Maxwell MPA Leadership Workshop with Howie Phanstiel June 22, 2009 Maxwell Leadership Workshop Agenda Introduction 9:10 – 9:20 a.m. What is Leadership & Who Are the Great Leaders? 9:20 – 10:00 a.m. Leading Through Diffuse Power Structures 10:00 – 10:15 a.m. Break 10:15 – 10:20 a.m. Leveraging Brands to Arouse Change: PacifiCare And Best Friends Animal Society 10:20 – 11:00 a.m. Aligning Strategy, Culture and Leadership Practices 11:00 – 11:15 a.m. Celebrating Results 11:15 – 11:30 a.m. Lunch, Discussion & Q&A 11:30 – 1:00 p.m. My Workshop Goals Share knowledge about fulcrums and forces that impact organizational performance Inspire you to be the best leader you can be Principle of Greatness “Disciplined people who engage in disciplined thought and who take disciplined action” Jim Collins, Good to Great and the Social Sectors What is Leadership? LEADERSHIP is the skillful use of influence to bring about the accomplishment of goals. The purpose of LEADERSHP is to produce change. The goal of LEADERSHIP is to produce success (results that move organizations forward). How? Effective leaders leverage resources and leadership style to produce clarity, governance, support standards and coaching for those they lead. They profoundly encourage success. Note: In great organizations, all members lead and great leaders are also good followers. Types of Leaders Transactional leaders work within existing structures, cut deals and make trade-offs between their followers and organizational needs. Transformational leaders radically transform and renew their followers, themselves and their organizations. James MacGregor Burns Who are the Great Leaders? people made of the “right stuff”, Jim Collins people who are the “master conductors”, Peter Drucker people who are the “stars”, Jack Welch people who possess “Executive Intelligence”, Justin Menkes Other Characteristics of Great Leaders “A man, to lead, must have a pot belly” – Ancient Greek myth according to Susan Komizes from Chancellor Buzz Shaw’s book on Leadership Are Leaders Born or Made? Max Weber and the charismatics Does the man make the times or the times make the man? - Winston Churchill - Mao-Tse-Tung vs. Deng Xiaoping Leaders vs. Managers “Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things.” - Peter Drucker Great Leaders Make A Difference “Give me a lever and a place to stand and I will move the earth.” - Archimedes, 3rd Century BC “Don’t be afraid to take a big step if one is indicated. You can’t cross a chasm in two small jumps.” - David Lloyd George “One man can make a difference. Every man should try.” - John F. Kennedy Phanstiel’s Criteria for Great Leaders Great Leaders: make good decisions take risk lead, don’t push create zealots * blend personal humility and professional will * ”when spider webs unite they can tie up a lion” - old Ethiopian proverb Limitations on Modern Leaders: Less Concentration of Pure Executive Power Jim Collins: Sarbanes-Oxley, Shareholder Activism, Consumer Activism, Regulatory Activism, Highly Mobile Knowledge Workers Jean Lipman-Blumen: Twin tensions between explosion of global interdependence and diversity requires leaders to do a better job of connecting diverse networks, institutions and constituencies without bowing to authoritarianism. Leading Through Diffuse Power Structures Leadership influence can be gained through power of: language inclusion shared interests coalition - Frances Hesselbein, CEO Girl Scouts of America Legislative leadership requires persuasion, political currency and shared interests. “Personal humility and professional will is a key factor in creating legitimacy and influence” - Jim Collins Socialized Power vs. Personalized Power sPower - Influence is used for the benefit of a greater good and/or towards an achievement goal. The goal is for the direct or indirect benefit of another. pPower – The concern for feeling or being perceived as strong, effective or influential is frequently selfish and self-aggrandizing. Renewal Transformation from “I” to “We” Learn that leading is not about your success but rather the success that you can create by empowering others to lead. The Transformation from “I” to “We” Crucibles True North by Bill George Leveraging Brands to Arouse Change “Without work all life goes rotten. But when work is soulless, life stifles and dies.” - Albert Camus Building A New Brand “Arousing Our See” We learned from Howard Schultz, CEO of Starbucks that brand is the sum of everything a consumer experiences “ “ Authentic brands emanate from everything the company does, from store design and site selection to training, production, packaging and merchandise selection. Everything matters. Howard Schultz, Chairman and CEO Starbucks Building A New Brand For PacifiCare In 2001, we surveyed: 400 consumers in CA (65% non-senior and 35% senior), 400 consumers in other PHS markets, 150 consumers outside our current markets, 400 more consumers nationwide via the internet, 67 providers, 101 benefit managers, 124 brokers and consultants, and conducted 31 focus groups So what’s Important? 1. Show some concern 2. Be perceived as being trustworthy & high quality 3. Solve problems Additional Focus Groups “Actions speak louder than words.” “You have to show how you are concerned.” “Give me some way to verify you have a pattern of concern.” “Do what you promise you would do.” “I want to know what you’re doing for me.” Bottom Line: The only way consumers will believe you care, is if you prove it. Brand Positioning PacifiCare believes caring is good. Doing something is better. Aligning Strategy, Culture & Leadership Practices Two key questions every leader has to ask Is my organization smart? Is my organization healthy? “Smart” translates to very intelligent plans, service models, financial discipline – all designed to yield that elusive goal “competitive advantage” in the private sector and “credibility” in the social sector because of execution of the concepts. In the social sectors, “Smart” translates to performance as defined by results and efficiency in delivering on the social mission. Most business graduate schools and executives focus solely on the “smart” piece. This is the “hard” measurable parts of the organization. “Healthy” is creating a work environment that stimulates individuals and groups to perform to their highest capacity and continually improves, yielding superior results and a workplace the employees would want their sons and daughters to work in. Most behaviorists focus on the “healthy” piece. This is what is seen as the “soft” issues – and is alienating to most line executives. This dynamic tension results in an “either or mental” set… At PacifiCare we focused both on culture – (the cause of health) while at the same time continuing to refine the “smarts” (strategy). We sought to align strategy, culture and leadership style. Alignment “All the elements of a company work together in concert within the context of the company’s core ideology and the type of progress it aims to achieve.” Excerpted from Collins, J.C. & Porras, J.L., Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies, New York: HarperCollins, 1994 Strategy Strategy = Magnetic North, Formula For Success Strategy is the Decider! Strategy determines the “right” improvement initiative(s) Raising the Bar 8ft Fosbury Flop Straddle Western Roll 6ft Scissors 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 Collins & Porras’ Findings Leaders concentrate on building an organization, per se Establish a core ideology – core values and a clear sense of purpose Preserve their core ideology, but also continually foster innovation and progress Set big difficult goals for people to accomplish Build cult-like cultures that are strong, integrated, focused and consistent Keep experimenting Grow their managers from within Keep trying to do things better Cumulative Stock Returns of $1 Invested January 1, 1926 - December 31, 1990 31 Treacy & Wiersema Connection They researched the question: Why does one group of companies achieve and sustain market leadership while others do not? Here’s what they found: > Three, fundamental “value disciplines” > Must find your ”unique value” to deliver Treacy & Wiersema Connection They discovered Three Core “Value Disciplines”: Operational Excellence - Example: Wal-Mart Customer Intimacy - Example: Airborne Express Product Leadership - Example: Intel Four Core Strategies CUSTOMER INTIMACY Close partnership High customization Total solution High personalization Co-development Incremental relationship DISCONTINUOUS INNOVATION Fuller realization of potential Growth of customer Raising of human spirit Further realization of ideals, values, higher order purposes Take customer to another plateau OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE Dependability Efficiency Commodity/Commodity-like Accuracy Predictability Convenience PRODUCT LEADERSHIP One of a kind Create market niche Extremely unique Unmatched product/service Excellence Constant innovation Social Sector Sample Strategies and Value Disciplines COLLABORATION/SYNERGY Family Services Municipal Town Meetings Government Health Systems Adoption Agencies CULTIVATION/ENRICHMENT World Bank AID Organizations Certain NGOs Peace Corps CONTROL/CERTANITY Social Security Administration US Army COMPETENCE/SUPERIORITY NASA US Marine Corps Cleveland Orchestra Culture The “Missing Link” between Strategy, Leadership, and bottomline performance “The way we do things around here in order to succeed” Kotter & Heskett’s Research They were curious about the impact of culture on organizational performance 207 firms from 22 industries Determined cultural strength Economic performance between 1977 – 1988 Interviewed 75 industry analysts Kotter & Heskett’s Definitions Cultural Strength = Internally Consistent • Effective cultures: Fit the strategy Were adaptive while still preserving core values Balanced the needs of 3 stakeholders: > Employees > Customers > Shareholder Excerpted from Kotter, J.P. & Heskett, J.L Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: The Free Press. 1992 Kotter & Heskett’s Research Results Strong & More Effective Strong & Less Effective Expanded Workforces 282% 36% Increased Revenues 682% 166% Grew Stock Prices 901% 74% Improved Net Incomes 756% 1% The Power of Culture Culture’s influence is more powerful than anything else including: Strategy Structure Financial analysis Management Systems… when it comes to impacting Bottom Line Performance STRATEGY + CULTURE Customer Intimacy Operational Excellence Collaboration Control “Dream The Team” “Plan The Work – Work The Plan” Discontinuous Innovation Product Leadership Cultivation Competency “Dream The Dream” “Beat The Plan & Win The Game” Core Culture Principles Collaboration Grouping/Teaming Human process Incrementalism Community Control Certainty Predictability Stability Organization per se Cultivation Meaningfulness Fulfillment Growth Values Competence Distinction Excellence Expertise Concept Core Culture Strengths Collaboration Teaming comes easily and naturally Very egalitarian Very receptive to diversity Power is based in relationships Cultivation Values are paramount Based on belief and commitment Strongly encourages selfexpression Premised on good will Control Very orderly and predictable Decision making is very careful and conservative Gets and stays in control Expectations, roles and jobs are definite Competence High performance standards Very win driven Strong achievement focus Emphasizes merit and demonstrated performance Centered on concepts Four Core Leadership Practices Participative Directive Team Builder Coach Close partner w/customers Integrator Conflict Manager Ensures utilization of diversity Authoritative Conservative Firm/Assertive Definitive Long-range planner Charismatic Standard-Setter Cultivator Catalyst People steward Idealist Commitment Builder Appeal to higher-level vision Conceptual visionary Challenger of others Spurs competition Tough Taskmaster Stretcher of people Drives constant innovation Organizational Structure by Core Culture COLLABORATION CONTROL Type name here Type title here Type name here Type title here Type name here Type title here Group; Cluster Hierarchy CULTIVATION COMPETENCE Sphere; Web Matrix Type name here Type title here Cultures “Out of Balance” Collaboration •relationships more important than performance •accountability slips •over compromising prevails •unnecessary meetings •indurduality stifled, high performers shunned •mediocrity tolerated •in-bred •cliquish •leaders/managers “laissez faire” Cultivation •intention all that matters •lack of structure, system, direction & focus •people put off by authority •people become overly moralistic, judgmental, self-expressive •excessive idealism, projects lay on the shelf or unfinished •details overlooked •necessary controls missing Control •overly bureaucratic, big is better •too many organized layers •meaningless polices/procedures •training and development ignored •functional silos, turn down •bad news rises slowly •conflict suppressed •low innovation; good ideas lost •Organization becomes inwardly focused, ignores external •people treated as replacement parts •senior management distant Competence •excessive win-loose behavior •excessive individualism •people refuse to team •people constantly tense •leaders/managers never satisfied, distant, aloof •paralysis/analysis •arrogant behavior •levels of mistrust •organization never celebrates •people overworked, stressed out •people worried about making mistakes Managing Complex Change Components of Change Result Vision Clear & Communicated + Values (Lived) + Culture & Alignment + Skills / Abilities + Financial Incentives + Resources + Action Plan + Execution = Change + Values (Lived) + Culture & Alignment + Skills / Abilities + Financial Incentives + Resources + Action Plan + Execution = Confusion + Culture & Alignment + Skills / Abilities + Financial Incentives + Resources + Action Plan + Execution = Cynicism + Skills / Abilities + Financial Incentives + Resources + Action Plan + Execution = Resistance + Financial Incentives + Resources + Action Plan + Execution = Anxiety + Resources + Action Plan + Execution = Crawl + Action Plan + Execution = Frustration + Execution = False Starts Vision Clear & Communicated - Vision Clear & Communicated + Values (Lived) - Vision Clear & Communicated + Values (Lived) + Culture & Alignment - Vision Clear & Communicated + Values (Lived) + Culture & Alignment + Skills / Abilities - Vision Clear & Communicated + Values (Lived) + Culture & Alignment + Skills / Abilities + Financial Incentives - Vision Clear & Communicated + Values (Lived) + Culture & Alignment + Skills / Abilities + Financial Incentives + Resources - Vision Clear & Communicated + Values (Lived) + Culture & Alignment + Skills / Abilities + Financial Incentives + Resources + Action Plan - = Failure © 2007 Spencer, Shenk & Capers