Presented by: Frank Martinelli The Center for Public Skills Training Assuring long term financial sustainability Alliances, partnerships and strategic restructuring Measuring mission impact Board and staff leadership succession planning Nonprofit advocacy and public policy work createthefuture.com A Framework for Strategic and Generative Thinking Fiduciary Mode – Key Questions "How are we doing to date?" “Are we in compliance?” The board as “watchdog” - Anything wrong? Strategic Mode – Key Questions "What should we be doing?” "Where are we going?“ The board as “strategist” - What’s the plan? Generative Mode – Key Questions “What are the new possibilities?” “What’s the new question?” The board as “sense-maker” - What’s coming next?” createthefuture.com Type I Fiduciary Type II Strategic Type III Generative Board’s role Steward/ Watchdog Strategist Sense Maker Key question What’s wrong? What’s the plan? What’s the key question? Problems are to be Spotted Solved Framed Way of deciding Reach resolution Reach consensus Reach understanding No perfect one-size-fits-all strategic planning model for every organization at all times. What is the purpose or hoped for outcomes to be achieved by strategic planning? Is a comprehensive planning process that includes work on mission and vision or is the organization only looking to update an existing plan at the level of strategy or action objectives? How rapidly is the external environment changing and what level of threat to the organization do these changes pose? Have past planning efforts been successful or not and what is the level of support for strategic planning this time around? Based on organizational culture and style, is there a preference for one strategic planning approach over another? More Focused Process More Comprehensive Process Mission/Vision Status Issue(s) Selection/Identification Information/Data Needs Number of Planning Participants Available Time See page 2 1. Basic, comprehensive model 2. More narrowly focused issuebased approach 3. Strategic program planning 4. Scenario planning 5. Collaborative strategic planning Strategic Planning is the process by which the guiding members of an organization envision its future and develop the necessary plans, procedures and operations to achieve that future. The mission, vision and goals your organization will pursue Whom you will serve Your organization's role in the community The kinds of programming, services or products you will offer The resources needed to succeed How to best combine these resources, programming and relationships for mission impact Attention to external environment, markets and stakeholders Focus on developing shared vision It’s strategic! Addressing critical emerging issues versus putting out brush fires Innovation versus business as usual Planning as a Journey Vision of Intended Impact Today’s Reality createthefuture.com Step 1- Information Gathering and Analysis Step 2 - Identification of Critical Issues Facing the Organization Step 3 - Development of Mission Statement Step 4 - Development of a Strategic Vision Statement that Sets Future Direction Step 5 - Development of Strategic Goals Step 6 - Formulation of Strategies for Each Goal Step 7 - Preparation for Implementation Planning Based on the Strategic Plan (Annual Objectives) Mission Vision Goals Strategies Objectives “Forever” 5-10 years out 3-5 years 1-3 years 1 year createthefuture.com Clear direction and focus Increased program impact Improved service delivery Enhanced marketing and fundraising Board effectiveness Foundation for other types of planning Engage others leading to deeper commitments Be prepared for change Shared understanding of strategic planning Real commitment to the process Agreed upon outcomes for process Leadership of the board Involvement of key stakeholders Structured to encourage boldness, risktaking and creativity Organizational leadership Executive director and board president Other board and staff leadership Strategic planning committee Broad based constituent input Internal stakeholders--all board and staff members, consumers/clients volunteers representing External stakeholders--donors and prospective public and private funders, partners, among others External Assessment Internal Assessment Market Assessment Changes and trends that impact the organization and the people we serve Market information about needs, perceptions and services expectations Internal assessment data that indicates capacity to deliver the mission Existing statistics, studies, etc. Secondary market research Surveys Focus groups Key informant/expert Interviews Community forums Internal reviews, assessments and evaluations Board and staff survey Key informant survey Focus groups (Ex. for a school: parents, students, alumni, educators, community partners, donors, volunteers) Financial trends data Data from regional and national networks Organizational assessments Accreditation reports Fundamental policy or program concerns which define major choices an organization faces now and in the future Long-standing problems anticipated to have a significant impact on the organization and/or community served Major shifts in thinking that challenge business as usual Tension Points Broad description of what we do, with/for whom we do it, our distinctive competence, and WHY we do it (our ultimate end) Mission communicates “purpose” Describes the results/ impact we will have achieved and what the organization will need to look/act like in order to achieve those results Vision communicates “direction” Planning as a Journey Vision of Intended Impact Today’s Reality createthefuture.com 2005: The Milwaukee Public Library is Everyperson's gateway to an expanding world of information. 2014: MPL is an anchor institution that helps build healthy families and vibrant neighborhoods – the foundation of a strong Milwaukee. Example We transform lives by creating a vibrant and diverse environment in which more women become independent, visible in leadership, and able to reach their full potential. Our mission and work are embraced by a community that has become intolerant of violence and oppression. (YWCA Sauk Valley) Example More people, bowling more often, having more fun. (Bowling Inc.) Example Every Nativity Jesuit Middle School student graduates from high school as a caring, compassionate and conscientious man poised for a life of Christian leadership and service. Broad statements of what the organization hopes to achieve in the next 3 years. Goals focus on outcomes or results and are qualitative in nature. Example Attract, develop and retain a versatile high performing workforce. Statements of major approach or method for attaining goals and resolving critical issues. Example Offer a wide range of professional development opportunities for all employees. Specific, concrete, measurable statements of what will be done to achieve a goal generally within a one year time-frame. Example Launch a web-based professional training and development portal for employees by December 2014. Goal Strategy Attract, Offer a wide develop and range of retain a professional versatile high development performing opportunities for workforce all employees Objective Launch a web-based professional training and development portal by December 2014 createthefuture.com Objectives Responsible Party Time Frame Measure What will be accomplished Position or group with primary responsibility for the objective Identify How achievement completion date of objective will be measured Launch a web-based professional training and development portal by December 2014 HR Director Dec. 31, 2014 • # of portal visits; • # of tools downloaded; • # of times accessed web based resources are incorporated into professional development plans • Etc. createthefuture.com Responding to new opportunities faster New models Not a substitute for mission and vision work “Faster is slower” Collaborative strategic planning Create opportunities for continuous strategic thinking Highly focused effort: issue(s) clearly identified at the outset Assessment of information/data needs Development of strategies and action objectives to address selected issue(s) MacMillan Matrix Matrix Map Theory of Change MacMillan Matrix Worksheet Program Fit Good Program 1 Economic Attractiveness Poor High X Alternate Coverage Low High X X Low Strong Weak X Program 2 X Program 3 X X X Program 4 X X X X Competitive Position X X X X Congruence with mission/purpose and vision? Organization has existing skills and competencies? Able to share resources and coordinate activities with other programs? Current stable funding? High appeal to funders, supporters? High market demand? Measurable, reportable outcomes/results? Are similar services provided? Do customers have many other choices? Competitors now and future? Good location, logistical delivery system? Will customers remain? Grow? Is quality superior? Record of securing grants, funding? Stable staffing? Ability to maintain and continually increase competency? Cost effective? Strong connections with consumers and stakeholders? MacMillan Matrix Worksheet Program Fit Good Program 1 Economic Attractiveness Poor High X Alternate Coverage Low High X X Low Strong Weak X Program 2 X Program 3 X X X Program 4 X X X X Competitive Position X X X X MacMillan Matrix High Economic Attractiveness (Easy to attract resources for support) Alternate Coverage HIGH Low Econonic Attractiveness (Difficult to attract resources for support) Alternate Coverage LOW Alternate Coverage HIGH Alternate Coverage LOW Strong 1. 2. Competi Aggressive Aggressive Competition Growth tive Position 5. Reinforce Best Competitor or Find Partner 6. “Soul of the Agency” Weak 3. Competi Aggressive Divestment tive Position 7. Consider Partner or Divest 8. Find Partner or Divest 4. Invest, Find Partner or Divest 9. Aggressive Divestment 10. Orderly Divestment GOOD FIT POOR FIT Bell, Masaoka and Zimmerman Understand Your Finances Specific Costs Direct Costs / Program Costs Shared Costs Portion of rent, liability insurance, technology, etc. Admin Costs Portion of administrative costs. Alignment with core mission Excellence in execution Scale or volume Depth Filling an important gap Community building Leverage Criteria to Consider Instead of: Taking it for granted . . . Not involving the board . . . Turning your attention to “problem areas” Instead of: Closing it because its not breaking even . . . Making it the sacred cow that can’t be criticized . . . Instead of: Giving it second class status . . . Keeping it separate from programs . . . Instead of: Trying once again to improve it . . . Not thinking about it . . . A Theory of Change defines all the building blocks required to bring about a long-term goal. FEF THEORY OF CHANGE Activities/ Programs/ Initiatives Strategies for Impact CIC Scholarships Internships FEF college/university certification & accreditation program Metal casting advisory committees Board contact to each school Funding support to improve infrastructure Research grants Targeted endowments Managed funds for AFS and others Supplier support to FEF schools Create opportunities for students with interest in metal casting and related fields to learn about employment/ leadership opportunities in the industry, develop relationships with industry leaders, and secure employment FEF interacts with industry, schools and key professors to foster development of programs that produce the students with needed skills Educate foundries on where and how student hires can be used/add value FEF collaborates with other societies to advance the industry Increase fund development efforts to support FEF efforts Engage new schools (broaden base) Provide support and recognition on behalf of high performing professors Intended Impact Priority HR needs of the industry are met High talent students with leadership potential choose metal casting careers Industry will hire the students “produced” by FEF Students have the skills required by Industry (talent pool is created) Collaborative efforts add measureable value Highly engaged professors and facilities that attract students to the industry Defined mix of FEF schools aligned with industry needs (research schools, etc.) Current Mission The Foundry Educational Foundation strengthens the metal casting industry by supporting unique partnerships among students, educators and industry, helping today's students become tomorrow's leaders. Step 1. State the focal issue or purpose. Step 2. List the key factors that influence the future in which our YWCA will operate. Step 3. List the driving forces among these key factors. Forces that are highly predictable or predetermined (i.e. demographics) Forces that are uncertain (i.e. public opinion). Step 4. Rank the key factors and driving forces by importance and by uncertainty. Step 5. Develop alternate futures. 1. Develop an initial description of this scenario -- how you might expect this scenario to play out for the YWCA – what would be happening in such a future? 2. What is the impact of this future scenario on the YWCA and/or community served? 3. What are the implications for the YWCA? What actions would we take to advance our mission if we knew this were the future? 4. Write a short story or narrative that describes your assigned scenario. Increasingly common – and important! Focus on a shared customer base or constituency rather than developing a plan for one organization Convener: Mental Health America - Wisconsin Collaboration Partners: Nonprofit organizations and public agencies working in mental health Planning Focus: Develop strategies to incorporate prevention and early intervention initiatives into the state public mental health system Open space Future search conference Whole systems Appreciative inquiry Real time strategic change Include “outsiders” Use analogies from other fields Involve people at the edges Meet in unfamiliar settings Let yourselves go createthefuture.com What do you expect to accomplish? How much commitment is there to the process? Is there organizational readiness for strategic planning? How will the board and key staff be oriented to the process? How long will it take? Who else should be involved? How? How will we encourage boldness, risk-taking and creativity on the part of planning participants? Should a consultant be used for all or part of the process? createthefuture.com