens Royal Bank of Canada / Dain Rauscher / Wessels SG / Cowen Major Bracket Institutional Firms Bear Stearns UBS Warburg / Paine Webber Special Bracket Firms Citigroup / Salomon Smith Barney CS First Boston / DLJ Goldman Sachs Lehman Brothers Merrill Lynch Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Regional Retail, Institutional or Emerging Growth Firms A.G. Edwards (St. Louis) Adams Harkness & Hill (Boston) Janney Montgomery Scott (Philadelphia) KeyCorp / McDonald & Company (Cleveland) Morgan Keegan (Memphis) Raymond James Financial (St. Petersburg) SunTrust Equity Securities (Atlanta) Stephens Inc. (Little Rock) Robert W. Baird (Milwaukee) Wachovia (Richmond) Wells Fargo/FSVK (San Francisco) William Blair (Chicago) Page 17 The Role of an Advisor …extracts from a standard engagement letter: • Reviewing with the Board of Directors and management the Company's financial plans, strategic plans and business alternatives • Reviewing and analyzing the historical and projected financial information of the Company and the Other Party provided by the respective managements of the Company and the Other Party • Assisting the Company's Board of Directors and management in the valuation of the business(es) involved in the Transaction • Assisting the financial due diligence efforts of the Company with respect to the Other Party • Advising the Company with regard to the financial structure and terms of any Transaction that might be realized in the current market environment and assisting the Company in structuring and negotiating the financial aspects of the Transaction Page 18 Preparation is Key • Discuss your business’ history and prospects with M&A advisors in detail • Realistic assessment of financing/M&A options with advisors Avoids “death-march” or “firesale” scenarios • Prepare realizable, bottoms-up, detailed financial forecasts • Outline non-financial concerns to your advisors Employee treatment, cultural and strategic fit with each potential buyer • Establish reasonable valuation expectations up front • Determine initial preference for cash, stock or combination thereof • Help your advisors build a Negotiating Plan Page 19 Assessing Negotiating Leverage Multiple Elements Drive Negotiating Leverage • Competition • Strategic Alternatives • Necessity/Desire Negotiating Leverage (5 key elements) • Resources • Time Page 20 Building the Negotiating Plan Planning is an Important Component of Successful Negotiations Collecting Information Achieving Resolution Assessing Leverage Negotiating Plan Establishing Expectations Determining Response Page 21 Critical Transaction Parameters Successful Negotiation Can Usually Result in a Broad Range of Outcomes Financial Terms Valuation Structure Liquidity Buyer’s Minimum Terms Seller’s Minimum Terms Non - Financial Terms Strategic Fit Culture Timing Page 22 Structure of M&A Advisor Fees Sellers pay advisory fees as a % of Total Transaction Value Sometimes staggered for additional incentive: 1% plus 2% over $100M • Advisors “minimum fee” common in this business environment Example: Fee is the greater of 1.5% or $750,000 • Interim fees sometimes charged and credited against total fees due on closing: Retainer fee on signing engagement letter Milestone Fees on signing of Letter of Intent/Agreement or Announcement • Fairness Opinion fees (Only necessary for public companies) Set $ amount charged is independent of transaction completion Page 23 Where Advisors are Focused Today • The Investment Banking industry is itself retrenching Many firms are pre-occupied with their own M&A and restructuring • M&A professionals spending more time advising Acquirers in a buyers market In 2000, Needham represented Buyers in just 27% of transactions In 2001 & 2002, Needham represented Buyers in 47% of transactions • Public companies who are building market leadership through M&A • Still very active in representing sellers, but Very cautious in assessing valuation and probability of transaction completion prior to committing resources Seller’s business stability and negotiating leverage, strategic drivers of transaction are critical Acquisitions of stand-alone private companies by public companies are difficult in today’s M&A market Page 24 Where Advisors are Focused Today Needham & Company remains committed to Emerging Growth companies • Supporting client-base through the downturn Follow-on equity offerings Private Placements PIPEs • Grew headcount in 2001 and YTD 2002 while maintaining profitability every quarter • Strong Q1 2002 -- our second best Q1 in 15 years • Taking market share in Emerging Growth M&A Ten M&A transactions announced YTD Including four public/public M&A transactions Page 25 Appendices The M&A Transaction A Typical Sale / Divestiture Process Preparation Weeks 1 - 4 Canvas Buyers Weeks 5 - 8/10* Phase/Action Items •Engagement of Needham Due Diligence •Review Co. Financial and Operational Information •Contact Buyers •Needham Values Co. •Send Executive summary •Prepare Memorandum, •Sign NDAs Weeks 8/10 - 12/14 •Distribute informational memorandum / materials Executive Summary and NDA with co. counsel •Prepare List of Likely Buyers •Prepare management team for diligence presentations •Request and receive initial non-binding bids in writing. Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Final Negotiation Weeks 12/14 - 16/18 •Setup Data Room Closing •Select Qualified Bidders for D.D. •Schedule and Conduct Visits •Provide Draft Definitive Agreement 9 10 •Shareholder Approval Process •Submit HSR Filing •Receive Final Bids 8 (TBA) •Select Winning Bidder •Negotiate & Execute Definitive Agreement •Press Release ($50 million threshold) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 * The length depends on such factors as the size of canvas, the overall market and the geographic location of contacts. Page 27 The M&A Transaction Acquisitions & Transactional Issues Financial Positioning •Press release announcing transaction Due Diligence •Backgrounder on the acquisition •Guidance for analysts’ forecasts •Interview key management •Financial due diligence Negotiations •Financial advisor or principal •Cash or stock preferable Structuring •Understand potential synergies •Employee issues such as: •Acceleration of options Valuation •Determine ability to use either •Employment agreements cash or stock •Non-compete agreements •Analyze respective proforma •Condition of closing acquisition •Financing outs •Balance sheet •Discuss business history and •Reps & warranties •P&L •Break-up fees prospects with management •Goodwill (write-off upon impairment) •Shopping restrictions •Analyze comparable transactions and projected financial statements; interview independent auditors •Plan and execute roadshow to sell the deal, if necessary •Third-party interviews and reference checks •Facility visits •Legal due diligence •Key issues to be negotiated: effects of a stock or cash •Analyze financial statements •Analyze comparable public companies’ trading multiples including analysis of historical •Prepare and conduct conference call •Topping offers •Material adverse change •Shareholders’ vote required (either company) Page 28 Representative Financial Advisory Assignments Undisclosed $128,000,000 $103,000,000 Acquiring Sale to Acquiring Sale to Sale to Innoveda Inc. Asyst Technologies, Inc. Mechanical Dynamics, Inc. Mentor Graphics Corporation Level 3 Communications GHz Technology, Inc. Pending 2002 2002 2002 2002 2002 $68,000,000 $77,000,000 $50,100,000 $140,000,000 $12,300,000 $26,000,000 $160,000,000 Sale to $120,000,000 $29,000,000 Acquiring has Acquired ADC Telecommunications, Inc. (RF Equipment Business) Spin-off to Sale to Sale to Therma-Wave, Inc. Integrated Circuit Systems Corp. Existing Shareholders FEI Company Lawson Software 2002 2002 2001 2001 2001 2001 $100,000,000 $115,000,000 $37,000,000 $36,000,000 $900,000,000 $77,000,000 Sale to Excalibur Technologies Corp. Sale to Merger of Sale to has Acquired Sale to has Acquired MMC Technology, Inc. NVIDIA Corporation CMD Technology Computer Network Technologies Intel’s Interactive Media Service Division Viasystems Group, Inc. 2001 2001 2001 2001 2000 2000 with Page 29 Representative Public Equity Offerings $125,000,000 $109,500,000 $52,200,000 $50,000,000 $60,750,000 $53,550,000 Convertible Debt Follow-On Offering Follow-On Offering Convertible Preferred Follow-On Offering Follow-On Offering Co-Manager Co-Manager Lead Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager April 2002 March 2002 March 2002 March 2002 March 2002 February 2002 $93,020,000 $100,350,000 $66,000,000 $23,490,000 $68,000,000 $76,467,060 Follow-On Offering Follow-On Offering Follow-On Offering Follow-On Offering Follow-On Offering Follow-On Offering Lead Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager Lead Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager January 2002 January 2002 December 2001 December 2001 November 2001 November 2001 $100,000,000 $103,020,000 $26,000,000 $150,000,000 $29,700,000 $62,100,000 Follow-On Offering Follow-On Offering Follow-On Offering Convertible Debt Follow-On Offering Follow-On Offering Co-Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager Lead-Manager Co-Manager October 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 August 2001 July 2001 Page 30 Representative Public Equity Offerings $64,000,000 $50,000,000 $36,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $244,000,000 Follow-On Offering Initial Public Offering Follow-On Offering Convertible Debt Convertible Debt Follow-On Offering Co-Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager July 2001 June 2001 June 2001 June 2001 May 2001 May 2001 $141,000,000 $42,000,000 $98,000,000 $126,000,000 $41,000,000 $36,000,000 Follow-On Offering Initial Public Offering Follow-On Offering Follow-On Offering Follow-On Offering Initial Public Offering Co-Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager Lead Manager Co-Manager February 2001 November 2000 October 2000 September 2000 August 2000 August 2000 $75,000,000 $26,000,000 $20,000,000 $53,000,000 $39,000,000 $120,000,000 Initial Public Offering Follow-On Offering Follow-On Offering Initial Public Offering Initial Public Offering Follow-On Offering Co-Manager Co-Manager Lead Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager Co-Manager August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 August 2000 July 2000 July 2000 Page 31 Representative Private Placements $29,450,000 $17,000,000 $20,000,000 $12,000,000 $8,220,000 $28,600,000 Common Stock Common Stocks Convertible Preferred Series C Preferred Series C Preferred Common Stock Common Stock Virtual Silicon Current Status: Current Status: 2002 2002 2002 2001 2001 2001 Public Public Private Private Public Public $10,250,000 $18,600,000 $10,000,000 $19,500,000 $37,500,000 $11,850,000 Common Stocks Common Stock Convertible Preferred Common Stock Series G Preferred Series D Preferred 2001 2001 2001 2001 2000 2000 Public Public Public Public Private Private $21,500,000 $8,200,000 $8,300,000 $10,000,000 $12,700,000 $6,000,000 Series B Preferred Common Stock Series B Preferred Common Stock Series I Preferred Common Stock Bernàrd Technologies, Inc. Current Status: 2000 2000 2000 2000 2000 1999 Private Public Private Public Public Private Page 32 Representative Corporate Investment Transactions Undisclosed $10,000,000 $35,000,000 $60,000,000 Conner Peripherals, Inc. Hitachi Metals Limited Philips N.V. Northrop Grumman and Vitesse Semiconductor investment in investment in Applied Magnetic Corporation $20,000,000 $10,000,000 strategic partnership with Sears, Roebuck & Company, Inc. investment in MaxServ, Inc. investment in Epoch System investment in Applied Magnetic Corporation Navigation Technologies Corporation Elo Touch System, Inc. $10,000,000 $24,000,000 $10,000,000 Westinghouse Electric Corporation Telemetrix PLC investment in Undisclosed investment in investment in investment in GTI Corporation RF Micro Devices GAMMA-METRICS Corporation Page 33