Differing Views on Future of African-
Americans
African-American Experience 2008
Both viewed their way as the best for
African-Americans
Positions were in opposition to each other
Washington’s views had more support from whites
Graduated from
Hampton Institute
Born as slave in 1856
Founded Tuskegee
Institute in 1881
Strongly influenced by education and training received at Hampton
Surest advancement was through skills and manual labor
Lead to respect from whites
Students did not earn
BA’s
Earned support from whites (Carnegie)
Reassured whites that cooperation between races did not endanger segregation
Claimed blacks more loyal than immigrants
Urged blacks to struggle steadily rather than make demands too quickly
If blacks made economic progress, whites would be more willing to grant rights
Advised blacks to avoid politics, though he was heavily involved
“The wisest among my race understand that agitation of questions of social equality is the extremist folly, and that progress in the enjoyment of all the privileges that will come to us must be the result of severe and constant struggle rather than artificial forcing.”
Tried to persuade owners to improve conditions on segregated trains/waiting rooms
Supported case against grandfather clauses
Supported literacy tests if equitable
Opposed women’s suffrage
Only occasionally attacked lynching
Born in mostly white
NE town (Mass)
Earned PhD from
Harvard (first)
Impatient with those who ignored racism
Understood he and
Washington came from different backgrounds
Written in 1903
Series of essays, many of which attack
Washington and his methods
Seminal literary work of movement
“Two-ness” (double consciousness)
Did not disagree with Washington’s training, but believed he opposed ambition
Securing of rights was responsibility of black elite
Education was key
“Education must not simply teach work- it must teach Life…”
Led by Dubois-1905
Demanded end to segregation, better treatment/rights
Was supposed to be
Dubois’ answer to
Tuskegee Machine
Undermined by
Washington
Formed in 1909
Focused on judicial system (use cases to change laws)
Led protest marches
Failed to get antilynching leg. Passed
Washington attempted to ruin the org. but failed
What are the pros and cons: working within the system or radical change?
Comparisons can be drawn between
Washington/MLK and WEB
Dubois/Malcolm X
Does economic power lead to political power?