Why Are Yield Spreads on Bank-Issued Subordinated Notes and

advertisement
Why Are Yield Spreads on BankIssued Subordinated Notes and
Debentures Not Sensitive to Bank
Risks?
Bhanu Balasubramnian
Emporia State University
Ken Cyree
The University of Mississippi
Debt Market Signals
• Yield Spread = f (Term-structure, Default risk, Maturity
Risk, Taxes, Liquidity Risk, Systematic Risk,
Unknown factors)
• Yield Spread on Bonds = YTM of a risky bond - YTM
of a risk-free bond of similar characteristics
• When leverage (or any other risk measure) decreases,
default risk decreases. In turn, yield spread should
decrease and vice versa
• Change in yield spreads acts as signal for market
perception of change in firm risk or default risk
Debt Market Signals – Empirical Evidence
• SND spreads are less risk sensitive during the 1993-97
period and market discipline is weak - Board of Governors (1999)
• Changes in yield spreads are not related to changes in
firm-specific risk of banks during 1994-99 - Krishnan, Ritchken,
and Thomson (2005)
• Default risk component is large in money-market
securities– Covitz and Downing (2007)
• Are the long-term debt markets sensitive to all non-credit
risks but not sensitive to credit risks?
Research Questions
• Is lack of default risk sensitivity due to omitted credit risk
factors?
– Omitted factors of credit risk
– Trust-Preferred Securities (TPS)
– Too Big To Fail (TBTF) effect after LTCM crisis
– Idiosyncratic Volatility
– Omitted factors in decomposition of yield spreads
– Tax effects – Elton, Gruber, Agrawal, and Mann (2001)
• Whether or not TPS yield spreads can be used for market
monitoring?
Data Sources
• National Association of Insurance
Commissioners (NAIC) database for bond
transactions for the years 1994 – 1999
• SDC Platinum database - bond issue
characteristics
• FR Y-9C reports for banks
• CRSP for stock market data
• H-15 Reports from St. Louis Fed for daily
Treasury rates
Sample Selection
• Select fixed-rate, U.S. dollar, plain-vanilla
bonds with investment grade credit ratings
• No put or call options, collateral, sinking fund
• Should not be convertible, Yankee, global,
serial, LBO
• Only bank-issued SND transactions
• With at least two years of remaining maturity
• At least 10 transactions per SND issue
• 6620 buys and 4072 sell transactions
• 300 SND issues by 71 BHCs
Decomposition of Yield Spreads
YS (i, t) = α + β (F, k) F (i, t-1) + β (M, k) M( t) + β
(L, k) L( t) + β (X, k) X (i, t) + ε (i, t)
(1)
•
•
•
•
•
•
YS (i, t) = Yield spread of bond i at time t
F (i, t-1) = Vector of firm-level default risk variables
M (t) = Vector of market variables
L (t) = Vector of liquidity variables
X (i, t) = Vector of other control variables
Non-linear GMM estimation with Newey -West
(1987) correction for autocorrelation and
heteroskedasticity with five lags
Table 4: Firm Specific Variables reflect default risks except ROA
Variable
Estimate
p-value
Loans / Total assets (LTA) %
0.4551
0.0001
Non-performing loans / Total loans (NPA) %
7.2025
<.0001
-9.2037
0.2752
Commercial loans / Total loans (CNI) %
0.2973
0.0038
Off-bal. sheet items / Total assets (OFFBAL) %
0.0200
0.0010
Log (Total Assets) (LNTA) %
-0.1130
<.0001
Total Assets / Total Equity (LEVERAGE) %
0.1883
0.0179
Return on Assets (ROA) %
7.6095
0.0198
-0.0853
<.0001
0.8886
0.0116
Net charge-off / Loans (CHGOFF) %
Market value / Book value (MB) %
Std. Dev. of stock returns (VOLATILITY) %
Results – Full Sample
• Yield Spread Levels are sensitive to firmspecific default risk variables
• Tax Effects are significant
• Idiosyncratic volatility measure (σ) captures
default risks better than Market volatility
measure (VIX)
• Discount for size – TBTF discount
• Exception - ROA is positively related to yield
spreads
LTCM Crisis and TBTF Effect
• January 1994 - June 1998 -Pre-LTCM bailout
period
• July 1998 – December 1999- Post-LTCM
period
• Important dates – July 20, 1998, Aug 17, 1998,
September 02, 1998, September 24, 1998
• Major Crises - Mexican (Dec 94), Asian
(June 97), Russian and LTCM (Aug 98),
Brazilian (Nov 98)
Paradigm Shift in Firm-specific Default
Risk Proxies and TBTF Effect
Table 5: Panel C: Firm Specific Variables
Variable
Pre-LTCM Crisis
Post-LTCM Crisis
Estimate
p-value
31.7902
0.0076
25.5631
0.3441
Non-per. loans / Total loans (NPA)
475.4882
0.0007
1759.2530
0.0215
Net charge-off / Loans (CHGOFF)
123.5340
0.8924
2764.0580
0.1512
15.9458
0.1346
32.4829
0.1587
0.9969
0.1596
2.5581
0.0072
Log (Total Assets) (LNTA)
-11.3074
<.0001
-23.2922
<.0001
Assets / Equity (LEVERAGE)
20.5950
0.0118
8.0460
0.6849
277.3742
0.4406
1938.2410
0.0193
Market value / Book value (MB)
-6.5626
0.0004
-8.7271
0.0033
Std. Dev. of returns (VOLATILITY)
94.8226
0.0570
-60.8598
0.2945
Loans / Total assets (LTA)
Commercial loans / Total loans (CNI)
Off-bal. items / Total assets (OFFBAL)
Return on Assets (ROA)
Estimate
p-value
Default Risk Reduction Due to TPS
• SND issued by all banks as at the end of 1998
$102.8 billion, of which, $100 billion was
issued by the top 50 banks
• TPS is the least expensive source of external
Tier 1 capital
• Over 800 banks have issued TPS for a total of
$85 billion between 1996 and 2004; $28
billion between 1996 and 1999 by the top 50
banks
Leverage is not a significant determinant of yield spread
even prior to LTCM bailout but after TPS issuance
Variable
Pre-TPS
Estimate
Post-TPS pre-LTCM
p-value
Estimate
p-value
Post-TPS post-LTCM
Estimate
p-value
LTA
52.1058
0.0005
64.7671
0.0467
13.7311
0.6362
NPA
452.8539
0.0019
262.9285
0.6540
2270.5670
0.0234
-714.7270
0.5415
-1001.8100
0.6388
2617.7570
0.2406
CNI
2.0294
0.8867
44.9515
0.1169
40.3863
0.1372
OFFBAL
1.3892
0.1068
-0.3551
0.8322
2.3734
0.0153
-14.8392
<.0001
-12.4138
0.0357
-28.3796
<.0001
35.7267
0.0008
27.3064
0.1117
-3.1101
0.8850
1082.2780
0.0178
548.6316
0.5427
2215.3660
0.0125
-18.4576
<.0001
-5.8614
0.0717
-8.1716
0.0118
-8.2015
0.9096
193.7806
0.0062
-28.9854
0.6205
CHGOFF)
LNTA
LEVERAGE
ROA
MB
VOLATILITY
TPS Spreads are sensitive to on-balance sheet default
risk proxies
Variable
Estimate
p-value
415.37
0.0648
10405.00
0.0646
Off-balance sheet items / Total assets (OFFBAL)
-2.08
0.4007
Log (Total Assets) (LNTA)
-5.02
0.5397
Total Assets / Total Equity (LEVERAGE)
91.22
0.0128
-4087.45
0.0521
Intercept
Net charge-off / Loans (CHGOFF)
Return on Assets (ROA)
No. of observations
58
Adj. R-Sq.
F-Statistics
0.5238
5.18
<.0001
Changes in Determinants of Yield Spreads
• To trace the changes in determinants of yield
spreads – Analyze four sub-periods around
LTCM crisis
• August 97 – February 98 - tranquil period
• March 98 – June 98, the period when bond
market volatility increased
• July 98 – September 98, the period when bond
markets became extremely volatile
• October 98 - December 99, the post-LTCM
bailout period
Leverage is irrelevant; ROA is a risk proxy;
Markets recognize off-balance sheet risks;
TBTF Discount increases
Variable
Aug97-Feb98
Mar98-June98
July98-Sep98
Oct98-Dec99
Estimate
p-value
Estimate
p-value
Estimate
p-value
Estimate
p-value
LTA
0.29
0.3983
1.32
0.1197
0.04
0.9540
0.35
0.2217
NPA
-5.03
0.6505
29.84
0.0190
-9.23
0.5279
21.99
0.0081
CHGOFF
57.53
0.6915
42.45
0.5676
24.01
0.6743
54.06
0.0062
OFFBAL
0.00
0.9975
0.01
0.5653
0.04
0.1916
0.02
0.0407
-0.07
0.4162
-0.15
0.2262
-0.28
0.0695
-0.25
<.0001
LEVERAGE
0.24
0.2974
-0.20
0.6847
-0.71
0.0786
0.34
0.1263
ROA
6.74
0.5700
-15.23
0.0085
-81.11
0.0588
17.80
0.0295
-0.10
0.0193
0.06
0.4068
0.12
0.1480
-0.09
0.0090
1.67
0.0802
1.95
0.0378
0.74
0.6524
-0.32
0.5930
LNTA
MB
VOLATILITY
n94
Ap
r-9
4
Ju
l-9
4
O
ct
-9
4
Ja
n95
Ap
r-9
5
Ju
l-9
5
O
ct
-9
5
Ja
n96
Ap
r-9
6
Ju
l-9
6
O
ct
-9
6
Ja
n97
Ap
r-9
7
Ju
l-9
7
O
ct
-9
7
Ja
n98
Ap
r-9
8
Ju
l-9
8
O
ct
-9
8
Ja
n99
Ap
r-9
9
Ju
l-9
9
O
ct
-9
9
Ja
Yield Spread in basis points
Monthly Average Yield Spread on BBB-rated SND
250.00
200.00
150.00
LTCM
TPS
100.00
50.00
0.00
Month-Year
WSJ 04/17/2008–Ahead of the Tape
Results
• Yield spread levels on SND are sensitive to conventional risk
measures prior to TPS issuance by banks
• Risk sensitivity of conventional risk measures decrease after the
introduction of TPS
• No TBTF effect before the LTCM bailout but size discount
doubles after the LTCM bailout
• Idiosyncratic volatility is a better proxy for firm-specific risks
• Omitting the tax effects in yield spreads leads to measurement
errors
• Yield spreads on TPS provide market signals
Results
• Bond markets are sensitive to default risks,
but paradigm changes in the determinants of
yield spreads after LTCM bailout
• Default risk proxies vary with time and
available information
– Leverage is not a proxy
– ROA is a proxy for changes in risk-taking
– Off-balance sheet items is a proxy
Policy Implications
• Implicit guarantees and market discipline
• Can TPS provide better market signals? –
Needs further investigation after TARP
• Disclosure Levels of off-balance sheet items
• Can TPS and SND be capital securities
without risk of capital loss?
• Risk-weighting of earnings for CAMELS
Thank You
Questions?
Suggestions?
Download