Casualty Actuarial Society Seminar on Ratemaking Tampa March 7-8, 2002 Risk Quiz On some questions, there are multiple right answers On all questions, there’s multiple wrong answers Write in answers are fine and may garner extra credit (or a debit) Choose the Best Phrase for your View on Risk Management A. Risk can be assessed and managed through mathematical techniques. I think math is fun; my friends find me geeky and I have a difficult time interacting with “normal” people B. I find trading to be the essence of risk management. I trade to make a profit and enhance my bonus. I can always make a profit if my employer would just remove all trading constraints C. Risk goes away over time. I just need to be able to get around the accounting rules. Using financial engineering tools is fundamentally stupid, as they cost money to trade over time. D. Producing and selling product is all that matters. Price volatility is the shareholders problem. E. ____________________________________________________ Risk Quiz Risk is: A-m B-s C - Mostly m but with an element of s D - Mostly s but modified by m E - What the _____ is m and s and why should I care? The Most Important Aspect of Risk Management is: A. B. C. D. E. Protecting the outcomes of my operation Protecting market share Creating the opportunity for trading profits Making sure my bonus formula is achieved Enhancing shareholder value through maximized income at a lower volatility What is a Garch Model A. Used in thermodynamics and measures the movement of heat through a semi-permeable metalic membrane B. Uses a physical theory of random movement of a molecule in a vacuum to simulate random motions of financial variables C. Measures and simulates outcomes for interest rate movements D. Captures financial volatility that demonstrates heteroskedastic properties E. None of the above F. C&D A Naked Straddle is: A. An interesting way to ride a horse B. Concurrently selling a put and a call C. The part the director eliminates from a movie so people 18 and under can gain admission D. Not something polite people would put in a quiz E. A & C F. A, B & C G. All of the above H. None of the above I. I don’t know, I don’t care but I’m willing to give it a try Match the Formula and the Description 1. Bayes Rule for Conditional Probability A. S(X i- X)(Yi -Y) n-1 1 2. Sample Covariance 3. Density of Normal Distribution 4. Circumference of a circle B. C. D. f(x)= 2ps 2 2 2 e -(x-m)/2s C = 2pR P(A&B) P(A|B) = P(B) Your View on Risk Management Answer Requires analysis and understanding of the analysis - being modeling conversant is an asset, but social oddness is not Trading is fine if it’s the organizational strategy but don’t confuse trading with risk management True - volatility over time matters relatively little, but does impact business operations Good to keep sight of the objectives of the organization - but the shareholder issues are your issues Risk Quiz Risk is: A-m B-s C - Mostly m but with an element of s D - Mostly s but modified by m E - What the _____ is m &s and why should I care? The Most Important Aspect of Risk Management Answer: A. B. C. D. E. Protecting the outcomes of my operation Protecting market share Creating the opportunity for trading profits Making sure my bonus formula is achieved Enhancing shareholder value through maximized income at a lower volatility A Naked Straddle is: A. An interesting way to ride a horse B. Concurrently selling a put and a call C. The part the director eliminates from a movie so people 18 and under can gain admission D. Not something polite people would put in a quiz E. A & C F. A, B & C G. All of the above H. None of the above I. I don’t know, I don’t care but I’m willing to give it a try What is a Garch Model A. Used in thermodynamics and measures the movement of heat through a semi-permeable metalic membrane B. Uses a physical theory of random movement of a molecule in a vacuum to simulate random motions of financial variables C. Measures and simulates outcomes for interest rate movements D. Captures financial volatility that demonstrates heteroskedastic properties E. None of the above F. C&D Extra Credit - GARCH stands for Generalized Auto - Regressive Conditional Heteroskedactic model Match the Formula and the Description 1. Bayes Rule for Conditional Probability A. S(X i- X)(Yi -Y) n-1 D. 1 2. Sample Covariance B. f(x)= 2ps 2 2 A. 3. Density of Normal Distribution C. C = 2pR B. 4. Circumference of a circle C. D. 2 e -(x-m)/2s P(A&B) P(A|B) = P(B) Write Down as Many Risks as Possible based on The Following Exposure Jack and Jill went up a hill to fetch a pail of water, Jack fell down and broke his crown and Jill came tumbling after. Jack and Jill Scenario J & J sue landowner for slick surface and failure to warn of dangerous conditions Jill sues Jack for encouraging her to climb an unsafe hill Purchaser of water sue J & J for non-delivery J & J sue purchaser of water for encouraging them to perform an inherently unsafe act J & J sue maker of pails for creating unbalanced pail system J&J sue shoemakers for unsafe sole pattern J&J sue school system for not teaching hill-climbing dangers Price spikes on water, compounding J&J’s spillage loss J&J sue ambulance company for failure to render adequate care and to safeguard the water supply Jill sues Jack for sexual harassment for the implication that she couldn’t climb the hill because “she was just a girl” Risk and Why We Care Impacts stock price Impacts ability to make future investments Impacts business decisions and willingness to enter a business Impacts cash flows and earnings from non-core activities Defines the potential deviations from expectations of the company Enterprise Risk Management Clients changing their view of risk to encompass many areas Risk is no longer defined by the products the insurance industry sells Measurement is defined by what the client thinks it is – – – – EVA CFaR Internally created metrics Stock price movements Generally: Risk can be defined as a deviation from an expected outcome Traditional View of Risk Clients have traditionally viewed their risks as a series of single elements Each risk stood alone - assumed one wasn’t related to another Optimized silos meant optimized risk management Insurance risk management wasn’t a problem Cheap insurance was an effective tool with these assumptions Derivatives allowed other risks (FX, commodity, interest rates) to be managed with their unique set of tools Assumes that management can deal with other non-tradable, non-insurable risks in their role of managing the business effort Issues Ignores portfolio effect Human beings are extremely bad at dealing with things that have not happened to them recently People assume mean reversion in short time periods Ignores possibility of related events (embedded, unrecognized correlation) Budgets are silo based and drive individual behaviors, even though the true outcomes are inherently intertwined Management of enterprise wide risk is perceived as complex The tools to manage enterprise risk are in their infancy 0% 0% 97 5% 91 5% 85 10% 79 10% 72 15% 66 15% 60 20% 54 20% 48 25% 42 25% 36 30% 30 30% 24 PROBABILITY Portfolio Effect Impact of Portfolio Effect Apparent Silo Volatility vs. Real Portfolio Volatility 1,200,000 1,000,000 Auto Liability General Liability Volatility 800,000 Workers Comp Property 600,000 Foreign Exchange Portfolio 400,000 200,000 0 Silo Management Actual Portfolio Client Issues Budgets and Silos Organizations seldom take an overall view – Budgets drive behaviors – Assumed that the sum of optimized elements optimizes the whole How do you split an integrated outcome? How to retain an entrepreneurial spirit How to reward and punish Client Issues Trading Mentality Current purchasing/treasury functions attempt to optimize timing Beating the market goes into the budget of the department, working against the desire to integrate People like to trade - its fun Client Issues Understanding the Cost of Volatility Unlike banks and insurers, non-financial companies have no explicit cost to take risk Hard to know the impact to the stock price if an unforeseen event does occur Not particularly concerned with things that haven’t happened recently Little concept of scope of volatility or correlation in the organization Client Issues Organizational Dynamics Decision process is inherently across a diverse group of managers Each member views in the context of their role Inertia Communication Difficult explanation to most senior management - too complex to show in three slides How many others have done this; “We don’t want to be first” Client Issues Economic Foundations Never really considered or modeled the volatility of the exposures, thus never concerned with risks not actually experienced Difficult to determine price elasticity questions on commodities and other economic indicators Underlying belief that economic elements can be forecasted with adequate certainty Mean reversion assumption and ability to view whether something is expensive or cheap It’s a lot of work and most organizations don’t have people with the skills Client Issues Market Pricing Inefficiency Complex structures lack transparency Differing view of modeling processes, resulting in differing view on value Markets have their own silos that have to be circumvented to capture portfolio pricing Lack of depth of people with multiple experience Lack of integrated reinsurance marketplace Is there a Future in Managing Risk together? There are rational economic foundations Marketplace for insurers and banking is overlapping, encouraging organizations to use the talents of each Will be slow to take off, but will fly The logical extension to Enterprise Risk Management approaches - why study something if there is no intent to manage? Evolving Tools Application of simulation modeling for single and multivariant exposures is being slowly accepted as a tool to measure risk The models are being taken from a combination of actuarial and econometric modeling processes May haven’t done it yet, but are interested in pursuing the subject There is a broadening of the insurance market to include derivative-like exposures for – Commodities that don’t trade – Exposures that trade, but may be illiquid – Correlation proxy opportunities A realization that risk is risk and should be treated consistently Risk Example Client makes nylon based products In their processes, they use – – – – – Ammonia Cyclohexane Benzene Propylene Natural gas (fuel and input) Product pricing presumed to be inelastic to input costs How do you manage this? Understand the risk All commodities are oil or natural gas based Can we model the inputs? Compare to proxy basket of oil and natural gas? Measure the volatility of the correlation? Structure an arrangement with and insurer where – they provide the client a cover for what they purchase – trade out the proxy basket – Charge for the volatility of the exposure Outcome - a synthetic derivative with excellent margins for the insurer that solves the client problem Optimized correlation $90,000,000 $80,000,000 $70,000,000 Optimized oil/gas w absorber Client Basket $60,000,000 $50,000,000 $40,000,000 $30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 Ja n9 M 6 ay -9 6 Se p96 Ja n9 M 7 ay -9 7 Se p97 Ja n9 M 8 ay -9 8 Se p98 Ja n9 M 9 ay -9 9 Se p99 Ja n0 M 0 ay -0 0 Se p00 Ja n0 M 1 ay -0 1 Se p01 $- Annual Volatility of Correlation Volatility of Correlation 3 2.5 X <=-0.19 5% X <=0.25 95% Mean = -3.601814E04 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 -30.00% -2.50% 25.00% 52.50% 80.00% Enterprise Risk Management Its coming - slowly Actuary’s opportunity - to understand and support modeling and understanding of the opportunity Provides an opportunity to increase insurer’s results while concurrently providing valuable tool for clients Not yet everyday - but will be The way risks will be managed tomorrow