An Entrepreneurial Approach to Design, Create, Implement, and Promote Successful Strategies for SRDC
Chyi-Lyi (Kathleen) Liang
Professor of Entrepreneurship and Applied Economics
The University of Vermont
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Department of Community Development and Applied Economics
Introduction – Personal and Professional Background
Path of Career Development
Leadership Experiences
Vision for SRDC
Plan of Work
Challenges and Opportunities
As a Faculty
As a Director for SRDC
Taiwan
Land area: 12,456 sq mi (32,261 sq km); 70% mountains
Population (2012 est.): 23,234,936
Key industries: Manufacturing,
Tourism, Agriculture
PhD and MS – Purdue University, Agricultural Economics
General Equilibrium Modeling, Fertilizer Tax Simulation,
Nonpoint Pollution, FINPACK/EPIC/IMPLAN
The first Ag Econ Graduate Instructor to teach Business Statistics at Krannert Graduate School of Business, and won Outstanding
Graduate Instructor Award
BS – National Taiwan University, Agricultural Economics
Benefit-Cost Analysis for Tourism and Nuclear Power Plants,
National Seashore Preservation and Evaluation
University of Nebraska, Panhandle Research and Extension
Center, Scottsbluff, Nebraska
Research and Extension – economic analysis, experimental design winter wheat, sunflower, alfalfa, corn, soybean, livestock, buffalo + prairie dogs, dry edible beans, water distribution for irrigation
Teaching – Agricultural Economics, joint appointment with
Western Nebraska Community College
Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development
Program Leader
Chair, Technical Advisory Committee
Accomplishments
More collaborative initiatives
More grants and projects
More outreach activities
Vermont Farms Association
Invent Vermont, LLC
Camp Uncommon Ground
Rural Entrepreneurship through Action Learning (youth)
Agricultural and Applied Economics (AAEA) – CWAE and Early
Career Mentoring Program
Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship
Association for American University Women
Small Business Institute
Economic Development Coalition – VT and New England
Needs and
Priorities
Culture
Endowment
Capacity
Infrastructure
Opportunities
Issues and Concerns for Rural America
Social
Characteristics
Economic
Characteristics
Ecological
Characteristics
Political
Characteristics
Be the “go-to” agency for Rural Development in the Region
• Initiate Team Driven solutions for rural development
• Maintain existing relationships and identify new institutional relationships that enhance rural development
• Coordinate land grant, agency and organizations to find creative solutions
Inventory existing programs
Meet with and discuss the needs of the region with stakeholders, constituents and others at the grassroots
Continue relevant existing programs
Define gaps and overlaps
Identify new programs and initiatives that meet the needs of the region
Prioritize existing and new programs and initiatives
Complete assessment tools, in measurable terms, to determine impact of programs
Develop solution-oriented initiatives and programs consistent with needs of the region
Develop collaborative discussion and activities with existing and newly identified partners
Promote Center proposed initiatives to land grant institutions, agencies, and other organizations in the region
Identify and apply for funding to enhance Center’s functions and services
Incentivize existing and newly identified partners to achieve creative and innovative solutions
Assess impacts of initiatives and programs in measurable terms
Continue to develop and prioritize initiatives and programs consistent with needs of the region
Develop, maintain, and expand collaborative efforts with existing and newly identified partners
Continue to promote Center initiatives to land grant institutions, agencies, and other organizations in the region and across regions
Identify and apply for funding to enhance Center’s functions and services
Offer more incentives to existing and newly identified partners to achieve creative and innovative solutions
Continue assessment activities
Development of the Northeast Regional Center
Phase
3
Create new collaborative teams
Apply for more funding
Update newsletter and social media
Expand joint services and functions
Expand Center’s Scholars Program
Phase
2
Create new website
Develop assessment indicators
Offer Center’s Scholars Program
Identify funding opportunities
Build creative teams
Phase 1
Inventory Northeast members 2010-2011
Identify new initiatives, partners, and opportunities
Prioritize initiatives, services, and functions
Examples of Integrated Programs
Multifunctional Agriculture in the United States
Project Funded by USDA AFRI Program, No 2011-67023-30106 (7/2011-6/2014)
Co PI – Mary Ahearn (USDA ERS), Jason Brown (Federal Reserve), and Stephan Goetz (Penn State University)
Background
There has been a significant change in the farming activities among small and medium sized farms in the United States (USDA, 2012).
About 60% of the farms were very small, generating gross cash farm income of less than $10,000 annually (USDA, 2012)
The number of small farms, particularly the non-commercial farms, has slowly increased since 2002 (USDA, 2012), and many of them are engaged in multifunctional operations.
There has been limited information to assess farms’ contribution to community viability beyond traditional production of food and fiber.
Objectives
To design a framework to study multifunctional agriculture in New
England and other regions in the U. S.
To examine the relationship between the multifunctional agriculture and farm profile, entrepreneurial characteristics, financial situations, reasons, challenges, risks, networks, expectations, and future outlook.
To integrate multiple sources of information to conduct research at state, regional, and national levels.
Primary field surveys (producer , enterprise, institution, and consumers), Census, National Agricultural Statistic Services, USDA
Agricultural Risk Management Survey
Stakeholders, researchers, extension educators, service providers,
USDA experts, community organizations (non-profit and for-profit), and government agencies at local, state, and national levels.
Findings and Work in Progress
Top reasons for farmers to choose multifunctional operations – income, connection with customers and community, promotion and education, health care.
The major issues for farmers - access to labor, financing, working capital, markets, and customers
education, training, financial and risk management, user friendly tools for marketing, and reaching the balance between accessibility, affordability, and availability.
Multifunctional agriculture has significant impacts on state economic development, not at regional level.
We need better information to represent local and regional characteristics by sectors for rural areas.
We need to find a better way to compare and consolidate different sources of information representing enterprises and individual households at state and regional level.
USDA Foundational Program, Entrepreneurship Division (UVM, CUNY,
OSU, PSU, UMD East Shore)
Understanding and Designing Long-Term Resilience in the US Food
System: the Role of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Supporting
Regional Food Networks
$500,000 July 2014 – June 2017
USDA Foundational Program, Rural Development Division (UNH and
UMaine)
Sustaining and Enhancing Local Agriculture in Rural Areas: Assessing
Key Producer and Consumer Issues in Northern New England
$500,000 July 2014 – June 2017
USDA Foundational Program, Small and Medium Sized Farm Division
(UVM and other 5 institutions)
Examining Farm Labor Decisions on Long-term Profitability and Farm
Enterprise Development
$500,000 July 2014 – June 2017
National Science Foundation (with Dartmouth College)
Biophysical and Social Interdependence of Integrated Food
Energy Systems
$700,000 July 2014 – June 2019
USDA Food Security Conference Grant (UVM and the Northeast
Regional Center for Rural Development)
Enhancing food security and rural viability through innovative food system practices and opportunities $50,000 2014-2015
Hawaii
Networks for Collaborations and Interdisciplinary Approach
L isten, observe, and learn from others; and ask a lot of questions
O btain teamwork and consensus building activities; and offer support and guidance
V alue and respect diversity of individuals, ideas, and contributions
E valuate and explain objectives and priorities, delegate tasks to other people, and reward good performance
Goals and Objectives – personal and institutional
Priorities – personal and institutional
Flexibility
Choices and Alternatives
Goals and Objectives – SRDC
Priorities – SRDC
Time Management and
Commitment
Collaboration and Networks
Explicit Leadership and
Mentoring Position
Desire, Discipline, Determination
Dream Comes True!
An Entrepreneurial Approach to Design, Implement, and Promote Successful Integrated Programs
Chyi-Lyi (Kathleen) Liang
Professor of Entrepreneurship and Applied Economics
The University of Vermont
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Department of Community Development and Applied Economics