Florida State University BOT – UFF Collective Bargaining Summation 2012-2013 November 20, 2012 Management Bargaining Committee • Eric Barron, President • Garnett Stokes, Provost • • Sally McRorie, Vice President of Faculty Development and Advancement Joyce Ingram, Assistant Vice President and Chief Human Resources and Diversity Officer* • Lisa Scoles, Associate General Counsel* • Anne Blankenship, Associate Vice President, Academic Affairs • Olivia Pope, Assistant Vice President, Research • Michael Lake, Director, Budget Office • Carolyn Egan, General Counsel* • Ralph Alvarez, Associate Vice President of Budget/Planning and Financial Services • Susannah Miller, Human Resources Director* • Seth Beckman, Senior Associate Dean, College of Music* • Bill Strickland, Senior Specialist, Human Resources* * Attends bargaining sessions with the UFF Relevant Articles Article 5: Academic Freedom and Responsibility Article 10: Performance Evaluations Appendix F: Annual Evaluation Form Article 14: Promotion Article 15: Tenure Appendix I: Criteria & Procedures for Promotion & Tenure • Article 23: Salaries • Article 24: Benefits • Article 31: Amendment & Duration • • • • • • Article 5 Academic Freedom & Responsibility Reflects that academic freedom is without regard to whether expression is verbal, written, or electronic. Includes provisions regarding safety in the classroom which comport with University policies and processes. Requires that faculty members be notified of public records requests and that the University ensure that department chairs and other administrators be provided guidance on the handling of public records requests. Requires that the University provide guidance to the faculty regarding records retention policies. Article 10 Performance Evaluations The new evaluation process is effective beginning on January 1, 2013. Departmental evaluation procedures should be revised as soon as possible to comport with the new provisions. After two attempts to draft provisions that comport with the new provisions of the collective bargaining agreement, the Vice President of Faculty Development and Advancement may resolve discrepancies and impose the departmental provisions. No evaluation process shall require a forced distribution of evaluation ratings. Faculty performance shall be assessed using the following ratings: o Substantially Exceeds FSU’s High Expectations o Exceeds FSU’s High Expectations o Meets FSU’s High Expectations o Official Concern o Does Not Meet FSU’s High Expectations Article 10 (cont.) Performance Evaluations Merit Evaluations require that all faculty members shall be reviewed for merit. Meritorious performance is now defined in the collective bargaining agreement as “Performance that meets or exceeds the expectations for the position classification and department/unit.” Merit criteria may not mandate a merit pay award for all members of the department. Merit criteria must reflect distinctive levels of merit reflecting the differences in performance. All evaluations must contain a narrative explanation attached to the evaluation summary form. New Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) Provisions: o o A PIP is required when a non-tenured faculty member receives a “Does Not Meet FSU’s High Expectations” rating. Tenured faculty members may be placed on a PIP if they receive an overall performance rating of “Does Not Meet FSU’s High Expectations” on three or more of the previous six performance evaluations. Appendix F – Annual Evaluation Summary Form: o The form was updated in accordance with the new evaluation ratings, and now contains a column for AOR average percentage. Articles 14 & 15; Appendix I Promotion & Tenure Assistant Professors will now receive a tenure review in their second and fourth years conducted by the department’s promotion and tenure committee. Annual Evaluations are no longer contained in the promotion and tenure binders for faculty members. Rather, the new Second and Fourth Year Reports for Assistant Professors and the Progress Toward Promotion letters for all other faculty are required in the binders. Promotion and tenure committees are now required to provide a narrative explanation summarizing the meeting regarding the candidates being considered for promotion and tenure. Article 23 Salaries Promotion amounts were increased to 12% and 15%. Full professors will receive a 3% recurring pay increase to coincide with sustained performance every seven years. Merit increases shall be awarded as follows: o o o Administrative Discretionary Increases o o o o Overall percentage: 1% Allocated in accordance with departmental merit criteria: 0.8% Allocated as determined by deans: 0.2% Administrative Discretionary Increases are capped at 1% for 2012-2013. Recognition of Distinguished Faculty is a new category contained within Administrative Discretionary Increases, which allows for adding “Distinguished o the professor titled and allowing for “…with Distinction” to be added to the end of the Assistant/Associate titles. Allocated in accordance with departmental merit criteria: 0.8% Allocated as determined by deans: 0.2% The BOT will investigate the possibility of paying 9-month contract salaries over a 12-month period. Article 24 Benefits Faculty members are now eligible for two (2) days of paid bereavement leave upon the death of an immediate family member. Article 31 Amendment & Duration Full-book negotiations for 2013-2016 shall begin no later than May 15, 2013. Winter Break Leave was agreed upon for all inunit faculty. NTTF Reclassification Project Reclassification of non-tenure track faculty into new classifications was negotiated. The project will require planning, preparation, and training for department chairs and other administrators prior to initiation.