Gary A. Troia, PhD, CCC-SLP Michigan State University Keynote Address, CEEDAR Institute October 6, 2014 What exactly is an evidence-based practice (EBP) or intervention (EBI)? − Particular educational (e.g., instructional) principles, approaches, programs, methods, and activities informed by a relevant body of research − The conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the education of individual students (Sackett et al., 1996) − Evidence for the efficacy and effectiveness (anticipated outcomes in real-world contexts) of a practice or intervention comes from clear, consistent, and convincing research evidence − The utility of a practice or intervention is closely scrutinized: Is it warranted in light of generalizability, feasibility, costs, and benefits? Best available research evidence Practice-based professional expertise System capacity • Fidelity of implementation through PD & curriculum design • Effective leadership • Coordination and integration EBPs (or SRBIs)— methods, programs, and procedures within & across domains Student and family characteristics, values, & preferences American Psychological Association, 2005; Sackett et al., 2000 Meta-analyses Systematic Reviews Greenhalgh, 1997; Hoagwood & Johnson, 2003; Robey & Schultz, 1998 Scaling/Effectiveness Studies Efficacy Studies (Laboratory & Field RCTs) Exploratory Studies (Descriptive Studies, Single-Case Research, Quasi-Experiments, Design Studies) Expert Opinion Practices based on other kinds of information may not correctly identify the “active ingredients” associated with positive outcomes ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Teaching lore Testimonial and anecdotes from case studies Professional writers’ wisdom Advocacy by publishers and authors of materials EBPs help anchor professional knowledge and decision-making ◦ Determining if something runs counter to evidence or falls outside established EBPs ◦ Differentiate essential, non-negotiable programmatic elements from less essential ones ◦ Adapt EBPs for unique learners and learning situations Persistent large achievement gaps for non-white, poor, and non-English dominant children in all academic areas require a sea change in education Practice Teach grammar rules using a unit approach or textbook Give lots of feedback on errors in writing conventions on students’ papers Spend most of the time allocated to writing instruction on independent writing activities Focus mostly on transcription activities (spelling, handwriting) in the early grades Use good and bad examples of writing to highlight salient characteristics EBP? Lack of professional knowledge? Limited teacher professional development and support to use EBPs with fidelity? Individual differences in teachers’ values, beliefs, and attitudes toward instruction and their competencies? A majority of teachers lacks a sufficient level of knowledge about language necessary for designing meaningful literacy lessons and providing effective feedback to students (Bos et al., 2001; Brady, Gillis, Smith, Lavalette, Liss-Bronstein, Lowe, North, Russo, & Wilder, 2009; Cheesman, McGuire, Shankweiler, & Coyne, 2009; Cunningham, Perry, Stanovich, & Stanovich, 2004; Cunningham, Zibulsky, Stanovich, & Stanovich, 2009;Joshi, Binks, Hougen, et al. 2009; Moats, 1994; McCutchen & Berninger, 1999; McCutchen, Green, Abbott, & Sanders, 2009; McCutchen, Abbott, et al., 2002; Parr, Glasswell, Aikman, 2007; Parr & Timperley, 2005; Spear-Swerling & Brucker, 2003; Spencer, Schuele, Guillot, & Lee 2008; Washburn et al., 2011) ◦ Teachers find it challenging to segment words into constituent phonemes, count the number of phonemes in a word, and classify words as irregular (Carroll, Gillon, & McNeill, 2013; Cunningham et al., 2004) ◦ Teachers lack sufficient understanding of basic principles of morphology, orthography, and grammar (Cajkler & Hislam, 2002; Harper & Rennie, 2009; Myhill, Jones, & Watson, 2013) In the domain of writing, teachers in a national K12 survey report that their pre-service coursework and experiences were inadequate; secondary teachers report feeling less prepared (70%) than elementary teachers (30%) (Gilbert & Graham, 2010) In-service professional development opportunities and teacher-initiated efforts for writing still considered inadequate by half of all teachers surveyed Troia & Maddox (2004) found that middle school teachers faced competing PD priorities, inadequate administrative support for collaborative planning and instruction, and limited writing curriculum choices Teachers’ confidence in their ability to help their students succeed exerts a direct influence on their classroom routines and, consequently, their students’ motivation and success (Anderson, Greene, & Loewen, 1988; Ross, Cousins, & Gaddalla, 1996; Tschannen-Moran, Hoy, & Hoy, 1998) Teachers’ assumptions about how students learn and what are the best ways to teach affect the instructional materials they select and the procedures they implement (Cunningham & Fitzgerald, 1996; Harste, Woodward, & Burke, 1984; Fitzgerald, 1993, 1999; Schommer, 1994) Observations have affirmed that what teachers elect to teach and how they go about teaching it are shaped largely by their theoretical orientation and perceived competence (Baumann & Ivey, 1997; DeFord, 1985; Fisher & Hiebert, 1990; Pressley, Wharton-McDonald, Rankin, Mistretta, & Yokoi, 1996; Sosniak & Stodolsky, 1993; Turner, 1995) Troia, Lin, Cohen, and Monroe (2011) found that teachers with higher levels of perceived teaching competence for writing generally enacted more key practices across the dimensions of classroom management, student engagement, and instructional tactics, and adapted their instruction more for struggling writers, while teachers with lower levels of teaching efficacy used a smaller repertoire of practices across these same dimensions and made fewer adaptations CCSS—Writing cover four main areas: ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Text types and purposes Production and distribution of writing Research to build and present knowledge Range of writing CCCS—Language cover three main areas: ◦ Conventions of standard English ◦ Knowledge of language ◦ Vocabulary acquisition and use W-1: Write arguments W-2: Write informative/explanatory texts W-3: Write narratives Students learn to ◦ Write in different genres and subgenres ◦ Include key elements appropriate for each genre ◦ Apply appropriate techniques in different genres W-4: Compose organized and coherent texts appropriate for task, purpose, and audience W-5: Engage in a writing process W-6: Use technology in writing Students learn to ◦ Structure and organize writing depending on genre, purpose, and audience ◦ Use a writing process (e.g., plan, draft, revise, edit) to strengthen writing ◦ Use technology resources in the production and distribution of writing ◦ Give and receive feedback, collaborate with others while writing W-7: Conduct research projects W-8: Gather information from multiple sources and integrate into writing W-9: Draw evidence from text to support writing Students learn to ◦ Research and communicate understanding through a range of shorter and longer projects ◦ Determine appropriate sources, summarize important information, and include in writing appropriately ◦ Read narrative or informational text, determine important information, and include in writing to support analysis, reflection, and research W-10: Write routinely ◦ Extended time frames Allow time for process ◦ Shorter time frames A day or two No process or abbreviated process ◦ Range of tasks, purposes, and audiences Students learn to ◦ Develop writing endurance ◦ Modify process based on the purpose and task ◦ Write a range of texts for different purposes and audiences L-1: Grammar and usage L-2: Capitalization, punctuation, and spelling Students learn to ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Print letters Use different parts of speech in sentences Produce different sentence types and structures Spell words Apply conventional capitalization and punctuation rules in writing L-3: Apply knowledge of language purposefully Students learn to ◦ Vary sentences and words depending on genre, purpose, and audience ◦ Choose words and sentences to enhance style ◦ Apply style manual guidelines L-6: Use a range of vocabulary Students learn to ◦ ◦ ◦ ◦ Include academic vocabulary in their writing Include domain-specific vocabulary in their writing Use precise words Include words that signify relationships among ideas Formatting with columns and marginal glosses/include citations for source materials/assist others without direction and exhibit leadership in writing community Heading and subheadings, captions for illustrations/pick from multiple source materials from array to plan/independent explicit writing goals with self-evaluation Basic elements of feature article/revise for clear definitions and accurate facts; edit for capitalization of proper nouns and spelling of topic-related vocabulary/cooperative with peers and provide some helpful advice Use audio, pictorial, and text-based source materials on same topic; KWLH+ to summarize source material Use computer with speech recognition and synthesis to complete all phases of assignment Have students identify and select from several areas of expertise; use conferencing to give effort feedback Write informative/explanatory texts in which they introduce a topic, use facts, definitions, and illustrations to develop points, and provide a concluding statement or section. Recall information from experiences or gather information from provided sources to answer a question. With guidance and support from adults and peers, focus on a topic and strengthen writing as needed by revising and editing. Planning organizer, topic source materials, revising/editing checklist, sample feature articles written by students Plan & revise/edit in small groups (crowd-source) Topic-focused spelling vocabulary list with preinstruction Collaborative goal setting Multiple passes at revising/editing Completed planning organizer Peer evaluation of revising/editing changes Rubric with key genre elements (adjusted for individual student goals and expectations)