Anomalous transport in
parity-breaking
Weyl semimetals
Pavel Buividovich
(Regensburg)
CRC 634 Concluding Conference
Darmstadt, 8-12 June 2015
Weyl semimetals: “3D graphene” and more
Weyl points survive ChSB!!!
Simplest model of Weyl semimetals
Dirac Hamiltonian
with time-reversal/parity-breaking terms
Breaks time-reversal
Well-studied by now:
Fermi arcs, AHE,
Berry flux…
Breaks parity
A lot of intuition
from HEP, only
recent experiments
Topological stability of Weyl points
Weyl Hamiltonian in momentum space
Full set of operators for 2x2 hamiltonian
Perturbations = just shift of the Weyl point
Weyl point are topologically stable
Berry Flux!!!
Only “annihilate” with
Weyl point of
another chirality
Anomalous transport: Hydrodynamics
Classical conservation laws for chiral fermions
• Energy and momentum
• Angular momentum
• Electric charge
No. of left-handed
• Axial charge
No. of right-handed
Hydrodynamics:
• Conservation laws
• Constitutive relations
Axial charge violates parity
New parity-violating
transport coefficients
Anomalous transport: CME, CSE, CVE
Chiral Magnetic Effect
[Kharzeev, Warringa,
Fukushima]
Chiral Separation Effect
[Son, Zhitnitsky]
Chiral Vortical Effect
[Erdmenger et al.,
Teryaev, Banerjee et al.]
Flow vorticity
Origin in
quantum anomaly!!!
Chiral Magnetic Effect
μA
Lowest Landau level =
1D Weyl fermion
• Excess of right-moving particles
• Excess of left-moving anti-particles
Directed current along magnetic field
Not surprising – we’ve broken parity
-μA
???
Signatures of CME in cond-mat
Negative magnetoresistivity
Enhancement of electric conductivity
along magnetic field
Intuitive explanation: no backscattering
for 1D Weyl fermions
Chirality pumping and magnetoresistivity
Relaxation time
approximation:
OR: photons with circular polarization
Chiral magnetic wave
Negative magnetoresistivity
Experimental signature of axial anomaly, Bi1-xSbx , T ~ 4 K
Negative magnetoresistivity [ArXiv:1412.6543]
]
Negative magnetoresistivity from lattice QCD
NMR in strongly coupled confined phase!!!
Non-renormalization of CME:
hydrodynamical argument
Let’s try to incorporate
Quantum Anomaly into Classical Hydrodynamics
Now require positivity of entropy production…
BUT: anomaly term
can lead to any sign of dS/dt!!!
• Strong constraints on
parity-violating transport coefficients
[Son, Surowka ‘ 2009]
• Non-dissipativity of anomalous transport
[Banerjee,Jensen,Landsteiner’2012]
CME and axial anomaly
Expand current-current correlators in μA:
VVA correlators in some special kinematics!!!
=
The only scale is µ
k3 >> µ !!!
General decomposition of VVA correlator
• 4 independent form-factors
• Only wL is constrained by axial WIs
[M. Knecht et al., hep-ph/0311100]
Anomalous correlators vs VVA correlator
CME: p = (0,0,0,k3), q=(0,0,0,-k3), µ=1, ν=2, ρ=0
IR SINGULARITY
Regularization: p = k + ε/2, q = -k+ε/2
ε – “momentum” of chiral chemical potential
Time-dependent chemical potential:
No ground state!!!
Anomalous correlators vs VVA correlator
Spatially modulated chiral chemical potential
By virtue of Bose symmetry, only w(+)(k2,k2,0)
Transverse form-factor
Not fixed by the anomaly
[PB 1312.1843]
CME and axial anomaly (continued)
In addition to anomaly non-renormalization,
new (perturbative!!!) non-renormalization theorems
[M. Knecht et al., hep-ph/0311100]
[A. Vainstein, hep-ph/0212231]:
Valid only for massless fermions!!
CME and axial anomaly (continued)
Special limit: p2=q2
Six equations for four unknowns… Solution:
Might be subject to corrections due to ChSB!!!
CME and inter-fermion interactions
Sources of corrections to CME in WSM:
Spontaneous
Radiative QED
chiral symmetry
corrections
Breaking
[Miransky,Jensen,
Kovtun,Gursoy 2014-2015]
Hydrodynamic/Kinetic arguments
invalid with Goldstones!
First principle check with
Overlap fermions
[PB,Kochetkov, in progress]
Effect of interaction: exact chiral symmetry
Continuum Dirac, cutoff regularization,
on-site interactions V [P. B., 1408.4573]
Effect of interactions on CME:
Wilson-Dirac lattice fermions
Enhancement of CME due to
renormalization of µA
[PB,Puhr,Valgushev,1505. 04582]
Instability of chiral plasmas
μA, QA- not “canonical” charge/chemical potential
Electromagnetic instability of μA
[Fröhlich 2000]
[Ooguri,Oshikawa’12]
[Akamatsu,Yamamoto’13] […]
• Chiral kinetic theory (see below)
• Classical EM field
• Linear response theory
• Unstable EM field mode
• μA => magnetic helicity
• Novel type of “inverse cascade” [1504.04854]
Instability of chiral plasmas – simple estimate
Maxwell equations + ohmic conductivity +
CME
Energy conservation
Plain wave solution
Dispersion relation
Unstable solutions at large k !!!
Real-time simulations:
classical statistical field theory approach
[Son’93, J. Berges and collaborators]
•
•
•
•
•
Full quantum dynamics of fermions
Classical dynamics of electromagnetic fields
Backreaction from fermions onto EM fields
Approximation validity same as kinetic theory
First nontrivial order of expansion in ђ
Real-time simulations of chirality pumping
[P.B., M.Ulybyshev’15]
• Wilson-Dirac fermions with zero bare mass as a
lattice model of WSM
• Fermi velocity still ~1 (vF << 1 in progress)
• Dynamics of fermions is exact, full mode
summation (no stochastic estimators)
• Technically: ~ 60 Gb / (16x16x32 lattice), MPI
• External magnetic field from external source
(rather than initial conditions )
• Anomaly reproduced up to ~5% error
• Energy conservation up to ~2-5%
Results from classical statistical field theory
Results from classical statistical field theory
Initial quantum fluctuations included
Initial quantum fluctuations included
Initial quantum fluctuations included
Conclusions
Parity-breaking WSM: dynamical equilibrium
Anomalous transport phenomena: CME, CVE
“Non-dissipative” ground-state transport
CME protected by anomaly
Nontrivial corrections from:
symmetry breaking
radiative QED corrections
• BUT: quite small for lattice models
• Real-time instability of parity-breaking WSM
• Backreaction speeds up chirality decay
•
•
•
•
•
This work was done with
Maksim Ulybyshev
Semen Valgushev
Matthias Puhr
Back-up slides
Weyl semimetals: realizations
Pyrochlore Iridates
Stack of TI’s/OI’s
[Wan et al.’2010]
• Strong SO coupling (f-element)
• Magnetic ordering
[Burkov,Balents’2011]
Surface states of TI
Spin splitting
Tunneling amplitudes
Iridium:
Rarest/strongest
elements
Consumption on
earth: 3t/year
Magnetic doping/TR breaking essential
Weyl semimetals with μA
How to split energies of Weyl nodes?
[Halasz,Balents ’2012]
• Stack of TI’s/OI’s
• Break inversion by voltage
• Or break both T/P
Electromagnetic instability of μA
[Akamatsu,Yamamoto’13]
•
•
•
•
Chiral kinetic theory (see below)
Classical EM field
Linear response theory
Unstable EM field mode
• μA => magnetic helicity
Lattice model of WSM
•
•
Take simplest model of TIs: Wilson-Dirac fermions
Model magnetic doping/parity breaking terms by local
terms in the Hamiltonian
•
Hypercubic symmetry broken by b
•
Vacuum energy is decreased for both b and μA
Weyl semimetals: no sign problem!
Wilson-Dirac with chiral chemical potential:
• No chiral symmetry
• No unique way to introduce μA
•
Save as many symmetries as possible
[Yamamoto‘10]
Counting Zitterbewegung,
not worldline wrapping
Weyl semimetals+μA : no sign problem!
• One flavor of Wilson-Dirac fermions
• Instantaneous interactions (relevant for condmat)
• Time-reversal invariance: no magnetic
interactions
Kramers degeneracy in spectrum:
• Complex conjugate pairs
• Paired real eigenvalues
• External magnetic field causes sign problem!
• Determinant is always positive!!!
• Chiral chemical potential: still T-invariance!!!
• Simulations possible with Rational HMC
Weyl points as monopoles in
momentum space
Free Weyl Hamiltonian:
Unitary matrix of eigenstates:
Associated non-Abelian gauge
field:
Weyl points as monopoles in
momentum space
Classical regime: neglect spin flips =
off-diagonal terms in ak
Classical action
(ap)11 looks like a field of Abelian monopole in
momentum space
Berry flux
Topological invariant!!!
Fermion doubling theorem:
In compact Brillouin zone
only pairs of
monopole/anti-monopole
Fermi arcs
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
[Wan,Turner,Vishwanath,Savrasov’2010]
What are surface states of a Weyl semimetal?
Boundary Brillouin zone
Projection of the Dirac point
kx(θ), ky(θ) – curve in BBZ
2D Bloch Hamiltonian
Toric BZ
Chern-Symons
= total number of Weyl points
inside the cylinder
h(θ, kz) is a topological Chern insulator
Zero boundary mode at some θ
Why anomalous transport?
Collective motion of chiral fermions
• High-energy physics:
 Quark-gluon plasma
 Hadronic matter
 Leptons/neutrinos in Early Universe
• Condensed matter physics:
 Weyl semimetals
 Topological insulators
Why anomalous transport
on the lattice?
1) Weyl semimetals/Top.insulators are crystals
2) Lattice is the only practical non-perturbative
regularization of gauge theories
First, let’s consider
axial anomaly
on the lattice
Warm-up: Dirac fermions in D=1+1
• Dimension of Weyl representation: 1
• Dimension of Dirac representation: 2
• Just one “Pauli matrix” = 1
Weyl Hamiltonian in D=1+1
Three Dirac matrices:
Dirac Hamiltonian:
Warm-up: anomaly in D=1+1
Axial anomaly on the lattice
Axial anomaly =
= non-conservation of Weyl fermion number
BUT: number of states is fixed on the lattice???
Anomaly on the (1+1)D lattice
DOUBLERS
1D minimally
doubled
fermions
• Even number of Weyl points in the BZ
• Sum of “chiralities” = 0
1D version of Fermion Doubling
Anomaly on the (1+1)D lattice
Let’s try “real” two-component fermions
Two chiral “Dirac” fermions
Anomaly cancels between doublers
Try to remove the doublers by additional terms
Anomaly on the (1+1)D lattice
(1+1)D Wilson fermions
A)
B)
C)
D)
In A) and B):
In C) and D):
B)
Maximal mixing of chirality at BZ boundaries!!!
Now anomaly comes from the Wilson term
+ All kinds of nasty renormalizations…
A)
B)
D) C)
Now, finally, transport:
“CME” in D=1+1
μA
-μA
• Excess of right-moving particles
• Excess of left-moving anti-particles
Directed current
Not surprising – we’ve broken parity
Effect relevant for nanotubes
“CME” in D=1+1
Fixed cutoff regularization:
Shift of integration
variable: ZERO
UV regularization
ambiguity
Dimensional reduction: 2D axial anomaly
Polarization tensor in 2D:
Proper regularization (vector current conserved):
[Chen,hep-th/9902199]
Final answer:
• Value at k0=0, k3=0: NOT DEFINED
(without IR regulator)
• First k3 → 0, then k0 → 0
• Otherwise zero
“CSE” in D=1+1
μA
μA
• Excess of right-moving particles
• Excess of left-moving particles
Directed axial current, separation of chirality
Effect relevant for nanotubes
“AME” or “CVE” for D=1+1
Single (1+1)D Weyl fermion at finite temperature T
Energy flux = momentum density
(1+1)D Weyl fermions, thermally excited states:
constant energy flux/momentum density
Going to higher dimensions:
Landau levels for Weyl fermions
Going to higher dimensions:
Landau levels for Weyl fermions
Finite volume:
Degeneracy of every level = magnetic flux
Additional operators [Wiese,Al-Hasimi, 0807.0630]
LLL, the Lowest Landau Level
Lowest Landau level = 1D Weyl fermion
Anomaly in (3+1)D from (1+1)D
Parallel uniform electric and magnetic fields
The anomaly comes only from LLL
Higher Landau
Levels do not
contribute
Anomaly on (3+1)D lattice
Nielsen-Ninomiya picture:
• Minimally doubled fermions
• Two Dirac cones in the Brillouin zone
• For Wilson-Dirac,
anomaly again stems
from Wilson terms
VALLEYTRONICS
Anomalous transport in (3+1)D
from (1+1)D
CME, Dirac fermions
CSE, Dirac fermions
“AME”, Weyl fermions
Chiral kinetic theory
[Stephanov,Son]
Classical action and
equations of motion with gauge fields
More consistent
is the Wigner
formalism
Streaming equations in phase space
Anomaly =
injection of
particles at zero
momentum
(level crossing)
CME and CSE in linear response theory
Anomalous current-current correlators:
Chiral Separation and Chiral Magnetic Conductivities:
Chiral symmetry breaking in WSM
Mean-field free energy
Partition function
For ChSB (Dirac fermions)
Unitary transformation of SP Hamiltonian
Vacuum energy and Hubbard action are not changed
b = spatially rotating condensate = space-dependent θ angle
Funny Goldstones!!!
Electromagnetic response of WSM
Anomaly: chiral rotation has nonzero Jacobian in E and B
Additional term in the action
Spatial shift of Weyl points:
Anomalous Hall Effect:
Energy shift of Weyl points
But: WHAT HAPPENS IN GROUND STATE (PERIODIC EUCLIDE???)
Chiral magnetic effect
In covariant form
Summary
Graphene
• Nice and simple “standard tight-binding model”
• Many interesting specific questions
• Field-theoretic questions (almost) solved
•
Topological insulators
Many complicated tight-binding models
Reduce to several typical examples
Topological classification and universality of boundary
states
Stability w.r.t. interactions? Topological Mott insulators?
•
•
•
•
•
Weyl semimetals
Many complicated tight-binding models, “physics of dirt”
Simple models capture the essence
Non-dissipative anomalous transport
Exotic boundary states
Topological protection of Weyl points
•
•
•