WG Minutes HeD 8-2

advertisement
Meeting Name
Location:
Meeting Date and Time:
Next Meeting Scheduled:
Health eDecisions Work Group Meeting
Conference Call
August 2, 2012 @ 11am EDT
August 9, 2012 @ 11am EDT
Agenda

Announcements/Reminders

Use Cases
• Data Element/Artifact Content Development SWG Update
• Community of Interests Section Review
• Review Use Case Diagram
• Review Base Flow & Activity Diagram
• Review Sequence Diagrams
• Review Information Interchange Requirements
• Review System Requirements (time permitting)
Attendance
Name/Affiliation
Jacob Reider
Mera Choi
Alicia Morton
Jennifer Brush
Emily Mitchell
Virginia Riehl
Aziz Boxwala
Tonya Hongsermeier
Bryn Rhodes
Christina Arenas
Cem Mangir
Merideth Vida
Anna Langhans
Heather Stevens
Email
Jacob.Reider@hhs.gov
mera.choi@hhs.gov
alicia.morton@hhs.gov,
jennifer.brush@esacinc.com
emily.d.mitchell@accenture.com
virginia.riehl@verizon.net
Aziz.boxwala@meliorix.com
tonya.hongsermeier@gmail.com
bryn@veracitysolutions.com
Christina.arenas@esacinc.com
cmangir@deloitte.com
merideth.c.vida@accenture.com
anna.langhans@accenture.com
heather.m.stevens@accenture.com
Attended
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Discussion
Announcements
 The glossary pages are now live and can be found on the Use Case section of the Wiki. Definitions will be
added beginning 8/3/12.
 A Pilots survey/interest form will be posted to the Wiki by the end of the week.
Data Element Development (DED) SWG Update
Page 1
The DED SWG met on 8/1/12 and revised some metadata elements. Offline they are drafting some rules and
elements and will present their final draft for discussion at the next Workgroup meeting. Additionally the DED
participation information is now posted on the Wiki.
Communities of Interest
Sue Bosivert led the WG through her draft of the Communities of Interest section. After further comment, the
group expanded upon the list (below) and those proposing new members to Communities of Interest table agreed
to define them respectively. The revised Communities of Interest table will be posted to the Wiki for comment.
Members of Communities of Interest















Healthcare Professionals
Provider Organizations
o This member was extended to include both products and services.
Patients
Health Professional Associations
Standards Organizations
Federal Agencies
o Dissemination of clinical guidance will be added as a role.
Accreditation Organizations
EHR/EMR/PHR Vendor
CDS Services Organizations
o Harry Solomon will define
Third-Party EHR/PHR Service
o Harry Solomon will define
CDS Vendor
o John Faughnan & Robert McClure will define.
Healthcare Researchers
o Tom Caruso will define
Healthcare Product Companies
o Tom Caruso will define
State Agencies
o A definition will be pulled from the S & I Framework Simplification.
Pharmaceutical Companies
o A definition will be pulled from the S & I Framework Simplification and Peter Haug and Kim Nolen
will review.
Review of Use Case 1 Diagrams, Actors, Value Statement, and Background





Page 2
Use Cases 1 and 2 will have their own set of diagrams.
An Assumption or Pre-condition will be added indicating that an Artifact Supplier will be certified to provide
artifacts to a given Integrator.
Jonathan Teich will present a content diagram at the next WG meeting, showing linkages among the
various tables in Use Case 1.
In the Activity Diagram for Use Case 1, the focus is simplicity.
Rob McClure will work with the Use Case team to refine the User Stories to create structure for the DED
SWG.



Kim Nolen suggested that developing a clinical example would be important to shed light on the base flow
diagram. A new section devoted to this clinical example will be created, drawing upon the Background
section written by Ken Pool. Two other volunteers (Laura Hermann Langford and Susan Campbell)
agreed to help Kim with this.
In the System Requirements diagram, the Artifact Repository was edited to also include “provide metadata
about the CDS Artifact.”
There was a debate on whether the scope of this Use Case is to define repository standards or to define
transaction standards. The group agreed to define the standardized format for the artifact (including
payloads and metadata elements). Afterward, the standardization can expand to include communication
protocols and defining transaction standards
WebEx Chats Q & A
None
Action Items
Name
Community
Aziz & Bob Greenes
Use Case Team
Community
Use Case Team
Use Case Team
Use Case Team
Use Case Team
Christina
Task
Due Date
Provide Wiki comments on the following Use Case Sections: (1)
Information Exchange Requirements, (2) System Requirements,
and (3) Background.
Add implementation specific assumptions
Aid Sue Bosivert and Robin Williams working on Risk Issues and
Obstacles
Review glossary definitions and post comments and/or terms
directly to the Wiki
Post Glossary Definitions to the Wiki (including definitions for
CDS Artifact Integrator and CDS system).
Work Offline with Robert McClure to refine the User Stories to
create structure for the DED SWG.
Distribute background information to Kim Nolen, Laura Hermann
Langford, David Lobach and Susan Campbell for them to update
and add in content to develop a clinical example.
Define State Agencies for the COI table
Distribute the WebEx Chat Log along with chat questions that
were not addressed during the meeting. Post meeting mins to
the Wiki.
8/8/12
8/8/10
8/8/12
8/8/12
8/3/12
8/8/12
8/8/12
8/8/12
8/2/12
Next Steps
Weekly HeD Work Group Meeting-Use Case Discussion
Health eDecisions Internal Touch Point Meeting
Page 3
August 9, 2012 @ 11am EDT
August 7, 2012 @ 12pm EDT
Download