Improving and Reforming Long-term Care Part 1: The Biological Foundation Steven A. Levenson, MD, CMD 1 “Reform” “Reform” is in the air But just what does “reform” aim to fix? Reform Improve by alteration or correction of errors or defects and put into a better condition Make changes for improvement in order to correct abuses Source: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+refo rm&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq= 2 Reform Hurdles “AMA to White House: Don't Dictate Care” [3/9/09] http://www.healthleadersmedia.com/content/229394 /topic/WS_HLM2_HR/AMA-to-White-House-DontDictate-Care.html “Any attempts by federal government to use evidence-based medicine to dictate how physicians provide individualized care would be a deal breaker” 3 Reform Hurdles It isn’t just patients and doctors Health care reflects and impacts all major social institutions Education, government, economics / commerce, families, law Oversight, attempts to change performance, enforcement all reflect and influence health care Reflect beliefs and methods; for example, how to investigate, draw conclusions, define truth, identify correct actions, attribute cause and effect 4 Who Can Reform What? Limitations of legislatures and political processes in bringing about true reform Many of us are having trouble changing our thinking and actions Non-therapeutic substitution “In American culture, prescriptions and procedures have become surrogates for real health care and real dialogue,” Dr. Newman said. “We need doctors and patients to conceive of medicine and health in a totally different way than they have been taught in the last 20 to 30 years.” Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/03/health/03well.html?scp=14&sq= health%20care&st=cse 5 Reform Efforts How much do current efforts really being about meaningful change and set appropriate expectations? Not surprisingly, current approaches are Often uncoordinated Sometimes self-contradictory Don’t consistently result in good care May not define issues correctly or identify root causes 6 Reform: Prerequisites To reform something effectively, it helps to understand what we are trying to improve Clear issue statement Causes of imperfections and problems What it should look like when done Nature and components What should be changed or strengthened Options for changing things Obstacles to implementing reform Options for overcoming obstacles 7 Our Subject Matter What will it take to do this right? A cohesive strategy and a meaningful plan Understand and apply biological foundation Reconsider current improvement and reform efforts Challenge the conventional wisdom Widespread, consistent accountability Rethink the research agenda 8 Our Subject Matter What will it take to do this right? Focus attention on basic care principles and processes Promote desired performance and practice Suppress reductionism and jurisdiction Reconsider notions of competency and expertise Change approaches to assessing and trying to improve quality Develop biologically sound reimbursement 9 What Can We Each Do? 10 Solution is Straightforward 11 Mostly Self-Evident 12 Logically Consistent 13 Little Changes Add Up 14 Key Principles What constitutes biologically sound care? 15 16 The Three Human Dimensions PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTIONAL PHYSICAL 17 Homeostasis A key biological principle Adequately functioning organ systems adjust to compensate for stresses An organism maintains relative stability through constant internal adjustment Including imbalances and impairments Disease and organ failure may Cause or exacerbate imbalances Impair physiological reserve capacity 18 Homeostasis: Water Balance Maintaining water balance 19 Homeostasis: Blood Sugar Blood sugar regulation 20 Personal and Psychological Homeostasis Similar to physiological homeostasis Individuals strive for psychological balance and adequate function To thrive in personal and social setting Personal and psychological homeostasis require adequate physical homeostasis Example: function and mood may decline when major medical illness causes physical instability 21 Health, Illness, and Impairment Health can be defined as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” World Health Organization (WHO) http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.html Limits of health care in producing complete well-being (i.e., health) However, can have profound effects, for better or worse 22 Key Biological Principles: When Things Go Astray Symptoms and risk factors have causes Often combined effects of multiple issues Causes and consequences have various relationships Defining those links is crucial to providing safe, effective, and patient-centered care 23 Biologically Sound Care “Quality of life” and “quality of care” are inseparable in all settings Effective care is based on linking each person’s physical, functional, and psychosocial causes and consequences The essence of “individualized (personcentered) care” Requires “context” of underlying causes and consequences Recognizes that interventions may be beneficial, inconsequential, or harmful 24 Causes and Consequences Consequences Causes One Multiple One Multiple +/+ + / ++++ ++++ / + ++++ / ++++ 25 Causes and Consequences All consequences (e.g., impairments, symptoms, complications) have causes Causes and consequences occur in four major patterns and relationships Clarify links among causes and consequences Basis for providing care in any setting 26 Causes and Consequences 27 28 Causes and Consequences (1:1) One cause One consequence (1:1) No other factors involved Usually occurs in otherwise healthy people or those with minor chronic conditions Examples Fracture impaired mobility until fracture heals Fatigue headache for a few hours 29 Causes and Consequences (1:Multiple) One cause multiple consequences Example Major stroke in previously well individual impaired mobility, self-care deficit, pain, altered nutritional status, altered mood Altered family processes mood disturbance social withdrawal and behavioral symptoms COPD (advanced) activity intolerance, altered breathing patterns, impaired gas exchange, self-care deficit New and old impairments may interact to increase risk for additional impairments 30 Causes and Consequences (Multiple:1) Multiple causes one impairment Example Hydration or depression risk due to CVA and dementia (neurological), chronic renal failure (urinary), colitis related to antibiotic use (gastrointestinal) Pain due to Parkinson’s Disease (neurological), osteoarthritis (musculoskeletal), side effects of medications used to treat hypertension or lower blood lipids 31 Causes and Consequences (Multiple:Multiple) Multiple causes Multiple impairments Very common in short-stay and long-stay nursing home population Example [New stroke + diabetes + ischemic cardiovascular disease + chronic renal failure + medication side effects + mood disorder] [impaired mobility + pain + social withdrawal + altered nutritional status + impaired fluid balance + pain + risk of altered skin integrity] 32 Linking Causes and Consequences Four essential steps before interventions 1) Characterize the disabilities 2) Identify causal impairments 3) Determine specific diseases underlying identified causal impairments 4) Discover any contributing factors Hoenig H, Nusbaum N, Brummel-Smith K. Geriatric rehabilitation: State of the Art. J Am Geriatr Soc 45:1371-1381, 1997 33 Biologically Sound Care: Key Underlying Principles Impairments may often be prevented or improved by treating underlying causes Important to Identify all causes of impairments, to extent possible Determine which ones can be addressed and to what extent Choose interventions in the context of the whole situation, not just one symptom or risk factor Try to optimize—not undermine—physical condition 34 Biologically Sound Care: Key Underlying Principles Interventions may prevent or correct physical impairment by Resolving underlying cause(s) Improving homoeostatic balance Maintaining or improving physiological reserve capacity Reverse impairments Lessen severity or help reduce progression to disability 35 36 Biologically Sound and Unsound Care Sound Care of person with [Condition A + Condition B + Condition C + Condition D + Condition E] ≠ Unsound [Care of Condition A] + [Care of Condition B] + [Care of Condition C] + [Care of Condition D] + [Care of Condition E] 37 Care in Context Coordinated and integrated care of people Especially those with multiple issues Consistent with biology because it Takes each symptom, condition, risk, or problem in context Including sequence of events Identifies proper combinations of cause-specific and symptomatic interventions Promotes care that optimizes physical, functional, and psychosocial homeostasis 38 Care in Context Fragmented or uncoordinated care Biologically unsound because it Approaches issues as distinct entities Fails to identify root causes Fails to address causes and consequences in proper context May cause new or additional complications while trying to address issues in isolation 39 40 Patient History and Context What are the likely differences in cause, approach, and context if someone Gets delirium and then gets anorexia Gets anorexia and then gets delirium Has a significant condition change with change in mental function and anorexia at the same time 41 Health Care Role What is the role of health care in providing biologically sound care? 42 Implications for Care Provision Key goal of all health care Effectively integrate interventions and services related to physical, functional, and psychosocial dimensions Key goal of medical care Help individuals attain and preserve enough physiological function to enable the greatest possible personal and psychosocial function Within limits of what’s reversible / preventable 43 Reform and Improvement How and why do these principles affect efforts to improve health care? 44 Essential Support for Reform Mutual influence between health care and all other social institutions Other social institutions and public policy must Reflect and respect underlying biology Understand what they are alleging to try to improve and reform Promoting “individualized” care means much more than just functional and psychosocial interventions 45 Essential Support for Reform Less helpful efforts Promote interventions out of context Focus on fragments of the care delivery process For example, care planning or treatment Are too focused on artificial distinctions Such as “medical” and “social” models of care 46 Long-Term Care Reform Problem Definition and Cause Identification 47 Approach to Long-Term Care Reform IF biologically sound care is required in order to meet key quality attributes Safe, effective, efficient, timely, equitable, patientcentered AND only some of the care is biologically sound THEN We must focus on improving the biological soundness of all care, in all settings 48 Approach to Long-Term Care Reform IF the three human dimensions are closely related AND long-term care only partially reflects that reality THEN We must focus on properly integrating and coordinating services in all settings We must suppress and reverse excesses of thinking about “medical” and “social” models 49 Approach to Long-Term Care Reform IF human beings have mechanisms to maintain physical, functional, and psychosocial stability despite change AND long-term care only partially reflects that reality THEN We must ensure that care in all settings respects and reflects—and does not impair or damage—those balances 50 Approach to Long-Term Care Reform IF causes and consequences have identifiable relationships, and those links are important to identifying care AND long-term care only partially reflects this understanding THEN We must try to get care in all settings to be based on identifying and linking causes and connecting causes and consequences 51 Approach to Long-Term Care Reform IF biologically sound care provides treatment in context and as a means to an end, instead of an end in itself AND long-term care only partially reflects this understanding THEN We must try to get the care to be given in the proper context 52