Antenna Modeling Using FDTD SURE Program 2004 Clemson University Michael Frye Faculty Advisor: Dr. Anthony Martin Presentation Outline General Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method (FDTD) Modeling Approach Formulation of Antenna Model in FDTD Dipole Driving-Point Impedance Comparison Future Work What is FDTD? Numerical technique Computer based (computationally intensive) Time-domain solution Modeling of electromagnetic phenomenon Radiation, scattering, etc. One FDTD Application Specific absorption rate distribution of 1,900MHz cell phone held against tilted head model Comp. Electrodynamics Taflove and Hagness FDTD Modeling Approach Approximation of Maxwell’s Curl Equations Faraday’s Law and Ampere’s Law Differential, time-domain form H 1 E t E 1 H t First-order derivatives (time and space) replaced with finite-difference approximations “Update equations” developed for calculation of field values in a discrete 3D grid Simple Finite-Difference Example ƒ(x) c Exact Value ƒ ( c ) ƒ ( a ) ƒ(b) lim x x 0 FD Approximation a b x ƒ ( c ) ƒ ( a ) ƒ(b) x (Central-difference) x(Forward-difference) (Reverse-difference) Development of update equations Consider Ex component equation of Ampere’s Law Ex 1 Hz Hy t y z Simply problem by reducing to 2D (for illustration) Ex 1 Hz t y Choose to evaluate at time: t=n and location: x=i, y=j Ex |in, j t n Hz | 1 i, j |i , j y Development of update equations Approx. time derivative with central-difference Ex |in, j t Ex |in,j1/ 2 Ex |in,j1/ 2 t Resulting expression (Ex and Hz displaced in time) Ex |in,j1/ 2 Ex |in,j1/ 2 t n Hz | 1 i, j |i , j y Hz evaluated at integer time-steps Ex evaluated at integer +/- ½ time-steps Development of update equations Approx. spatial partial derivative with central-difference Hz |in, j y Hz |in, j 1 2 Hz |in, j 1 2 y Result: Ex and Hz also displaced in space Ex |in,j1/ 2 Ex |in,j1/ 2 t n n Hz | Hz | 1 i , j 1 2 i , j 1 2 |i , j y Hz evaluated at integer +/- ½ y points along grid Ex evaluated at integer y points along grid Development of update equations Resulting update equation for Ex for 2D case n 1/ 2 i, j Ex | n 1/ 2 i, j Ex | 1 |i , j t n n Hz | Hz | i , j 1 2 i , j 1 2 y Fully explicit solution for each Ex point on grid Only information at previous time steps needed No matrix inversion needed (Implicit solution) Introduces stability issues (Courant condition) Species maximum ratio of spatial and time step Remaining update equations derived similarly Faraday’s law provides H component update equations Yee Cell (Typically Used for FDTD) z Hy Ez Hx Hz Hx Hy Hz Hz Ey Ex Basis of 3D computational grid Field components displaced in space and time E and H field locations interlocked in space Solution is “time-stepped” Hx Hy y x Builds lattice of Yee cells Antenna model in FDTD Basic elements for FDTD antenna model Open region Representation of antenna structure in FDTD grid Infinite computational grid Contains antenna, modeled structures, etc. Thin-wire model (one example) Voltage feed Provides antenna excitation Uniaxial Perfectly Matched Layer Problem: FDTD grid cannot be “infinite” Solution: Truncate with conductive material layer Implies unlimited computational time and resources Similar to walls in anechoic chamber Allows antennas to be simulated as radiating into open space with a finite FDTD grid Desired characteristics Reflectionless boundary regardless of incident field polarization or angle Incident fields attenuated to zero (through conductivity) Reasonably small addition to computational grid 3D FDTD Grid Truncated by UPML The PML on the Top The PML on the Left PEC wall Free space region UPML region Thin-wire FDTD model Consider modeling a very thin wire Needed for dipole, monopole, etc. Option 1: Decrease cell size fit wire into cell Diameter of wire equals cell width Significantly increases computation time Cubic approx. of circular cross-section Option 2: Use sub-cellular modeling techniques Modeled features can be smaller than FDTD grid size Cell size independent of wire radius Faraday’s Law contour path model Uses integral form of Faraday’s Law Results not obvious from differential FD approach Special update equations developed Affects field components immediately around wire Near-field physics behavior built into field values immediately around wire Tangential E set to zero (along wire) Circulating H and radial E fields decay as 1/r Radial distance away from center of wire Implementation of wire in FDTD grid a z z Ez Ey Ex Hy Ey Hz Hx Ez a z Hx Ez Ey Hx Hx Hy Hz Ey Hz Ez Ey Ex Hx yH Hy Ex Ez Hy Ex Ez Ex y x x Ez x Components set to zero Components which decay as 1/r y y Faraday’s Law contour path model a z Faraday’s Law Thin wire 1 Ey Hx Ez C S Ez Ey C x y0 y y y dH ds S t E dl Applied to contour C and surface S New update equations derived for circulating H components Yee grid illustrates both differential and integral forms Antenna Feeding Gap-feed method Provides problem excitation Relates incident voltage to E-field in feeding gap Added to tangential E-Field component Shows very little dependence on grid size Acts like infinitesimal feed gap Important for consistent results Visual Results Dipole ( l=2m, a=0.005m ) radiating into a 3D FDTD grid terminated by UPML, pulse excitation Driving-Point Impedance Comparison Need quantitative verification of FDTD model Dipole Driving Point Impedance compared Antenna and EM Modeling with MATLAB, Sergey N. Makarov Method of Moments patch code (freq. domain) Dipole parameters: length 2m, radius 0.005m Frequency range: 25MHz-500MHz How can freq. information be determined from time-domain results? Driving-Point Impedance Comparison Antenna excited with wideband voltage source Differentiated Gaussian Pulse chosen Known spectrum, zero DC content Driving-Point Impedance Comparison Energy radiates into grid Discrete Fourier Transform Voltage and current calculated for each time step Transients allowed to “die-out” Compare directly to frequency information FDTD Solution convergence Spatial cell size dictated by desired frequencies 10 or more cells per wavelength Computation time increases as spatial size decreases Finer grids typically result in higher accuracy Comparison Results Comparison Results Future Work Development of Near Field to Far Field transformation Currently in progress FDTD intrinsically Near Field technique Radiation patterns Wideband Far Zone information Design/analysis of reconfigurable antennas Nonlinear switching devices Acknowledgments Dr. Anthony Martin Chaitanya Sreerama Dr. Daniel Noneaker Dr. Xiao-Bang Xu Thank You